Title
A single sentence description.
|
Finnis-Sinclair potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for solid-liquid interfaces in Al-Mg alloys developed by Mendelev et al. (2009) v005 |
---|---|
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
The potential was developed to study solidification in Al-rich Al-Mg alloys.
Different approaches are analyzed for construction of semi-empirical potentials for binary alloys, focusing specifically on the capability of these potentials to describe solid–liquid phase equilibria, as a pre-requisite to studies of solidification phenomena. Fitting ab initio compound data does not ensure correct reproduction of the dilute solid-solution formation energy, and explicit inclusion of this quantity in the potential development procedure does not guarantee that the potential will predict the correct solid–liquid phase diagram. Therefore, we conclude that fitting only to solid phase properties, as is done in most potential development procedures, generally is not sufficient to develop a semi-empirical potential suitable for the simulation of solidification. A method is proposed for the incorporation of data for liquid solution energies in the potential development procedure, and a new semi-empirical potential developed suitable for simulations of dilute alloys of Mg in Al. The potential correctly reproduces both zero-temperature solid properties and solidus and liquid lines on the Al-rich part of the Al–Mg phase diagram. |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| Al, Mg |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/Al.html |
Contributor |
Mikhail I. Mendelev |
Maintainer |
Mikhail I. Mendelev |
Developer |
Mikhail I. Mendelev Mark Asta J. J. Hoyt MJ Rahman |
Published on KIM | 2018 |
How to Cite |
This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5]. [1] Mendelev MI, Asta M, Rahman MJ, Hoyt JJ. Development of interatomic potentials appropriate for simulation of solid–liquid interface properties in Al–Mg alloys. Philosophical Magazine. 2009;89(34-36):3269–85. doi:10.1080/14786430903260727 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Mendelev MI, Asta M, Hoyt JJ, Rahman MJ. Finnis-Sinclair potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for solid-liquid interfaces in Al-Mg alloys developed by Mendelev et al. (2009) v005. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/fbec42d2 [3] Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS, Plimpton SJ. EAM Model Driver for tabulated potentials with cubic Hermite spline interpolation as used in LAMMPS v005. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/68defa36 [4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 122 Citations (104 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (definite) L. Zhang, Y. Shibuta, X. Huang, C. Lu, and M. Liu, “Grain boundary induced deformation mechanisms in nanocrystalline Al by molecular dynamics simulation: From interatomic potential perspective,” Computational Materials Science. 2019. link Times cited: 39 USED (definite) L. Huber, R. Hadian, B. Grabowski, and J. Neugebauer, “A machine learning approach to model solute grain boundary segregation,” npj Computational Materials. 2018. link Times cited: 83 USED (high confidence) H. Zhang, X. Wang, J.-R. Zhang, H.-B. Yu, and J. Douglas, “Approach to hyperuniformity in a metallic glass-forming material exhibiting a fragile to strong glass transition,” The European Physical Journal. E, Soft Matter. 2023. link Times cited: 2 USED (high confidence) Y. Mahmood, M. Alghalayini, E. Martínez, C. Paredis, and F. Abdeljawad, “Atomistic and machine learning studies of solute segregation in metastable grain boundaries,” Scientific Reports. 2022. link Times cited: 9 USED (high confidence) T. P. Matson and C. Schuh, “Atomistic Assessment of Solute-Solute Interactions during Grain Boundary Segregation,” Nanomaterials. 2021. link Times cited: 7 Abstract: Grain boundary solute segregation is becoming increasingly c… read more USED (high confidence) S. Pal, K. V. Reddy, T. Yu, J. Xiao, and C. Deng, “The spectrum of atomic excess free volume in grain boundaries,” Journal of Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 7 USED (high confidence) L. E. Kar’kina, I. N. Kar’kin, and Y. Gornostyrev, “Effect of Alloying Element Segregations on the Grain Boundary Sliding in Al–Mg and Al–Ni Alloy Bicrystals: Atomistic Modeling,” Physics of Metals and Metallography. 2020. link Times cited: 5 USED (high confidence) R. K. Koju and Y. Mishin, “Atomistic Study of Grain-Boundary Segregation and Grain-Boundary Diffusion in Al-Mg Alloys,” EngRN: Metals & Alloys (Topic). 