Title
A single sentence description.
|
MEAM potential for Cu developed by Asadi et al. (2015) v002 |
---|---|
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
The two-phase solid-liquid coexisting structures of Ni, Cu, and Al are studied by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using the second nearest-neighbor (2NN) modified-embedded atom method (MEAM) potential. For this purpose, the existing 2NN-MEAM parameters for Ni and Cu were modified to make them suitable for the MD simulations of the problems related to the two-phase solid-liquid coexistence of these elements. Using these potentials, we compare calculated low-temperature properties of Ni, Cu, and Al, such as elastic constants, structural energy differences, vacancy formation energy, stacking fault energies, surface energies, specific heat, and thermal expansion coefficient with experimental data. The solid-liquid coexistence approach is utilized to accurately calculate the melting points of Ni, Cu, and Al. The MD calculations of the expansion in melting, latent heat, and the liquid structure factor are also compared with experimental data. In addition, the solid-liquid interface free energy and surface anisotropy of the elements are determined from the interface fluctuations, and the predictions are compared to the experimental and computational data in the literature. |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| Cu |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | NIST IPRP (https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/Cu.html) |
Content Other Locations | https://openkim.org/id/Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_AsadiZaeemNouranian_2015_Cu__SM_239791545509_000 |
Contributor |
Yaser Afshar |
Maintainer |
Yaser Afshar |
Developer |
Ebrahim Asadi Mohsen Asle Zaeem Sasan Nouranian Michael I. Baskes |
Published on KIM | 2023 |
How to Cite |
This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5]. [1] Asadi E, Zaeem MA, Nouranian S, Baskes MI. Two-phase solid–liquid coexistence of Ni, Cu, and Al by molecular dynamics simulations using the modified embedded-atom method. Acta Materialia. 2015;86:169–81. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.010 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Asadi E, Zaeem MA, Nouranian S, Baskes MI. MEAM potential for Cu developed by Asadi et al. (2015) v002. OpenKIM; 2023. doi:10.25950/d439eda9 [3] Afshar Y, Hütter S, Rudd RE, Stukowski A, Tipton WW, Trinkle DR, et al. The modified embedded atom method (MEAM) potential v002. OpenKIM; 2023. doi:10.25950/ee5eba52 [4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 91 Citations (66 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (high confidence) T. Isensee and D. Tourret, “Convective effects on columnar dendritic solidification – A multiscale dendritic needle network study,” Acta Materialia. 2022. link Times cited: 10 USED (high confidence) S. M. Elahi, R. Tavakoli, A. K. Boukellal, T. Isensee, I. Romero, and D. Tourret, “Multiscale simulation of powder-bed fusion processing of metallic alloys,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 16 USED (high confidence) F. Gitzhofer, J. Aluha, P.-O. Langlois, F. Barandehfard, T. Ntho, and N. Abatzoglou, “Proven Anti-Wetting Properties of Molybdenum Tested for High-Temperature Corrosion-Resistance with Potential Application in the Aluminum Industry,” Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: The behavior of Mo in contact with molten Al was modelled by… read more USED (high confidence) A. Mahata, M. A. Zaeem, and M. Baskes, “Understanding homogeneous nucleation in solidification of aluminum by molecular dynamics simulations,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2017. link Times cited: 65 Abstract: Homogeneous nucleation from aluminum (Al) melt was investiga… read more USED (high confidence) N. T. Brown, E. Martínez, and J. Qu, “Interfacial free energy and stiffness of aluminum during rapid solidification,” Acta Materialia. 2017. link Times cited: 12 USED (high confidence) J. Davoodi, S. Dadashi, and M. Yarifard, “Molecular dynamics simulations of the melting of Al–Ni nanowires,” Philosophical Magazine. 2016. link Times cited: 6 Abstract: Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed to invest… read more USED (high confidence) L. H. Li, L. Hu, S. J. Yang, W. Wang, and B. Wei, “Thermodynamic properties and solidification kinetics of intermetallic Ni7Zr2 alloy investigated by electrostatic levitation technique and theoretical calculations,” Journal of Applied Physics. 2016. link Times cited: 16 Abstract: The thermodynamic properties, including the density, volume … read more USED (low confidence) S. M. Handrigan and S. Nakhla, “Generation of viable nanocrystalline structures using the melt-cool method: the influence of force field selection,” Philosophical Magazine. