Title
A single sentence description.
|
Finnis-Sinclair potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for Cu with improved stacking fault energy developed by Mendelv and King (2013) v005 |
---|---|
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
The same as the Cu potential in [M.I. Mendelev, M.J. Kramer, C.A. Becker and M. Asta, Phil. Mag. 88, 1723 - 1750 (2008).] except of improvement of stacking fault energy. |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| Cu |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/Cu.html |
Contributor |
Mikhail I. Mendelev |
Maintainer |
Mikhail I. Mendelev |
Developer |
Alexander King Mikhail I. Mendelev |
Published on KIM | 2018 |
How to Cite |
This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5]. [1] Mendelev MI, King AH. The interactions of self-interstitials with twin boundaries. Philosophical Magazine. 2013;93(10-12):1268–78. doi:10.1080/14786435.2012.747012 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] King A, Mendelev MI. Finnis-Sinclair potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for Cu with improved stacking fault energy developed by Mendelv and King (2013) v005. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/34748b8d [3] Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS, Plimpton SJ. EAM Model Driver for tabulated potentials with cubic Hermite spline interpolation as used in LAMMPS v005. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/68defa36 [4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 53 Citations (37 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (high confidence) N. Dubinin and R. Ryltsev, “Effective Pair Interactions and Structure in Liquid Noble Metals within Wills-Harrison and Bretonnet-Silbert Models,” Metals. 2021. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: Recently, for calculating the effective pair interactions in… read more USED (high confidence) K. Zolnikov, D. Kryzhevich, and A. Korchuganov, “Regularities of Structural Rearrangements in Single- and Bicrystals Near the Contact Zone,” Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering. 2020. link Times cited: 0 USED (high confidence) V. Kulagin, A. A. Itskovich, A. Rodin, and B. Bokshteĭn, “Effect of Grain-Boundary Segregation on the Diffusion of Atoms in Grain Boundaries in Copper-Based Systems,” Russian Metallurgy (Metally). 2020. link Times cited: 1 USED (high confidence) K. V. Reddy, C. Deng, and S. Pal, “Intensification of shock damage through heterogeneous phase transition and dislocation loop formation due to presence of pre-existing line defects in single crystal Cu,” Journal of Applied Physics. 2019. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: In general, shock wave deformation studies of perfect single… read more USED (high confidence) S. Hayakawa, T. Okita, M. Itakura, T. Kawabata, and K. Suzuki, “Atomistic simulations for the effects of stacking fault energy on defect formations by displacement cascades in FCC metals under Poisson’s deformation,” Journal of Materials Science. 2019. link Times cited: 10 USED (high confidence) D. Nakanishi, T. Kawabata, K. Doihara, T. Ōkita, M. Itakura, and K. Suzuki, “Effects of stacking fault energies on formation of irradiation-induced defects at various temperatures in face-centred cubic metals,” Philosophical Magazine. 2018. link Times cited: 9 Abstract: ABSTRACT By using the six sets of interatomic potentials for… read more USED (high confidence) K.-Q. Li, Z. Zhang, L.-L. Li, P. Zhang, J.-B. Yang, and Z.-F. Zhang, “Effective Stacking Fault Energy in Face-Centered Cubic Metals,” Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters). 2018. link Times cited: 4 USED (high confidence) Z. Pan and T. Rupert, “Damage nucleation from repeated dislocation absorption at a grain boundary,” arXiv: Materials Science. 2014. link Times cited: 43 USED (low confidence) S. M. Handrigan and S. Nakhla, “Generation of viable nanocrystalline structures using the melt-cool method: the influence of force field selection,” Philosophical Magazine. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) W. Ji, W. Jian, Y. Su, S. Xu, and I. Beyerlein, “Role of stacking fault energy in confined layer slip in nanolaminated Cu,” Journal of Materials Science. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) L. Safina, E. A. Rozhnova, R. Murzaev, and J. Baimova, “Effect of Interatomic Potential on Simulation of Fracture Behavior of Cu/Graphene Composite: A Molecular Dynamics Study,” Applied Sciences. 2023. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: Interatomic interaction potentials are compared using a mole… read more USED (low confidence) X. Pan et al., “Microstructure and residual stress modulation of 7075 aluminum alloy for improving fatigue performance by laser shock peening,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2023. link Times cited: 22 USED (low confidence) A. B. Sivak, D. N. Demidov, and P. A. Sivak, “Diffusion Characteristics of Self-Point Defects in Copper: Molecular Dynamic Study,” Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 2022. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) S. Pal, K. V. Reddy, and C. Deng, “Improving thermal stability and Hall-Petch breakdown relationship in nanocrystalline Cu: A molecular dynamics simulation study,” Materials Letters. 2022. link Times cited: 6 USED (low confidence) P. Wu and Y. Yang, “Melting characteristics and strain-based mechanical characterization of single metal nanoparticles,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2022. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) Y. Lin, T.-H. Yang, T.-M. Chen, and D. Pen, “Using atomic response time to explore the effect of strain rate on yielding behaviors of tensile Cu nanowire with the molecular dynamic method,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2022. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) A. Rajput and S. Paul, “Effect of void in deformation and damage mechanism of single crystal copper: a molecular dynamics study,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2021. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: The current study investigates the deformation and damage me… read more USED (low confidence) D. Roy, S. Pal, C. Tiwary, A. Gupta, P. N. Babu, and R. Mitra, “Stable nanocrystalline structure attainment and strength enhancement of Cu base alloy using bi-modal distributed tungsten dispersoids,” Philosophical Magazine. 2021. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: In this study, an experimental and atomic-scale simulationba… read more USED (low confidence) A. Rajput and S. Paul, “Bauschinger Effect Analysis in Polycrystalline Copper: an Atomistic Simulation,” Transactions of the Indian National Academy of Engineering. 2021. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) A. Rajput and S. Paul, “Bauschinger Effect Analysis in Polycrystalline Copper: an Atomistic Simulation,” Transactions of the Indian National Academy of Engineering. 2021. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) J. Yan et al., “Effects of pressure on the generalized stacking fault energy and twinning propensity of face-centered cubic metals,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2021. link Times cited: 17 USED (low confidence) Y. Yu, “Deposited Mono-component Cu Metallic Glass: A Molecular Dynamics Study,” Materials today communications. 2021. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) A. Rajput and S. Paul, “Deformation inhomogeneity at the crack tip of polycrystalline copper,” Materials today communications. 2020. link Times cited: 6 USED (low confidence) K. V. Reddy and S. Pal, “Shock velocity-dependent elastic-plastic collapse of pre-existing stacking fault tetrahedron in single crystal Cu,” Computational Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 11 USED (low confidence) A. Rajput and S. Paul, “Effect of different tensile loading modes on deformation behavior of nanocrystalline copper: Atomistic simulations.” 2019. link Times cited: 9 USED (low confidence) A. Korchuganov, K. Zolnikov, and D. S. Kryzhevich, “Atomic mechanisms of stacking fault propagation in copper crystallite,” Materials Letters. 2019. link Times cited: 26 USED (low confidence) B. Bokstein, A. Rodin, A. Itckovich, and L. Klinger, “Segregation and Phase Transitions in Grain Boundaries,” Diffusion Foundations. 2019. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: The paper is devoted to some properties of grain boundaries:… read more USED (low confidence) M. Dupraz, S. Rao, and H. V. Swygenhoven, “Large Scale 3-Dimensional Atomistic Simulations of Screw Dislocations Interacting with Coherent Twin Boundaries in Al, Cu and Ni Under Uniaxial and Multiaxial Loading Conditions,” MatSciRN: Process & Device Modeling (Topic). 2019. link Times cited: 17 USED (low confidence) A. Korchuganov et al., “Nucleation of dislocations and twins in fcc nanocrystals: Dynamics of structural transformations,” Journal of Materials Science & Technology. 2019. link Times cited: 46 USED (low confidence) H. N. Pishkenari, F. S. Yousefi, and A. Taghibakhshi, “Determination of surface properties and elastic constants of FCC metals: a comparison among different EAM potentials in thin film and bulk scale,” Materials Research Express. 