2020. link Times cited: 60 Abstract: Mg grain boundary (GB) segregation and GB diffusion can impa… read more USED (high confidence) H. Zhao et al., “Interplay of Chemistry and Faceting at Grain Boundaries in a Model Al Alloy.,” Physical review letters. 2020. link Times cited: 23 Abstract: The boundary between two crystal grains can decompose into a… read more USED (high confidence) L. Karkina, I. Karkin, A. Kuznetsov, and Y. Gornostyrev, “Alloying Element Segregation and Grain Boundary Reconstruction, Atomistic Modeling.” 2019. link Times cited: 8 Abstract: Grain boundary (GB) segregation is an important phenomenon t… read more USED (high confidence) S. Hocker, H. Lipp, and S. Schmauder, “Precipitation, planar defects and dislocations in alloys: Simulations on Ni3Si and Ni3Al precipitates,” The European Physical Journal Special Topics. 2019. link Times cited: 5 USED (high confidence) A. Kazemi and S. Yang, “Atomistic Study of the Effect of Magnesium Dopants on the Strength of Nanocrystalline Aluminum,” JOM. 2019. link Times cited: 37 USED (high confidence) C. Tang, J. Yi, W. Xu, and M. Ferry, “Temperature rise in shear bands in a simulated metallic glass,” Physical Review B. 2018. link Times cited: 7 Abstract: Temperature rise ($\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}T$) associate… read more USED (high confidence) P. D. Yang Sun et al., “Effects of Dopants on the Glass Forming Ability in Al-Based Metallic Alloy,” EngRN: Metals & Alloys (Topic). 2018. link Times cited: 9 Abstract: The effect of dopants on the metallic glass forming ability … read more USED (high confidence) L. E. Kar’kina, I. N. Kar’kin, A. R. Kuznetsov, and Y. Gornostyrev, “Grain-Boundary Shear-Migration Coupling in Al Bicrystals. Atomistic Modeling,” Physics of the Solid State. 2018. link Times cited: 16 USED (high confidence) G. Anciaux, T. Junge, M. Hodapp, J. Cho, J. Molinari, and W. Curtin, “The Coupled Atomistic/Discrete-Dislocation method in 3d part I: Concept and algorithms,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2018. link Times cited: 38 USED (high confidence) T. Zhang, W.-xian Wang, J. Zhou, X. Cao, R. Xie, and Y. Wei, “Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Experimental Investigations of Atomic Diffusion Behavior at Bonding Interface in an Explosively Welded Al/Mg Alloy Composite Plate,” Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters). 2017. link Times cited: 23 USED (high confidence) A. Zinovev, M. G. Bapanina, R. Babicheva, N. Enikeev, S. Dmitriev, and K. Zhou, “Deformation of nanocrystalline binary aluminum alloys with segregation of Mg, Co and Ti at grain boundaries,” Physics of Metals and Metallography. 2017. link Times cited: 6 USED (high confidence) G. Zu and S. Groh, “Effect of segregated alloying element on the intrinsic fracture behavior of Mg,” Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics. 2016. link Times cited: 3 USED (high confidence) M. Bahramyan, R. T. Mousavian, and D. Brabazon, “Molecular dynamic simulation of edge dislocation-void interaction in pure Al and Al-Mg alloy,” Materials Science and Engineering A-structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing. 2016. link Times cited: 14 USED (high confidence) P. Li, Z. Liu, and Z. P. Zhang, “The initial stage of surface modification of magnesium alloys by high intensity pulse ions beam,” Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B-beam Interactions With Materials and Atoms. 2016. link Times cited: 2 USED (high confidence) R. Babicheva et al., “Elastic moduli of nanocrystalline binary Al alloys with Fe, Co, Ti, Mg and Pb alloying elements,” Philosophical Magazine. 2016. link Times cited: 13 Abstract: The paper studies the elastic moduli of nanocrystalline (NC)… read more USED (high confidence) M. J. Rahman, H. Zurob, and J. Hoyt, “Molecular Dynamics Study of Solute Pinning Effects on Grain Boundary Migration in the Aluminum Magnesium Alloy System,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2016. link Times cited: 22 USED (high confidence) H. Song and J. Hoyt, “An atomistic simulation study of the crystallographic orientation relationships during the austenite to ferrite transformation in pure Fe,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2015. link Times cited: 21 Abstract: Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on a model of pure Fe ha… read more USED (high confidence) M. Kramer, M. Mendelev, and M. Asta, “Structure of liquid Al and Al67Mg33 alloy: comparison between experiment and simulation,” Philosophical Magazine. 2014. link Times cited: 9 Abstract: We report data on the structure of liquid Al and an Al67Mg33… read more USED (high confidence) L. Shen, “Molecular dynamics study of Al solute-dislocation interactions in Mg alloys,” Interaction and multiscale mechanics. 