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) O. Klimanova, T. Miryashkin, and A. Shapeev, “Accurate melting point prediction through autonomous physics-informed learning,” Physical Review B. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: We present an algorithm for computing melting points by auto… read more USED (low confidence) S. Kavousi, V. Ankudinov, P. Galenko, and M. A. Zaeem, “Atomistic-informed kinetic phase-field modeling of non-equilibrium crystal growth during rapid solidification,” Acta Materialia. 2023. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) D. Tourret et al., “Morphological Stability of Solid-Liquid Interfaces Under Additive Manufacturing Conditions,” Acta Materialia. 2023. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) B. Zhai and H. P. Wang, “Accurate interatomic potential for the nucleation in liquid Ti-Al binary alloy developed by deep neural network learning method,” Computational Materials Science. 2023. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) J. Zhang, F. Han, Z. Yang, and J. Cui, “Coupling of an atomistic model and bond-based peridynamic model using an extended Arlequin framework,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2023. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) D. Cui et al., “Atomistic insights into sluggish crystal growth in an undercooled CoNiCrFe multi-principal element alloy,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2023. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) C. Zhang, Q. Liao, X. Zhang, F. Ma, M. Wu, and Q. Xu, “Characterization of porosity in lack of fusion pores in selective laser melting using the wavefunction,” Materials Research Express. 2022. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: Selective laser melting (SLM) is used extensively in the man… read more USED (low confidence) B. Waters, D. S. Karls, I. Nikiforov, R. Elliott, E. Tadmor, and B. Runnels, “Automated determination of grain boundary energy and potential-dependence using the OpenKIM framework,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) H. Deng, J. Comer, and B. Liu, “A high-dimensional neural network potential for molecular dynamics simulations of condensed phase nickel and phase transitions,” Molecular Simulation. 2022. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: ABSTRACT A high-dimensional neural network interatomic poten… read more USED (low confidence) Y. Wang, B. Yang, S. Li, X.-L. Cao, Z. Liu, and H.-juan Xing, “Seaweed pattern formation in the non-axially directional solidification of 2D-like and 3D Al-3 wt.% Mg single crystal,” Journal of Materials Science & Technology. 2022. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) L. Zepeda-Ruiz, “Melting temperature, critical nucleus size, and interfacial free energy in single FCC metals — A Molecular Dynamics study of liquid–solid phase equilibria,” Journal of Crystal Growth. 2022. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) X. Chen et al., “Effects of Cooling Rate on the Solidification Process of Pure Metal Al: Molecular Dynamics Simulations Based on the MFPT Method,” Metals. 2022. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: Isothermal solidification process of pure metal Al was studi… read more USED (low confidence) M. Haapalehto, T. Pinomaa, L. Wang, and A. Laukkanen, “An atomistic simulation study of rapid solidification kinetics and crystal defects in dilute Al–Cu alloys,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 9 USED (low confidence) R. Liu, Z. Wang, and L. Xu, “Determining the melting temperature of three-dimensional atomic crystal using molecular dynamics simulation,” Other Conferences. 2022. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: Copper was one of the initial metals to be used by human. Be… read more USED (low confidence) G. Azizi, S. Kavousi, and M. A. Zaeem, “Interactive Effects of Interfacial Energy Anisotropy and Solute Transport on Solidification Patterns of Al-Cu Alloys,” Acta Materialia. 2022. link Times cited: 16 USED (low confidence) S. A. Etesami, M. Laradji, and E. Asadi, “The influence of Pb content on the interfacial free energy of solid Sn in eutectic Pb–Sn liquid mixtures using molecular dynamics simulations,” Molecular Simulation. 2022. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: ABSTRACT The solid–liquid interfacial free energy (γ) for bi… read more USED (low confidence) S. Xu, W. Wu, J. Chang, S. Sha, and B. Wei, “Duplex Solidification Mechanisms of Glass Forming Zr55Cu30Al10Ni5 Alloy During Electromagnetic Levitation Processing,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2022. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) Y. Liu, F. Yang, X. Zhang, J. Zhang, and Z. Zhong, “Crack propagation in gradient nano-grained metals with extremely small grain size based on molecular dynamic simulations,” International Journal of Fracture. 