Title
A single sentence description.
|
EAM potential (2nd gen magnetic, quintic tabulation) for magnetic Fe developed by Chiesa et al. (2011) v002 |
---|---|
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
A second generation of empirical potentials is produced for α-Fe within the framework of the magnetic potential formalism (Dudarev and Derlet 2005 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17 7097). This is a parameterization for bcc Fe fitted to a database of material parameters, including ab initio-derived point defect formation energies, third-order elastic constants, and ab initio-derived string potential data, the final two controlling, respectively, the thermal expansion properties and the core structure of the 1/2<111> screw dislocation. The potential produces a non-degenerate configuration for the relaxed 1/2<111> screw dislocation. |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| Fe |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Contributor |
Mark R. Gilbert |
Maintainer |
Mark R. Gilbert |
Developer |
Samuele Chiesa Helena van Swygenhoven Sergei Dudarev Peter Derlet |
Published on KIM | 2018 |
How to Cite |
This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5]. [1] Chiesa S, Derlet PM, Dudarev SL, Swygenhoven HV. Optimization of the magnetic potential for α-Fe. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2011;23(20):206001. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/23/20/206001 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Chiesa S, Swygenhoven H van, Dudarev S, Derlet P. EAM potential (2nd gen magnetic, quintic tabulation) for magnetic Fe developed by Chiesa et al. (2011) v002. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/ce6a5ce5 [3] Gilbert MR, Chiesa S, Derlet P, Dudarev S, Swygenhoven H van. Second generation EAM potential within the magnetic potential formalism with quintic interpolation v002. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/ed3ceac9 [4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 42 Citations (22 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (definite) J. J. Möller and E. Bitzek, “BDA: A novel method for identifying defects in body-centered cubic crystals,” MethodsX. 2016. link Times cited: 17 USED (high confidence) B. Waters, D. S. Karls, I. Nikiforov, R. Elliott, E. Tadmor, and B. Runnels, “Automated determination of grain boundary energy and potential-dependence using the OpenKIM framework,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 5 USED (high confidence) E. Angelova and H. Chamati, “Dynamic Simulation of the Energy Spectrum of Phonons in the Magnetic BCC Iron,” Proceedings of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. 2022. link Times cited: 1 Abstract:
We used the symplectic and scalable algorithm for spin … read more USED (high confidence) P. Derlet and S. Dudarev, “Microscopic structure of a heavily irradiated material,” Physical Review Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 48 Abstract: New generation nuclear fission and future fusion reactors pr… read more USED (high confidence) J. J. Moller et al., “110
planar faults in strained bcc metals: Origins and implications of a commonly observed artifact of classical potentials,” Physical Review Materials. 2018. link Times cited: 18 Abstract: Large-scale atomistic simulations with classical potentials … read more USED (low confidence) V. V. Pogorelko and A. Mayer, “Dynamic tensile fracture of iron: Molecular dynamics simulations and micromechanical model based on dislocation plasticity,” International Journal of Plasticity. 2023. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) L. Ventelon, D. Caillard, B. Lüthi, E. Clouet, D. Rodney, and F. Willaime, “Mobility of carbon-decorated screw dislocations in bcc iron,” Acta Materialia. 2023. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) R. S. Varanasi, M. Lipińska-Chwałek, J. Mayer, B. Gault, and D. Ponge, “Mechanisms of austenite growth during intercritical annealing in medium manganese steels,” Scripta Materialia. 2022. link Times cited: 21 USED (low confidence) Z. Wu, R. Wang, L. Zhu, S. Pattamatta, and D. Srolov, “Revealing and Controlling the Core of Screw Dislocations in BCC Metals.” 2021. link Times cited: 0 Abstract:
Body-centred-cubic (BCC) transition metals (TMs) tend to b… read more USED (low confidence) A. Mayer, “Micromechanical model of nanoparticle compaction and shock waves in metal powders,” International Journal of Plasticity. 2021. link Times cited: 11 USED (low confidence) S. Starikov et al., “Angular-dependent interatomic potential for large-scale atomistic simulation of iron: Development and comprehensive comparison with existing interatomic models,” Physical Review Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 16 Abstract: The development of classical interatomic potential for iron … read more USED (low confidence) J. Wang, Q. Hou, and B. L. Zhang, “Migration behavior of self-interstitial defects in tungsten and iron,” Solid State Communications. 2021. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) S. Starikov, M. Mrovec, and R. Drautz, “Study of Grain Boundary Self-Diffusion in Iron with Different Atomistic Models,” MatSciRN: Computational Studies of Inorganic & Organic Materials (Topic). 