Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

EAM_IMD_BrommerGaehlerMihalkovic_2007_CaCd__MO_145183423516_003

Title
A single sentence description.
EAM potential (IMD tabulation) for the Ca-Cd system developed by Brommer, Gaehler and Mihalkovic (2007) v003
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
In order to study the low-temperature phase transition in CaCd6, which is attributed to a reordering of the innermost tetrahedral cluster shells, accurate Embedded-Atom-Method potentials are developed for this system. With these potentials, the ideal cluster structure and the couplings between neighbouring clusters are determined. From these data, an effective Hamiltonian for the cluster orientations is derived. The Hamiltonian is used in Monte Carlo simulations, which exhibit a sharp jump in the internal energy near the expected transition temperature.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Ca, Cd
Contributor schopfdan
Maintainer schopfdan
Author Daniel Schopf
Publication Year 2018
Source Citations
A citation to primary published work(s) that describe this KIM Item.

Brommer P, Gähler F, Mihalkovič M (2007) Ordering and correlation of cluster orientations in CaCd_6. Philosophical Magazine 87(18-21):2671–2677. doi:10.1080/14786430701361370

Item Citation Click here to download a citation in BibTeX format.
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_145183423516_003
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
EAM_IMD_BrommerGaehlerMihalkovic_2007_CaCd__MO_145183423516_003
DOI 10.25950/8bb732f8
https://doi.org/10.25950/8bb732f8
https://search.datacite.org/works/10.25950/8bb732f8
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Stand-alone Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Parameterized Model (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Parameterized Model using Model Driver EAM_IMD__MD_113599595631_003
DriverEAM_IMD__MD_113599595631_003
KIM API Version2.0
Previous Version EAM_IMD_BrommerGaehlerMihalkovic_2007_CaCd__MO_145183423516_002

Verification Check Dashboard

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files

Visualizers (in-page)


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ca
Species: Cd

Click on any thumbnail to get a full size image.



Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ca
Species: Cd

Click on any thumbnail to get a full size image.



Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ca
Species: Cd

Click on any thumbnail to get a full size image.



FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ca
Species: Cd

Click on any thumbnail to get a full size image.



SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ca
Species: Cd

Click on any thumbnail to get a full size image.



Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Ca

Species: Cd



Tests

CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_002
This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_bcc_Ca__TE_377565108639_002 view 4909
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_bcc_Cd__TE_757382278447_002 view 4845
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_diamond_Ca__TE_978401783211_002 view 4909
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_diamond_Cd__TE_545990130600_002 view 4973
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_fcc_Ca__TE_482937725655_002 view 7155
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_fcc_Cd__TE_599791424648_002 view 7091
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_sc_Ca__TE_555111893738_002 view 6192
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_sc_Cd__TE_055218122902_002 view 6353
ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_004
Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
ElasticConstantsCubic_bcc_Ca__TE_094381497019_004 view 1957
ElasticConstantsCubic_bcc_Cd__TE_245682693622_004 view 2952
ElasticConstantsCubic_fcc_Ca__TE_116005237822_004 view 2438
ElasticConstantsCubic_fcc_Cd__TE_833871902473_004 view 2823
ElasticConstantsCubic_sc_Ca__TE_359718686305_004 view 1925
ElasticConstantsCubic_sc_Cd__TE_828237696373_004 view 1957
ElasticConstantsHexagonal__TD_612503193866_003
Computes the elastic constants for hcp crystals by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
ElasticConstantsHexagonal_hcp_Ca__TE_266758454331_003 view 3885
ElasticConstantsHexagonal_hcp_Cd__TE_905828054853_003 view 5131
LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_006
Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
LatticeConstantCubicEnergy_bcc_Ca__TE_156745948509_006 view 1155
LatticeConstantCubicEnergy_bcc_Cd__TE_984897592545_006 view 1091
LatticeConstantCubicEnergy_diamond_Ca__TE_361236224863_006 view 1476
LatticeConstantCubicEnergy_diamond_Cd__TE_434909302061_006 view 1636
LatticeConstantCubicEnergy_fcc_Ca__TE_138201882100_006 view 1027
LatticeConstantCubicEnergy_fcc_Cd__TE_935448828097_006 view 1444
LatticeConstantCubicEnergy_sc_Ca__TE_891988197052_006 view 1027
LatticeConstantCubicEnergy_sc_Cd__TE_670421747557_006 view 1027
LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_004
Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy_hcp_Ca__TE_030748014934_004 view 18327
LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy_hcp_Cd__TE_424501117674_004 view 21625
PhononDispersionCurve__TD_530195868545_003
Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
PhononDispersionCurve_fcc_Ca__TE_941495178906_003 view 91506
StackingFaultFccCrystal__TD_228501831190_001
Intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies, unstable stacking fault energy, unstable twinning energy, stacking fault energy as a function of fractional displacement, and gamma surface for a monoatomic FCC lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
StackingFaultFccCrystal_Ca_0bar__TE_812847954572_001 view 9754578
SurfaceEnergyCubicCrystalBrokenBondFit__TD_955413365818_003
Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):


import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime muliplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
SurfaceEnergyCubicCrystalBrokenBondFit_fcc_Ca__TE_402264927720_003 view 18288


Errors

  • No Errors associated with this Model




Download Dependency

This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver EAM_IMD__MD_113599595631_003 appear below.


EAM_IMD__MD_113599595631_003.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
EAM_IMD__MD_113599595631_003.zip Zip Windows archive

Wiki

Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content