Title
A single sentence description.
|
EAM potential for Cu–Ni developed by Fischer et al. (2019) v000 |
---|---|
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
In this atomistic study on the copper–nickel system, a new embedded-atom alloy potential between copper and nickel is fitted to experimental data on the mixing enthalpy, taking available potentials for the pure components from literature. The resulting phase boundaries of the new potential are in very good agreement with a recent CALPHAD prediction. Using this new potential, a high angle symmetrical tilt Σ5 and a coherent Σ3 twin grain boundary (GB) are chosen for a systematic investigation of equilibrium GB segregation in the semi-grandcanonical ensemble at temperatures from 400 K to 800 K. Applying thermodynamically accurate integration techniques, the GB formation energies are calculated exactly and as an absolute value for every temperature and composition, which also enables the evaluation of GB excess entropies. The thorough thermodynamic model of GBs developed by Frolov and Mishin is excellently confirmed by the simulations quantitatively, if the impact of both segregation and GB tension on the change in GB formation energy is accounted for. In the case of the Σ3 coherent GB, it turns out that the change in GB formation energy at low temperatures is for the most part attributed to the GB tension, while segregation only has a small influence. This demonstrated effect of GB tensions should also be taken into account in the interpretation of experiments. |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| Cu, Ni |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/entry/2019--Fischer-F-Schmitz-G-Eich-S-M--Cu-Ni/2019--Fischer-F--Cu-Ni--LAMMPS--ipr3.html |
Contributor |
Sebastian M. Eich |
Maintainer |
Sebastian M. Eich |
Developer |
Felix Fischer Guido Schmitz Sebastian M. Eich |
Published on KIM | 2021 |
How to Cite |
This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5]. [1] Fischer F, Schmitz G, Eich SM. A systematic study of grain boundary segregation and grain boundary formation energy using a new copper–nickel embedded-atom potential. Acta Mater [Internet]. 2019;176:220–31. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359645419303945 doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.06.027 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Fischer F, Schmitz G, Eich SM. EAM potential for Cu–Ni developed by Fischer et al. (2019) v000. OpenKIM; 2021. doi:10.25950/ca482d5d [3] Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS, Plimpton SJ. EAM Model Driver for tabulated potentials with cubic Hermite spline interpolation as used in LAMMPS v005. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/68defa36 [4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 30 Citations (28 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (high confidence) H. Jo et al., “Direct strain correlations at the single-atom level in three-dimensional core-shell interface structures,” Nature Communications. 2022. link Times cited: 8 USED (high confidence) R. Garza et al., “Atomistic Mechanisms of Binary Alloy Surface Segregation from Nanoseconds to Seconds Using Accelerated Dynamics.,” Journal of chemical theory and computation. 2021. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: Although the equilibrium composition of many alloy surfaces … read more USED (low confidence) A. Verma, O. K. Johnson, G. B. Thompson, S. Ogata, and E. R. Homer, “Solute influence in transitions from non-Arrhenius to stick-slip Arrhenius grain boundary migration,” Acta Materialia. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) M. Chen, “The Optimum Grain Size of Nanocrystalline CuNi Alloy with Grain Boundary Segregation Structure,” Crystal Growth & Design. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) Y. Gao et al., “Investigation of deformation mechanism of SiC–CuNi composite thin film material nanochannels by molecular dynamics simulation,” Results in Physics. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) N. Chen, A. Devaraj, S. Mathaudhu, and S. Hu, “Atomic mixing mechanisms in nanocrystalline Cu/Ni composites under continuous shear deformation and thermal annealing,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) X. Lu et al., “Effect of twin boundary spacing on the mechanical properties of nano-columnar crystalline Cu-Ni alloy,” Molecular Simulation. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: ABSTRACT Nanotwinned exist in crystals as coherent interface… read more USED (low confidence) T. L. Dora, S. K. Singh, R. R. Mishra, and A. Verma, “Role of Crystal Orientation, Temperature, and Strain Rate on the Mechanical Characterization of Nickel: An Atomistic-scale investigation,” Journal of Micromanufacturing. 2023. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: In this article, the influence of crystallographic orientati… read more USED (low confidence) A. Verma, O. K. Johnson, G. Thompson, I. Chesser, S. Ogata, and E. Homer, “Insights into factors that affect non-Arrhenius migration of a simulated incoherent Σ3 grain boundary,” Acta Materialia. 2023. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) H. Peng et al., “Correlation between stabilizing and strengthening effects due to grain boundary segregation in iron-based alloys: theoretical models and first-principles calculations,” Acta Materialia. 2023. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) S. Yazdani and V. Vitry, “Using Molecular Dynamic Simulation to Understand the Deformation Mechanism in Cu, Ni, and Equimolar Cu-Ni Polycrystalline Alloys,” Alloys. 2023. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: The grain boundaries and dislocations play an important role… read more USED (low confidence) C. Hu, S. Berbenni, D. Medlin, and R. Dingreville, “Discontinuous segregation patterning across disconnections,” Acta Materialia. 2023. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) B. Waters, D. S. Karls, I. Nikiforov, R. Elliott, E. Tadmor, and B. Runnels, “Automated determination of grain boundary energy and potential-dependence using the OpenKIM framework,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) J. Liu, H. Li, B. Liu, L. Wang, J. Zhou, and F. Zhang, “The hardening and softening mechanism governed by GB stability in nanograined metals: A molecular dynamics study,” Materials Today Communications. 2022. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) L. Granger, M.-J. Chen, D. Brenner, and M. Zikry, “The Challenges of Modeling Defect Behavior and Plasticity across Spatial and Temporal Scales: A Case Study of Metal Bilayer Impact,” Metals. 2022. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: Atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) and a microstructural disl… read more USED (low confidence) J. Zhu, S. Huang, Z. Xie, H. Guo, and H. Yang, “Thermal Conductance of Copper–Graphene Interface: A Molecular Simulation,” Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: Copper is often used as a heat-dissipating material due to i… read more USED (low confidence) Z. Sharipov et al., “Simulation of the Interaction Processes between Copper Nanoclusters and Metal Targets with Pore-Type Defects,” Journal of Surface Investigation: X-ray, Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques. 2022. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) A.-S. Tran, “Influences of grain size and twin boundary on the tensile properties of nanocrystalline face-centered cubic Cu50Ni50 alloy,” Molecular Simulation. 2022. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: ABSTRACT
The effects of grain size (GS) and distance betwee… read more USED (low confidence) J. Li, J. Li, Q. Zhao, and R. Xia, “Molecular dynamics simulations on the mechanical properties of gyroidal bicontinuous Cu/Ni nanocomposites,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2022. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) X. Liu et al., “Coalescence kinetics and microstructure evolution of Cu nanoparticles sintering on substrates: A molecular dynamics study,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2022. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) U. Sarder, T. Paul, I. Belova, and G. Murch, “The Diffusion Isotope Effect and Diffusion Mechanism in Liquid Cu-Ag and Cu-Ni Alloys,” Defect and Diffusion Forum. 2021. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: In this paper, the diffusion isotope effect and diffusion me… read more USED (low confidence) H. Wang, C. Wang, L. Zhang, G. Chen, Q. Zhu, and P. Zhang, “Effect of Strain Rate on the Mechanical Properties of Cu/Ni Clad Foils,” Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: The performance of clad foils in microforming deserves to be… read more USED (low confidence) D. Lu et al., “Effects of microstructure on tensile properties of AA2050-T84 Al-Li alloy,” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China. 2021. link Times cited: 10 USED (low confidence) P. Lejček, S. Hofmann, M. Všianská, and M. Šob, “Entropy matters in grain boundary segregation,” Acta Materialia. 2021. link Times cited: 19 USED (low confidence) F. Fischer and S. Eich, “Analytic description of grain boundary segregation, tension, and formation energy in the copper–nickel system,” Acta Materialia. 2020. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) T. Krauss and S. Eich, “Development of a segregation model beyond McLean based on atomistic simulations,” Acta Materialia. 2020. link Times cited: 6 USED (low confidence) A. Nikonov, A. Dmitriev, and A. Smolin, “Selection of the potential for MD-modeling of phase martensitic transformations in Al-Cu-Ni alloy,” PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “PHYSICAL MESOMECHANICS. MATERIALS WITH MULTILEVEL HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY.” 2022. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) F. Fischer and S. Eich, “Analytic Description of Grain Boundary Segregation, Tension, and Formation Energy in the Copper-Nickel System,” Chemical Engineering (Engineering) eJournal. 2020. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: In this theoretical study, a recently proposed segregation m… read more NOT USED (low confidence) T. L. Dora, S. K. Singh, R. R. Mishra, R. Das, J. Gupta, and A. Verma, “Unravelling the atomistic-scale insights into tensile response of equiatomic cupronickel alloy with pre-existing faceted grain boundary interface,” Results in Surfaces and Interfaces. 2023. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) R. Garza et al., “Multiscale vacancy and dislocation-mediated surface segregation in CuNi alloy up to microsecond timescales with accelerated dynamics,” Microscopy and Microanalysis. 2021. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: Phase separation of CuNi in vacuum is well-documented in bot… read more |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_266134052596_000 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| EAM_Dynamo_FischerSchmitzEich_2019_CuNi__MO_266134052596_000 |
