Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

Tersoff_LAMMPS_AlbeNordlundAverback_2002_PtC__MO_500121566391_004

Interatomic potential for Carbon (C), Platinum (Pt).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
Tersoff-style three-body potential for PtC developed by Albe, Nordlund, and Averback (2002) v004
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
Tersoff-style potential for PtC by Albe, Nordlund, and Averback. The C-C interaction is potential II from Brenner, Phys. Rev. B 42, 9458 (1990) without the overbinding correction.
Species
The supported atomic species.
C, Pt
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Contributor Tobias Brink
Maintainer Tobias Brink
Implementer Tobias Brink
Developer Karsten Albe
Kai Nordlund
Robert S. Averback
Published on KIM 2021
How to Cite

This Model originally published in [1-3] is archived in OpenKIM [4-7].

[1] Albe K, Nordlund K, Averback RS. Modeling the metal-semiconductor interaction: Analytical bond-order potential for platinum-carbon. Physical Review B. 2002May;65(19):195124. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.195124 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Brenner DW. Empirical potential for hydrocarbons for use in simulating the chemical vapor deposition of diamond films. Physical Review B. 1990Nov;42(15):9458–71. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.42.9458

[3] Brenner DW. Erratum: Empirical potential for hydrocarbons for use in simulating the chemical vapor deposition of diamond films. Physical Review B. 1992Jul;46(3):1948–. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.46.1948.2

[4] Brink T, Albe K, Nordlund K, Averback RS. Tersoff-style three-body potential for PtC developed by Albe, Nordlund, and Averback (2002) v004. OpenKIM; 2021. doi:10.25950/78d69967

[5] Brink T, Thompson AP, Farrell DE, Wen M, Tersoff J, Nord J, et al. Model driver for Tersoff-style potentials ported from LAMMPS v005. OpenKIM; 2021. doi:10.25950/9a7dc96c

[6] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[7] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Citations

This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on.

The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel.

The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied.

The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP).

Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis.

OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm.

This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information.

Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the  .
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_500121566391_004
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
Tersoff_LAMMPS_AlbeNordlundAverback_2002_PtC__MO_500121566391_004
DOI 10.25950/78d69967
https://doi.org/10.25950/78d69967
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/78d69967
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005
DriverTersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005
KIM API Version2.2
Potential Type tersoff
Previous Version Tersoff_LAMMPS_AlbeNordlundAverback_2002_PtC__MO_500121566391_003

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
A vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Pt
Species: C


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Pt
Species: C


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Pt
Species: C


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: C
Species: Pt


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: C
Species: Pt


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Pt


FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Pt


SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Pt
Species: C


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: C

Species: Pt





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc C v004 view 2894
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Pt v004 view 2447
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond C v004 view 3203
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Pt v004 view 2429
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc C v004 view 3387
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Pt v004 view 2503
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc C v004 view 2884
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Pt v004 view 2288


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc C at zero temperature v006 view 10861
Elastic constants for bcc Pt at zero temperature v006 view 21692
Elastic constants for diamond C at zero temperature v001 view 28704
Elastic constants for diamond Pt at zero temperature v001 view 26844
Elastic constants for fcc C at zero temperature v006 view 13716
Elastic constants for fcc Pt at zero temperature v006 view 5591
Elastic constants for sc C at zero temperature v006 view 5479
Elastic constants for sc Pt at zero temperature v006 view 5628


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2f2c4ad3

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF16_227_c v002 view 237500
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF240_202_h2i v002 view 1378705
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Pt in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 view 89817
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF8_227_a v002 view 129719
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI16_206_c v002 view 83338
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI16_229_f v002 view 76193
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI8_214_a v002 view 68598
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP1_221_a v002 view 68246
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP20_221_gj v002 view 88284
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP12_194_bc2f v002 view 47757
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP12_194_e2f v002 view 55363
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP16_194_e3f v002 view 86136
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_191_c v002 view 91626
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_bc v002 view 39555
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_f v002 view 45935
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP8_194_ef v002 view 42654
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR10_166_5c v002 view 114038
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR14_166_7c v002 view 121400
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR2_166_c v002 view 66774
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR4_166_2c v002 view 37975
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR60_166_2h4i v002 view 177662
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_mC16_12_4i v002 view 57540
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC16_65_mn v002 view 354188
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC16_65_pq v002 view 85915
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC8_65_gh v002 view 94529
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC8_67_m v002 view 77522
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oI120_71_lmn6o v002 view 535147
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oP16_62_4c v002 view 65964
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tI8_139_h v002 view 43322
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CPt in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_216_a_c v002 view 109474
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CPt in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_225_a_b v002 view 98872
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CPt in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 view 58998
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CPt in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_hP2_187_a_d v002 view 80099


Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v003

Creators:
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2c59c9d6

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pt v000 view 39625572
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pt v000 view 125223023
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pt v000 view 51955827


Cohesive energy and equilibrium lattice constant of hexagonal 2D crystalline layers v002

Creators: Ilia Nikiforov
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/dd36239b

Given atomic species and structure type (graphene-like, 2H, or 1T) of a 2D hexagonal monolayer crystal, as well as an initial guess at the lattice spacing, this Test Driver calculates the equilibrium lattice spacing and cohesive energy using Polak-Ribiere conjugate gradient minimization in LAMMPS
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy and equilibrium lattice constant of graphene v002 view 596


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc C v007 view 4100
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Pt v007 view 6922
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond C v007 view 9528
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Pt v007 view 9140
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc C v007 view 4212
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Pt v007 view 8733
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc C v007 view 9349
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Pt v007 view 6435


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Pt v005 view 27656


Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v002

Creators:
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/9d9822ec

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of diamond C at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 5079299
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Pt at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 4459176


Phonon dispersion relations for an fcc lattice v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64f4999b

Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Pt v004 view 127069


Stacking and twinning fault energies of an fcc lattice at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: SubrahmanyamPattamatta
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/b4cfaf9a

Intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies, unstable stacking fault energy, unstable twinning energy, stacking fault energy as a function of fractional displacement, and gamma surface for a monoatomic FCC lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Pt v002 view 69510454


High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):


import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Pt v004 view 269775


Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fca89cea

Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Pt view 607075


Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Pt view 5614962


DislocationCoreEnergyCubic__TD_452950666597_002

ElasticConstantsHexagonal__TD_612503193866_004
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Elastic constants for hcp Pt at zero temperature v004 other view

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_000

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp C v005 other view

PhononDispersionCurve__TD_530195868545_004
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Pt v004 other view

No Driver
Verification Check Error Categories Link to Error page
PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004 other view




This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005 appear below.


Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005.zip Zip Windows archive
Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content