Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

EAM_Dynamo_DeluigiPasianotValencia_2021_FeNiCrCoCu__MO_657255834688_001

Interatomic potential for Chromium (Cr), Cobalt (Co), Copper (Cu), Iron (Fe), Nickel (Ni).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for FeNiCrCoCu developed by Deluigi et al. (2021) v001
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
High Entropy Alloys (HEA) attract attention as possible radiation resistant materials, a feature observed in some experiments that has been attributed to several unique properties of HEA, in particular to the disorder-induced reduced thermal conductivity and to the peculiar defect properties originating from the chemical complexity. To explore the origin of such behavior we study the early stages (less than 0.1 ns), of radiation damage response of a HEA using molecular dynamics simulations of collision cascades induced by primary knock-on atoms (PKA) with 10, 20 and 40 keV, at room temperature, on an idealized model equiatomic quinary fcc FeNiCrCoCu alloy, the corresponding "Average Atom" (AA) material, and on pure Ni. We include accurate corrections to describe short-range atomic interactions during the cascade. In all cases the average number of defects in the HEA is lower than for pure Ni, which has been previously used to help claiming that HEA is radiation resistant. However, simulated defect evolution during primary damage, including the number of surviving Frenkel Pairs, and the defect cluster size distributions are nearly the same in all cases, within our statistical uncertainty. The number of surviving FP in the alloy is predicted fairly well by analytical models of defect production in pure materials. All of this indicates that the origin of radiation resistance in HEAs as observed in experiments may not be related to a reduction in primary damage due to chemical disorder, but is probably caused by longer-time defect evolution.

Notes: This is a modified version of 2018--Farkas-D-Caro-A--Fe-Ni-Cr-Co-Cu that adds the ZBL correction at shorter interatomic distances making it suitable for radiation studies.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/entry/2021--Deluigi-O-R-Pasianot-R-C-Valencia-F-J-et-al--Fe-Ni-Cr-Co-Cu/
Contributor D. R. Tramontina
Maintainer D. R. Tramontina
Developer O.R. Deluigi
Roberto C Pasianot
Felipe J. Valencia
A. Caro
Diana Farkas
Eduardo Bringa
Published on KIM 2025
How to Cite

This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5].

[1] Deluigi OR, Pasianot RC, Valencia FJ, Caro A, Farkas D, Bringa EM. Simulations of primary damage in a High Entropy Alloy: Probing enhanced radiation resistance. Acta Materialia. 2021;213:116951. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116951 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Deluigi OR, Pasianot RC, Valencia FJ, Caro A, Farkas D, Bringa E. EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for FeNiCrCoCu developed by Deluigi et al. (2021) v001. OpenKIM; 2025. doi:10.25950/8adfc48b

[3] Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS, Plimpton SJ. EAM Model Driver for tabulated potentials with cubic Hermite spline interpolation as used in LAMMPS v006. OpenKIM; 2025. doi:10.25950/233cb735

[4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_657255834688_001
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
EAM_Dynamo_DeluigiPasianotValencia_2021_FeNiCrCoCu__MO_657255834688_001
DOI 10.25950/8adfc48b
https://doi.org/10.25950/8adfc48b
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/8adfc48b
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_006
DriverEAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_006
KIM API Version2.2
Potential Type eam
Previous Version EAM_Dynamo_DeluigiPasianotValencia_2021_FeNiCrCoCu__MO_657255834688_000

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
B vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Fe
Species: Ni
Species: Cu
Species: Co
Species: Cr


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ni
Species: Co
Species: Fe
Species: Cu
Species: Cr


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Fe
Species: Cr
Species: Co
Species: Ni
Species: Cu


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Fe
Species: Ni
Species: Co
Species: Cu
Species: Cr


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ni
Species: Cr
Species: Cu
Species: Fe
Species: Co


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ni
Species: Cu


SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu
Species: Co
Species: Cr
Species: Ni
Species: Fe


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Co

Species: Cr

Species: Cu

Species: Fe

Species: Ni





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Co v004 view 15854
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cr v004 view 16014
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v004 view 15774
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Fe v004 view 11787
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ni v004 view 14493
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Co v004 view 12491
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cr v004 view 14493
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cu v004 view 12891
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Fe v004 view 15129
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ni v004 view 13212
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Co v004 view 14339
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cr v004 view 14036
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cu v004 view 14522
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Fe v004 view 14279
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ni v004 view 17615
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Co v004 view 12517
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cr v004 view 12091
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cu v004 view 13246
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Fe v004 view 14157
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ni v004 view 12213


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Co at zero temperature v006 view 13003
Elastic constants for bcc Cr at zero temperature v006 view 10815
Elastic constants for bcc Cu at zero temperature v006 view 16094
Elastic constants for bcc Fe at zero temperature v006 view 18977
Elastic constants for bcc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 12213
Elastic constants for diamond Co at zero temperature v001 view 48122
Elastic constants for fcc Co at zero temperature v006 view 39314
Elastic constants for fcc Cr at zero temperature v006 view 34030
Elastic constants for fcc Cu at zero temperature v006 view 11909
Elastic constants for fcc Fe at zero temperature v006 view 7899
Elastic constants for fcc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 32348
Elastic constants for sc Co at zero temperature v006 view 17924
Elastic constants for sc Cr at zero temperature v006 view 18410
Elastic constants for sc Cu at zero temperature v006 view 10451
Elastic constants for sc Fe at zero temperature v006 view 21448
Elastic constants for sc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 20418


