Title
A single sentence description.
|
MEAM potential for Fe developed by Etesami and Asadi (2018) v002 |
---|---|
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
Availability of a reliable interatomic potential is one of the major challenges in utilizing molecular dynamics (MD) for simulations of metals near the melting temperatures and melting point (MP). Here, we propose a novel approach to address this challenge in the concept of modified-embedded-atom (MEAM) interatomic potential; also, we apply the approach to iron, nickel, copper, and aluminum as case studies. We propose adding experimentally available high-temperature elastic constants and MP of the element to the list of typical low-temperature properties used for the development of MD interatomic potential parameters. We show that the proposed approach results in a reasonable agreement between the MD calculations of melting properties such as latent heat, expansion in melting, liquid structure factor, and solid-liquid interface stiffness and their experimental/computational counterparts. Then, we present the physical properties of mentioned elements near melting temperatures using the new MEAM parameters. We observe that the behavior of elastic constants, heat capacity, and thermal linear expansion coefficient at room temperature compared to MP follows an empirical linear relation (α±β × MP) for transition metals. Furthermore, a linear relation between the tetragonal shear modulus and the enthalpy change from room temperature to MP is observed for face-centered cubic materials. |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| Fe |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | NIST IPRP (https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/Fe.html) |
Content Other Locations | https://openkim.org/id/Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_EtesamiAsadi_2018_Fe__SM_267016608755_000 |
Contributor |
Yaser Afshar |
Maintainer |
Yaser Afshar |
Developer |
Seyed-Alireza Etesami Ebrahim Asadi |
Published on KIM | 2023 |
How to Cite |
This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5]. [1] Etesami SA, Asadi E. Molecular dynamics for near melting temperatures simulations of metals using modified embedded-atom method. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 2018;112:61–72. doi:10.1016/j.jpcs.2017.09.001 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Etesami S-A, Asadi E. MEAM potential for Fe developed by Etesami and Asadi (2018) v002. OpenKIM; 2023. doi:10.25950/88bf887e [3] Afshar Y, Hütter S, Rudd RE, Stukowski A, Tipton WW, Trinkle DR, et al. The modified embedded atom method (MEAM) potential v002. OpenKIM; 2023. doi:10.25950/ee5eba52 [4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 69 Citations (53 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (high confidence) B. Waters, D. S. Karls, I. Nikiforov, R. Elliott, E. Tadmor, and B. Runnels, “Automated determination of grain boundary energy and potential-dependence using the OpenKIM framework,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 5 USED (high confidence) N. Chen, Q. Peng, Z. Jiao, I. van Rooyen, W. Skerjanc, and F. Gao, “Analytical bond-order potential for silver, palladium, ruthenium and iodine bulk diffusion in silicon carbide,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2019. link Times cited: 6 Abstract: The analytical bond-order potential has been developed for s… read more USED (high confidence) W. Dednam et al., “Directional bonding explains the high conductance of atomic contacts in bcc metals,” Physical Review B. 2019. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: Atomic-sized junctions of iron, created by controlled ruptur… read more USED (low confidence) S. M. Handrigan and S. Nakhla, “Generation of viable nanocrystalline structures using the melt-cool method: the influence of force field selection,” Philosophical Magazine. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) Z. Zou and P. Tiwary, “Enhanced sampling of Crystal Nucleation with Graph Representation Learnt Variables,” ArXiv. 2023. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: In this study, we present a graph neural network-based learn… read more USED (low confidence) C. Li, S. Lu, S. Divinski, and L. Vitos, “Theoretical and experimental grain boundary energies in body-centered cubic metals,” Acta Materialia. 2023. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) O. Klimanova, T. Miryashkin, and A. Shapeev, “Accurate melting point prediction through autonomous physics-informed learning,” Physical Review B. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: We present an algorithm for computing melting points by auto… read more USED (low confidence) T. Chen et al., “Grain boundary serration tuning and its effect on hot workability of a wrought superalloy,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) S. Kazanç and C. Canbay, “Investigation of microstructural development of liquid Nb in dependence of cooling rate: Molecular dynamics simulation study,” Vacuum. 