Title
A single sentence description.
|
EMT potential for Cu-Mg metallic glasses developed by Bailey, Schiotz, and Jacobsen (2004) v001 |
---|---|
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
Effective Medium Theory (EMT) model based on the EMT implementation in ASAP (https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/asap). Effective Medium Theory is a many-body potential of the same class as Embedded Atom Method, Finnis-Sinclair etc. The main term in the energy per atom is the local density of atoms. The functional form implemented here is that of Ref. 1. The principles behind EMT are described in Refs. 2 and 3 (with 2 being the more detailed and 3 being the most pedagogical). Be aware that the functional form and even some of the principles have changed since refs 2 and 3. EMT can be considered the last step of a series of approximations starting with Density Functional Theory; see Ref 4. This model implements a special parametrization optimized for CuMg [5] bulk metallic glasses only! It probably gives reasonable results for other CuMg compounds. These files are based on Asap version 3.11.5. REFERENCES: [1] Jacobsen, K. W., Stoltze, P., & Nørskov, J.: "A semi-empirical effective medium theory for metals and alloys". Surf. Sci. 366, 394–402 (1996). [2] Jacobsen, K. W., Nørskov, J., & Puska, M.: "Interatomic interactions in the effective-medium theory". Phys. Rev. B 35, 7423–7442 (1987). [3] Jacobsen, K. W.: "Bonding in Metallic Systems: An Effective-Medium Approach". Comments Cond. Mat. Phys. 14, 129-161 (1988). [4] Chetty, N., Stokbro, K., Jacobsen, K. W., & Nørskov, J.: "Ab initio potential for solids". Phys. Rev. B 46, 3798–3809 (1992). [5] Bailey, N., Schiøtz, J., & Jacobsen, K. W.: "Simulation of Cu-Mg metallic glass: Thermodynamics and structure". Phys. Rev. B 69, 144205 (2004). KNOWN ISSUES / BUGS: * On-the-fly modifications of the parameters is not supported, and should be implemented in the future. |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| Cu, Mg |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | https://gitlab.com/asap/asap |
Contributor |
Jakob Schiøtz |
Maintainer |
Jakob Schiøtz |
Developer |
Karsten W. Jacobsen Nicholas P. Bailey Jakob Schiøtz |
Published on KIM | 2019 |
How to Cite |
This Model originally published in [1-3] is archived in OpenKIM [4-7]. [1] Jacobsen KW, Stoltze P, Nørskov JK. A semi-empirical effective medium theory for metals and alloys. Surface Science. 1996;366(2):394–402. doi:10.1016/0039-6028(96)00816-3 [2] Bailey NP, Schiøtz J, Jacobsen KW. Simulation of Cu-Mg metallic glass: Thermodynamics and structure. Physical Review B. 2004Apr;69(14):144205. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.69.144205 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [3] Bailey NP, Schiøtz J, Jacobsen KW. Erratum: Simulation of Cu-Mg metallic glass: Thermodynamics and structure. Physical Review B. 2017Aug;96(5):059904. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.059904 [4] Jacobsen KW, Bailey NP, Schiøtz J. EMT potential for Cu-Mg metallic glasses developed by Bailey, Schiotz, and Jacobsen (2004) v001. OpenKIM; 2019. doi:10.25950/dfe6edcd [5] Jacobsen KW, Stoltze P, Nørskov JK. Effective Medium Theory (EMT) potential driver v004. OpenKIM; 2019. doi:10.25950/7e5b8be7 [6] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [7] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 56 Citations (32 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (high confidence) J. Chun and B. Lee, “Atomistic calculations of mechanical properties of Ni-Ti-C metallic glass systems,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2013. link Times cited: 3 USED (high confidence) J. Chun and B. Lee, “Atomistic calculations of mechanical properties of Ni-Ti-C metallic glass systems,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2013. link Times cited: 0 USED (high confidence) S. Zhao, J. Li, and B. Liu, “Local structure of the Zr–Al metallic glasses studied by proposed n-body potential through molecular dynamics simulation,” Journal of Materials Research. 2010. link Times cited: 9 Abstract: An n -body potential is first constructed for the Zr–Al syst… read more USED (high confidence) S. Jiang, M. Jiang, L. Dai, and Y. Yao, “Atomistic Origin of Rate-Dependent Serrated Plastic Flow in Metallic Glasses,” Nanoscale Research Letters. 2008. link Times cited: 23 USED (high confidence) N. Bailey, J. Schiøtz, A. Lemaître, and K. Jacobsen, “Avalanche size scaling in sheared three-dimensional amorphous solid.,” Physical review letters. 