2013. link Times cited: 7 Abstract: In this study, atomistic simulations are performed to study … read more USED (high confidence) J. Hoyt and A. A. Potter, “A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study of the Cavitation Pressure in Liquid Al,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2012. link Times cited: 15 USED (high confidence) S. Yan, “Multiscale study of the properties of hybrid laser-welded Al-Mg-Si alloy joints.” 2019. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: ............................................................… read more USED (high confidence) D. Sun, “Proliferation of Twinning in Metals: Application to Magnesium Alloys.” 2018. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: In the search for new alloys with a great strength-to-weight… read more USED (high confidence) T. Junge, “Modelling Plasticity in Nanoscale Contact.” 2014. link Times cited: 6 Abstract: The problem of mechanical contact is a truly multiscale one.… read more USED (low confidence) M. E. Ayoubi, A. Khmich, A. Samiri, and A. Hasnaoui, “Investigating medium range order in Mg-Al binary metallic glasses: Molecular dynamics approach,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) Z. Zhang and C. Deng, “Hydrostatic pressure-induced transition in grain boundary segregation tendency in nanocrystalline metals,” Scripta Materialia. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) L. Han et al., “Revealing the key structural characteristics governing the glass forming ability in Ca50Mg50-xZnx alloys,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) A. Moitra, “Twin-boundary and precipitate interaction in Mg–Al alloy: an MD study,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: Strengthening of Mg-alloys by precipitation is much less eff… read more USED (low confidence) Z. Ma and Z. Pan, “Efficient machine learning of solute segregation energy based on physics-informed features,” Scientific Reports. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) Z. Zhang and C. Deng, “Solid solution softening in single crystalline metal nanowires studied by atomistic simulations,” Physical Review Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) M. Abu-Shams and Q. Altwarah, “Deformation characteristics and dislocation quantification of aluminum-magnesium alloy with different 〈0 0 1〉 tilt grain boundaries using MD simulation,” Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) N. Tuchinda and C. Schuh, “Triple junction solute segregation in Al-based polycrystals,” Physical Review Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) M. Trybula, A. Żydek, P. Korzhavyi, and J. Wojewoda-Budka, “Structure and Behavior of Oxide-Coated Aluminum in Contact with Acidic and Alkaline Aqueous Solutions─A Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2023. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) C. Hu, S. Berbenni, D. Medlin, and R. Dingreville, “Discontinuous segregation patterning across disconnections,” Acta Materialia. 2023. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) B. Waters, D. S. Karls, I. Nikiforov, R. Elliott, E. Tadmor, and B. Runnels, “Automated determination of grain boundary energy and potential-dependence using the OpenKIM framework,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) N. Ma et al., “Unraveling the enhanced stability and strength of Al Σ9 (221)[$ 1\bar10 $] symmetric tilt grain boundary with Mg segregation,” Journal of Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) D. Choudhuri, B. Majumdar, and H. Wilkinson, “Investigation of in-liquid ordering mediated transformations in Al-Sc via
ab initio
molecular dynamics and unsupervised learning,” Physical Review Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) L. E. Kar’kina, I. N. Kar’kin, and Y. Gornostyrev, “The Formation of Segregations and Nanofaceting of Asymmetric Special Grain Boundaries in Al,” Physics of Metals and Metallography. 2022. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) M. E. Fernandez, R. Dingreville, and D. Spearot, “Statistical perspective on embrittling potency for intergranular fracture,” Physical Review Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) L. Meng and X. Yao, “Atomic Order Evolution on the Length Scale in Metallic Glasses,” Materials Today Communications. 2022. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) W. Ye, M. Misra, P. Menezes, and L. Mushongera, “Influence of Grain Boundary Character on Dopants Segregation in Nanocrystalline Aluminum,” Metals and Materials International. 2022. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) A. Prakash et al., “Mechanistic Origin of Orientation-Dependent Substructure Evolution in Aluminum and Aluminum-Magnesium Alloys,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2022. