@Comment { \documentclass{article} \usepackage{url} \begin{document} This Model originally published in \cite{OpenKIM-MO:670013535154:000a} is archived in \cite{OpenKIM-MO:670013535154:000, OpenKIM-MD:120291908751:005, tadmor:elliott:2011, elliott:tadmor:2011}. \bibliographystyle{vancouver} \bibliography{kimcite-MO_670013535154_000.bib} \end{document} } @Misc{OpenKIM-MO:670013535154:000, author = {Pär A. T. Olsson}, title = {{EAM} potential ({LAMMPS} cubic hermite tabulation) for {W} developed by {O}lsson (2009) v000}, doi = {10.25950/93ead537}, howpublished = {OpenKIM, \url{https://doi.org/10.25950/93ead537}}, keywords = {OpenKIM, Model, MO_670013535154_000}, publisher = {OpenKIM}, year = 2022, } @Misc{OpenKIM-MD:120291908751:005, author = {Stephen M. Foiles and Michael I. Baskes and Murray S. Daw and Steven J. Plimpton}, title = {{EAM} {M}odel {D}river for tabulated potentials with cubic {H}ermite spline interpolation as used in {LAMMPS} v005}, doi = {10.25950/68defa36}, howpublished = {OpenKIM, \url{https://doi.org/10.25950/68defa36}}, keywords = {OpenKIM, Model Driver, MD_120291908751_005}, publisher = {OpenKIM}, year = 2018, } @Article{tadmor:elliott:2011, author = {E. B. Tadmor and R. S. Elliott and J. P. Sethna and R. E. Miller and C. A. Becker}, title = {The potential of atomistic simulations and the {K}nowledgebase of {I}nteratomic {M}odels}, journal = {{JOM}}, year = {2011}, volume = {63}, number = {7}, pages = {17}, doi = {10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6}, } @Misc{elliott:tadmor:2011, author = {Ryan S. Elliott and Ellad B. Tadmor}, title = {{K}nowledgebase of {I}nteratomic {M}odels ({KIM}) Application Programming Interface ({API})}, howpublished = {\url{https://openkim.org/kim-api}}, publisher = {OpenKIM}, year = 2011, doi = {10.25950/ff8f563a}, } @Article{OpenKIM-MO:670013535154:000a, abstract = {We have constructed a set of embedded atom method (EAM) potentials for Fe, Ta, W and V and used them in order to study point defect properties. The parametrizations of the potentials ensure that the third order elastic constants are continuous and they have been fitted to the cohesive energies, the lattice constants, the unrelaxed vacancy formation energies and the second order elastic constants. Formation energies for different self-interstitials reveal that the 〈110〉 split dumbbell is the most stable configuration for Fe while for Ta, W and V we find that the 〈111〉 split dumbbell is preferred. Self-interstitial migration energies are simulated using the nudged elastic band method and for Fe and W the migration energies are found to be in good agreement with experimental and ab initio data. Migration energies for Ta and V self-interstitials are found to be quite low. The calculated formation, activation and migration energies for monovacancies are in good agreement with experimental data. Formation energies for divacancies reveal that the second nearest neighbor divacancy is more energetically favorable than nearest neighbor divacancies and the migration energies indicate that nearest neighbor migration paths are more likely to occur than second nearest neighbor migration jumps. For Fe, we have also studied the influence of the pair potential behavior between the second and third nearest neighbor on the stability of the 〈110〉 split dumbbell, which revealed that the higher the energy level of the pair potential is in that region, the more stable the 〈110〉 split dumbbell becomes.}, author = {Olsson, P"{a}r A. T.}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.06.025}, issn = {0927-0256}, journal = {Computational Materials Science}, keywords = {EAM, BCC transition metals, Self-interstitials, Vacancies}, number = {1}, pages = {135-145}, title = {Semi-empirical atomistic study of point defect properties in {BCC} transition metals}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025609002791}, volume = {47}, year = {2009}, }