2007. link Times cited: 74 Abstract: We study the statistics of plastic rearrangement events in a… read more USED (high confidence) N. Bailey, J. Schiøtz, and K. Jacobsen, “Atomistic simulation study of the shear-band deformation mechanism in Mg-Cu metallic glasses,” Physical Review B. 2006. link Times cited: 81 Abstract: We have simulated plastic deformation of a model Mg-Cu metal… read more USED (low confidence) B. Waters, D. S. Karls, I. Nikiforov, R. Elliott, E. Tadmor, and B. Runnels, “Automated determination of grain boundary energy and potential-dependence using the OpenKIM framework,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) N. Dubinin and R. Ryltsev, “Self-Diffusion Coefficients of Components in Liquid Binary Alloys of Noble Metals,” Metals. 2022. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: An accurate determination of transport coefficients in liqui… read more USED (low confidence) K. Saksl et al., “Atomic structure of the Mg66Zn30Ca4 metallic glass,” Journal of Non-crystalline Solids. 2021. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) L. Chen, Q. Chen, D. Ando, Y. Sutou, M. Kubo, and J. Koike, “Potential of low-resistivity Cu2Mg for highly scaled interconnects and its challenges,” Applied Surface Science. 2021. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) D. Ma, J. Zhang, Y. Di, J. Wang, S. Guan, and T. Zhang, “Atomic structure of
Co
92−
x
B
x
Ta
8
glassy alloys studied by ab initio molecular dynamics simulations,” International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. 2020. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) R. Dai, R. Ashcraft, A. Gangopadhyay, and K. Kelton, “Predicting metallic glass formation from properties of the high temperature liquid,” Journal of Non-crystalline Solids. 2019. link Times cited: 11 USED (low confidence) X. Yue, C. Liu, S. Pan, A. Inoue, P. Liaw, and C. Fan, “Effect of cooling rate on structures and mechanical behavior of Cu50Zr50 metallic glass: A molecular-dynamics study,” Physica B: Condensed Matter. 2018. link Times cited: 24 USED (low confidence) M. Kbirou, M. Mazroui, and A. Hasnaoui, “Atomic packing and fractal behavior of Al-Co metallic glasses,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2018. link Times cited: 17 USED (low confidence) W. Cui, C. Peng, L. Wang, Y. Qi, and T. Fang, “Structure and dynamics of undercooled FeNi,” Physics and Chemistry of Liquids. 2014. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: Molecular dynamics simulation has been performed to explore … read more USED (low confidence) J. Ding, Y. Q. Cheng, and E. Ma, “Charge-transfer-enhanced prism-type local order in amorphous Mg65Cu25Y10: Short-to-medium-range structural evolution underlying liquid fragility and heat capacity,” Acta Materialia. 2013. link Times cited: 53 USED (low confidence) J.-C. Huang, S. Chang, and H. Chen, “Evaluation of Microstructure and Glass Transition Temperature of Al-Cu-Cr-Fe-Ni High-Entropy Alloy by Molecular Dynamics Simulation,” Advanced Materials Research. 2012. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: In this study, the microstructure and glass transition tempe… read more USED (low confidence) C. Wang and C. Wong, “Short-to-medium range order of Al–Mg metallic glasses studied by molecular dynamics simulations,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2011. link Times cited: 37 USED (low confidence) B. Jelinek et al., “Modified embedded atom method potential for Al, Si, Mg, Cu, and Fe alloys,” Physical Review B. 2011. link Times cited: 218 Abstract: A set of modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) potentials for… read more USED (low confidence) Y. Cheng and E. Ma, “Atomic-level structure and structure–property relationship in metallic glasses,” Progress in Materials Science. 2011. link Times cited: 1296 USED (low confidence) D. S. Liu, J. Qin, and T. Gu, “The structure of liquid Mg–Cu binary alloys,” Journal of Non-crystalline Solids. 2010. link Times cited: 16 USED (low confidence) A. Paduraru, U. G. Andersen, A. Thyssen, N. Bailey, K. Jacobsen, and J. Schiøtz, “Computer simulations of nanoindentation in Mg–Cu and Cu–Zr metallic glasses,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2010. link Times cited: 17 Abstract: The formation of shear bands during plastic deformation of C… read more USED (low confidence) F. Delogu, “A numerical investigation of the stability of nanometer-sized amorphous structures,” Intermetallics. 2010. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) Z. Hou, L.-X. Liu, R.-su Liu, Z.-an Tian, and J. Wang, “Short-range and medium-range order in Ca7Mg3 metallic glass,” Journal of Applied Physics. 2010. link Times cited: 34 Abstract: A molecular dynamics simulation has been performed on the ra… read more USED (low confidence) F. Liu, R.