2023. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) S. Paul, D. Schwen, M. Short, and K. Momeni, “A Modified Embedded-Atom Method Potential for a Quaternary Fe-Cr-Si-Mo Solid Solution Alloy,” Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: Ferritic-martensitic steels, such as T91, are candidate mate… read more USED (low confidence) C. Zhang, Q. Liao, X. Zhang, F. Ma, M. Wu, and Q. Xu, “Characterization of porosity in lack of fusion pores in selective laser melting using the wavefunction,” Materials Research Express. 2022. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: Selective laser melting (SLM) is used extensively in the man… read more USED (low confidence) H. Deng, J. Comer, and B. Liu, “A high-dimensional neural network potential for molecular dynamics simulations of condensed phase nickel and phase transitions,” Molecular Simulation. 2022. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: ABSTRACT A high-dimensional neural network interatomic poten… read more USED (low confidence) J.-L. Lee et al., “Effect of serrated grain boundary on tensile and creep properties of a precipitation strengthened high entropy alloy,” Science and Technology of Advanced Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 6 Abstract: ABSTRACT In this study, tensile and creep deformation of a h… read more USED (low confidence) S. Luo et al., “Thermal Behavior of Li Electrode in All-Solid-State Batteries and Improved Performance by Temperature Modulation,” SSRN Electronic Journal. 2022. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) S. S. M. N. Souq, F. A. Ghasemi, and M. M. S. Fakhrabadi, “Performance of different traditional and machine learning-based atomistic potential functions in the simulation of mechanical behavior of Fe nanowires,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) X.-W. Wang, X. Sun, T. Song, J. Tian, and Z.-J. Liu, “Prediction of the melting curve and phase diagram for CaO using newly developed interatomic potentials,” Vacuum. 2022. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) J. Shi, W. Xiao, J. Wang, and H. Yang, “A molecular dynamics study on sintering behavior and densification characterization of nanocopper,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2022. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: The technical problem of copper additive manufacturing is ex… read more USED (low confidence) N. Gui, Q. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Yang, J. Tu, and S. Jiang, “Diffusion and Thermo-Driven Migration of Silver, Palladium and Ruthenium Nanoparticles in Cubic Sic Matrix Using Molecular Dynamics,” SSRN Electronic Journal. 2022. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) Y. Wang, F. Wang, W. Yu, Y. Wang, Z. Qi, and Y. Wang, “Effects of pressure on volatilisation of pure Bi nanoparticles and Bi–Fe core–shell nanoparticles during continuous heating: a molecular dynamics study,” Molecular Physics. 2022. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: In the present work, the molecular dynamics study method has… read more USED (low confidence) Y. Lei et al., “An Embedded-Atom Method Potential for studying the properties of Fe-Pb solid-liquid interface,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) L. Zhang, G. Csányi, E. Giessen, and F. Maresca, “Atomistic fracture in bcc iron revealed by active learning of Gaussian approximation potential,” npj Computational Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) I. Toda-Caraballo, J. Wróbel, and D. Nguyen-Manh, “Generalized universal equation of states for magnetic materials: A novel formulation for an interatomic potential in Fe,” Physical Review Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) C. C. Sluss, J. Pittman, D. Nicholson, and D. Keffer, “Exploration of Entropy Pair Functional Theory,” Entropy. 2022. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: Evaluation of the entropy from molecular dynamics (MD) simul… read more USED (low confidence) Y. Xu, G. Wang, P. Qian, and Y. Su, “Element segregation and thermal stability of Ni–Rh nanoparticles,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2022. link Times cited: 6 USED (low confidence) S. A. Etesami, M. Laradji, and E. Asadi, “The influence of Pb content on the interfacial free energy of solid Sn in eutectic Pb–Sn liquid mixtures using molecular dynamics simulations,” Molecular Simulation. 2022. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: ABSTRACT The solid–liquid interfacial free energy (γ) for bi… read more USED (low confidence) F. Gao, Q. Peng, and D. Huang, “Abnormal radiation resistance via direct-amorphization-induced defect recovery in HgTe,” Applied Physics Letters. 