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) X. Lv, X.-Y. Li, and H.-B. Liu, “Coherent-interface-induced second hardening deformation of Al-Mg-Al nanolayers by molecular dynamics simulations.,” Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP. 2022. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: Thermal diffusion plays an important role in the determinati… read more USED (low confidence) H. Xue, T. Cui, H. Guo, R. Chu, C.-xiang Zhang, and J. Luo, “A molecular dynamics study on the cyclic plastic deformation mechanism of Al–Mg alloys,” Journal of Applied Physics. 2022. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) X. Lv and X.-Y. Li, “Melting at Mg/Al interface in Mg–Al–Mg nanolayer by molecular dynamics simulations,” Nanotechnology. 2021. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: The melting at the magnesium/aluminum (Mg/Al) interface is a… read more USED (low confidence) Z. Jian et al., “Shock-induced plasticity and phase transformation in single crystal magnesium: an interatomic potential and non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2021. link Times cited: 8 Abstract: An effective and reliable Finnis–Sinclair (FS) type potentia… read more USED (low confidence) W. Ye, J. Hohl, M. Misra, Y. Liao, and L. Mushongera, “Grain boundary relaxation in doped nano-grained aluminum,” Materials Today Communications. 2021. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) N. Tuchinda and C. Schuh, “Grain Size Dependencies of Intergranular Solute Segregation in Nanocrystalline Materials,” Acta Materialia. 2021. link Times cited: 15 USED (low confidence) W. Ye, P. Kumar, M. Misra, and L. Mushongera, “Local damage in grain boundary stabilized nanocrystalline aluminum,” Materials Letters. 2021. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) M. Wagih and C. Schuh, “Thermodynamics and design of nanocrystalline alloys using grain boundary segregation spectra,” Acta Materialia. 2021. link Times cited: 20 USED (low confidence) W. Zhu, J. Du, and G. Jiang, “Effect of pore shape and porosity on the elastic and fracture properties of nanoporous Mg and Mg17Al12,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) C. M. Andolina, J. G. Wright, N. Das, and W. Saidi, “Improved Al-Mg alloy surface segregation predictions with a machine learning atomistic potential,” Physical Review Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 14 Abstract: Various industrial/commercial applications use Al-Mg alloys,… read more USED (low confidence) A. Rajput and S. Paul, “Effect of soft and hard inclusions in tensile deformation and damage mechanism of Aluminum: A molecular dynamics study,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2021. link Times cited: 14 USED (low confidence) L.-F. Zhu, J. Janssen, S. Ishibashi, F. Körmann, B. Grabowski, and J. Neugebauer, “A fully automated approach to calculate the melting temperature of elemental crystals,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 17 USED (low confidence) X. Liao et al., “Interatomic potentials and defect properties of Fe–Cr–Al alloys,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 12 USED (low confidence) A. Kazemi and S. Yang, “Effects of magnesium dopants on grain boundary migration in aluminum-magnesium alloys,” Computational Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 30 USED (low confidence) M. Wagih and C. Schuh, “Grain boundary segregation beyond the dilute limit: Separating the two contributions of site spectrality and solute interactions,” Acta Materialia. 2020. link Times cited: 38 USED (low confidence) M. S. Nitol, S. Adibi, C. Barrett, and J. Wilkerson, “Solid solution softening in dislocation-starved Mg–Al alloys,” Mechanics of Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 15 USED (low confidence) A. Moitra, “Atomistic simulations of precipitation hardening mechanisms in Mg-Al alloys,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: Precipitation hardening of Mg-Al alloys primarily comes from… read more USED (low confidence) S. Mojumder, M. Mahboob, and M. Motalab, “Atomistic and finite element study of nanoindentation in pure aluminum,” Materials Today Communications. 2020. link Times cited: 10 USED (low confidence) Y. Liu, H. Yan, and X. Cui, “Underlying Mechanisms of the Electrolyte Structure and Dynamics on the Doped-Anode of Magnesium Batteries Based on the Molecular Dynamics Simulations,” Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage. 2020. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: As a potential energy storage cell, the rechargeable magnesi… read more USED (low confidence) D. Kumar, S. Goel, N. Gosvami, and J. Jain, “Towards an improved understanding of plasticity, friction and wear mechanisms in precipitate containing AZ91 Mg alloy,” Materialia. 