2019. link Times cited: 22 USED (low confidence) K. Lai, H. Wen, J. Liu, Y. Wu, and Y. Zheng, “Ferromagnetic effects on non-Arrhenius diffusion of single interstitial helium solute in BCC Fe,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2019. link Times cited: 7 USED (low confidence) T. Suzudo, T. Onitsuka, and K. Fukumoto, “Analyzing the cross slip motion of screw dislocations at finite temperatures in body-centered-cubic metals: molecular statics and dynamics studies,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. link Times cited: 13 Abstract: The plasticity of body-centered-cubic metals at low temperat… read more USED (low confidence) C. Gao, D. Tian, M. Li, and D.-zhi Qian, “Comparative study of displacement cascades simulated with ‘magnetic’ potentials and Mendelev-type potential in α-Fe,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2017. link Times cited: 7 USED (low confidence) J. Bach, J. J. Möller, M. Göken, E. Bitzek, and H. Höppel, “On the transition from plastic deformation to crack initiation in the high- and very high-cycle fatigue regimes in plain carbon steels,” International Journal of Fatigue. 2016. link Times cited: 23 USED (low confidence) A. Al-Motasem, N. Mai, S. Choi, and M. Posselt, “Atomistic study on mixed-mode fracture mechanisms of ferrite iron interacting with coherent copper and nickel nanoclusters,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2016. link Times cited: 10 USED (low confidence) H. Wen and C. Woo, “Quantum statistics in the spin-lattice dynamics simulation of formation and migration of mono-vacancy in BCC iron,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2016. link Times cited: 14 USED (low confidence) J. J. Möller and E. Bitzek, “On the influence of crack front curvature on the fracture behavior of nanoscale cracks,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2015. link Times cited: 26 USED (low confidence) S. M. H. Haghighat et al., “Influence of the dislocation core on the glide of the ½ 110 edge dislocation in bcc-iron: An embedded atom method study,” Computational Materials Science. 2014. link Times cited: 14 USED (low confidence) P. Staikov and N. Djourelov, “Simulations of 〈1 0 0〉 edge and 1/2〈1 1 1〉 screw dislocations in α-iron and tungsten and positron lifetime calculations,” Physica B-condensed Matter. 2013. link Times cited: 23 NOT USED (low confidence) Y. Lei et al., “An Embedded-Atom Method Potential for studying the properties of Fe-Pb solid-liquid interface,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 1 NOT USED (low confidence) L. M. Woryk et al., “Geometrically necessary dislocation fingerprints of dislocation loop absorption at grain boundaries,” Physical Review Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (low confidence) I. Toda-Caraballo, J. Wróbel, and D. Nguyen-Manh, “Generalized universal equation of states for magnetic materials: A novel formulation for an interatomic potential in Fe,” Physical Review Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (low confidence) T. Shimada, K. Ouchi, I. Ikeda, Y. Ishii, and T. Kitamura, “Magnetic instability criterion for spin–lattice systems,” Computational Materials Science. 2015. link Times cited: 12 NOT USED (low confidence) J. J. Möller and E. Bitzek, “Atomic-scale modeling of elementary processes during the fatigue of metallic materials: from crack initiation to crack-microstructure interactions.” 2018. link Times cited: 1 NOT USED (high confidence) R. Meyer et al., “Vibrational and magnetic signatures of extended defects in Fe,” The European Physical Journal B. 2020. link Times cited: 5 NOT USED (high confidence) H. Wen, Y. Wu, J. Liu, and Y. Zheng, “Ferromagnetic effects on helium-vacancy complex formation in BCC Fe,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2019. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: The substitution of helium atom inside BCC Fe results in (1)… read more NOT USED (high confidence) A. Mutter, B. Wang, J. Meiser, P. Umstätter, and H. Urbassek, “Magnetic structure of [0 0 1] tilt grain boundaries in bcc Fe studied via magnetic potentials,” Philosophical Magazine. 2017. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: Using magnetic potentials and a molecular statics approach, … read more NOT USED (high confidence) D. Dragoni, T. Daff, G. Csányi, and N. Marzari, “Achieving DFT accuracy with a machine-learning interatomic potential: thermomechanics and defects in bcc ferromagnetic iron,” arXiv: Materials Science. 2017. link Times cited: 167 Abstract: We show that the Gaussian Approximation Potential machine le… read more NOT USED (high confidence) C. Angelie and J. Soudan, “Nanothermodynamics of iron clusters: Small clusters, icosahedral and fcc-cuboctahedral structures.,” The Journal of chemical physics. 2017. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: The study of the thermodynamics and structures of iron clust… read more NOT USED (high confidence) M. G. D. V. Cuppari, R. Veiga, H. Goldenstein, J. E. G. Silva, and C. Becquart, “Lattice Instabilities and Phase Transformations in Fe from Atomistic Simulations,” Journal of Phase Equilibria and Diffusion. 2017. link Times cited: 2 NOT USED (high confidence) C. P. Chui, W. Liu, Y. Xu, and Y. Zhou, “Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Iron — A Review.” 