Title
A single sentence description.
|
MEAM Potential for the Al-Ni system developed by Silva et al. (2007) v002 |
---|---|
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
LAMMPS MEAM Potential for the Al-Ni system developed by Silva et al. (2007) v000 |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| Al, Ni |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | http://cmse.postech.ac.kr/home_2nnmeam |
Contributor |
Sang-Ho Oh |
Maintainer |
Sang-Ho Oh |
Developer |
A. Costa e Silva John Agren M. T. Clavaguera-Mora D. Djurovic T. Gomez-Acebo Byeong-Joo Lee Zi-Kui Liu A. P. Miodownik Hans Jeurgen Seifert |
Published on KIM | 2023 |
How to Cite |
This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5]. [1] Silva AC e, Ågren J, Clavaguera-Mora MT, Djurovic D, Gomez-Acebo T, Lee B-J, et al. Applications of computational thermodynamics—the extension from phase equilibrium to phase transformations and other properties. Calphad. 2007;31(1):53–74. doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2006.02.006 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Silva AC e, Agren J, Clavaguera-Mora MT, Djurovic D, Gomez-Acebo T, Lee B-J, et al. MEAM Potential for the Al-Ni system developed by Silva et al. (2007) v002. OpenKIM; 2023. doi:10.25950/845958e4 [3] Afshar Y, Hütter S, Rudd RE, Stukowski A, Tipton WW, Trinkle DR, et al. The modified embedded atom method (MEAM) potential v002. OpenKIM; 2023. doi:10.25950/ee5eba52 [4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 46 Citations (6 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (high confidence) S. Shang et al., “Generalized stacking fault energy, ideal strength and twinnability of dilute Mg-based alloys: A first-principles study of shear deformation,” Acta Materialia. 2014. link Times cited: 178 USED (high confidence) K. Tanaka, H. Takamiya, N. Iwata, and K. Nakanishi, “Microstructure and Bond Strength of Steels Using Low-Cr-substituted Cementite Foil,” Isij International. 2011. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: In our previous paper, the eutectic liquid that appears betw… read more USED (low confidence) A. Mahata, T. Mukhopadhyay, and M. A. Zaeem, “Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for Al-Cu, Al-Fe and Al-Ni binary alloys: From room temperature to melting point,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 27 USED (low confidence) S. Oh, X.-gang Lu, Q. Chen, and B.-J. Lee, “Pressure dependence of thermodynamic interaction parameters for binary solid solution phases: An atomistic simulation study,” Calphad-computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry. 2021. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) G. Neves, H. G. Tirollo, S. Probst, C. Binder, and A. N. Klein, “Application of computational thermodynamics to Fe/Ni, Fe-3%Si/Ni and 316L/Ni systems produced by powder metallurgy,” Powder Metallurgy. 2017. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: ABSTRACT The commercial simulation software packages, Thermo… read more USED (low confidence) J. Torrens-Serra, J. Rodríguez-Viejo, and M. Clavaguera-Mora, “Nanocrystallization kinetics and glass forming ability of the Fe 65 Nb 10 B 25 metallic alloy,” Physical Review B. 2007. link Times cited: 27 Abstract: The crystallization kinetics of glassy ${\mathrm{Fe}}_{65}{\… read more NOT USED (low confidence) R. Xiao, K. L. Liu, Y. Ruan, and B. Wei, “Rapid acquisition of liquid thermophysical properties from pure metals to quaternary alloys by proposing a machine learning strategy,” Applied Physics Letters. 2023. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: The establishment of reliable materials genome databases inv… read more NOT USED (low confidence) B. Waters, D. S. Karls, I. Nikiforov, R. Elliott, E. Tadmor, and B. Runnels, “Automated determination of grain boundary energy and potential-dependence using the OpenKIM framework,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 5 NOT USED (low confidence) J. Herrnring, B. Sundman, P. Staron, and B. Klusemann, “Modeling precipitation kinetics for multi-phase and multi-component systems using particle size distributions via a moving grid technique,” Acta Materialia. 2021. link Times cited: 8 NOT USED (low confidence) Z. Aitken, V. Sorkin, Z. Yu, S. Chen, Z. Wu, and Y.-W. Zhang, “Modified embedded-atom method potentials for the plasticity and fracture behaviors of unary fcc metals,” Physical Review B. 2021. link Times cited: 5 NOT USED (low confidence) H. Gog, “First-principles study of dehydration interfaces between diaspore and corundum, gibbsite and boehmite, and boehmite and γ-Al2O3: Energetic stability, interface charge effects, and dehydration defects,” Applied Surface Science. 2020. link Times cited: 13 NOT USED (low confidence) D. Zhang, Y. Xue, D. Tian, C. Zeng, Y. Fu, and Y.-fang Tian, “Theoretical investigation the growth of Fe3Si on GaAs: Stability and electronic properties of Fe3Si/GaAs(0 0 1), (1 1 0) via DFT,” Applied Surface Science. 2020. link Times cited: 3 NOT USED (low confidence) E. D. M. Alvares, W. Botta, J. Ågren, and A. C. Silva, “An assessment of Fe-Nb-B melts using the two-state liquid model,” Calphad-computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry. 2020. link Times cited: 3 NOT USED (low confidence) G. Neves, E. Pio, P. Martin, C. Aguilar, C. Binder, and A. N. Klein, “Semi-empirical computational thermodynamic calculations used to predict carbide dissociation in Fe matrix,” Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2020. link Times cited: 11 NOT USED (low confidence) W. Dong, Z. Chen, and B.-J. Lee, “Modified embedded-atom interatomic potential for Co–W and Al–W systems,” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China. 2015. link Times cited: 9 NOT USED (low confidence) A. C. E. Silva, “Importance of Interfacial Energy in Precipitation Modeling Using Computational Thermodynamics Techniques.” 2015. link Times cited: 3 NOT USED (low confidence) Y.