2022. link Times cited: 7 USED (low confidence) A. Mahata, T. Mukhopadhyay, and M. A. Zaeem, “Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for Al-Cu, Al-Fe and Al-Ni binary alloys: From room temperature to melting point,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 27 USED (low confidence) M. T. Curnan, D. Shin, W. Saidi, J. C. Yang, and J. Han, “Universally characterizing atomistic strain via simulation, statistics, and machine learning: low-angle grain boundaries,” Acta Materialia. 2022. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) M. Wu and W. Ji, “Nanoscale Origin of the Crystalline-to-Amorphous Phase Transformation and Damage Tolerance of Cantor Alloys at Cryogenic Temperatures,” SSRN Electronic Journal. 2022. link Times cited: 13 USED (low confidence) J. A. Vita and D. Trinkle, “Exploring the necessary complexity of interatomic potentials,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) G. Singh, A. Waas, and V. Sundararaghavan, “Understanding defect structures in nanoscale metal additive manufacturing via molecular dynamics,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 11 USED (low confidence) L. Shi et al., “Achieving high strength and ductility in copper matrix composites with graphene network,” Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2021. link Times cited: 18 USED (low confidence) M. Khalid, J. Friis, P. H. Ninive, K. Marthinsen, I. G. Ringdalen, and A. Strandlie, “Modified embedded atom method potential for Fe-Al intermetallics mechanical strength: A comparative analysis of atomistic simulations,” Physica B-condensed Matter. 2021. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) M. O’Masta, C. CloughEric, and J. H. Martin, “Island formation and the heterogeneous nucleation of aluminum,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) J. F. Hickman, Y. Mishin, V. Ozoliņš, and A. Ardell, “Coarsening of solid
β
-Sn particles in liquid Pb-Sn alloys: Reinterpretation of experimental data in the framework of trans-interface-diffusion-controlled coarsening,” Physical Review Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: James F. Hickman,1 Yuri Mishin ,2 Vidvuds Ozoliņš ,3 and Ala… read more USED (low confidence) M. T. Curnan, W. Saidi, J. C. Yang, and J. Han, “Universal prediction of strain footprints via simulation, statistics, and machine learning: low-Σ grain boundaries,” Acta Materialia. 2021. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) Z. Aitken, V. Sorkin, Z. Yu, S. Chen, Z. Wu, and Y.-W. Zhang, “Modified embedded-atom method potentials for the plasticity and fracture behaviors of unary fcc metals,” Physical Review B. 2021. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) M. Bahramyan, R. T. Mousavian, J. Carton, and D. Brabazon, “Nano-scale simulation of directional solidification in TWIP stainless steels: A focus on plastic deformation mechanisms,” Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2021. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) A. Agrawal and R. Mirzaeifar, “Copper-graphene composites; developing the MEAM potential and investigating their mechanical properties,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 9 USED (low confidence) S. Kavousi, B. R. Novak, J. Hoyt, and D. Moldovan, “Interface kinetics of rapid solidification of binary alloys by atomistic simulations: Application to Ti-Ni alloys,” Computational Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 20 USED (low confidence) S. A. Etesami, M. Laradji, and E. Asadi, “Reliability of molecular dynamics interatomic potentials for modeling of titanium in additive manufacturing processes,” Computational Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) G. Hu, C. Luo, L. Wu, Q. Tang, Z. Ren, and B. Xu, “Molecular dynamics simulation of solid/liquid interfacial energy of uranium,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 7 USED (low confidence) Y. Wang, S. Li, Z. Liu, B. Yang, H. Zhong, and H. Xing, “Anisotropy-dependent seaweed growth during directional solidification of Al-4.5%Cu single crystal,” Scripta Materialia. 2020. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) R. Yan, S. Ma, W. Sun, T. Jing, and H. Dong, “The solid–liquid interface free energy of Al: A comparison between molecular dynamics calculations and experimental measurements,” Computational Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) K. Bai, K. Wang, M. Sullivan, and Y. Zhang, “Prediction of the solid-liquid interface energy of a multicomponent metallic alloy via a solid-liquid interface sublattice model,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2020. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) C. Skelland et al., “Atomistic study on the pressure dependence of the melting point of NdFe12,” AIP Advances. 2020. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: We investigated, using molecular dynamics, how pressure affe… read more USED (low confidence) I. Aslam et al., “Thermodynamic and kinetic behavior of low-alloy steels: An atomic level study using an Fe-Mn-Si-C modified embedded atom method (MEAM) potential,” Materialia. 2019. link Times cited: 12 USED (low confidence) A. Mahata and M. A. Zaeem, “Effects of solidification defects on nanoscale mechanical properties of rapid directionally solidified Al-Cu Alloy: A large scale molecular dynamics study,” Journal of Crystal Growth. 2019. link Times cited: 21 USED (low confidence) N. T. Brown, E. Martínez, and J. Qu, “Solid-liquid metal interface definition studies using capillary fluctuation method,” Computational Materials Science. 2019. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) Y. Zuo et al., “A Performance and Cost Assessment of Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials.,” The journal of physical chemistry. A. 2019. link Times cited: 413 Abstract: Machine learning of the quantitative relationship between lo… read more USED (low confidence) S. Kavousi, B. R. Novak, M. A. Zaeem, and D. Moldovan, “Combined molecular dynamics and phase field simulation investigations of crystal-melt interfacial properties and dendritic solidification of highly undercooled titanium,” Computational Materials Science. 2019. link Times cited: 28 USED (low confidence) A. Mahata and M. A. Zaeem, “Evolution of solidification defects in deformation of nano-polycrystalline aluminum,” Computational Materials Science. 2019. link Times cited: 25 USED (low confidence) S. A. Etesami, M. Baskes, M. Laradji, and E. Asadi, “Thermodynamics of solid Sn and Pb Sn liquid mixtures using molecular dynamics simulations,” Acta Materialia. 2018. link Times cited: 21 USED (low confidence) R. Yan et al., “Structural and mechanical properties of homogeneous solid-liquid interface of Al modelled with COMB3 potential,” Computational Materials Science. 2018. link Times cited: 9 USED (low confidence) X.-G. Li, C. Hu, C. Chen, Z. Deng, J. Luo, and S. Ong, “Quantum-accurate spectral neighbor analysis potential models for Ni-Mo binary alloys and fcc metals,” Physical Review B. 2018. link Times cited: 61 Abstract: In recent years, efficient interatomic potentials approachin… read more USED (low confidence) A. Nourian-Avval and E. Asadi, “Thermodynamics of FCC metals at melting point in one-mode phase-field crystals model,” Computational Materials Science. 2018. link Times cited: 7 USED (low confidence) M. A. Zaeem and E. Asadi, “Phase‐Field Crystal Modeling: Integrating Density Functional Theory, Molecular Dynamics, and Phase‐Field Modeling.” 2018. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) X. Gan, S. Xiao, H. Deng, X. Li, and W. Hu, “Orientation dependences of the Fe-Li solid-liquid interface properties: Atomistic simulations,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2016. link Times cited: 13 USED (low confidence) C. Qi, J. Li, B. Xu, L. Kong, and S. Zhao, “Atomistic characterization of solid-liquid interfaces in the Cu-Ni binary alloy system,” Computational Materials Science. 2016. link Times cited: 15 USED (low confidence) Y. Shibuta, S. Sakane, T. Takaki, and M. Ohno, “Submicrometer-scale molecular dynamics simulation of nucleation and solidification from undercooled melt: Linkage between empirical interpretation and atomistic nature,” Acta Materialia. 2016. link Times cited: 73 USED (low confidence) E. Asadi and M. A. Zaeem, “Predicting Solidification Properties of Magnesium by Molecular Dynamics Simulations.” 2016. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) E. Asadi, M. A. Zaeem, S. Nouranian, and M. Baskes, “Quantitative Modeling of the Equilibration of Two-Phase Solid-Liquid Fe by Atomistic Simulations on Diffusive Time Scales,” Physical Review B. 2015. link Times cited: 61 Abstract: (Received 10 July 2014; revised manuscript received 10 Decem… read more USED (low confidence) A. Mahata, T. Mukhopadhyay, and M. A. Zaeem, “Liquid ordering induced heterogeneities in homogeneous nucleation during solidification of pure metals,” Journal of Materials Science & Technology. 2022. link Times cited: 11 USED (low confidence) K. Wang, X. Chen, X. Chen, Y. Huang, and Z. Wang, “Modified extended Finnis Sinclair potential for cubic crystal metal,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) S. A. Etesami and E. Asadi, “Molecular dynamics for near melting temperatures simulations of metals using modified embedded-atom method,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 2018. link Times cited: 71 USED (low confidence) M. A. Zaeem and L. Hogan, “Dendritic Solidification of Crystals.” 2014. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) Z. Bjelobrk, D. Mendels, T. Karmakar, M. Parrinello, and M. Mazzotti, “Solubility Prediction of Organic Molecules with Molecular Dynamics Simulations.” 