Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

EAM_Dynamo_PunYamakovMishin_2013_NiAlCo__MO_826591359508_001

Interatomic potential for Aluminum (Al), Cobalt (Co), Nickel (Ni).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for the Ni-Al-Co system developed by Pun, Yamakov and Mishin (2013) v001
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
EAM potential for the Ni-Al-Co system developed by Pun, Yamakov and Mishin (2013) by fitting to experimental and first-principles data. Reasonably good agreement is achieved for physical properties between values predicted by the potential and values known from experiment and/or first-principles calculations. The potential reproduces basic features of the martensitic phase transformation from the B2-ordered high-temperature phase to a tetragonal CuAu-ordered low-temperature phase. The compositional and temperature ranges of this transformation and the martensite microstructure predicted by the potential compare well with existing experimental data. These results indicate that the proposed potential can be used for simulations of the shape memory effect in the Ni–Al–Co system.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Al, Co, Ni
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin NIST IPRP (https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/Al.html#Al-Co-Ni)
Contributor Ellad B. Tadmor
Maintainer Ellad B. Tadmor
Developer Vesselin Yamakov
Yuri Mishin
Ganga P. Purja Pun
Published on KIM 2025
How to Cite

This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5].

[1] Pun GPP, Yamakov V, Mishin Y. Interatomic potential for the ternary Ni–Al–Co system and application to atomistic modeling of the B2–L1 0 martensitic transformation. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2015;23(6):065006. doi:10.1088/0965-0393/23/6/065006 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Yamakov V, Mishin Y, Pun GPP. EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for the Ni-Al-Co system developed by Pun, Yamakov and Mishin (2013) v001. OpenKIM; 2025. doi:10.25950/da2eab38

[3] Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS, Plimpton SJ. EAM Model Driver for tabulated potentials with cubic Hermite spline interpolation as used in LAMMPS v006. OpenKIM; 2025. doi:10.25950/233cb735

[4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_826591359508_001
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
EAM_Dynamo_PunYamakovMishin_2013_NiAlCo__MO_826591359508_001
DOI 10.25950/da2eab38
https://doi.org/10.25950/da2eab38
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/da2eab38
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_006
DriverEAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_006
KIM API Version2.0
Potential Type eam
Previous Version EAM_Dynamo_PunYamakovMishin_2013_NiAlCo__MO_826591359508_000

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
B vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Co
Species: Al
Species: Ni


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Co
Species: Al
Species: Ni


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Co
Species: Al
Species: Ni


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Co
Species: Ni
Species: Al


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Al
Species: Ni
Species: Co


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Al
Species: Ni


SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ni
Species: Co
Species: Al


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Al

Species: Co

Species: Ni





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Al v004 view 34831
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Co v004 view 28679
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ni v004 view 33549
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Al v004 view 28496
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Co v004 view 28436
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ni v004 view 34991
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Al v004 view 28983
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Co v004 view 29955
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ni v004 view 28557
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Al v004 view 27767
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Co v004 view 27707
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ni v004 view 26674


Crystal structure and binding potential versus applied hydrostatic pressure v000

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/687267bf

This Test Driver computes the crystal structure and binding potential versus applied hydrostatic pressure for an arbitrary crystal. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. A scan over negative and positive hydrostatic pressures is performed, with a symmetry-constrained minimization of the cell and internal degrees of freedom at each step. Binding potential energy, volume, mass density, and the cell and internal crystal structure parameters are reported at each pressure step.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Crystal structure and binding potential versus applied hydrostatic pressure for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_hP5_164_ad_d v000 view 8524810


Elastic constants for arbitrary crystals at zero temperature and pressure v001

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/922d328f

Computes the elastic constants for an arbitrary crystal. A robust computational protocol is used, attempting multiple methods and step sizes to achieve an acceptably low error in numerical differentiation and deviation from material symmetry. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation as part of the Crystal Genome testing framework. In addition, the distance from the obtained elasticity tensor to the nearest isotropic tensor is computed.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_hP5_164_ad_d at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 1267757
Elastic constants for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B5_oC16_65_ah_bej at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 688289
Elastic constants for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_oP16_62_cd_c at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 1020890


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Al at zero temperature v006 view 18410
Elastic constants for bcc Co at zero temperature v006 view 13793
Elastic constants for bcc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 21699
Elastic constants for diamond Al at zero temperature v001 view 37793
Elastic constants for fcc Al at zero temperature v006 view 15854
Elastic constants for fcc Co at zero temperature v006 view 17135
Elastic constants for fcc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 17499
Elastic constants for sc Al at zero temperature v006 view 11119
Elastic constants for sc Co at zero temperature v006 view 23781
Elastic constants for sc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 17438


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v003

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/866c7cfa

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_hP5_164_ad_d v003 view 169946
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B5_oC16_65_ah_bej v003 view 206520
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v003 view 192120
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_oP16_62_cd_c v003 view 273602
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype A9B2_mP22_14_a4e_e v003 view 675840
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 view 179437
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 view 191288
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 view 212907
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v003 view 139080
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v003 view 188645
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v003 view 146432
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v003 view 138897
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tI2_139_a v003 view 176555
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v003 view 589557
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v003 view 143090
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_hP8_194_c_h v003 view 156822
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v003 view 261633
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v003 view 137075


Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v003

Creators:
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2c59c9d6

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v003 view 7915691
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 8547838
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 view 26346379
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 34292545
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 view 12302077
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 14147115
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 view 48999760
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 49073725


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Al v007 view 13610
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Co v007 view 14522
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ni v007 view 13452
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Al v007 view 16334
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Co v007 view 15008
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ni v007 view 14461
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Al v007 view 20658
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Co v007 view 21379
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ni v007 view 12395
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Al v007 view 12942
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Co v007 view 12274
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ni v007 view 13124


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Al v005 view 117383
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Co v005 view 117143
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ni v005 view 76618


Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v002

Creators:
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/9d9822ec

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Al at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 623347
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Ni at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 975866


Phonon dispersion relations for an fcc lattice v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64f4999b

Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Al v004 view 99646
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Ni v004 view 124109


High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):


import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Al v004 view 71211
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Ni v004 view 92173


Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fca89cea

Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Al view 455119
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Ni view 562333
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for hcp Co view 488814


Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Al view 350767
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Ni view 526182
Vacancy formation and migration energy for hcp Co view 1047199


ElasticConstantsCrystal__TD_034002468289_000

ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B5_oC16_65_ah_bej v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_oP16_62_cd_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A4B3_cI112_230_af_g v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype A5B2_hP28_194_ahk_ch v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype A9B2_mP22_14_a4e_e v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tI2_139_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cF16_225_a_bc v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_hP8_194_c_h v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_tP4_123_a_ce v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 other view

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_003

StackingFaultFccCrystal__TD_228501831190_002



This Model requires a Model Driver. Click below for the Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_006 archive.


Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content