2015. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: Molecular dynamics (MD) is a technique of atomistic simulati… read more NOT USED (high confidence) Z. Chen and J. Qu, “A fluctuation method to calculate the third order elastic constants in crystalline solids,” Journal of Applied Physics. 2015. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: This paper derives exact expressions of the isothermal third… read more NOT USED (high confidence) M. Basire, J. Soudan, and C. Angelie, “Nanothermodynamics of large iron clusters by means of a flat histogram Monte Carlo method.,” The Journal of chemical physics. 2014. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: The thermodynamics of iron clusters of various sizes, from 7… read more NOT USED (high confidence) C. P. Chui and Y. Zhou, “Investigating the magnetovolume effect in isotropic body-centered-cubic iron using spin-lattice dynamics simulations,” AIP Advances. 2014. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: The understanding of the magnetovolume effect lacks explicit… read more NOT USED (high confidence) J. J. Möller and E. Bitzek, “Comparative study of embedded atom potentials for atomistic simulations of fracture in α-iron,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2014. link Times cited: 50 Abstract: Atomistic simulations play a crucial role in advancing our u… read more NOT USED (high confidence) M. Marinica et al., “Interatomic potentials for modelling radiation defects and dislocations in tungsten,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2013. link Times cited: 258 Abstract: We have developed empirical interatomic potentials for study… read more NOT USED (high confidence) L. Ventelon, F. Willaime, E. Clouet, and D. Rodney, “Ab initio investigation of the Peierls potential of screw dislocations in bcc Fe and W,” Acta Materialia. 2013. link Times cited: 103 |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_140444321607_002 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| EAM_Magnetic2GQuintic_ChiesaDerletDudarev_2011_Fe__MO_140444321607_002 |
DOI |
10.25950/ce6a5ce5 https://doi.org/10.25950/ce6a5ce5 https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/ce6a5ce5 |
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver EAM_Magnetic2GQuintic__MD_543355979582_002 |
Driver | EAM_Magnetic2GQuintic__MD_543355979582_002 |
KIM API Version | 2.0 |
Potential Type | eam |
Previous Version | EAM_Magnetic2GQuintic_ChiesaDerletDudarev_2011_Fe__MO_140444321607_001 |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
A | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
N/A | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
N/A | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Fe v004 | view | 2079 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Fe v004 | view | 2534 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Fe v004 | view | 3429 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Fe v004 | view | 1850 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc Fe at zero temperature v006 | view | 1695 | |
Elastic constants for diamond Fe at zero temperature v001 | view | 3199 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Fe at zero temperature v006 | view | 1759 | |
Elastic constants for sc Fe at zero temperature v006 | view | 2079 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp Fe at zero temperature v004 | view | 1178 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 | view | 370940 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v003 | view | 139626 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v003 | view | 144913 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v003 | view | 584032 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Fe v007 | view | 1919 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Fe v007 | view | 2879 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Fe v007 | view | 3071 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Fe v007 | view | 1951 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Fe v005 | view | 21235 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of bcc Fe at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 | view | 458860 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in bcc Fe v004 | view | 12188 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for bcc Fe | view | 255021 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Vacancy formation and migration energy for bcc Fe | view | 3082490 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP1_123_a v003 | other | view |
Verification Check | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 | other | view |
PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004 | other | view |
EAM_Magnetic2GQuintic_ChiesaDerletDudarev_2011_Fe__MO_140444321607_002.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
EAM_Magnetic2GQuintic_ChiesaDerletDudarev_2011_Fe__MO_140444321607_002.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver EAM_Magnetic2GQuintic__MD_543355979582_002 appear below.
EAM_Magnetic2GQuintic__MD_543355979582_002.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
EAM_Magnetic2GQuintic__MD_543355979582_002.zip | Zip | Windows archive |