2020. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) H. Chabba and D. Dafir, “Compression Behavior of Al-Mg Phases, Molecular Dynamics Simulation,” International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa. 2020. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: Aluminum alloys development always exit in the manufacturing… read more USED (low confidence) B. Yu et al., “MD study on topologically close-packed and configuration entropy of Mg40Al60 metallic glasses under rapid solidification,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2019. link Times cited: 6 USED (low confidence) M. Wagih and C. Schuh, “Spectrum of grain boundary segregation energies in a polycrystal,” Acta Materialia. 2019. link Times cited: 74 USED (low confidence) X. Zhou, L. Wang, and C. Chen, “Improving ductility of nanoporous metallic glasses,” Computational Materials Science. 2019. link Times cited: 15 USED (low confidence) G. Esteban-Manzanares, A. Ma, I. Papadimitriou, E. Martínez, and J. Llorca, “Basal dislocation/precipitate interactions in Mg–Al alloys: an atomistic investigation,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. link Times cited: 19 Abstract: The interaction between edge basal dislocations and β-Mg17Al… read more USED (low confidence) A. Devaraj et al., “Grain boundary segregation and intermetallic precipitation in coarsening resistant nanocrystalline aluminum alloys,” Acta Materialia. 2019. link Times cited: 76 USED (low confidence) S. Yan, H. Zhou, B. Xing, S. Zhang, L. Li, and Q. Qin, “Crystal plasticity in fusion zone of a hybrid laser welded Al alloys joint: From nanoscale to macroscale,” Materials & Design. 2018. link Times cited: 13 USED (low confidence) Z. Li, J. Wang, and W. Liu, “Basal 〈a〉 dislocation-1¯011 contraction twin interactions in magnesium,” Computational Materials Science. 2018. link Times cited: 11 USED (low confidence) X. Zhou, L. Wang, and C. Chen, “Strengthening mechanisms in nanoporous metallic glasses,” Computational Materials Science. 2018. link Times cited: 28 USED (low confidence) S. Kumar, “Evolution of nano-porous structure of aluminium-magnesium alloy during multi-axial tensile deformation: Estimation of stress-strain response and dimension-less aspect ratio,” Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2018. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) H. N. Pishkenari, F. S. Yousefi, and A. Taghibakhshi, “Determination of surface properties and elastic constants of FCC metals: a comparison among different EAM potentials in thin film and bulk scale,” Materials Research Express. 2018. link Times cited: 22 Abstract: Three independent elastic constants C11, C12, and C44 were c… read more USED (low confidence) M. Tang, D. Fan, L. Wang, and S. Luo, “Deformation of metals under dynamic loading: Characterization via atomic-scale orientation mapping,” Computational Materials Science. 2018. link Times cited: 11 USED (low confidence) S. Kumar and S. Das, “Characterization of mechanical properties and nano-porous structure of Aluminium-Magnesium alloy during multi-axial tensile deformation: An atomistic investigation,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2018. link Times cited: 12 USED (low confidence) K. Choudhary, A. Biacchi, S. Ghosh, L. Hale, A. Walker, and F. Tavazza, “High-throughput assessment of vacancy formation and surface energies of materials using classical force-fields,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2018. link Times cited: 16 Abstract: In this work, we present an open access database for surface… read more USED (low confidence) H. Song and J. Hoyt, “A molecular dynamics study of the nucleus interface structure and orientation relationships during the austenite-to-ferrite transformation in pure Fe,” Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly. 2018. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: ABSTRACT Molecular dynamics simulations using an embedded-at… read more USED (low confidence) L. Huber, B. Grabowski, M. Militzer, J. Neugebauer, and J. Rottler, “Ab initio modelling of solute segregation energies to a general grain boundary,” Acta Materialia. 2017. link Times cited: 44 USED (low confidence) L. Huber, B. Grabowski, M. Militzer, J. Neugebauer, and J. Rottler, “A QM/MM approach for low-symmetry defects in metals,” Computational Materials Science. 2016. link Times cited: 11 USED (low confidence) S. M. Rassoulinejad-Mousavi, Y. Mao, and Y. Zhang, “Evaluation of Copper, Aluminum and Nickel Interatomic Potentials on Predicting the Elastic Properties,” arXiv: Computational Physics. 