Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

Sim_LAMMPS_Vashishta_BranicioRinoGan_2009_InP__SM_090647175366_000

Interatomic potential for Indium (In), Phosphorus (P).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
LAMMPS Vashishta potential for the In-P system developed by Branicio et al. (2009) v000
Description Indium phosphide is investigated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and density-functional theory calculations. MD simulations use a proposed effective interaction potential for InP fitted to a selected experimental dataset of properties. The potential consists of two- and three-body terms that represent atomic-size effects, charge–charge, charge–dipole and dipole–dipole interactions as well as covalent bond bending and stretching. Predictions are made for the elastic constants as a function of density and temperature, the generalized stacking fault energy and the low-index surface energies.
Species
The supported atomic species.
In, P
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin LAMMPS package 22-Sep-2017
Contributor Ronald E. Miller
Maintainer Ronald E. Miller
Developer Paulo S. Branicio
José P. Rino
Chee Kwan Gan
Helio Tsuzuki
Published on KIM 2019
How to Cite

This Simulator Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-4].

[1] Branicio PS, Rino JP, Gan CK, Tsuzuki H. Interaction potential for indium phosphide: a molecular dynamics and first-principles study of the elastic constants, generalized stacking fault and surface energies. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter [Internet]. 2009Jan;21(9):095002. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/9/095002 doi:10.1088/0953-8984/21/9/095002 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Branicio PS, Rino JP, Gan CK, Tsuzuki H. LAMMPS Vashishta potential for the In-P system developed by Branicio et al. (2009) v000. OpenKIM; 2019. doi:10.25950/a96d2c32

[3] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[4] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Citations

This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on.

The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel.

The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied.

The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP).

Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis.

OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm.

This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information.

Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the  .
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
SM_090647175366_000
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
Sim_LAMMPS_Vashishta_BranicioRinoGan_2009_InP__SM_090647175366_000
DOI 10.25950/a96d2c32
https://doi.org/10.25950/a96d2c32
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/a96d2c32
KIM Item TypeSimulator Model
KIM API Version2.1
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn.
LAMMPS
Potential Type vashishta
Simulator Potential vashishta
Run Compatibility portable-models

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
A vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: In
Species: P


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: In
Species: P


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: In

Species: P





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v002

Creators: Daniel S. Karls
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c6746c52

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Indium view 355
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Phosphorus view 484
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Indium view 451
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Phosphorus view 355
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Indium view 355
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Phosphorus view 613
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Indium view 516
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Phosphorus view 516


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v004

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/75393d88

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc In at zero temperature view 2064
Elastic constants for bcc P at zero temperature view 2193
Elastic constants for fcc In at zero temperature view 1773
Elastic constants for fcc P at zero temperature view 2225
Elastic constants for sc In at zero temperature view 2418
Elastic constants for sc P at zero temperature view 2289


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2f2c4ad3

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for P in AFLOW crystal prototype A_aP24_2_12i v002 view 126928
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for P in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP1_221_a v002 view 92246
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for P in AFLOW crystal prototype A_mC16_12_2ij v002 view 91383
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for P in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC8_64_f v002 view 86504
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for In in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tI2_139_a v002 view 74798
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for P in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tI4_139_e v002 view 40162
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for InP in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_hR8_166_c_h v002 view 702413
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for InP in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_216_a_c v002 view 115879
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for InP in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_225_a_b v002 view 105056
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for InP in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_hP4_186_b_b v002 view 87829


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/f3eec5a9

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc In view 1258
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc P view 967
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond In view 1161
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond P view 1483
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc In view 1032
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc P view 1096
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc In view 1000
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc P view 1258


EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_000

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_007

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005

No Driver
Verification Check Error Categories Link to Error page
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 other view



Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content