EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for Fe developed by Mendelev et al. (2003); Potential #2 v005

Mikhail I. Mendelev; Graeme J. Ackland; David J. Srolovitz; Seungwu Han; Mark Asta; Deyan Sun

doi:10.25950/f3e7b22d

Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

EAM_Dynamo_MendelevHanSrolovitz_2003Potential2_Fe__MO_769582363439_005

Interatomic potential for Iron (Fe).
Use this Potential

Title A single sentence description.	EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for Fe developed by Mendelev et al. (2003); Potential #2 v005
Description A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.	Two procedures were developed to fit interatomic potentials of the embedded-atom method (EAM) form and applied to determine a potential which describes crystalline and liquid iron. While both procedures use perfect crystal and crystal defect data, the first procedure also employs the first-principles forces in a model liquid and the second procedure uses experimental liquid structure factor data. These additional types of information were incorporated to ensure more reasonable descriptions of atomic interactions at small separations than is provided using standard approaches, such as fitting to the universal binding energy relation. The new potentials (provided herein) are, on average, in better agreement with the experimental or first-principles lattice parameter, elastic constants, point-defect energies, bcc–fcc transformation energy, liquid density, liquid structure factor, melting temperature and other properties than other existing EAM iron potentials. This is potential #2 from [M.I. Mendelev, S. Han, D.J. Srolovitz, G.J. Ackland, D.Y. Sun and M. Asta, Phil. Mag. 83, 3977-3994 (2003)], which is the most popular one. This potential is similar to https://openkim.org/cite/MO_807997826449_000, but gives different results for very small interatomic distances (The other potential is in fact the deprecated potential referred to in the March 9, 2009 update on the NIST repository). The file header includes a note from the NIST contributor: "The potential was taken from v9_4_bcc (in C:\SIMULATION.MD\Fe\Results\ab_initio+Interstitials)"
Species The supported atomic species.	Fe
Disclaimer A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.	Note that there is a typographical error in the table of parameters for this potential in the paper describing it [1]. This is potential is suitable for the simulation of the bcc Fe or solidification. For simulation of the fcc phase, one can use the Fe part from the Fe-Ni-Cr potential developed by Mendelev instead (https://openkim.org/id/EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005).
Content Origin	http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/Fe.html

Contributor	Mikhail I. Mendelev
Maintainer	Mikhail I. Mendelev
Developer	Mikhail I. Mendelev Graeme J. Ackland David J. Srolovitz Seungwu Han Mark Asta Deyan Sun
Published on KIM	2018
How to Cite	This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5]. [1] Mendelev MI, Han S, Srolovitz DJ, Ackland GJ, Sun DY, Asta M. Development of new interatomic potentials appropriate for crystalline and liquid iron. Philosophical Magazine. 2003;83(35):3977–94. doi:10.1080/14786430310001613264 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Mendelev MI, Ackland GJ, Srolovitz DJ, Han S, Asta M, Sun D. EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for Fe developed by Mendelev et al. (2003); Potential #2 v005. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/f3e7b22d [3] Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS, Plimpton SJ. EAM Model Driver for tabulated potentials with cubic Hermite spline interpolation as used in LAMMPS v005. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/68defa36 [4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Citations This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm.	This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. Show Model Used Show All Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
Funding	Not available

Short KIM ID The unique KIM identifier code.	MO_769582363439_005
Extended KIM ID The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.	EAM_Dynamo_MendelevHanSrolovitz_2003Potential2_Fe__MO_769582363439_005
DOI	10.25950/f3e7b22d https://doi.org/10.25950/f3e7b22d https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/f3e7b22d
KIM Item Type Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).	Portable Model using Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005
Driver	EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005
KIM API Version	2.0
Potential Type	eam
Programming Language(s) The programming languages used in the code and the percentage of the code written in each one. "N/A" means "not applicable" and refers to model parameterizations which only include parameter tables and have no programming language.	N/A

Previous Version	EAM_Dynamo_MendelevHanSrolovitz_2003Potential2_Fe__MO_769582363439_004

Verification Check Dashboard

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade	Name	Category	Brief Description	Full Results	Aux File(s)
P All elements claimed by model are supported in at least one of the tested configurations.	vc-species-supported-as-stated	mandatory	The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.	Results	Files
P Periodic boundary conditions were correctly supported for all configurations that the model was able to compute.	vc-periodicity-support	mandatory	Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.	Results	Files
P Model energy has permutation symmetry for all configurations the model was able to compute.	vc-permutation-symmetry	mandatory	Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.	Results	Files
B The letter grade B was assigned because the normalized error in the computation was 1.02158e-08 compared with a machine precision of 2.22045e-16. The letter grade was based on 'score=log10(error/eps)', with ranges A=[0, 7.5], B=(7.5, 10.0], C=(10.0, 12.5], D=(12.5, 15.0), F>15.0. 'A' is the best grade, and 'F' indicates failure.	vc-forces-numerical-derivative	consistency	Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.	Results	Files
P The model is C^1 continuous. This means that the model has continuous energy and continuous first derivative.	vc-dimer-continuity-c1	informational	The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.	Results	Files
P Model energy and forces are invariant with respect to rigid-body motion (translation and rotation) for all configurations the model was able to compute.	vc-objectivity	informational	Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.	Results	Files
P Model energy has inversion symmetry for all configurations the model was able to compute.	vc-inversion-symmetry	informational	Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.	Results	Files
P No memory leak detected.	vc-memory-leak	informational	The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.	Results	Files
P All threads give identical results for tested case. Model appears to be thread-safe.	vc-thread-safe	mandatory	The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.	Results	Files
P Unit conversion successful	vc-unit-conversion	mandatory	The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.	Results	Files

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Fe

Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Fe

Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Fe

Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Fe

FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Fe

FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Fe

Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Fe

Tests

Disclaimer From Model Developer

Note that there is a typographical error in the table of parameters for this potential in the paper describing it [1]. This is potential is suitable for the simulation of the bcc Fe or solidification. For simulation of the fcc phase, one can use the Fe part from the Fe-Ni-Cr potential developed by Mendelev instead
(https://openkim.org/id/EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005).

CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003

Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Fe v004	view	7390
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Fe v004	view	13753
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Fe v004	view	10772
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Fe v004	view	11368

ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006

Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Fe at zero temperature v006	view	2079
Elastic constants for fcc Fe at zero temperature v006	view	1951
Elastic constants for sc Fe at zero temperature v006	view	1376

ElasticConstantsHexagonal__TD_612503193866_004

Elastic constants for hexagonal crystals at zero temperature v004

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/d794c746

Computes the elastic constants for hcp crystals by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for hcp Fe at zero temperature v004		view	1464

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002

Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2f2c4ad3

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002	view	86218
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002	view	49033
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002	view	47575
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v002	view	115216

GrainBoundaryCubicCrystalSymmetricTiltRelaxedEnergyVsAngle__TD_410381120771_002

Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v002

Creators: Brandon Runnels
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/4723cee7

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Fe v000		view	109531873

GrainBoundaryCubicCrystalSymmetricTiltRelaxedEnergyVsAngle__TD_410381120771_003

Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v003

Creators:
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2c59c9d6

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Fe v001	view	3221122
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Fe v001	view	9230883
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Fe v001	view	4527111
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Fe v001	view	16927207
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Fe v001	view	15056324
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Fe v001	view	129862804
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Fe v001	view	84976955

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_007

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Fe v007	view	2079
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Fe v007	view	3423
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Fe v007	view	4095
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Fe v007	view	1951

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005

Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Fe v005		view	29544

LinearThermalExpansionCoeffCubic__TD_522633393614_002

Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v002

Creators:
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/9d9822ec

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of bcc Fe at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002		view	342565

SurfaceEnergyCubicCrystalBrokenBondFit__TD_955413365818_004

High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in bcc Fe v004		view	16410

VacancyFormationEnergyRelaxationVolume__TD_647413317626_001

Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fca89cea

Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for bcc Fe		view	362875

VacancyFormationMigration__TD_554849987965_001

Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for bcc Fe		view	5222417

Errors

ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006

Test	Error Categories	Link to Error page
Elastic constants for diamond Fe at zero temperature v001	other	view

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002

Test	Error Categories	Link to Error page
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP1_123_a v002	other	view

GrainBoundaryCubicCrystalSymmetricTiltRelaxedEnergyVsAngle__TD_410381120771_003

Test	Error Categories	Link to Error page
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Fe v001	other	view

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_006

Test	Error Categories	Link to Error page
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Fe	other	view

Files

CMakeLists.txt
Fe_2.eam.fs
LICENSE.CDDL
kimprovenance.edn
kimspec.edn

Download

EAM_Dynamo_MendelevHanSrolovitz_2003Potential2_Fe__MO_769582363439_005.txz	Tar+XZ	Linux and OS X archive
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevHanSrolovitz_2003Potential2_Fe__MO_769582363439_005.zip	Zip	Windows archive

Download Dependency

This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 appear below.

EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.txz	Tar+XZ	Linux and OS X archive
EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.zip	Zip	Windows archive

Wiki

**Notes:**

This potential is identical to [EAM_MagneticCubic_MendelevHanSrolovitz_2003_Fe__MO_856295952425_002](https://openkim.org/cite/MO_856295952425_002).  They differ only in terms of their specific implementation.  The Fe-Fe interactions of [EAM_Dynamo_BonnyPasianotMalerba_2009_FeNi__MO_267721408934_005](https://openkim.org/cite/MO_267721408934_005) and [EAM_Dynamo_BonnyPasianotCastin_2009_FeCuNi__MO_469343973171_005](https://openkim.org/cite/MO_469343973171_005) are similar to those of this potential but were altered to account for certain invariances of the energy inherent to the EAM formalism.

**Data used in fitting:**

This potential's parameters were fitted using the equilibrium, zero-temperature lattice constants of bcc and fcc iron ($$\alpha$$-Fe and $$\gamma$$-Fe, resp.), the unrelaxed monovacancy formation energy in bcc iron, the potential energy difference that exists between the equilibrium bcc and fcc Fe lattices, and the cubic elastic constants (C$$_{11}$$, C$$_{12}$$, C$$_{44}$$) of bcc Fe.  First-principles relaxed formation energies of <100>, <110> and <111> dumbbell interstitials were also present in the training set, as well as an experimental value for the average density of liquid iron.  In addition, first-principles (GGA DFT) atomic forces found in liquid Fe configurations which were generated using a simple pair potential (see text for more details) were used to determine its parameters.

For those interested in this potential, the source article listed at the top of this page (Mendelev. Phil. Mag. 83, 2003) also includes a comparison with [EAM_Dynamo_AcklandBaconCalder_1997_Fe__MO_142799717516_005](https://openkim.org/cite/MO_142799717516_005).

EAM_Dynamo_MendelevHanSrolovitz_2003Potential2_Fe__MO_769582363439_005

Verification Check Dashboard

Visualizers (in-page)

BCC Lattice Constant

Cohesive Energy Graph

Diamond Lattice Constant

Dislocation Core Energies

FCC Elastic Constants

FCC Lattice Constant

FCC Stacking Fault Energies

FCC Surface Energies

SC Lattice Constant

Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Tests

Disclaimer From Model Developer

Errors

Files

Download

Download Dependency

Wiki