2018. link Times cited: 22 Abstract: Three independent elastic constants C11, C12, and C44 were c… read more USED (low confidence) A. Itckovich, M. Mendelev, A. Rodin, and B. Bokstein, “Effect of Atomic Complexes Formation in Grain Boundaries on Grain Boundary Diffusion,” Defect and Diffusion Forum. 2018. link Times cited: 7 Abstract: The peculiarities of grain boundary diffusion in Cu connecte… read more USED (low confidence) Y. Yang, T. Okita, M. Itakura, T. Kawabata, and K. Suzuki, “Influence of stacking fault energies on the size distribution and character of defect clusters formed by collision cascades in face-centered cubic metals,” Nuclear materials and energy. 2016. link Times cited: 11 USED (low confidence) K. Li, Z. Zhang, L. Li, P. Zhang, J. Yang, and Z. F. Zhang, “The dissociation behavior of dislocation arrays in face centered cubic metals,” Computational Materials Science. 2016. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) X. Xiao, D. Song, H. Chu, J. Xue, and H. Duan, “Mechanical behaviors of irradiated FCC polycrystals with nanotwins,” International Journal of Plasticity. 2015. link Times cited: 25 USED (low confidence) L. Li et al., “Strain localization and fatigue cracking behaviors of Cu bicrystal with an inclined twin boundary,” Acta Materialia. 2014. link Times cited: 34 USED (low confidence) N. Gao, D. Perez, G. Lu, and Z. G. Wang, “Molecular dynamics study of the interaction between nanoscale interstitial dislocation loops and grain boundaries in BCC iron,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2018. link Times cited: 19 USED (low confidence) D. Liu, G. Wang, J. Yu, and Y. Rong, “Molecular dynamics simulation on formation mechanism of grain boundary steps in micro-cutting of polycrystalline copper,” Computational Materials Science. 2017. link Times cited: 32 NOT USED (low confidence) T. Olugbade and J. Lu, “Literature review on the mechanical properties of materials after surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT).” 2020. link Times cited: 76 NOT USED (low confidence) A. Hernandez, A. Balasubramanian, F. Yuan, S. Mason, and T. Mueller, “Fast, accurate, and transferable many-body interatomic potentials by symbolic regression,” npj Computational Materials. 2019. link Times cited: 51 NOT USED (low confidence) J. S. Amelang, G. Venturini, and D. Kochmann, “Summation rules for a fully nonlocal energy-based quasicontinuum method,” Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2015. link Times cited: 53 NOT USED (low confidence) I. Shepelev and E. Korznikova, “Dependence of the supersonic propagation of 2-crowdions on the stacking fault energy in FCC metals,” MATHEMATICS EDUCATION AND LEARNING. 2022. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) B. Waters, D. S. Karls, I. Nikiforov, R. Elliott, E. Tadmor, and B. Runnels, “Automated determination of grain boundary energy and potential-dependence using the OpenKIM framework,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 5 NOT USED (high confidence) J.-J. Tang et al., “Interactions between twin boundary and point defects in magnesium at low temperature,” Journal of Materials Research. 2021. link Times cited: 6 Abstract: The interactions between a 101¯2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal… read more NOT USED (high confidence) W. Jiang, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Accurate Deep Potential model for the Al–Cu–Mg alloy in the full concentration space*,” arXiv: Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 24 Abstract: Combining first-principles accuracy and empirical-potential … read more NOT USED (high confidence) G. Lerma, B. Verschueren, B. Gurrutxaga-Lerma, and J. Verschueren, “Generalized Kanzaki force field of extended defects in crystals with applications to the modeling of edge dislocations,” Physical Review Materials. 2019. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: The Kanzaki forces and their associated multipolar moments a… read more NOT USED (high confidence) Q. Lu et al., “Influence of laser shock peening on irradiation defects in austenitic stainless steels,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2017. link Times cited: 17 NOT USED (high confidence) A. Korchuganov, K. Zolnikov, D. S. Kryzhevich, V. Chernov, and S. Psakhie, “MD simulation of plastic deformation nucleation in stressed crystallites under irradiation,” Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 2016. link Times cited: 34 NOT USED (high confidence) V. Borovikov, M. Mendelev, and A. King, “Effects of stable and unstable stacking fault energy on dislocation nucleation in nano-crystalline metals,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2016. link Times cited: 50 Abstract: Dislocation nucleation from grain boundaries (GB) can contro… read more NOT USED (high confidence) N. Admal, J. Marian, and G. Po, “The atomistic representation of first strain-gradient elastic tensors,” Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2016. link Times cited: 36 NOT USED (high confidence) T. Okita, Y.