-su Liu, Z. Hou, H.-rong Liu, Z.-an Tian, and L.-li Zhou, “Formation mechanism of atomic cluster structures in Al–Mg alloy during rapid solidification processes,” Annals of Physics. 2009. link Times cited: 26 USED (low confidence) A. Takeuchi, K. Yubuta, and A. Inoue, “Phase stability of Cu2Mg and CuMg2 compounds against noncrystallizations analyzed with a plastic crystal model,” Intermetallics. 2008. link Times cited: 7 USED (low confidence) N. Bailey, U. R. Pedersen, N. Gnan, T. Schrøder, and J. Dyre, “Pressure-energy correlations in liquids. I. Results from computer simulations.,” The Journal of chemical physics. 2008. link Times cited: 187 Abstract: We show that a number of model liquids at fixed volume exhib… read more USED (low confidence) W. Li, Z. Yan-ning, M. Xiu-Ming, and P. Chuan-xiao, “Formation of NiZr 2 Binary Metallic Glass: Experimental and Molecular Dynamics Analyses,” Chinese Physics Letters. 2007. link Times cited: 5 Abstract: The local atomic structure of an amorphous NiZr2 alloy is id… read more USED (low confidence) M. Baricco et al., “Thermal stability and hardness of Mg–Cu–Au–Y amorphous alloys,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2007. link Times cited: 14 USED (low confidence) S. Ö. Kart, M. Tomak, M. Uludoǧan, and T. Çagin, “Structural, thermodynamical, and transport properties of undercooled binary Pd–Ni alloys,” Materials Science and Engineering A-structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing. 2006. link Times cited: 15 USED (low confidence) N. Yedla and S. Ghosh, “Nature of atomic trajectories and convective flow during plastic deformation of amorphous Cu50Zr50 alloy at room temperature-classical molecular dynamics studies,” Intermetallics. 2017. link Times cited: 15 USED (low confidence) W. Zhao et al., “Atomic bond proportions and relations to physical properties in metallic glasses,” Materials & Design. 2015. link Times cited: 9 NOT USED (high confidence) E. Kirova and V. Pisarev, “Morphological aspect of crystal nucleation in wall-confined supercooled metallic film,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2020. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: In this paper, we simulate the nucleation and growth of crys… read more NOT USED (high confidence) B. Parsaeifard, D. Tomerini, D. De, and S. Goedecker, “Maximum volume simplex method for automatic selection and classification of atomic environments and environment descriptor compression.,” The Journal of chemical physics. 2020. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: Fingerprint distances, which measure the similarity of atomi… read more NOT USED (high confidence) A. A. Deshmukh and S. Pal, “Dynamic probing of structural evolution for Co50Ni50 metallic glass during pressurized cooling using atomistic simulation,” Journal of Molecular Modeling. 2020. link Times cited: 1 NOT USED (high confidence) T. Mizuguchi, S. Tatsumi, and S. Fujiwara, “Icosahedral order in liquid and glassy phases of cyclohexane,” Molecular Simulation. 2020. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: ABSTRACT We performed all-atom molecular dynamics simulation… read more NOT USED (high confidence) B. Bocklund, R. Otis, A. Egorov, A. Obaied, I. Roslyakova, and Z.-kui Liu, “ESPEI for efficient thermodynamic database development, modification, and uncertainty quantification: application to Cu–Mg,” MRS Communications. 2019. link Times cited: 47 Abstract: The software package ESPEI has been developed for efficient … read more NOT USED (high confidence) X. Yue, C. Liu, S. Pan, A. Inoue, P. Liaw, and C. Fan, “Effect of concentration on the structure of isothermally-annealed CuZr metallic glasses,” Materials Science and Technology. 2018. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: ABSTRACT To clarify the influence of isothermal annealing on… read more NOT USED (high confidence) Y. Shi, “Creating Atomic Models of Brittle Glasses for In Silico Mechanical Tests,” International Journal of Applied Glass Science. 2016. link Times cited: 5 Abstract: Atomic level computer simulation has become indispensable in… read more NOT USED (high confidence) P. M. Larsen, S. Schmidt, and J. Schiøtz, “Robust structural identification via polyhedral template matching,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2016. link Times cited: 532 Abstract: Successful scientific applications of large-scale molecular … read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. Adibi, P. S. Branicio, Y. Zhang, and S. Joshi, “Composition and grain size effects on the structural and mechanical properties of CuZr nanoglasses,” Journal of Applied Physics. 