MEAM_LAMMPS_AgrawalMirzaeifar_2021_CuC__MO_028979335952_001
| Title
A single sentence description.
|
MEAM potential for Cu-C composites developed by Agrawal and Mirzaeifar (2021) v001 |
|---|---|
| Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
A 2NN MEAM (second nearest-neighbor modified embedded atomic method) potential for the copper and carbon atom interaction is developed. Since crystal structures like B1 or B2 are not experimentally available for the Cu-C system, first-principle calculations are used to determine the reference structure and its elastic constants in this work. The B1 and B2 structure of Cu-C has positive formation energy, but B1 is dynamically stable. Accordingly, the B1 crystal structure is used as the reference structure for the Cu-C system to develop the interatomic potential. The current potential agrees reasonably well for phonon dispersion frequencies, stacking fault energies, and the atomic forces with the available experimental data and first-principle calculations. This potential is utilized to study the mechanical properties of copper-graphene composites subjected to uniaxial loading. Our results show that adding graphene to a defect-free Cu crystal weakens the metallic matrix's mechanical properties. However, when the graphene is embedded into a Cu matrix with some defects, it can significantly improve the polycrystalline Cu's mechanical properties. |
| Species
The supported atomic species.
| C, Cu |
| Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
| Content Origin | Files are provided by Arpit Agrawal and Reza Mirzaeifar (Virginia Tech) on Jan 27, 2021, and posted with their permission. |
| Contributor |
Yaser Afshar |
| Maintainer |
Yaser Afshar |
| Developer |
Arpit Agrawal Reza Mirzaeifar |
| Published on KIM | 2021 |
| How to Cite | Click here to download this citation in BibTeX format. |
| Funding | Not available |
| Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_028979335952_001 |
| Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| MEAM_LAMMPS_AgrawalMirzaeifar_2021_CuC__MO_028979335952_001 |
| DOI |
10.25950/ba346aba https://doi.org/10.25950/ba346aba https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/ba346aba |
| KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001 |
| Driver | MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001 |
| KIM API Version | 2.2 |
| Potential Type | meam |
| Previous Version | MEAM_LAMMPS_AgrawalMirzaeifar_2021_CuC__MO_028979335952_000 |
| Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| N/A | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
BCC Lattice Constant
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Cohesive Energy Graph
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Diamond Lattice Constant
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Dislocation Core Energies
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)FCC Elastic Constants
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
FCC Lattice Constant
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
FCC Stacking Fault Energies
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)FCC Surface Energies
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)SC Lattice Constant
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table
Species: CSpecies: Cu
Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5
This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc C v004 | view | 5926 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v004 | view | 5600 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond C v004 | view | 6405 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cu v004 | view | 4655 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc C v004 | view | 5522 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cu v004 | view | 4496 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc C v004 | view | 5522 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cu v004 | view | 7193 |
Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f
Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elastic constants for bcc C at zero temperature v006 | view | 20638 | |
| Elastic constants for bcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 32702 | |
| Elastic constants for diamond C at zero temperature v001 | view | 36999 | |
| Elastic constants for diamond Cu at zero temperature v001 | view | 35209 | |
| Elastic constants for fcc C at zero temperature v006 | view | 40470 | |
| Elastic constants for fcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 22438 | |
| Elastic constants for sc C at zero temperature v006 | view | 19932 | |
| Elastic constants for sc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 20111 |
Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/53ef2ea4
Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Creators:
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2c59c9d6
Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 35583486 | |
| Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 244597724 | |
| Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 102133890 | |
| Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 383458510 |
Creators: Ilia Nikiforov
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/dd36239b
Given atomic species and structure type (graphene-like, 2H, or 1T) of a 2D hexagonal monolayer crystal, as well as an initial guess at the lattice spacing, this Test Driver calculates the equilibrium lattice spacing and cohesive energy using Polak-Ribiere conjugate gradient minimization in LAMMPS
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohesive energy and equilibrium lattice constant of graphene v002 | view | 1044 |
Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf
Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc C v007 | view | 16461 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cu v007 | view | 15844 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond C v007 | view | 17296 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu v007 | view | 16769 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc C v007 | view | 10101 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cu v007 | view | 9952 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc C v007 | view | 15914 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cu v007 | view | 15506 |
Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32
Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu v005 | view | 240534 |
| Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| Elastic constants for hcp Cu at zero temperature v004 | other | view |
EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_000
GrainBoundaryCubicCrystalSymmetricTiltRelaxedEnergyVsAngle__TD_410381120771_002
LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005
| Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp C v005 | other | view |
LinearThermalExpansionCoeffCubic__TD_522633393614_001
| Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| Linear thermal expansion coefficient of diamond C at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 | other | view |
| Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Cu at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 | other | view |
PhononDispersionCurve__TD_530195868545_004
| Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004 | other | view |
StackingFaultFccCrystal__TD_228501831190_002
| Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu v002 | other | view |
SurfaceEnergyCubicCrystalBrokenBondFit__TD_955413365818_004
| Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 | other | view |
No Driver
| Verification Check | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| ForcesNumerDeriv__VC_710586816390_003 | other | view |
| MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 | other | view |
| ThreadSafety__VC_881176209980_005 | other | view |
| MEAM_LAMMPS_AgrawalMirzaeifar_2021_CuC__MO_028979335952_001.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
| MEAM_LAMMPS_AgrawalMirzaeifar_2021_CuC__MO_028979335952_001.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001 appear below.
| MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
| MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001.zip | Zip | Windows archive |