-Y. Yang, J. Hirabayashi, M. Itakura, and K. Suzuki, “Effects of stacking fault energy on defect formation process in face-centered cubic metals,” Philosophical Magazine. 2016. link Times cited: 14 Abstract: To elucidate the effect of stacking fault energies (SFEs) on… read more NOT USED (high confidence) T. Lagrange, K. Arakawa, H. Yasuda, and M. Kumar, “Preferential void formation at crystallographically ordered grain boundaries in nanotwinned copper thin films,” Acta Materialia. 2015. link Times cited: 14 NOT USED (high confidence) V. Borovikov, M. Mendelev, A. King, and R. LeSar, “Effect of stacking fault energy on mechanism of plastic deformation in nanotwinned FCC metals,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2015. link Times cited: 53 Abstract: Starting from a semi-empirical potential designed for Cu, we… read more NOT USED (definite) L. Sun, X. He, and J. Lu, “Nanotwinned and hierarchical nanotwinned metals: a review of experimental, computational and theoretical efforts,” npj Computational Materials. 2018. link Times cited: 102 |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_748636486270_005 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| EAM_Dynamo_MendelevKing_2013_Cu__MO_748636486270_005 |
DOI |
10.25950/34748b8d https://doi.org/10.25950/34748b8d https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/34748b8d |
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 |
Driver | EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 |
KIM API Version | 2.0 |
Potential Type | eam |
Programming Language(s)
The programming languages used in the code and the percentage of the code written in each one. "N/A" means "not applicable" and refers to model parameterizations which only include parameter tables and have no programming language.
| N/A |
Previous Version | EAM_Dynamo_MendelevKing_2013_Cu__MO_748636486270_004 |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
B | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
N/A | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v004 | view | 10101 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cu v004 | view | 8146 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cu v004 | view | 7778 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cu v004 | view | 11443 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 1951 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 6174 | |
Elastic constants for sc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 5086 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp Cu at zero temperature v004 | view | 1655 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 | view | 69939 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v001 | view | 70749 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 9670481 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 19733033 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 10486157 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 60884595 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cu v007 | view | 2111 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu v007 | view | 3071 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cu v007 | view | 3903 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cu v007 | view | 2335 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu v005 | view | 35306 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Cu at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 | view | 7078110 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004 | view | 49999 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu v002 | view | 7518439 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 | view | 29046 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Cu | view | 357648 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Cu | view | 1803997 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Elastic constants for diamond Cu at zero temperature v001 | other | view |
Verification Check | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 | other | view |
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevKing_2013_Cu__MO_748636486270_005.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevKing_2013_Cu__MO_748636486270_005.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 appear below.
EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.zip | Zip | Windows archive |