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v003

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/866c7cfa

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b v003 view 552180
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b v003 view 414079
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b v003 view 514931
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B13_tP16_123_abc_defr v003 view 209160
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B5_cI16_229_b_ac v003 view 245335
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cF16_225_ac_b v003 view 254783
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cF16_225_ac_b v003 view 176460
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoCr in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v003 view 210120
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v003 view 172791
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v003 view 193020
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v003 view 183841
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v003 view 192780
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v003 view 184562
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_tI8_139_ad_b v003 view 215309
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_tI8_139_ad_b v003 view 199080
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A7B9_cP16_221_acd_bg v003 view 196194
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 view 145824
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 view 142786
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 view 487948
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 view 143211
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v003 view 145459
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v003 view 144305
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v003 view 180638
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP8_223_ac v003 view 312610
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v003 view 154452
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v003 view 195611
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v003 view 142725
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v003 view 135313
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tI2_139_a v003 view 172471
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v003 view 582431
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v003 view 620704
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v003 view 576369
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB15_cP16_221_a_bcdg v003 view 246420
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF24_227_a_d v003 view 390505
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF24_227_a_d v003 view 598140
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF24_227_a_d v003 view 526380
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cF16_225_a_bc v003 view 178877
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cF16_225_a_bc v003 view 161136
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cF16_225_a_bc v003 view 164234
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v003 view 145581
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v003 view 142725
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_tI8_139_a_bd v003 view 183677
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_tP4_123_a_ce v003 view 183556
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB7_cI16_229_a_bc v003 view 195343
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoCr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v003 view 132943
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v003 view 150989
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v003 view 147829
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_tP2_123_a_d v003 view 141206


Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v003

Creators:
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2c59c9d6

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Fe v001 view 14219347
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Fe v001 view 16891609
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 9812436
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Fe v001 view 10424775
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 8887632
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 28884939
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 32905246
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 16989043
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Fe v001 view 21559714
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 18784744
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 57556381
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Fe v001 view 65918433
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 59376457


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Co v007 view 8385
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cr v007 view 18576
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cu v007 view 8871
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Fe v007 view 9600
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ni v007 view 15534
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Co v007 view 19537
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cr v007 view 16895
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu v007 view 8081
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Fe v007 view 12331
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ni v007 view 12274
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Co v007 view 14733
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cr v007 view 17135
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cu v007 view 13932
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Fe v007 view 13732
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ni v007 view 13292
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Co v007 view 10451
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cr v007 view 9782
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cu v007 view 10876
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Fe v007 view 15053
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ni v007 view 10937


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Co v005 view 77955
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cr v005 view 112178
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu v005 view 71818
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Fe v005 view 107454
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ni v005 view 80203


Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v002

Creators:
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/9d9822ec

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of bcc Cr at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 445110
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of bcc Fe at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 525180
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Cu at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 845942
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Ni at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 939063


Phonon dispersion relations for an fcc lattice v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64f4999b

Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004 view 127071
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Ni v004 view 129634


High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):


import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in bcc Cr v004 view 140683
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in bcc Fe v004 view 157498
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 view 69084
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Ni v004 view 75768


Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fca89cea

Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for bcc Cr view 589076
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for bcc Fe view 1125579
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Cu view 441587
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Ni view 350547


Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for bcc Cr view 2475290
Vacancy formation and migration energy for bcc Fe view 1199220
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Cu view 1172708
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Ni view 1249495
Vacancy formation and migration energy for hcp Co view 13066985


ElasticConstantsCrystal__TD_034002468289_000

ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B13_tP16_123_abc_defr v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B5_cI16_229_b_ac v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cF16_225_ac_b v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cF16_225_ac_b v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoCr in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_tI8_139_ad_b v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_tI8_139_ad_b v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A5B11_tP16_123_aef_bcdr v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A7B9_cP16_221_acd_bg v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP8_223_ac v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tI2_139_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB15_cP16_221_a_bcdg v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF24_227_a_d v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF24_227_a_d v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF24_227_a_d v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cF16_225_a_bc v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cF16_225_a_bc v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cF16_225_a_bc v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_tI8_139_a_bd v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_tP4_123_a_ce v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB7_cI16_229_a_bc v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoCr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_tP2_123_a_d v002 other view

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_003

GrainBoundaryCubicCrystalSymmetricTiltRelaxedEnergyVsAngle__TD_410381120771_003

StackingFaultFccCrystal__TD_228501831190_002

VacancyFormationEnergyRelaxationVolume__TD_647413317626_001
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for hcp Co other view



This Model requires a Model Driver. Click below for the Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_006 archive.


Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content