2016. link Times cited: 63 Abstract: Choice of appropriate force field is one of the main concern… read more USED (low confidence) X. Zhou and C. Chen, “Strengthening and toughening mechanisms of amorphous/amorphous nanolaminates,” International Journal of Plasticity. 2016. link Times cited: 61 USED (low confidence) R. Babicheva et al., “Effect of grain boundary segregation on the deformation mechanisms and mechanical properties of nanocrystalline binary aluminum alloys,” Computational Materials Science. 2016. link Times cited: 49 USED (low confidence) H. Song and J. Hoyt, “A molecular dynamics study of heterogeneous nucleation at grain boundaries during solid-state phase transformations,” Computational Materials Science. 2016. link Times cited: 29 USED (low confidence) X. Zhou and C. Chen, “Atomistic investigation of the intrinsic toughening mechanism in metallic glass,” Computational Materials Science. 2016. link Times cited: 11 USED (low confidence) S. Hocker, M. Hummel, P. Binkele, H. Lipp, and S. Schmauder, “Molecular dynamics simulations of tensile tests of Ni-, Cu-, Mg- and Ti-alloyed aluminium nanopolycrystals,” Computational Materials Science. 2016. link Times cited: 12 USED (low confidence) B. Lee, S. H. Kim, J. H. Park, H. W. Kim, and J. C. Lee, “Role of Mg in simultaneously improving the strength and ductility of Al–Mg alloys,” Materials Science and Engineering A-structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing. 2016. link Times cited: 100 USED (low confidence) L. E. Kar’kina, I. N. Kar’kin, A. R. Kuznetsov, I. Razumov, P. Korzhavyi, and Y. Gornostyrev, “Solute-grain boundary interaction and segregation formation in Al : First principles calculations and molecular dynamics modeling,” Computational Materials Science. 2016. link Times cited: 33 USED (low confidence) X. Zhou, H. Zhou, X. Li, and C. Chen, “Size effects on tensile and compressive strengths in metallic glass nanowires,” Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2015. link Times cited: 60 USED (low confidence) S. Kalidindi, J. A. Gomberg, Z. Trautt, and C. Becker, “Application of data science tools to quantify and distinguish between structures and models in molecular dynamics datasets,” Nanotechnology. 2015. link Times cited: 39 Abstract: Structure quantification is key to successful mining and ext… read more USED (low confidence) P. Li, Y. Zou, and Z. P. Zhang, “Influence of high-intensity pulsed ion beam irradiation energy on magnesium alloy surface modification,” Vacuum. 2015. link Times cited: 7 USED (low confidence) L. Huber, J. Rottler, and M. Militzer, “Atomistic simulations of the interaction of alloying elements with grain boundaries in Mg,” Acta Materialia. 2014. link Times cited: 45 USED (low confidence) Y. Sun et al., “‘Crystal Genes’ in Metallic Liquids and Glasses,” Scientific Reports. 2014. link Times cited: 59 USED (low confidence) M. J. Rahman, H. Zurob, and J. Hoyt, “A comprehensive molecular dynamics study of low-angle grain boundary mobility in a pure aluminum system,” Acta Materialia. 2014. link Times cited: 29 USED (low confidence) M. Horstemeyer, “Case Study: Conducting a Structural Scale Metal Forming Finite Element Analysis Starting from Electronics Structures Calculations Using ICME Tools.” 2012. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) C. Wang and C. Wong, “Short-to-medium range order of Al–Mg metallic glasses studied by molecular dynamics simulations,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2011. link Times cited: 37 USED (low confidence) M. Asta, “Computational Investigations of Solid-Liquid Interfaces.” 2011. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: In a variety of materials synthesis and processing contexts,… read more USED (low confidence) L. Shen, G. Proust, and G. Ranzi, “An atomistic study of dislocation-solute interaction in Mg-Al alloys,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2010. link Times cited: 6 Abstract: In this study, atomistic simulations are performed to study … read more USED (low confidence) S. Groh and M. K. Nahhas, “Modeling Dislocation in Binary Magnesium-Based Alloys Using Atomistic Method,” Handbook of Mechanics of Materials. 2019. link Times cited: 1 NOT USED (low confidence) Z. Trautt, F. Tavazza, and C. Becker, “Facilitating the selection and creation of accurate interatomic potentials with robust tools and characterization,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2015. link Times cited: 14 Abstract: The Materials Genome Initiative seeks to significantly decre… read more NOT USED (low confidence) K. Zhang, M. Fan, Y. Liu, J. Schroers, M. Shattuck, and C. O’Hern, “Beyond packing of hard spheres: The effects of core softness, non-additivity, intermediate-range repulsion, and many-body interactions on the glass-forming ability of bulk metallic glasses.,” The Journal of chemical physics. 