Glue potential (EAM-style) (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for Al developed by Ercolessi and Adams (1994) v002

doi:10.25950/58328955

Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

EAM_ErcolessiAdams_1994_Al__MO_324507536345_002

There is a newer version of this item. See EAM_ErcolessiAdams_1994_Al__MO_324507536345_003

Interatomic potential for Aluminum (Al).
Use this Potential

Title A single sentence description.	Glue potential (EAM-style) (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for Al developed by Ercolessi and Adams (1994) v002
Description A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.	This is a glue potential (which has the same functional form as EAM) for pure aluminum due to F. Ercolessi and J. B. Adams. The potential was developed using the "force-matching method", which includes forces from first-principles calculations in the fitting data base. The potential was fitted to properties of face-centered cubic (fcc) crystals.
Species The supported atomic species.	Al
Disclaimer A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.	By design, this potential is not expected to be accurate for geometries with extremely low coordination -- such as small molecules -- which were not included in the input set.

Contributor	Ellad B. Tadmor
Maintainer	Ellad B. Tadmor
Published on KIM	2018
How to Cite	Click here to download this citation in BibTeX format.
Funding	Not available

Short KIM ID The unique KIM identifier code.	MO_324507536345_002
Extended KIM ID The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.	EAM_ErcolessiAdams_1994_Al__MO_324507536345_002
DOI	10.25950/58328955 https://doi.org/10.25950/58328955 https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/58328955
KIM Item Type Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).	Portable Model
KIM API Version	2.0
Potential Type	eam
Programming Language(s) The programming languages used in the code and the percentage of the code written in each one. "N/A" means "not applicable" and refers to model parameterizations which only include parameter tables and have no programming language.	100.00% Fortran

Previous Version	EAM_ErcolessiAdams_1994_Al__MO_324507536345_001

Verification Check Dashboard

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade	Name	Category	Brief Description	Full Results	Aux File(s)
P All elements claimed by model are supported in at least one of the tested configurations.	vc-species-supported-as-stated	mandatory	The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.	Results	Files
P Periodic boundary conditions were correctly supported for all configurations that the model was able to compute.	vc-periodicity-support	mandatory	Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.	Results	Files
P Model energy has permutation symmetry for all configurations the model was able to compute.	vc-permutation-symmetry	mandatory	Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.	Results	Files
A The letter grade A was assigned because the normalized error in the computation was 1.27433e-10 compared with a machine precision of 2.22045e-16. The letter grade was based on 'score=log10(error/eps)', with ranges A=[0, 7.5], B=(7.5, 10.0], C=(10.0, 12.5], D=(12.5, 15.0), F>15.0. 'A' is the best grade, and 'F' indicates failure.	vc-forces-numerical-derivative	consistency	Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.	Results	Files
F The model is C^0 continuous. This means that the model has continuous energy, but a discontinuous first derivative.	vc-dimer-continuity-c1	informational	The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.	Results	Files
P Model energy and forces are invariant with respect to rigid-body motion (translation and rotation) for all configurations the model was able to compute.	vc-objectivity	informational	Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.	Results	Files
P Model energy has inversion symmetry for all configurations the model was able to compute.	vc-inversion-symmetry	informational	Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.	Results	Files
P No memory leak detected.	vc-memory-leak	informational	The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.	Results	Files
P All threads give identical results for tested case. Model appears to be thread-safe.	vc-thread-safe	mandatory	The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.	Results	Files
N/A Unable to perform verification check due to an error.	vc-unit-conversion	mandatory	The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.	Results	Files

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Al

Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Al

Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Al

Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Al

FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Al

FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Al

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Al

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Al

Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Al

Tests

Disclaimer From Model Developer

By design, this potential is not expected to be accurate for geometries with extremely low coordination -- such as small molecules -- which were not included in the input set.

CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003

Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Al v003	view	1663
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Al v003	view	1855
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Al v003	view	1727
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Al v003	view	1823

ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006

Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Al at zero temperature v006	view	2111
Elastic constants for fcc Al at zero temperature v006	view	1919
Elastic constants for sc Al at zero temperature v006	view	1535

ElasticConstantsHexagonal__TD_612503193866_004

Elastic constants for hexagonal crystals at zero temperature v004

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/d794c746

Computes the elastic constants for hcp crystals by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for hcp Al at zero temperature v004		view	1751

GrainBoundaryCubicCrystalSymmetricTiltRelaxedEnergyVsAngle__TD_410381120771_002

Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v002

Creators: Brandon Runnels
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/4723cee7

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v002	view	2769922
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v000	view	7779396
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v000	view	4121649
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v000	view	17655802

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_007

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Al v007	view	1471
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Al v007	view	1855
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Al v007	view	3807
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Al v007	view	2047

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005

Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Al v005		view	19293

LinearThermalExpansionCoeffCubic__TD_522633393614_001

Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v001

Creators: Mingjian Wen
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fc69d82d

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Al at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001		view	5891062

PhononDispersionCurve__TD_530195868545_004

Phonon dispersion relations for an fcc lattice v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64f4999b

Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Al v004		view	51406

StackingFaultFccCrystal__TD_228501831190_002

Stacking and twinning fault energies of an fcc lattice at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: SubrahmanyamPattamatta
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/b4cfaf9a

Intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies, unstable stacking fault energy, unstable twinning energy, stacking fault energy as a function of fractional displacement, and gamma surface for a monoatomic FCC lattice at zero temperature and pressure.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Al v002		view	7655416

SurfaceEnergyCubicCrystalBrokenBondFit__TD_955413365818_004

High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]