2014. link Times cited: 66 Abstract: Nanoglasses (NGs), metallic glasses (MGs) with a nanoscale g… read more NOT USED (high confidence) A. Malins, S. R. Williams, J. Eggers, and C. Royall, “Identification of structure in condensed matter with the topological cluster classification.,” The Journal of chemical physics. 2013. link Times cited: 115 Abstract: We describe the topological cluster classification (TCC) alg… read more NOT USED (high confidence) O. Senkov, Y. Cheng, and Y. Cheng, “Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Amorphous Structure of Ca-Mg-Cu and Ca-Mg-Zn Alloys,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2013. link Times cited: 9 NOT USED (high confidence) O. Senkov, Y. Cheng, D. Miracle, E. Barney, A. Hannon, and C. Woodward, “Atomic structure of Ca40+XMg25Cu35−X metallic glasses,” Journal of Applied Physics. 2012. link Times cited: 28 Abstract: The atomic structures of four Ca40+XMg25Cu35−X (X = 0, 5, 10… read more NOT USED (high confidence) N. Wang, L. Ji, W. Yao, and Y. Zheng, “Correlation between fragility and eutectic instability and glass-forming ability in binary metallic glasses under growth controlled conditions,” Journal of Applied Physics. 2012. link Times cited: 5 Abstract: We find that the fragility can be correlated to the eutectic… read more NOT USED (high confidence) J. Pang, M. Tan, and K. M. Liew, “Structural evolution of Ti50Cu50 on rapid cooling by molecular dynamics simulation,” Applied Physics A. 2012. link Times cited: 4 NOT USED (high confidence) D. Rodney, A. Tanguy, and D. Vandembroucq, “Modeling the mechanics of amorphous solids at different length scale and time scale,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2011. link Times cited: 244 Abstract: We review the recent literature on the simulation of the str… read more NOT USED (high confidence) J. Wang, J. Wang, P. Hodgson, J. Zhang, W. Yan, and C. Yang, “Effects of quenching rate on amorphous structures of Cu46Zr54 metallic glass,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2009. link Times cited: 33 NOT USED (high confidence) L. Yang, X.-L. Wang, A. Stoica, J. Almer, D. Shi, and W. H. Wang, “Multistage Devitrification Behavior of Mg65Cu25Tb10 Bulk Metallic Glass,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2008. link Times cited: 6 NOT USED (high confidence) P. Jóvári et al., “Atomic structure of glassy Mg60Cu30Y10 investigated with EXAFS, x-ray and neutron diffraction, and reverse Monte Carlo simulations,” Physical Review B. 2007. link Times cited: 30 Abstract: Short range order of amorphous Mg{sub 60}Cu{sub 30}Y{sub 10}… read more NOT USED (high confidence) A. Paduraru, A. Kenoufi, N. Bailey, and J. Schiøtz, “An Interatomic Potential for Studying CuZr Bulk Metallic Glasses,” Advanced Engineering Materials. 2007. link Times cited: 22 Abstract: Binary alloys capable of forming metallic glasses have been … read more NOT USED (high confidence) G. Liang, H. Fang, D. Katz, Z. Tang, and K. Salama, “Phase formation in Cu-sheathed MgB2 wires,” Physica C-superconductivity and Its Applications. 2006. link Times cited: 19 NOT USED (high confidence) P. Demo, A. M. Sveshnikov, K. Nitsch, M. Rodová, and Z. Kožíšek, “Duration of nucleation process in supercooled halide melts.,” The Journal of chemical physics. 2005. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: We present a model allowing to estimate the so-called time l… read more NOT USED (high confidence) G. Duan et al., “Molecular dynamics study of the binary Cu_(46)Zr_(54) metallic glass motivated by experiments: Glass formation and atomic-level structure,” Physical Review B. 2005. link Times cited: 216 Abstract: We have identified a binary bulk metallic glass forming allo… read more NOT USED (high confidence) J. Pang, “Metallic glasses : thermal, mechanical properties and their correlation.” 2012. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) W. Guang-hai, P. Hui, K. Fu-jiu, X. Meng-Fen, and B. Yilong, “Study Of Mechanical Properties Of Amorphous Copper With Molecular Dynamics Simulation,” Chinese Physics B. 2008. link Times cited: 8 Abstract: The formation and mechanical properties of amorphous copper … read more |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_228059236215_001 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| EMT_Asap_MetalGlass_BaileySchiotzJacobsen_2004_CuMg__MO_228059236215_001 |
DOI |
10.25950/dfe6edcd https://doi.org/10.25950/dfe6edcd https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/dfe6edcd |
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver EMT_Asap__MD_128315414717_004 |
Driver | EMT_Asap__MD_128315414717_004 |
KIM API Version | 2.0.2 |
Potential Type | eam |
