Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

EAM_Dynamo_MendelevSunZhang_2019_CuZr__MO_609260676108_001

Interatomic potential for Copper (Cu), Zirconium (Zr).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
Finnis-Sinclair potential for the Cu-Zr system developed by Mendelev et al. (2019) v001
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
This is an improved version of the Cu-Zr potential published in [M.I. Mendelev, M.J. Kramer, R.T. Ott, D.J. Sordelet, D. Yagodin and P. Popel, Phil. Mag. 89, 967-987 (2009)., KIM item https://doi.org/10.25950/2f5abf6e ]. This version was designed to fix the problem with artificially stable Laves phases. The potential should be used to study the vitrification and glass properties.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Cu, Zr
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/Download/2019--Mendelev-M-I--Cu-Zr/1/Cu-Zr_4.eam.fs
Contributor Ronald E. Miller
Maintainer Ronald E. Miller
Developer Cai-Zhuang Wang
Mikhail I. Mendelev
Feng Zhang
Yang Sun
Kai-Ming Ho
Published on KIM 2025
How to Cite

This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5].

[1] Mendelev MI, Sun Y, Zhang F, Wang CZ, Ho KM. Development of a semi-empirical potential suitable for molecular dynamics simulation of vitrification in Cu-Zr alloys. The Journal of Chemical Physics [Internet]. 2019Dec;151(21):214502. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5131500 doi:10.1063/1.5131500 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Wang C-Z, Mendelev MI, Zhang F, Sun Y, Ho K-M. Finnis-Sinclair potential for the Cu-Zr system developed by Mendelev et al. (2019) v001. OpenKIM; 2025. doi:10.25950/e76835a7

[3] Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS, Plimpton SJ. EAM Model Driver for tabulated potentials with cubic Hermite spline interpolation as used in LAMMPS v006. OpenKIM; 2025. doi:10.25950/233cb735

[4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_609260676108_001
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevSunZhang_2019_CuZr__MO_609260676108_001
DOI 10.25950/e76835a7
https://doi.org/10.25950/e76835a7
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/e76835a7
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_006
DriverEAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_006
KIM API Version2.0
Potential Type eam
Programming Language(s)
The programming languages used in the code and the percentage of the code written in each one. "N/A" means "not applicable" and refers to model parameterizations which only include parameter tables and have no programming language.
N/A
Previous Version EAM_Dynamo_MendelevSunZhang_2019_CuZr__MO_609260676108_000

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
B vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Zr
Species: Cu


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Zr
Species: Cu


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu
Species: Zr


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Zr
Species: Cu


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Zr
Species: Cu


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu


SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Zr
Species: Cu


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Cu

Species: Zr





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v004 view 24261
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Zr v004 view 32689
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cu v004 view 28983
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Zr v004 view 23028
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cu v004 view 29772
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Zr v004 view 24101
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cu v004 view 25783
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Zr v004 view 28739


Crystal structure and binding potential versus applied hydrostatic pressure v000

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/687267bf

This Test Driver computes the crystal structure and binding potential versus applied hydrostatic pressure for an arbitrary crystal. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. A scan over negative and positive hydrostatic pressures is performed, with a symmetry-constrained minimization of the cell and internal degrees of freedom at each step. Binding potential energy, volume, mass density, and the cell and internal crystal structure parameters are reported at each pressure step.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Crystal structure and binding potential versus applied hydrostatic pressure for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype A10B7_oC68_64_f2g_adef v000 view 41787540


Elastic constants for arbitrary crystals at zero temperature and pressure v001

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/922d328f

Computes the elastic constants for an arbitrary crystal. A robust computational protocol is used, attempting multiple methods and step sizes to achieve an acceptably low error in numerical differentiation and deviation from material symmetry. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation as part of the Crystal Genome testing framework. In addition, the distance from the obtained elasticity tensor to the nearest isotropic tensor is computed.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype A10B7_oC68_64_f2g_adef at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 1354387
Elastic constants for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF96_227_e_cf at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 1203960
Elastic constants for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_tI6_139_a_e at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 461411
Elastic constants for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_tP4_123_a_ce at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 556865
Elastic constants for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 320144
Elastic constants for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_oC8_63_c_c at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 636420


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Cu at zero temperature v006 view 15737
Elastic constants for bcc Zr at zero temperature v006 view 16466
Elastic constants for diamond Zr at zero temperature v001 view 30347
Elastic constants for fcc Cu at zero temperature v006 view 14339
Elastic constants for fcc Zr at zero temperature v006 view 19382
Elastic constants for sc Cu at zero temperature v006 view 41742
Elastic constants for sc Zr at zero temperature v006 view 18896


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v003

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/866c7cfa

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype A10B7_oC68_64_f2g_adef v003 view 538200
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype A5B_cF24_216_ae_c v003 view 246720
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Zr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 view 152204
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Zr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v003 view 190807
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Zr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v003 view 172231
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF96_227_e_cf v003 view 1064160
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_tI6_139_a_e v003 view 157186
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_tP4_123_a_ce v003 view 149470
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v003 view 151475
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_mC16_8_2ab_2ab v003 view 273906
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_mP4_11_e_e v003 view 218675
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_oC8_63_c_c v003 view 165085


Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v003

Creators:
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2c59c9d6

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 13383013
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 45031561
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 22792473
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 86827012


Test driver for computing reference ground state structures and energies for each element at zero temperature and applied stress v000

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fa5ed729

This test returns reference ground state structures and energies for each element at zero temperature and applied stress. The results from this test are useful when a reference structure is required in some downstream test, such as vacancy tests (used as a reservoir). This test driver works by querying results from the EquilibriumCrystalStructure test driver using element specific reference structures following CHIPS-FF. Although the reference prototypes are independent of model, the resulting structure and energy of the prototypes are model-dependent.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Reference elemental energy for Zr v000 view 35909


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cu v007 view 15854
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Zr v007 view 13292
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu v007 view 14733
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Zr v007 view 17377
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cu v007 view 14653
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Zr v007 view 17317
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cu v007 view 19625
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Zr v007 view 11850


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu v005 view 87517
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Zr v005 view 88224


Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v002

Creators:
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/9d9822ec

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Cu at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 1711366


Phonon dispersion relations for an fcc lattice v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64f4999b

Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004 view 120986


High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):


import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 view 120123


Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fca89cea

Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Cu view 625220
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for hcp Zr view 469932


Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Cu view 1088941
Vacancy formation and migration energy for hcp Zr view 1868038


ElasticConstantsCrystal__TD_034002468289_000

ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Elastic constants for diamond Cu at zero temperature v001 other view

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype A10B7_oC68_64_f2g_adef v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype A5B_cF24_216_ae_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Zr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Zr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Zr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF96_227_e_cf v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_tI6_139_a_e v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_tP4_123_a_ce v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_mC16_8_2ab_2ab v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_mP4_11_e_e v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuZr in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_oC8_63_c_c v002 other view

StackingFaultFccCrystal__TD_228501831190_002
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu v002 other view



This Model requires a Model Driver. Click below for the Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_006 archive.


Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content