2021. link Times cited: 14 Abstract: We present a molecular dynamics simulation method for the co… read more NOT USED (high confidence) D. Tourret, H. Liu, and J. Llorca, “Phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution: Recent applications, perspectives and challenges,” Progress in Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 61 NOT USED (high confidence) J. Zhao et al., “Liquid Structure and Thermophysical Properties of Ternary Ni-Fe-Co Alloys Explored by Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Electrostatic Levitation Experiments,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2021. link Times cited: 6 NOT USED (high confidence) G. P. P. Pun, V. Yamakov, J. Hickman, E. Glaessgen, and Y. Mishin, “Development of a general-purpose machine-learning interatomic potential for aluminum by the physically informed neural network method,” Physical Review Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 13 Abstract: Interatomic potentials constitute the key component of large… read more NOT USED (high confidence) W. Jiang, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Accurate Deep Potential model for the Al–Cu–Mg alloy in the full concentration space*,” arXiv: Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 24 Abstract: Combining first-principles accuracy and empirical-potential … read more NOT USED (high confidence) Y. Zhang, C. Hu, and B. Jiang, “Accelerating atomistic simulations with piecewise machine-learned ab Initio potentials at a classical force field-like cost.,” Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP. 2020. link Times cited: 12 Abstract: Recently, machine learning methods have become easy-to-use t… read more NOT USED (high confidence) J.-H. Fu, C. Zhang, T. Liu, and J. Liu, “Room temperature liquid metal: its melting point, dominating mechanism and applications,” Frontiers in Energy. 2020. link Times cited: 27 NOT USED (high confidence) J.-yu Yang, Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, W. Hu, and X. Dai, “A comparative atomic simulation study of the configurations in M-Al (M = Mg, Ni, and Fe) nanoalloys: influence of alloying ability, surface energy, atomic radius, and atomic arrangement,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2020. link Times cited: 3 NOT USED (high confidence) J.-H. Fu, C. Zhang, T. Liu, and J. Liu, “Room temperature liquid metal: its melting point, dominating mechanism and applications,” Frontiers in Energy. 2019. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) S. Kavousi, B. R. Novak, M. Baskes, M. A. Zaeem, and D. Moldovan, “Modified embedded-atom method potential for high-temperature crystal-melt properties of Ti–Ni alloys and its application to phase field simulation of solidification,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. link Times cited: 21 Abstract: We developed new interatomic potentials, based on the second… read more NOT USED (high confidence) A. Mahata and M. A. Zaeem, “Size effect in molecular dynamics simulation of nucleation process during solidification of pure metals: investigating modified embedded atom method interatomic potentials,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. link Times cited: 8 Abstract: Due to the significant increase in computing power in recent… read more NOT USED (high confidence) V. Korolev, V. Samsonov, and P. Protsenko, “Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Unstable Equilibrium of a Spherical Nucleus for Determining the Interfacial Energy in a Pb–Cu Two-Component System,” Colloid Journal. 2019. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) S. A. Etesami, M. Laradji, and E. Asadi, “Transferability of interatomic potentials in predicting the temperature dependency of elastic constants for titanium, zirconium and magnesium,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: We present our investigation of the current state of the art… read more NOT USED (high confidence) L. Wu et al., “Calculation of solid–liquid interfacial free energy and its anisotropy in undercooled system,” Rare Metals. 2018. link Times cited: 6 NOT USED (high confidence) M. A. Zaeem, “Recent Advances in Study of Solid-Liquid Interfaces and Solidification of Metals.” 2018. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: Solidification occurs in several material processing methods… read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. D. Nath, Y. Shibuta, M. Ohno, T. Takaki, and T. Mohri, “A Molecular Dynamics Study of Partitionless Solidification and Melting of Al–Cu Alloys,” Isij International. 2017. link Times cited: 13 Abstract: Title A Molecular Dynamics Study of Partitionless Solidifica… read more NOT USED (high confidence) M. Muralles, D. Choi, and B. Lee, “A comparative study of mechanical properties of Ni <001> nanowires from atomistic calculations,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2017. link Times cited: 3 NOT USED (high confidence) E. Asadi and M. A. Zaeem, “Quantitative Phase-Field Crystal Modeling of Solid-Liquid Interfaces for FCC Metals,” Computational Materials Science. 