2015. link Times cited: 16 Abstract: When a liquid is cooled well below its melting temperature a… read more NOT USED (high confidence) H. Wang, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Crystal Structure Prediction of Binary Alloys via Deep Potential,” Frontiers in Chemistry. 2020. link Times cited: 9 Abstract: Predicting crystal structure has been a challenging problem … read more NOT USED (high confidence) M. Wagih, P. M. Larsen, and C. Schuh, “Learning grain boundary segregation energy spectra in polycrystals,” Nature Communications. 2020. link Times cited: 62 NOT USED (high confidence) W. Jiang, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Accurate Deep Potential model for the Al–Cu–Mg alloy in the full concentration space*,” arXiv: Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 24 Abstract: Combining first-principles accuracy and empirical-potential … read more NOT USED (high confidence) J.-yu Zhai, X. Song, A. Xu, Y.-gang Chen, and Q. Han, “Dislocation Damping and Defect Friction Damping in Magnesium: Molecular Dynamics Study,” Metals and Materials International. 2019. link Times cited: 7 NOT USED (high confidence) S. Kavousi, B. R. Novak, M. Baskes, M. A. Zaeem, and D. Moldovan, “Modified embedded-atom method potential for high-temperature crystal-melt properties of Ti–Ni alloys and its application to phase field simulation of solidification,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. link Times cited: 21 Abstract: We developed new interatomic potentials, based on the second… read more NOT USED (high confidence) L. Hale, “Comparing Modeling Predictions of Aluminum Edge Dislocations: Semidiscrete Variational Peierls–Nabarro Versus Atomistics,” JOM. 2018. link Times cited: 7 NOT USED (high confidence) M. K. Nahhas and S. Groh, “Atomistic modeling of grain boundary behavior under shear conditions in magnesium and magnesium-based binary alloys,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 2018. link Times cited: 12 NOT USED (high confidence) H. Zhuang, M. Chen, and E. Carter, “Prediction and characterization of an Mg-Al intermetallic compound with potentially improved ductility via orbital-free and Kohn-Sham density functional theory,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2017. link Times cited: 7 Abstract: Magnesium-aluminum (Mg-Al) intermetallic compounds that form… read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. Groh, “Modified embedded-atom potential for B2-MgAg,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2016. link Times cited: 5 Abstract: Interatomic potentials for pure Ag and Mg–Ag alloy have been… read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. Parviainen, F. Djurabekova, S. Fitzgerald, A. Ruzibaev, and K. Nordlund, “Atomistic simulations of field assisted evaporation in atom probe tomography,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2016. link Times cited: 19 Abstract: Atom probe tomography (APT) is an extremely powerful techniq… read more NOT USED (high confidence) K. Choudhary et al., “Charge optimized many-body potential for aluminum,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2014. link Times cited: 19 Abstract: An interatomic potential for Al is developed within the thir… read more NOT USED (high confidence) M. Mendelev, M. Kramer, S. Hao, K. Ho, and C. Z. Wang, “Development of interatomic potentials appropriate for simulation of liquid and glass properties of NiZr2 alloy,” Philosophical Magazine. 2012. link Times cited: 116 Abstract: A new interatomic potential for the Ni–Zr system is presente… read more NOT USED (high confidence) B. Jelinek et al., “Modified embedded atom method potential for Al, Si, Mg, Cu, and Fe alloys,” Physical Review B. 2011. link Times cited: 218 Abstract: A set of modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) potentials for… read more NOT USED (high confidence) L. Proville and S. Patinet, “Atomic-scale models for hardening in fcc solid solutions,” Physical Review B. 2010. link Times cited: 31 Abstract: Atomic-scale simulations are associated with an elastic line… read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. Kavousi, “Combined Molecular Dynamics and Phase Field Simulation of Crystal Melt Interfacial Properties and Microstructure Evolution during Rapid Solidification of TI-NI Alloys.” 2019. link Times cited: 0 |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_658278549784_005 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| EAM_Dynamo_MendelevAstaRahman_2009_AlMg__MO_658278549784_005 |
DOI |
