EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for the Pt-Au system developed by O'Brien et al. (2018) v000

Christopher J O'Brien; Christopher M Barr; Khalid Hattar; Patrick M Price; Stephen M. Foiles

doi:10.25950/a57b36d8

Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

EAM_Dynamo_OBrienBarrPrice_2018_PtAu__MO_946831081299_000

Interatomic potential for Gold (Au), Platinum (Pt).
Use this Potential

Title A single sentence description.	EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for the Pt-Au system developed by O'Brien et al. (2018) v000
Description A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.	EAM potential for the Pt-Au system developed by O'Brien et al. (2018). There has recently been a great deal of interest in employing immiscible solutes to stabilize nanocrystalline microstructures. Existing modeling efforts largely rely on mesoscale Monte Carlo approaches that employ a simplified model of the microstructure and result in highly homogeneous segregation to grain boundaries. However, there is ample evidence from experimental and modeling studies that demonstrates segregation to grain boundaries is highly non-uniform and sensitive to boundary character. This work employs a realistic nanocrystalline microstructure with experimentally relevant global solute concentrations to illustrate inhomogeneous boundary segregation. Experiments quantifying segregation in thin films are reported that corroborate the prediction that grain boundary segregation is highly inhomogeneous. In addition to grain boundary structure modifying the degree of segregation, the existence of a phase transformation between low and high solute content grain boundaries is predicted. In order to conduct this study, new embedded atom method interatomic potentials are developed for Pt, Au, and the PtAu binary alloy.
Species The supported atomic species.	Au, Pt
Disclaimer A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.	None
Content Origin	NIST IPRP (https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/Pt.html#Au-Pt)

Contributor	Ellad B. Tadmor
Maintainer	Ellad B. Tadmor
Developer	Christopher J O'Brien Christopher M Barr Khalid Hattar Patrick M Price Stephen M. Foiles
Published on KIM	2018
How to Cite	This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5]. [1] O’Brien CJ, Barr CM, Price PM, Hattar K, Foiles SM. Grain boundary phase transformations in PtAu and relevance to thermal stabilization of bulk nanocrystalline metals. Journal of Materials Science. 2018Feb;53(4):2911–27. doi:10.1007/s10853-017-1706-1 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] O’Brien CJ, Barr CM, Hattar K, Price PM, Foiles SM. EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for the Pt-Au system developed by O’Brien et al. (2018) v000. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/a57b36d8 [3] Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS, Plimpton SJ. EAM Model Driver for tabulated potentials with cubic Hermite spline interpolation as used in LAMMPS v005. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/68defa36 [4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Citations This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm.	This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. Show Model Used Show All Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
Funding	Not available

Short KIM ID The unique KIM identifier code.	MO_946831081299_000
Extended KIM ID The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.	EAM_Dynamo_OBrienBarrPrice_2018_PtAu__MO_946831081299_000
DOI	10.25950/a57b36d8 https://doi.org/10.25950/a57b36d8 https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/a57b36d8
KIM Item Type Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).	Portable Model using Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005
Driver	EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005
KIM API Version	2.0
Potential Type	eam
Forked By	EAM_QuinticClampedSpline_Kim_2021_PtAu__MO_463728687265_000