2017. link Times cited: 8 NOT USED (high confidence) C. D. Paola and J. P. Brodholt, “Modeling the melting of multicomponent systems: the case of MgSiO3 perovskite under lower mantle conditions,” Scientific Reports. 2016. link Times cited: 9 NOT USED (high confidence) C. Paola and J. Brodholt, “Modeling the melting of multicomponent systems: the case of MgSiO3 perovskite under lower mantle conditions,” Scientific Reports. 2016. link Times cited: 5 NOT USED (high confidence) J.-yu Yang and W. Hu, “Nucleation and solid–liquid interfacial energy of Li nanoparticles: A molecular dynamics study,” physica status solidi (b). 2016. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: The nucleation and growth processes of lithium nanoparticles… read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. Wilson and M. Mendelev, “A unified relation for the solid-liquid interface free energy of pure FCC, BCC, and HCP metals.,” The Journal of chemical physics. 2016. link Times cited: 37 Abstract: We study correlations between the solid-liquid interface (SL… read more NOT USED (high confidence) E. Asadi and M. A. Zaeem, “The anisotropy of hexagonal close-packed and liquid interface free energy using molecular dynamics simulations based on modified embedded-atom method,” Acta Materialia. 2016. link Times cited: 37 NOT USED (high confidence) Y. Shibuta, M. Ohno, and T. Takaki, “Solidification in a Supercomputer: From Crystal Nuclei to Dendrite Assemblages,” JOM. 2015. link Times cited: 83 NOT USED (high confidence) S. Kavousi, “Combined Molecular Dynamics and Phase Field Simulation of Crystal Melt Interfacial Properties and Microstructure Evolution during Rapid Solidification of TI-NI Alloys.” 2019. link Times cited: 0 |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_390178379548_002 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| MEAM_LAMMPS_AsadiZaeemNouranian_2015_Cu__MO_390178379548_002 |
DOI |
10.25950/d439eda9 https://doi.org/10.25950/d439eda9 https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/d439eda9 |
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 |
Driver | MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 |
KIM API Version | 2.2 |
Potential Type | meam |
Previous Version | MEAM_LAMMPS_AsadiZaeemNouranian_2015_Cu__MO_390178379548_001 |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
A | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v004 | view | 2871 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cu v004 | view | 3332 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cu v004 | view | 2945 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cu v004 | view | 2945 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 38750 | |
Elastic constants for diamond Cu at zero temperature v001 | view | 19068 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 23264 | |
Elastic constants for sc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 10601 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 | view | 72884 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v001 | view | 82970 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 11012629 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 32414173 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 15170226 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 74590057 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cu v007 | view | 8225 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu v007 | view | 9497 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cu v007 | view | 8908 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cu v007 | view | 8653 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu v005 | view | 39187 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Cu at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 | view | 61323008 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004 | view | 99768 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu v002 | view | 18197221 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 | view | 102752 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Cu | view | 322973 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Cu | view | 4247682 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp Cu at zero temperature v004 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 | other | view |
MEAM_LAMMPS_AsadiZaeemNouranian_2015_Cu__MO_390178379548_002.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
MEAM_LAMMPS_AsadiZaeemNouranian_2015_Cu__MO_390178379548_002.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 appear below.
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002.zip | Zip | Windows archive |