Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

GEAM_LAMMPS_Samanta_2025_AlMgY__MO_534783049221_000

Interatomic potential for Aluminum (Al), Magnesium (Mg), Yttrium (Y).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
GEAM potential for the Al-Mg-Y system developed by Samanta (2025) v000
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
General-purpose generalized embedded atom method (GEAM) potential for the Al-Mg-Y ternary system.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Al, Mg, Y
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Contributor Chloe Zeller
Maintainer Chloe Zeller
Developer Amit Samanta
Published on KIM 2026
How to Cite

This Model is archived in OpenKIM [1-4].

[1] Samanta A. GEAM potential for the Al-Mg-Y system developed by Samanta (2025) v000. OpenKIM; 2026. doi:10.25950/e96952d5

[2] Zeller C, Kim WK, Samanta A, Sharma B, Teh YS, Shi H, et al. Model driver for the Generalized Embedded Atom Method (GEAM) potential v001. OpenKIM; 2026. doi:10.25950/835fca74

[3] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[4] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Funding Award Number: Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program at LLNL under the project tracking code 23-S1-006
Funder: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_534783049221_000
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
GEAM_LAMMPS_Samanta_2025_AlMgY__MO_534783049221_000
DOI 10.25950/e96952d5
https://doi.org/10.25950/e96952d5
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/e96952d5
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver GEAM_LAMMPS__MD_810175167647_001
DriverGEAM_LAMMPS__MD_810175167647_001
KIM API Version2.3
Potential Type geam

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
C vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-contributing-atom-energy informational
other
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Y
Species: Mg
Species: Al


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Mg
Species: Y
Species: Al


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Al
Species: Y
Species: Mg


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Y
Species: Mg
Species: Al


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Al
Species: Mg
Species: Y


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Al


SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Mg
Species: Al
Species: Y


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Al

Species: Mg

Species: Y





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Al v004 view 16891
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Mg v004 view 12820
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Y v004 view 10970
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Al v004 view 14886
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Mg v004 view 13320
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Al v004 view 24960
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Mg v004 view 26188
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Al v004 view 21180
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Mg v004 view 14733
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Y v004 view 14096


Elastic constants for arbitrary crystals at zero temperature and pressure v001

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/922d328f

Computes the elastic constants for an arbitrary crystal. A robust computational protocol is used, attempting multiple methods and step sizes to achieve an acceptably low error in numerical differentiation and deviation from material symmetry. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation as part of the Crystal Genome testing framework. In addition, the distance from the obtained elasticity tensor to the nearest isotropic tensor is computed.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for AlMg in AFLOW crystal prototype A67B41_cP108_221_aeh2il_cfgm at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 25403040
Elastic constants for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 891592
Elastic constants for Mg in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 972132
Elastic constants for Y in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 1124906
Elastic constants for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 1705380
Elastic constants for Mg in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 1539720
Elastic constants for Y in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c at zero temperature and pressure v001 view 1073821


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Mg at zero temperature v006 view 30866
Elastic constants for diamond Al at zero temperature v001 view 128673
Elastic constants for diamond Mg at zero temperature v001 view 58320
Elastic constants for diamond Y at zero temperature v001 view 97826880
Elastic constants for fcc Al at zero temperature v006 view 54208
Elastic constants for fcc Mg at zero temperature v006 view 1269353
Elastic constants for fcc Y at zero temperature v006 view 19860
Elastic constants for sc Al at zero temperature v006 view 26977
Elastic constants for sc Mg at zero temperature v006 view 25920
Elastic constants for sc Y at zero temperature v006 view 19200


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v003

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/866c7cfa

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlMg in AFLOW crystal prototype A12B17_cI58_217_g_acg v003 view 391260
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlMg in AFLOW crystal prototype A14B13_cI54_229_ef_ah v003 view 386520
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for MgY in AFLOW crystal prototype A24B5_cI58_217_2g_ac v003 view 309572
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlY in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B3_tP20_136_j_dfg v000 view 218311
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlY in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b v000 view 391659
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for MgY in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_hP12_194_ah_f v003 view 253200
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlMg in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_tI24_141_2e_e v003 view 329319
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlMg in AFLOW crystal prototype A30B23_hR53_148_5f_a2c3f v003 view 686345
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlMg in AFLOW crystal prototype A67B41_cP108_221_aeh2il_cfgm v003 view 2945700
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 view 165753
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Mg in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 view 124193
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Y in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 view 168852
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v003 view 158880
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Mg in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v003 view 155120
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Mg in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v003 view 126259
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Y in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v003 view 152400
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlY in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v000 view 131302
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for MgY in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v003 view 160920
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlY in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_oC8_63_c_c v000 view 158158
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlMgY in AFLOW crystal prototype ABC_hP9_189_ad_g_f v000 view 210290


Test driver for computing reference ground state structures and energies for each element at zero temperature and applied stress v000

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fa5ed729

This test returns reference ground state structures and energies for each element at zero temperature and applied stress. The results from this test are useful when a reference structure is required in some downstream test, such as vacancy tests (used as a reservoir). This test driver works by querying results from the EquilibriumCrystalStructure test driver using element specific reference structures following CHIPS-FF. Although the reference prototypes are independent of model, the resulting structure and energy of the prototypes are model-dependent.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Reference elemental energy for Al v000 view 36213


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Al v007 view 11301
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Mg v007 view 17100
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Y v007 view 7352
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Al v007 view 66058
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Mg v007 view 55413
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Y v007 view 5979392
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Al v007 view 23028
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Mg v007 view 456368
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Y v007 view 15372
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Al v007 view 12030
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Mg v007 view 20476
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Y v007 view 9539


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Al v005 view 1470514
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Mg v005 view 6095322


Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v002

Creators:
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/9d9822ec

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Al at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 71788980


Phonon dispersion relations for an fcc lattice v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64f4999b

Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Al v004 view 101408


High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):


import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Al v004 view 1092638


Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fca89cea

Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Al view 11306400


Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Al view 4340148




This Model requires a Model Driver. Click below for the Model Driver GEAM_LAMMPS__MD_810175167647_001 archive.


Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content