Tersoff_LAMMPS_PetismeGrenWahnstrom_2015_WCCo__MO_454528624659_000
| Title
A single sentence description.
|
Tersoff-style three-body potential for the W-C-Co system developed by Petisme, Gren, and Wahnstrom (2015) v000 |
|---|---|
| Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
An analytical bond-order potential for the W-C-Co system fitted for the purpose of modeling grain boundary slinding in WC–Co based cemented carbides at high temperature. The W-C interaction is from [2], which in turn took the C-C interaction from [3]. The W potential provides a good description of the coordination dependence of structural parameters and cohesive energies. Thermal, point defects as well as surface properties are reasonably described. The structural and elastic properties obtained with the WC potential compare well with experiment and density functional theory calculations. It also yields reasonable agreement with the available reference data for thermal and point-defects properties. It has been, furthermore, shown to be capable of reproducing energies and relaxation of several unreconstructed surfaces. The remaining interactions involving Co were fitted using force-matching to describe WC/Co interfaces and configurations with dissolved W and C in Co. The experimental melting point of Co is also well described. |
| Species
The supported atomic species.
| C, Co, W |
| Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
The C-C interactions in this potential are taken from Brenner [3] and is optimized with respect to molecular properties. It is not expected that this potential will correctly reproduce properties of bulk carbon. |
| Contributor |
I Nikiforov |
| Maintainer |
I Nikiforov |
| Developer |
M.V.G. Petisme Martin A Gren Göran Wahnström |
| Published on KIM | 2026 |
| How to Cite |
This Model originally published in [1-3] is archived in OpenKIM [4-7]. [1] Petisme MVG, Gren MA, Wahnstrom G. Molecular dynamics simulation of WC/WC grain boundary sliding resistance in WC–Co cemented carbides at high temperature. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials [Internet]. 2015Mar;49:75–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2014.07.037 doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2014.07.037 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Juslin N, Erhart P, Traskelin P, Nord J, Henriksson KOE, Nordlund K, et al. Analytical interatomic potential for modeling nonequilibrium processes in the W–C–H system. Journal of Applied Physics [Internet]. 2005Dec;98(12). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2149492 doi:10.1063/1.2149492 [3] Brenner DW. Empirical potential for hydrocarbons for use in simulating the chemical vapor deposition of diamond films. Physical Review B [Internet]. 1990Nov;42(15):9458–71. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.9458 doi:10.1103/physrevb.42.9458 [4] Petisme MVG, Gren MA, Wahnström G. Tersoff-style three-body potential for the W-C-Co system developed by Petisme, Gren, and Wahnstrom (2015) v000. OpenKIM; 2026. doi:10.25950/a529d575 [5] Brink T, Thompson AP, Farrell DE, Wen M, Tersoff J, Nord J, et al. Model driver for Tersoff-style potentials ported from LAMMPS v005. OpenKIM; 2021. doi:10.25950/9a7dc96c [6] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [7] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a |
| Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information.
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
|
| Funding |
Award Number: VR 621-2013-5768 Funder: Vetenskapsrådet Funder: Sandvik Funder: Chalmers Tekniska Högskola |
| Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_454528624659_000 |
| Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| Tersoff_LAMMPS_PetismeGrenWahnstrom_2015_WCCo__MO_454528624659_000 |
| DOI |
10.25950/a529d575 https://doi.org/10.25950/a529d575 https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/a529d575 |
| KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005 |
| Driver | Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005 |
| KIM API Version | 2.3 |
| Potential Type | tersoff |
| Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-contributing-atom-energy | informational | other |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
The C-C interactions in this potential are taken from Brenner [3] and is optimized with respect to molecular properties. It is not expected that this potential will correctly reproduce properties of bulk carbon.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc C v004 | view | 3342 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc W v004 | view | 2248 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond C v004 | view | 3160 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Co v004 | view | 3600 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond W v004 | view | 2127 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc C v004 | view | 3585 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc W v004 | view | 3480 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc C v004 | view | 3099 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Co v004 | view | 3600 |
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elastic constants for bcc C at zero temperature v006 | view | 17681 | |
| Elastic constants for diamond C at zero temperature v001 | view | 20400 | |
| Elastic constants for diamond Co at zero temperature v001 | view | 20476 | |
| Elastic constants for fcc C at zero temperature v006 | view | 14522 | |
| Elastic constants for fcc W at zero temperature v006 | view | 19565 | |
| Elastic constants for sc C at zero temperature v006 | view | 7080 | |
| Elastic constants for sc Co at zero temperature v006 | view | 6600 |
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reference elemental energy for C v000 | view | 26280 | |
| Reference elemental energy for Co v000 | view | 27360 | |
| Reference elemental energy for W v000 | view | 22481 |
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohesive energy and equilibrium lattice constant of graphene v002 | view | 480 |
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp C v005 | view | 23520 | |
| Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Co v005 | view | 19079 | |
| Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp W v005 | view | 24300 |
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linear thermal expansion coefficient of diamond C at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 | view | 4128217 |
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in bcc W v004 | view | 79500 |
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for bcc W | view | 455943 |
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vacancy formation and migration energy for bcc W | view | 622729 | |
| Vacancy formation and migration energy for hcp Co | view | 2309940 |
| Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| Elastic constants for diamond W at zero temperature v001 | other | view |
| Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC4_63_c v003 | other | view |
| Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tI2_139_a v003 | other | view |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Click below for the Model Driver Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005 archive.