DOI |
10.25950/ca482d5d https://doi.org/10.25950/ca482d5d https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/ca482d5d |
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 |
Driver | EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 |
KIM API Version | 2.2 |
Potential Type | eam |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
B | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v004 | view | 16400 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ni v004 | view | 19270 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cu v004 | view | 19419 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ni v004 | view | 17481 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cu v004 | view | 19381 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ni v004 | view | 15990 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cu v004 | view | 12602 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ni v004 | view | 19456 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 18062 | |
Elastic constants for bcc Ni at zero temperature v006 | view | 16978 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 17972 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Ni at zero temperature v006 | view | 10362 | |
Elastic constants for sc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 9691 | |
Elastic constants for sc Ni at zero temperature v006 | view | 9728 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 | view | 61473 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v001 | view | 62651 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 | view | 92467 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 | view | 81645 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 | view | 81424 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cu v007 | view | 7603 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ni v007 | view | 8088 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu v007 | view | 7678 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ni v007 | view | 12224 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cu v007 | view | 12482 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ni v007 | view | 12373 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cu v007 | view | 7417 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ni v007 | view | 11696 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu v005 | view | 174871 | |
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ni v005 | view | 168276 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Cu at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 | view | 17564805 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Ni at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 | view | 1286289 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004 | view | 133474 | |
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Ni v004 | view | 97459 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu v002 | view | 14406552 | |
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Ni v002 | view | 26495286 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 | view | 118078 | |
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Ni v004 | view | 167023 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Cu | view | 457331 | |
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Ni | view | 558117 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Cu | view | 2240714 | |
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Ni | view | 1940268 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Elastic constants for diamond Cu at zero temperature v001 | other | view |
Elastic constants for diamond Ni at zero temperature v001 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp Cu at zero temperature v004 | other | view |
Elastic constants for hcp Ni at zero temperature v004 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004 | other | view |
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Ni v004 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 | other | view |
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Ni v004 | other | view |
Verification Check | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 | other | view |
PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004 | other | view |
EAM_Dynamo_FischerSchmitzEich_2019_CuNi__MO_266134052596_000.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
EAM_Dynamo_FischerSchmitzEich_2019_CuNi__MO_266134052596_000.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 appear below.
EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.zip | Zip | Windows archive |