Previous Version | EMT_Asap_MetalGlass_BaileySchiotzJacobsen_2004_CuMg__MO_228059236215_000 |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
A | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v004 | view | 3764 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Mg v004 | view | 2188 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cu v004 | view | 2572 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Mg v004 | view | 2198 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cu v004 | view | 3392 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Mg v004 | view | 2317 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cu v004 | view | 2128 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Mg v004 | view | 2356 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for CuMg in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b at zero temperature and pressure v000 | view | 100254 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 5918 | |
Elastic constants for bcc Mg at zero temperature v006 | view | 1631 | |
Elastic constants for diamond Mg at zero temperature v001 | view | 7262 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 2175 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Mg at zero temperature v006 | view | 5886 | |
Elastic constants for sc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 1887 | |
Elastic constants for sc Mg at zero temperature v006 | view | 3871 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp Cu at zero temperature | view | 2354 | |
Elastic constants for hcp Mg at zero temperature | view | 1580 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 | view | 78038 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v001 | view | 73252 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuMg in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF24_227_c_b v002 | view | 202695 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuMg in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_oF48_70_e_ef v002 | view | 1278199 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Mg in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 | view | 142239 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Mg in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v003 | view | 169268 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Mg in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v003 | view | 173672 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 13070426 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 77964377 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 46660295 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 159963373 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cu v007 | view | 1887 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Mg v007 | view | 1887 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu v007 | view | 3039 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Mg v007 | view | 3647 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cu v007 | view | 3711 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Mg v007 | view | 3711 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cu v007 | view | 1951 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Mg v007 | view | 2335 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu | view | 7835 | |
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Mg | view | 5159 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Cu at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 | view | 21607866 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004 | view | 49775 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu v002 | view | 13717139 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 | view | 50319 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Cu | view | 595663 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Cu | view | 1919581 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Elastic constants for diamond Cu at zero temperature v001 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu v005 | other | view |
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Mg v005 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu | other | view |
Verification Check | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004 | other | view |
EMT_Asap_MetalGlass_BaileySchiotzJacobsen_2004_CuMg__MO_228059236215_001.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
EMT_Asap_MetalGlass_BaileySchiotzJacobsen_2004_CuMg__MO_228059236215_001.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver EMT_Asap__MD_128315414717_004 appear below.
EMT_Asap__MD_128315414717_004.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
EMT_Asap__MD_128315414717_004.zip | Zip | Windows archive |