Verification Check Dashboard

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade	Name	Category	Brief Description	Full Results	Aux File(s)
P All elements claimed by model are supported in at least one of the tested configurations.	vc-species-supported-as-stated	mandatory	The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.	Results	Files
P Periodic boundary conditions were correctly supported for all configurations that the model was able to compute.	vc-periodicity-support	mandatory	Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.	Results	Files
P Model energy has permutation symmetry for all configurations the model was able to compute.	vc-permutation-symmetry	mandatory	Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.	Results	Files
C The letter grade C was assigned because the normalized error in the computation was 8.08896e-06 compared with a machine precision of 2.22045e-16. The letter grade was based on 'score=log10(error/eps)', with ranges A=[0, 7.5], B=(7.5, 10.0], C=(10.0, 12.5], D=(12.5, 15.0), F>15.0. 'A' is the best grade, and 'F' indicates failure.	vc-forces-numerical-derivative	consistency	Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.	Results	Files
F The model is C^0 continuous. This means that the model has continuous energy, but a discontinuous first derivative.	vc-dimer-continuity-c1	informational	The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.	Results	Files
P Model energy and forces are invariant with respect to rigid-body motion (translation and rotation) for all configurations the model was able to compute.	vc-objectivity	informational	Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.	Results	Files
P Model energy has inversion symmetry for all configurations the model was able to compute.	vc-inversion-symmetry	informational	Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.	Results	Files
N/A Unable to perform verification check due to an error.	vc-memory-leak	informational	The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.	Results	Files
P All threads give identical results for tested case. Model appears to be thread-safe.	vc-thread-safe	mandatory	The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.	Results	Files
P Unit conversion successful	vc-unit-conversion	mandatory	The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.	Results	Files

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Au

Species: Pt

Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Pt

Species: Au

Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Pt

Species: Au

Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Pt

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Au

Species: Pt

FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Pt

Species: Au

FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Au

Species: Pt

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Au

Species: Pt

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Pt

Species: Au

Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Au

Species: Pt

Tests

CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003

Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Au v004	view	8498
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Pt v004	view	5799
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Au v004	view	7241
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Pt v004	view	6773
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Au v004	view	6714
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Pt v004	view	5679
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Au v004	view	6783
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Pt v004	view	6847

DislocationCoreEnergyCubic__TD_452950666597_002

Dislocation core energy for cubic crystals at a set of dislocation core cutoff radii v002

Creators:
Contributor: qyc081025
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/ebecf626

This Test Driver computes the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. First, it generates several periodic atomistic supercells containing a dislocation dipole. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. The supercell is increased in size until the disolcation core energy converges. Finally, after checking the independence of the results from the simulation cell geometry, the dislocation core energies are determined for each dislocation core radius.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Dislocation core energy for fcc Pt computed at zero temperature for a set of dislocation core cutoff radii with burgers vector [0.5, 0.5, 0] along line direction [1, 1, 0] v000		view	12593375

ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006

Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Au at zero temperature v006	view	6526
Elastic constants for bcc Pt at zero temperature v006	view	1983
Elastic constants for fcc Au at zero temperature v006	view	1440
Elastic constants for fcc Pt at zero temperature v006	view	4159
Elastic constants for sc Au at zero temperature v006	view	2047
Elastic constants for sc Pt at zero temperature v006	view	4255

ElasticConstantsHexagonal__TD_612503193866_004

Elastic constants for hexagonal crystals at zero temperature v004

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/d794c746

Computes the elastic constants for hcp crystals by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for hcp Au at zero temperature v004		view	1433
Elastic constants for hcp Pt at zero temperature v004		view	1783

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_001

Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v001

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/e8a7ed84

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Au in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001		view	84884

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002

Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2f2c4ad3

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Pt in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002		view	65195

GrainBoundaryCubicCrystalSymmetricTiltRelaxedEnergyVsAngle__TD_410381120771_003

Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v003

Creators:
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2c59c9d6

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Au v000		view	8949308
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Au v000		view	35466381

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_007

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Au v007	view	1887
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Pt v007	view	1951
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Au v007	view	2527
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Pt v007	view	2911
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Au v007	view	3263
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Pt v007	view	2559
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Au v007	view	2047
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Pt v007	view	2687

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005

Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Au v005		view	15122
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Pt v005		view	15154

LinearThermalExpansionCoeffCubic__TD_522633393614_001

Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v001

Creators: Mingjian Wen
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fc69d82d

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Au at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001		view	4401590

LinearThermalExpansionCoeffCubic__TD_522633393614_002

Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v002

Creators:
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/9d9822ec

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Pt at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002		view	635271

PhononDispersionCurve__TD_530195868545_004

Phonon dispersion relations for an fcc lattice v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64f4999b

Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Au v004		view	51918
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Pt v004		view	45104

StackingFaultFccCrystal__TD_228501831190_002

Stacking and twinning fault energies of an fcc lattice at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: SubrahmanyamPattamatta
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/b4cfaf9a

Intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies, unstable stacking fault energy, unstable twinning energy, stacking fault energy as a function of fractional displacement, and gamma surface for a monoatomic FCC lattice at zero temperature and pressure.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Au v002		view	8254154
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Pt v002		view	4935103

SurfaceEnergyCubicCrystalBrokenBondFit__TD_955413365818_004

High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Au v004		view	30965
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Pt v004		view	25591

VacancyFormationEnergyRelaxationVolume__TD_647413317626_001

Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fca89cea

Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Au		view	316715
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Pt		view	383342

VacancyFormationMigration__TD_554849987965_001

Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Au		view	2802880
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Pt		view	1545736

Errors

ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006

Test	Error Categories	Link to Error page
Elastic constants for diamond Au at zero temperature v001	other	view
Elastic constants for diamond Pt at zero temperature v001	other	view

GrainBoundaryCubicCrystalSymmetricTiltRelaxedEnergyVsAngle__TD_410381120771_003

Test	Error Categories	Link to Error page
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Au v000	other	view
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pt v000	other	view
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Au v000	other	view
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pt v000	other	view
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pt v000	other	view
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pt v000	other	view

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_006

Test	Error Categories	Link to Error page
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Pt	other	view
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Au	other	view

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_004

Test	Error Categories	Link to Error page
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Au	other	view
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Pt	other	view

Files

CMakeLists.txt
LICENSE
PtAu.eam.alloy
kimprovenance.edn
kimspec.edn

Download

EAM_Dynamo_OBrienBarrPrice_2018_PtAu__MO_946831081299_000.txz	Tar+XZ	Linux and OS X archive
EAM_Dynamo_OBrienBarrPrice_2018_PtAu__MO_946831081299_000.zip	Zip	Windows archive

Download Dependency

This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 appear below.

EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.txz	Tar+XZ	Linux and OS X archive
EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.zip	Zip	Windows archive

Wiki

## 1. Inconsistency in parameters

Line 5 of an EAM file in setfl format lists Nrho, drho, Nr, dr, cutoff, where Nrho is the number of tabulated values for embedding function and Nr is the number of tabulated values for electron density function and pair energy function in the subsequent arrays, drho is the spacing in electron density for embedding energy and dr is the distance space for electron density function and pair energy function, and cutoff is the global cutoff radius for both electron density function and pair energy function. The maximum electron density for embedding energy, rhomax, is 50 [1]. These variables should meet the following relations:

$$
drho = \frac{rhomax}{Nrho - 1}
$$

and

$$
dr = \frac{cutoff}{Nr - 1}
$$

However, the values in the parameter file (PtAu.eam.alloy), which are

5000 1.000000000000e-02 5000 1.150000000000e-03 5.750000000000,

do not satisfy these relations.

## 2. Discontinuity issue

The model does not pass the continuity test (vc-dimer-continuity-c1) because the electron density and pair energy functions change too abruptly toward the cutoff radius.

## References

[1] O’Brien CJ, Barr CM, Price PM, Hattar K, Foiles SM. Grain boundary phase transformations in PtAu and relevance to thermal stabilization of bulk nanocrystalline metals, Journal of Materials Science, 53, 2911–2927, 2018.

Wiki Contributors

2021-01-11T13:08:53.346116	kwk4814

EAM_Dynamo_OBrienBarrPrice_2018_PtAu__MO_946831081299_000

Verification Check Dashboard

Visualizers (in-page)

BCC Lattice Constant

Cohesive Energy Graph

Diamond Lattice Constant

Dislocation Core Energies

FCC Elastic Constants

FCC Lattice Constant

FCC Stacking Fault Energies

FCC Surface Energies

SC Lattice Constant

Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Tests

Errors

Files

Download

Download Dependency

Wiki