Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

MEAM_LAMMPS_AhmadGrohGhazisaeidi_2018_MgY__MO_135739722270_001

Interatomic potential for Magnesium (Mg), Yttrium (Y).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
MEAM potential for Mg–Y alloys developed by Ahmad et al. (2018) v001
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
The Mg–Y binary system's potential has been developed within the framework of the second-nearest-neighbor modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) based on a potential for pure Mg. The potential fitting is done on a range of physical properties, either experimental or computed by first-principles methods. These include the Y interaction energy with basal and pyramidal stacking faults and properties of the B2 Mg–Y intermetallic phase. Using this model, one can make predictions generally in reasonable agreement with experiments and or DFT, but differences remain for subtle but important aspects of Y solutes in Mg.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Mg, Y
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin Files are provided by Rasool Ahmad (EPFL) on Feb 2, 2021, and posted with his permission.
Contributor Yaser Afshar
Maintainer Yaser Afshar
Developer Rasool Ahmad
Sebastien Groh
Maryam Ghazisaeidi
William Curtin
Published on KIM 2021
How to Cite Click here to download this citation in BibTeX format.
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_135739722270_001
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
MEAM_LAMMPS_AhmadGrohGhazisaeidi_2018_MgY__MO_135739722270_001
DOI 10.25950/3d7d66f9
https://doi.org/10.25950/3d7d66f9
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/3d7d66f9
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001
DriverMEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001
KIM API Version2.2
Potential Type meam
Previous Version MEAM_LAMMPS_AhmadGrohGhazisaeidi_2018_MgY__MO_135739722270_000

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
A vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Y
Species: Mg


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Mg
Species: Y


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Y
Species: Mg


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Mg
Species: Y


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Mg
Species: Y


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Y
Species: Mg


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Mg

Species: Y





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Mg v004 view 7310
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Y v004 view 7042
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Mg v004 view 8834
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Y v004 view 7052
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Mg v004 view 8466
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Y v004 view 7072
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Mg v004 view 8614
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Y v004 view 8540


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Mg at zero temperature v006 view 35388
Elastic constants for bcc Y at zero temperature v006 view 27749
Elastic constants for diamond Mg at zero temperature v001 view 34216
Elastic constants for diamond Y at zero temperature v001 view 95909
Elastic constants for fcc Mg at zero temperature v006 view 34551
Elastic constants for fcc Y at zero temperature v006 view 25352
Elastic constants for sc Mg at zero temperature v006 view 27829
Elastic constants for sc Y at zero temperature v006 view 18636


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v000

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/53ef2ea4

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for MgY in AFLOW crystal prototype A24B5_cI58_217_2g_ac v000 view 211733
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for MgY in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_hP12_194_ah_f v000 view 79767
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Mg in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v000 view 70897
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Y in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v000 view 87314
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Mg in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v000 view 62577
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Mg in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v000 view 75240
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Y in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v000 view 63784
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for MgY in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v000 view 88649


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Mg v007 view 15098
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Y v007 view 10585
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Mg v007 view 16212
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Y v007 view 11964
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Mg v007 view 10883
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Y v007 view 10995
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Mg v007 view 15685
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Y v007 view 10697


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Mg v005 view 435585
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Y v005 view 389045





This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001 appear below.


MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001.zip Zip Windows archive
Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content