10.25950/fbec42d2 https://doi.org/10.25950/fbec42d2 https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/fbec42d2 |
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 |
Driver | EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 |
KIM API Version | 2.0 |
Potential Type | eam |
Programming Language(s)
The programming languages used in the code and the percentage of the code written in each one. "N/A" means "not applicable" and refers to model parameterizations which only include parameter tables and have no programming language.
| N/A |
Previous Version | EAM_Dynamo_MendelevAstaRahman_2009_AlMg__MO_658278549784_004 |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
B | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Al v004 | view | 14452 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Mg v004 | view | 15933 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Al v004 | view | 22289 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Mg v004 | view | 14959 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Al v004 | view | 14263 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Mg v004 | view | 17448 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Al v004 | view | 23966 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Mg v004 | view | 14372 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for AlMg in AFLOW crystal prototype A12B17_cI58_217_g_acg at zero temperature and pressure v000 | view | 199597 | |
Elastic constants for AlMg in AFLOW crystal prototype A14B13_cI54_229_ef_ah at zero temperature and pressure v000 | view | 1699883 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc Al at zero temperature v006 | view | 1887 | |
Elastic constants for bcc Mg at zero temperature v006 | view | 2303 | |
Elastic constants for diamond Al at zero temperature v001 | view | 2975 | |
Elastic constants for diamond Mg at zero temperature v001 | view | 2623 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Al at zero temperature v006 | view | 1663 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Mg at zero temperature v006 | view | 2143 | |
Elastic constants for sc Al at zero temperature v006 | view | 4830 | |
Elastic constants for sc Mg at zero temperature v006 | view | 2207 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp Al at zero temperature v004 | view | 2229 | |
Elastic constants for hcp Mg at zero temperature v004 | view | 1910 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v003 | view | 12396369 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 | view | 22873861 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 | view | 19593555 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 | view | 82151215 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Al v007 | view | 1919 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Mg v007 | view | 2431 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Al v007 | view | 2495 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Mg v007 | view | 3775 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Al v007 | view | 5150 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Mg v007 | view | 4191 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Al v007 | view | 2559 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Mg v007 | view | 2271 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Al v005 | view | 24259 | |
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Mg v005 | view | 48200 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Al at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 | view | 1409317 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Al v004 | view | 50543 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Al v002 | view | 9577315 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Al v004 | view | 26327 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Al | view | 560178 | |
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for hcp Mg | view | 346973 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Al | view | 1194566 | |
Vacancy formation and migration energy for hcp Mg | view | 1121093 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlMg in AFLOW crystal prototype A12B17_cI58_217_g_acg v000 | other | view |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlMg in AFLOW crystal prototype A67B41_cP108_221_aeh2il_cfgm v000 | other | view |
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevAstaRahman_2009_AlMg__MO_658278549784_005.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevAstaRahman_2009_AlMg__MO_658278549784_005.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 appear below.
EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.zip | Zip | Windows archive |