Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

MEAM_LAMMPS_KimLee_2008_TiC__MO_134206624109_001

Interatomic potential for Carbon (C), Titanium (Ti).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
MEAM Potential for the Ti-C system developed by Kim, and Lee (2008) v001
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
Modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) interatomic potentials for the Ti–C binary system has been developed using previously developed MEAM potentials of Ti and C. The potential parameters were determined by fitting to experimental data on the enthalpy of formation, lattice parameter, elastic constants, thermal linear expansion of NaCl-type TiC, and dilute heat of solution of carbon and nitrogen atoms in hexagonal close-packed Ti. In the original paper (Kim and Lee, Acta Materialia, 56(14), 2008), the potentials can describe fundamental physical properties (structural, elastic, thermal and surface properties) of the alloys well, in good agreement with experimental information or first-principles calculations.
Species
The supported atomic species.
C, Ti
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin http://cmse.postech.ac.kr/home_2nnmeam
Contributor Jong-Kwan Lee
Maintainer Jong-Kwan Lee
Developer Young-Min Kim
Byeong-Joo Lee
Published on KIM 2021
How to Cite Click here to download this citation in BibTeX format.
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_134206624109_001
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimLee_2008_TiC__MO_134206624109_001
DOI 10.25950/8f72324a
https://doi.org/10.25950/8f72324a
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/8f72324a
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001
DriverMEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001
KIM API Version2.2
Potential Type meam
Previous Version MEAM_LAMMPS_KimLee_2008_TiC__MO_134206624109_000

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
A vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: C
Species: Ti


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: C
Species: Ti


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ti
Species: C


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: C
Species: Ti


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ti
Species: C


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ti
Species: C


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: C

Species: Ti





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc C v004 view 3392
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ti v004 view 3710
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond C v004 view 4270
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ti v004 view 4049
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc C v004 view 3402
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ti v004 view 3620
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc C v004 view 3976
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ti v004 view 3441


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc C at zero temperature v006 view 17326
Elastic constants for bcc Ti at zero temperature v006 view 29778
Elastic constants for diamond C at zero temperature v001 view 69264
Elastic constants for fcc C at zero temperature v006 view 18251
Elastic constants for fcc Ti at zero temperature v006 view 16600
Elastic constants for sc C at zero temperature v006 view 30644
Elastic constants for sc Ti at zero temperature v006 view 17356


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v000

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/53ef2ea4

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A5B8_hR13_166_abd_ch v000 view 147683
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF16_227_c v000 view 317304
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF240_202_h2i v000 view 12204144
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v000 view 75818
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF8_227_a v000 view 123609
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI16_206_c v000 view 100492
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI16_229_f v000 view 110431
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v000 view 71790
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI8_214_a v000 view 100198
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP1_221_a v000 view 52123
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP20_221_gj v000 view 107854
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP12_194_bc2f v000 view 82823
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_191_c v000 view 87682
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP3_191_ad v000 view 55449
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_bc v000 view 67363
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_f v000 view 67583
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP8_194_ef v000 view 74430
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR10_166_5c v000 view 134331
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR14_166_7c v000 view 92762
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR2_166_c v000 view 55001
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR60_166_2h4i v000 view 2411808
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC16_65_pq v000 view 87314
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC8_65_gh v000 view 83357
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oI120_71_lmn6o v000 view 832978
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tI8_139_h v000 view 116557
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF48_227_c_e v000 view 351023
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_225_a_b v000 view 87829


Cohesive energy and equilibrium lattice constant of hexagonal 2D crystalline layers v002

Creators: Ilia Nikiforov
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/dd36239b

Given atomic species and structure type (graphene-like, 2H, or 1T) of a 2D hexagonal monolayer crystal, as well as an initial guess at the lattice spacing, this Test Driver calculates the equilibrium lattice spacing and cohesive energy using Polak-Ribiere conjugate gradient minimization in LAMMPS
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy and equilibrium lattice constant of graphene v002 view 706


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc C v007 view 13477
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ti v007 view 12989
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond C v007 view 14292
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ti v007 view 13268
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc C v007 view 13755
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ti v007 view 13527
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc C v007 view 13546
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ti v007 view 13338


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp C v005 view 148544
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ti v005 view 134669


ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Elastic constants for diamond Ti at zero temperature v001 other view

ElasticConstantsHexagonal__TD_612503193866_004

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_000

LinearThermalExpansionCoeffCubic__TD_522633393614_001

No Driver
Verification Check Error Categories Link to Error page
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 other view
PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004 other view




This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001 appear below.


MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001.zip Zip Windows archive
Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content