Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

MEAM_LAMMPS_GaoOteroAouadi_2013_AgTaO__MO_112077942578_001

Interatomic potential for Oxygen (O), Silver (Ag), Tantalum (Ta).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
MEAM potential for perovskite silver tantalate (AgTaO3) developed by Gao et al. (2013) v001
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
A set of parameters for the modified embedded atom method (MEAM) potential was developed to describe the perovskite silver tantalate (AgTaO3). First, MEAM parameters for AgO and TaO were determined based on the structural and elastic properties of the materials in a B1 reference structure predicted by density-functional theory (DFT). Then, using the fitted binary parameters, additional potential parameters were adjusted to enable the empirical potential to reproduce DFT-predicted lattice structure, elastic constants, cohesive energy, and equation of state for the ternary AgTaO3. Finally, thermal expansion was predicted by a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation using the newly developed potential and compared directly to experimental values. The agreement with known experimental data for AgTaO3 is satisfactory and confirms that the new empirical model is a good starting point for further MD studies.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Ag, O, Ta
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin NIST IPRP (https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/Ag.html#AgTaO3)
Content Other Locations https://openkim.org/id/Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_GaoOterodelaRozaAouadi_2013_AgTaO__SM_485325656366_000
Contributor Yaser Afshar
Maintainer Yaser Afshar
Developer Hongyu Gao
Alberto Otero de la Roza
Samir Aouadi
Erin R. Johnson
Ashlie Martini
Published on KIM 2021
How to Cite Click here to download this citation in BibTeX format.
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_112077942578_001
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
MEAM_LAMMPS_GaoOteroAouadi_2013_AgTaO__MO_112077942578_001
DOI 10.25950/f6534a4d
https://doi.org/10.25950/f6534a4d
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/f6534a4d
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001
DriverMEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001
KIM API Version2.2
Potential Type meam
Previous Version MEAM_LAMMPS_GaoOteroAouadi_2013_AgTaO__MO_112077942578_000

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ag
Species: O
Species: Ta


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ag
Species: Ta
Species: O


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ta
Species: O
Species: Ag


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: O
Species: Ag
Species: Ta


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ag
Species: O
Species: Ta


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ag


SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ag
Species: O
Species: Ta


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Ag

Species: O

Species: Ta





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ag v004 view 3839
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc O v004 view 3392
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ta v004 view 3113
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ag v004 view 3223
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond O v004 view 3902
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ta v004 view 3607
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ag v004 view 3183
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc O v004 view 3581
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ta v004 view 3213
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ag v004 view 3460
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc O v004 view 3083
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ta v004 view 3322


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Ag at zero temperature v006 view 17565
Elastic constants for bcc O at zero temperature v006 view 19385
Elastic constants for bcc Ta at zero temperature v006 view 41853
Elastic constants for diamond Ag at zero temperature v001 view 24596
Elastic constants for diamond Ta at zero temperature v001 view 24437
Elastic constants for fcc Ag at zero temperature v006 view 27332
Elastic constants for fcc O at zero temperature v006 view 19753
Elastic constants for fcc Ta at zero temperature v006 view 17594
Elastic constants for sc Ag at zero temperature v006 view 37765
Elastic constants for sc O at zero temperature v006 view 17187
Elastic constants for sc Ta at zero temperature v006 view 16898


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v000

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/53ef2ea4

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AgO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B3_oF40_43_b_ab v000 view 519410
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AgO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cP6_224_b_a v000 view 176999
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AgO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_hP3_164_d_a v000 view 88102
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTa in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_tP6_136_f_a v000 view 58463
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTa in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_mC20_12_3i_2i v000 view 162996
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AgO in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_hP8_162_k_c v000 view 85473
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTa in AFLOW crystal prototype A5B2_mC14_5_a2c_c v000 view 73989
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTa in AFLOW crystal prototype A5B2_mC28_15_e2f_f v000 view 205033
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ag in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v000 view 81645
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ta in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v000 view 87093
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ta in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v000 view 68025
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ag in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v000 view 70070
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_f v000 view 72735
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR2_166_c v000 view 151478
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_mC4_12_i v000 view 99682
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC12_63_cg v000 view 174622
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oP24_61_3c v000 view 1257930
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ta in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP22_136_af2i v000 view 79510
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ta in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP22_81_g5h v000 view 216087
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ta in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP30_113_c3e2f v000 view 166973
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ta in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP30_136_af2ij v000 view 182837
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ta in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP4_127_g v000 view 73660
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTa in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cI24_217_c_abc v000 view 223686
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTa in AFLOW crystal prototype AB4_tP5_123_c_abh v000 view 68230
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AgO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_216_a_c v000 view 118397
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTa in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_225_a_b v000 view 93681


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ag v007 view 13218
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc O v007 view 13338
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ta v007 view 12930
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ag v007 view 13606
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond O v007 view 14183
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ta v007 view 13537
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ag v007 view 13049
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc O v007 view 12691
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ta v007 view 12980
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ag v007 view 12383
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc O v007 view 13348
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ta v007 view 12751


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ag v005 view 179456
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp O v005 view 242155
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ta v005 view 171738


Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v001

Creators: Mingjian Wen
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fc69d82d

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of bcc Ta at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 view 42708034
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Ag at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 view 47077322


High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):


import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in bcc Ta v004 view 470764
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Ag v004 view 366629


ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Elastic constants for diamond O at zero temperature v001 other view

ElasticConstantsHexagonal__TD_612503193866_004

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_000

PhononDispersionCurve__TD_530195868545_004
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Ag v004 other view

StackingFaultFccCrystal__TD_228501831190_002
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Ag v002 other view

No Driver
Verification Check Error Categories Link to Error page
ForcesNumerDeriv__VC_710586816390_003 other view
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 other view




This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001 appear below.


MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001.zip Zip Windows archive
Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content