Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

EAM_Dynamo_BelandTammMu_2017_FeNiCr__MO_715003088863_000

Interatomic potential for Chromium (Cr), Iron (Fe), Nickel (Ni).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for the Fe-Ni-Cr system developed by Beland et al. (2017) v000
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
This is a modification of an existing embedded-atom method FeNiCr potential to handle short-range interactions. Density functional theory is used to calculate the energetics of two atoms approaching each other, embedded in the alloy, and to calculate the equation of state of the alloy as it is compressed. The pairwise terms and the embedding terms of the potential are modified in accordance with the ab initio results.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Cr, Fe, Ni
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/entry/2017--Beland-L-K-Tamm-A-Mu-S-et-al--Fe-Ni-Cr/
Contributor I Nikiforov
Maintainer I Nikiforov
Developer Laurent K. Béland
Artur Tamm
Sai Mu
German D. Samolyuk
Yuri N. Osetskiy
Alvo Aabloo
Mattias Klintenberg
A. Caro
Roger E. Stoller
Published on KIM 2022
How to Cite

This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5].

[1] Béland LK, Tamm A, Mu S, Samolyuk GD, Osetsky YN, Aabloo A, et al. Accurate classical short-range forces for the study of collision cascades in Fe–Ni–Cr. Computer Physics Communications [Internet]. 2017;219:11–9. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465517301315 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.05.001 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Béland LK, Tamm A, Mu S, Samolyuk GD, Osetskiy YN, Aabloo A, et al. EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for the Fe-Ni-Cr system developed by Beland et al. (2017) v000. OpenKIM; 2022. doi:10.25950/3b5d96b4

[3] Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS, Plimpton SJ. EAM Model Driver for tabulated potentials with cubic Hermite spline interpolation as used in LAMMPS v005. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/68defa36

[4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Citations

This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on.

The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel.

The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied.

The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP).

Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis.

OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm.

This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information.

Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the  .
Funding Funder: Basic Energy Sciences

Funder: Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning

Award Number: ANR-11-LABX-0053, ANR-11-IDEX- 0001-02
Funder: Agence Nationale de la Recherche

Funder: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Funder: Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies

Funder: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_715003088863_000
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
EAM_Dynamo_BelandTammMu_2017_FeNiCr__MO_715003088863_000
DOI 10.25950/3b5d96b4
https://doi.org/10.25950/3b5d96b4
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/3b5d96b4
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005
DriverEAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005
KIM API Version2.2
Potential Type eam

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
B vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ni
Species: Fe
Species: Cr


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ni
Species: Fe
Species: Cr


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cr
Species: Ni
Species: Fe


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ni
Species: Cr
Species: Fe


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cr
Species: Fe
Species: Ni


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ni


FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ni


SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Fe
Species: Cr
Species: Ni


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Cr

Species: Fe

Species: Ni





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cr v004 view 14238
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Fe v004 view 22848
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ni v004 view 11766
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cr v004 view 11398
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Fe v004 view 15170
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ni v004 view 11597
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cr v004 view 14135
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Fe v004 view 11885
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ni v004 view 12114
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cr v004 view 13988
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Fe v004 view 18114
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ni v004 view 12045


Elastic constants for arbitrary crystals at zero temperature and pressure v000

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/888f9943

Computes the elastic constants for an arbitrary crystal. A robust computational protocol is used, attempting multiple methods and step sizes to achieve an acceptably low error in numerical differentiation and deviation from material symmetry. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation as part of the Crystal Genome testing framework. In addition, the distance from the obtained elasticity tensor to the nearest isotropic tensor is computed.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b at zero temperature and pressure v000 view 105783
Elastic constants for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b at zero temperature and pressure v000 view 111616
Elastic constants for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b at zero temperature and pressure v000 view 347783


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Cr at zero temperature v006 view 17943
Elastic constants for bcc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 18947
Elastic constants for diamond Fe at zero temperature v001 view 16847
Elastic constants for fcc Cr at zero temperature v006 view 9691
Elastic constants for fcc Fe at zero temperature v006 view 18191
Elastic constants for fcc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 9803
Elastic constants for sc Cr at zero temperature v006 view 20835
Elastic constants for sc Fe at zero temperature v006 view 9542
Elastic constants for sc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 10287


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2f2c4ad3

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b v002 view 319292
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b v002 view 216974
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b v002 view 369943
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cF16_225_ac_b v002 view 122873
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cF16_225_ac_b v002 view 145253
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 view 77007
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 view 84274
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 view 72608
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_tI8_139_ad_b v002 view 57236
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_tI8_139_ad_b v002 view 89302
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 view 85694
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 view 157106
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 view 74430
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 view 59970
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 view 47271
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 view 58694
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP8_223_ac v002 view 102138
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 view 57350
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 view 67952
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 view 75019
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cr in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v002 view 241254
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v002 view 129204
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF24_227_a_d v002 view 242189
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF24_227_a_d v002 view 338213
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF24_227_a_d v002 view 253034
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cF16_225_a_bc v002 view 141499
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cF16_225_a_bc v002 view 73945
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cF16_225_a_bc v002 view 76072
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CrFe in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v002 view 89891
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v002 view 55535
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_tI8_139_a_bd v002 view 47089
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for FeNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_tP2_123_a_d v002 view 42957


Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v003

Creators:
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2c59c9d6

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Fe v001 view 18100238
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Fe v001 view 28371074
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Fe v001 view 15013994
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Fe v001 view 93181677
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Fe v001 view 7706091
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 11687418
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Fe v001 view 48310774
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 33102642
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Fe v001 view 19786326
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 11018855
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Fe v001 view 69368298
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 72969892


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cr v007 view 8312
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Fe v007 view 15546
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ni v007 view 11408
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cr v007 view 12896
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Fe v007 view 12747
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ni v007 view 11995
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cr v007 view 11567
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Fe v007 view 11964
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ni v007 view 11885
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cr v007 view 11815
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Fe v007 view 11331
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ni v007 view 10511


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cr v005 view 151660
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Fe v005 view 160091
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ni v005 view 167277


Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v002

Creators:
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/9d9822ec

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of bcc Cr at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 433158
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of bcc Fe at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 451508
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Ni at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 772806


Phonon dispersion relations for an fcc lattice v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64f4999b

Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Ni v004 view 124640


Stacking and twinning fault energies of an fcc lattice at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: SubrahmanyamPattamatta
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/b4cfaf9a

Intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies, unstable stacking fault energy, unstable twinning energy, stacking fault energy as a function of fractional displacement, and gamma surface for a monoatomic FCC lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Ni v002 view 15402244


High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):


import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in bcc Cr v004 view 167530
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in bcc Fe v004 view 160489
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Ni v004 view 115861


Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fca89cea

Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for bcc Cr view 509012
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Ni view 369280


Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for bcc Cr view 3762376
Vacancy formation and migration energy for bcc Fe view 3470618
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Ni view 1601025


ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006

ElasticConstantsHexagonal__TD_612503193866_004

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_000

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002

PhononDispersionCurve__TD_530195868545_004
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Ni v004 other view

SurfaceEnergyCubicCrystalBrokenBondFit__TD_955413365818_004

VacancyFormationEnergyRelaxationVolume__TD_647413317626_001
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for bcc Fe other view

No Driver
Verification Check Error Categories Link to Error page
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 other view




This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 appear below.


EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.zip Zip Windows archive
Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content