2022. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) Z. Yan, B. Xu, J. Li, and L. Kong, “Defect-mediated crystal growth from deeply undercooled melts,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) I. Balyakin and A. A. Rempel, “Atomistic Calculation of the Melting Point of the High-Entropy Cantor Alloy CoCrFeMnNi,” Doklady Physical Chemistry. 2022. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) G. Skarbalius et al., “Molecular Dynamics Study on Water Flow Behaviour inside Planar Nanochannel Using Different Temperature Control Strategies,” Energies. 2021. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: In the present paper, molecular dynamics simulations were pe… read more USED (low confidence) S. Paul, M. Muralles, D. Schwen, M. Short, and K. Momeni, “A Modified Embedded-Atom Potential for Fe-Cr-Si Alloys,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2021. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) Y. Zhou, G. Luo, Y. Hu, D. Wu, and Z. Yao, “Interaction properties between molten metal and quartz by molecular dynamics simulation,” Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2021. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) Y. Shin, Y. Gao, D. Shin, and A. Duin, “Impact of three-body interactions in a ReaxFF force field for Ni and Cr transition metals and their alloys on the prediction of thermal and mechanical properties,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) S. Shuang et al., “Effects of high entropy and twin boundary on the nanoindentation of CoCrNiFeMn high-entropy alloy: A molecular dynamics study,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 29 USED (low confidence) C. Canbay and S. Kazanç, “Fe Elementinin Kristal ve Camsı Faza Dönüşümünün Hidrostatik Basınç Altında İncelenmesi: Moleküler Dinamik Benzetim Çalışması.” 2021. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) S. Starikov et al., “Angular-dependent interatomic potential for large-scale atomistic simulation of iron: Development and comprehensive comparison with existing interatomic models,” Physical Review Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 16 Abstract: The development of classical interatomic potential for iron … read more USED (low confidence) F. Iesari, H. Setoyama, and T. Okajima, “Extracting Local Symmetry of Mono-Atomic Systems from Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Using Deep Neural Networks,” Symmetry. 2021. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: In recent years, neural networks have become a new method fo… read more USED (low confidence) S. Kumar, M.-W. Liu, K.-A. Wu, and M. Gururajan, “Anisotropy in interface stress at the bcc-iron solid–melt interface: Molecular dynamics and phase field crystal modelling,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) M. O’Masta, C. CloughEric, and J. H. Martin, “Island formation and the heterogeneous nucleation of aluminum,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) Z. Aitken, V. Sorkin, Z. Yu, S. Chen, Z. Wu, and Y.-W. Zhang, “Modified embedded-atom method potentials for the plasticity and fracture behaviors of unary fcc metals,” Physical Review B. 2021. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) Y. Lysogorskiy et al., “Performant implementation of the atomic cluster expansion (PACE) and application to copper and silicon,” npj Computational Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 84 USED (low confidence) A. Agrawal and R. Mirzaeifar, “Copper-graphene composites; developing the MEAM potential and investigating their mechanical properties,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 9 USED (low confidence) R. Wu, X. Zhao, and Y. Liu, “Atomic Insights of Cu Nanoparticles Melting and Sintering Behavior in Cu — Cu Direct Bonding,” Energy Engineering (Energy) eJournal. 2020. link Times cited: 27 USED (low confidence) S. A. Etesami, M. Laradji, and E. Asadi, “Reliability of molecular dynamics interatomic potentials for modeling of titanium in additive manufacturing processes,” Computational Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) R. Meyer et al., “Vibrational and magnetic signatures of extended defects in Fe,” The European Physical Journal B. 2020. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) K. Li et al., “Determination of the accuracy and reliability of molecular dynamics simulations in estimating the melting point of iron: Roles of interaction potentials and initial system configurations,” Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2019. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) M. Hazarika and S. N. Chakraborty, “Study of structural stability of copper crystal with voids from molecular dynamics simulations,” Chemical Physics Letters. 2019. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) S. Zhevnenko, “Ordering of cobalt surface particles by moving grain boundaries in copper,” Applied Surface Science. 2019. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) S. A. Etesami, M. Baskes, M. Laradji, and E. Asadi, “Thermodynamics of solid Sn and Pb Sn liquid mixtures using molecular dynamics simulations,” Acta Materialia. 2018. link Times cited: 21 USED (low confidence) A. Nourian-Avval and E. Asadi, “Thermodynamics of FCC metals at melting point in one-mode phase-field crystals model,” Computational Materials Science. 2018. link Times cited: 7 USED (low confidence) M. Melnykov and R. Davidchack, “Characterization of melting properties of several Fe-C model potentials,” Computational Materials Science. 2018. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) X. Liu et al., “A statistics-based study and machine-learning of stacking fault energies in HEAs,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) S. Y. Korostelev, E. E. Slyadnikov, and I. Turchanovsky, “The resistance of amorphous metals to thermal effects. Molecular dynamics modeling,” PHYSICAL MESOMECHANICS OF CONDENSED MATTER: Physical Principles of Multiscale Structure Formation and the Mechanisms of Nonlinear Behavior: MESO2022. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) Z. Yan, H. Sheng, E. Ma, B. Xu, J. Li, and L. Kong, “Intermediate structural evolution preceding growing BCC crystal interface in deeply undercooled monatomic metallic liquids,” Acta Materialia. 2021. link Times cited: 6 NOT USED (high confidence) C. Lapointe, T. Swinburne, L. Proville, C. Becquart, N. Mousseau, and M. Marinica, “Machine learning surrogate models for strain-dependent vibrational properties and migration rates of point defects,” Physical Review Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: ,… read more NOT USED (high confidence) K. Jurkiewicz, M. Kamiński, A. Bródka, and A. Burian, “Atomistic origin of nano-silver paracrystalline structure: molecular dynamics and x-ray diffraction studies,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2022. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: Classical molecular dynamics (MD) and x-ray diffraction (XRD… read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. Kazanç and C. Canbay, “Cu’nun Mekanik Özelliklerine Tek Eksenli Germe Zorlanmasının Etkisi: Moleküler Dinamik Yöntemi,” Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2021. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) S. Kazanç and C. Canbay, “Fe elementindeki αγδ Katı-Katı Faz Geçişlerinin Moleküler Dinamik Benzetimi ile İncelenmesi,” Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2021. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: When the phase diagram of the element Fe is examined, it is … read more NOT USED (high confidence) H. Zou, Y. Feng, L. Qiu, and X. Zhang, “Effect of the loading amount and arrangement of iodine chains on the interfacial thermal transport of carbon nanotubes: a molecular dynamics study,” RSC Advances. 2020. link Times cited: 7 Abstract: Due to their excellent electrical and thermal conductivity p… read more NOT USED (high confidence) L. Morrissey and S. Nakhla, “Considerations when calculating the mechanical properties of single crystals and bulk polycrystals from molecular dynamics simulations,” Molecular Simulation. 2020. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: ABSTRACT The choice of a proper interatomic potential is cri… read more NOT USED (high confidence) W. Jiang, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Accurate Deep Potential model for the Al–Cu–Mg alloy in the full concentration space*,” arXiv: Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 24 Abstract: Combining first-principles accuracy and empirical-potential … read more NOT USED (high confidence) C. Lapointe et al., “Machine learning surrogate models for prediction of point defect vibrational entropy,” Physical Review Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 5 Abstract: The temperature variation of the defect densities in a cryst… read more NOT USED (high confidence) J. Zhang, J. Cui, Z. Yang, and S. Shen, “Thermodynamic properties and thermoelastic constitutive relation for cubic crystal structures based on improved free energy,” Computational Mechanics. 2020. link Times cited: 1 NOT USED (high confidence) J.-H. Fu, C. Zhang, T. Liu, and J. Liu, “Room temperature liquid metal: its melting point, dominating mechanism and applications,” Frontiers in Energy. 2020. link Times cited: 27 NOT USED (high confidence) J.-H. Fu, C. Zhang, T. Liu, and J. Liu, “Room temperature liquid metal: its melting point, dominating mechanism and applications,” Frontiers in Energy. 2019. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) J. Zhang, J. Cui, Z. Yang, and S. Shen, “Thermodynamic properties and thermoelastic constitutive relation for cubic crystal structures based on improved free energy,” Computational Mechanics. 