-hong Zhao, Z. Wen, H. Hou, W. Guo, and P. Han, “Density functional theory study of the interfacial properties of Ni/Ni3Si eutectic alloy,” Applied Surface Science. 2014. link Times cited: 11 NOT USED (low confidence) W. Dong, H.-K. Kim, W. Ko, B.-M. Lee, and B.-J. Lee, “Atomistic modeling of pure Co and Co–Al system,” Calphad-computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry. 2012. link Times cited: 42 NOT USED (low confidence) M. Easton et al., “The role of crystallography and thermodynamics on phase selection in binary magnesium–rare earth (Ce or Nd) alloys,” Acta Materialia. 2012. link Times cited: 63 NOT USED (low confidence) V. Tomashik, “C-N-Si Ternary Phase Diagram Evaluation,” MSI Eureka. 2012. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (low confidence) B.-J. Lee, W. Ko, H.-K. Kim, and E.-H. Kim, “The modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials and recent progress in atomistic simulations,” Calphad-computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry. 2010. link Times cited: 137 NOT USED (low confidence) Z.-kui Liu, “A materials research paradigm driven by computation,” JOM. 2009. link Times cited: 18 NOT USED (low confidence) L. Zhang et al., “Thermodynamic properties of the Al–Fe–Ni system acquired via a hybrid approach combining calorimetry, first-principles and CALPHAD,” Acta Materialia. 2009. link Times cited: 85 NOT USED (low confidence) L. Zhang et al., “Phase equilibria and thermal analysis in the Fe–Mn–Ni system,” International Journal of Materials Research. 2009. link Times cited: 15 Abstract: Based on the critical review of the experimental data availa… read more NOT USED (low confidence) L. Zhang et al., “Thermodynamic description of the C-Fe-Mn system with key experiments and its practical applications,” International Journal of Materials Research. 2008. link Times cited: 11 Abstract: Based on the critically reviewed experimental data available… read more NOT USED (low confidence) H.-K. Kim, W. Jung, and B.-J. Lee, “Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for the Fe–Ti–C and Fe–Ti–N ternary systems,” Acta Materialia. 2008. link Times cited: 121 NOT USED (low confidence) L.-qing Chen and Y. Gu, “27 – Computational Metallurgy.” 2014. link Times cited: 3 NOT USED (low confidence) M. Strangwood, “Fundamentals of ferrite formation in steels.” 2012. link Times cited: 11 Abstract: Abstract: The diffusional formation of ferrite at low underc… read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. Yang, J. Zhong, J. Wang, L. Zhang, and G. Kaptay, “OpenIEC: an open-source code for interfacial energy calculation in alloys,” Journal of Materials Science. 2019. link Times cited: 12 NOT USED (high confidence) A. Walle and M. Asta, “High-throughput calculations in the context of alloy design,” MRS Bulletin. 2019. link Times cited: 24 Abstract: Modern approaches to alloy design increasingly exploit the f… read more NOT USED (high confidence) D. Schmidmair, V. Kahlenberg, and A. Grießer, “K2CaSi4O10: A novel phase in the ternary system K2O–CaO–SiO2 and member of the litidionite group of crystal structures,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 2018. link Times cited: 6 NOT USED (high confidence) S. Liu et al., “Refinement effect of TiC on ferrite by molecular statics/dynamics simulations and first-principles calculations,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2018. link Times cited: 3 NOT USED (high confidence) H. Colpaert, “Equilibrium Phases and Constituents in the Fe–C System,” Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis. 2017. link Times cited: 1 NOT USED (high confidence) A. C. E. Silva, “Applications of Multicomponent Databases to the Improvement of Steel Processing and Design,” Journal of Phase Equilibria and Diffusion. 2017. link Times cited: 7 NOT USED (high confidence) Y.-K. Kim, W. Jung, and B.-J. Lee, “Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for the Ni–Co binary and the Ni–Al–Co ternary systems,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2015. link Times cited: 32 Abstract: Interatomic potentials for the Ni–Co binary and Ni–Al–Co ter… read more NOT USED (high confidence) W. Dong, B.-J. Lee, and Z. Chen, “Atomistic modeling for interfacial properties of Ni-Al-V ternary system,” Metals and Materials International. 2014. link Times cited: 6 NOT USED (high confidence) C. Campbell, U. Kattner, and Z.-kui Liu, “The development of phase-based property data using the CALPHAD method and infrastructure needs,” Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation. 2014. link Times cited: 41 NOT USED (high confidence) S. Shang, C. L. Zacherl, H. Fang, Y. Wang, Y. Du, and Z. Liu, “Effects of alloying element and temperature on the stacking fault energies of dilute Ni-base superalloys,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2012. link Times cited: 127 Abstract: A systematic study of stacking fault energy (γSF) resulting … read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. G. Popov, V. Lysenko, and V. N. Proselkov, “Thermodynamic simulation of phase equilibria in the UO2-Gd2O3 system at high temperatures,” High Temperature. 2012. link Times cited: 2 NOT USED (high confidence) S. G. Popov, V. N. Proselkov, and V. Lysenko, “Thermodynamic analysis of uranium–gadolinium fuel stability at high temperatures,” Atomic Energy. 2011. link Times cited: 7 NOT USED (high confidence) A. Ardell, “A1-L12 interfacial free energies from data on coarsening in five binary Ni alloys, informed by thermodynamic phase diagram assessments,” Journal of Materials Science. 2011. link Times cited: 57 NOT USED (high confidence) S. Lee, “SiC Particulate‐Reinforced Si–C–N—Highly Oxidation Resistant Composites at 1500°C in Air,” International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology. 2009. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: The thermal stability and high-temperature strength of SiC f… read more NOT USED (high confidence) K. Tanaka, H. Ikehata, K. Nakanishi, and T. Nishikawa, “Growth Simulation of Spheroidized Carbide in the Carbide-Dispersed Carburizing Process,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2008. link Times cited: 5 NOT USED (high confidence) U. Kattner, “THE CALPHAD METHOD AND ITS ROLE IN MATERIAL AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT.,” Tecnologia em metalurgia, materiais e mineracao. 2016. link Times cited: 81 Abstract: Successful design of materials and manufacturing processes r… read more NOT USED (high confidence) A. C. E. Silva, F. Beneduce, and R. Avillez, “LIQUID IRON DEOXIDATION BY ALUMINUM: A BRIEF REVIEW OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA AND THERMODYNAMIC DESCRIPTION,” Tecnologia em Metalurgia, Materiais e Mineração. 2015. link Times cited: 7 Abstract: The iron-oxygen-aluminum equilibrium has been a subject of i… read more |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_131642768288_002 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| MEAM_LAMMPS_CostaAgrenClavaguera_2007_AlNi__MO_131642768288_002 |
DOI |
10.25950/845958e4 https://doi.org/10.25950/845958e4 https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/845958e4 |
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 |
Driver | MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 |
KIM API Version | 2.2 |
Potential Type | meam |
Previous Version | MEAM_LAMMPS_CostaAgrenClavaguera_2007_AlNi__MO_131642768288_001 |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
B | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
N/A | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Al v004 | view | 7877 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ni v004 | view | 7509 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Al v004 | view | 7877 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ni v004 | view | 7877 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Al v004 | view | 7877 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ni v004 | view | 7657 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Al v004 | view | 8025 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ni v004 | view | 7804 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_hP5_164_ad_d at zero temperature and pressure v000 | view | 494877 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc Al at zero temperature v006 | view | 33497 | |
Elastic constants for bcc Ni at zero temperature v006 | view | 28418 | |
Elastic constants for diamond Al at zero temperature v001 | view | 43289 | |
Elastic constants for diamond Ni at zero temperature v001 | view | 33757 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Al at zero temperature v006 | view | 31289 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Ni at zero temperature v006 | view | 24815 | |
Elastic constants for sc Al at zero temperature v006 | view | 20479 | |
Elastic constants for sc Ni at zero temperature v006 | view | 43289 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 | view | 40210634 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 | view | 66393121 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 | view | 36035780 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 | view | 71248141 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Al v007 | view | 17475 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ni v007 | view | 16122 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Al v007 | view | 21245 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ni v007 | view | 14209 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Al v007 | view | 17197 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ni v007 | view | 16361 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Al v007 | view | 19878 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ni v007 | view | 16839 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Al v005 | view | 184935 | |
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ni v005 | view | 168992 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Al at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 | view | 3387188 | |
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Ni at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 | view | 5827431 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Al v004 | view | 86887 | |
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Ni v004 | view | 117646 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Al v002 | view | 42344009 | |
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Ni v002 | view | 55742655 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Al v004 | view | 133744 | |
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Ni v004 | view | 173627 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Al | view | 562313 | |
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Ni | view | 844059 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Al | view | 1147523 | |
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Ni | view | 1381489 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp Al at zero temperature v004 | other | view |
Elastic constants for hcp Ni at zero temperature v004 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_tP4_123_a_ce v002 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Al v004 | other | view |
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Ni v004 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Al v004 | other | view |
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Ni v004 | other | view |
Verification Check | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
DimerContinuityC1__VC_303890932454_005 | other | view |
MEAM_LAMMPS_CostaAgrenClavaguera_2007_AlNi__MO_131642768288_002.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
MEAM_LAMMPS_CostaAgrenClavaguera_2007_AlNi__MO_131642768288_002.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 appear below.
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002.zip | Zip | Windows archive |