2019. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) S. Kavousi, B. R. Novak, M. Baskes, M. A. Zaeem, and D. Moldovan, “Modified embedded-atom method potential for high-temperature crystal-melt properties of Ti–Ni alloys and its application to phase field simulation of solidification,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. link Times cited: 21 Abstract: We developed new interatomic potentials, based on the second… read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. M. Handrigan, L. Morrissey, and S. Nakhla, “Investigating various many-body force fields for their ability to predict reduction in elastic modulus due to vacancies using molecular dynamics simulations,” Molecular Simulation. 2019. link Times cited: 6 Abstract: ABSTRACT Molecular dynamics simulations are more frequently … read more NOT USED (high confidence) L. Morrissey, S. M. Handrigan, S. Subedi, and S. Nakhla, “Atomistic uniaxial tension tests: investigating various many-body potentials for their ability to produce accurate stress strain curves using molecular dynamics simulations,” Molecular Simulation. 2019. link Times cited: 13 Abstract: ABSTRACT Molecular dynamics simulations, which take place on… read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. A. Etesami, M. Laradji, and E. Asadi, “Transferability of interatomic potentials in predicting the temperature dependency of elastic constants for titanium, zirconium and magnesium,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: We present our investigation of the current state of the art… read more |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_549900287421_002 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| MEAM_LAMMPS_EtesamiAsadi_2018_Fe__MO_549900287421_002 |
DOI |
10.25950/88bf887e https://doi.org/10.25950/88bf887e https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/88bf887e |
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 |
Driver | MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 |
KIM API Version | 2.2 |
Potential Type | meam |
Previous Version | MEAM_LAMMPS_EtesamiAsadi_2018_Fe__MO_549900287421_001 |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
B | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Fe v004 | view | 4712 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Fe v004 | view | 4734 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Fe v004 | view | 4655 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Fe v004 | view | 4147 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc Fe at zero temperature v006 | view | 17445 | |
Elastic constants for diamond Fe at zero temperature v001 | view | 56414 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Fe at zero temperature v006 | view | 16908 | |
Elastic constants for sc Fe at zero temperature v006 | view | 17177 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 | view | 149597 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 | view | 61368 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 | view | 51646 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v002 | view | 60152 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Fe v001 | view | 27941357 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Fe v001 | view | 16534479 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Fe v001 | view | 62074170 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Fe v001 | view | 19529419 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Fe v007 | view | 18332 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Fe v007 | view | 6111 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Fe v007 | view | 10055 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Fe v007 | view | 9939 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Fe v005 | view | 71117 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of bcc Fe at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 | view | 1617370 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in bcc Fe v004 | view | 72357 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for bcc Fe | view | 441208 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Vacancy formation and migration energy for bcc Fe | view | 5158883 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp Fe at zero temperature v004 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP1_123_a v002 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in bcc Fe v004 | other | view |
MEAM_LAMMPS_EtesamiAsadi_2018_Fe__MO_549900287421_002.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
MEAM_LAMMPS_EtesamiAsadi_2018_Fe__MO_549900287421_002.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 appear below.
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002.zip | Zip | Windows archive |