Title
A single sentence description.
|
MEAM Potential for C developed by Lee and Lee (2005) v001 |
---|---|
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
A semi-empirical interatomic potential for carbon based on the modified embedded atom method formalism. The potential describes the structural properties of various polytypes of carbon, elastic, defect and surface properties of diamonds as satisfactorily as the well-known Tersoff potential. Combined with the Lennard-Jones potential, it can also reproduce the physical properties of graphite and amorphous carbon reasonably well. The potential has the same formalism as previously developed MEAM potentials for bcc, fcc and hcp elements, and can be easily extended to describe various metal–carbon alloy systems. |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| C |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/entry/2005--Lee-B-J-Lee-J-W--C/ |
Contributor |
I Nikiforov |
Maintainer |
I Nikiforov |
Developer |
Byeong-Joo Lee Jin Wook Lee |
Published on KIM | 2023 |
How to Cite |
This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5]. [1] Lee B-J, Lee JW. A modified embedded atom method interatomic potential for carbon. Calphad [Internet]. 2005;29(1):7–16. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0364591605000180 doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2005.02.003 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Lee B-J, Lee JW. MEAM Potential for C developed by Lee and Lee (2005) v001. OpenKIM; 2023. doi:10.25950/dc72e397 [3] Afshar Y, Hütter S, Rudd RE, Stukowski A, Tipton WW, Trinkle DR, et al. The modified embedded atom method (MEAM) potential v002. OpenKIM; 2023. doi:10.25950/ee5eba52 [4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 83 Citations (38 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (high confidence) J. Gu’enol’e et al., “Assessment and optimization of the fast inertial relaxation engine (fire) for energy minimization in atomistic simulations and its implementation in lammps,” Computational Materials Science. 2019. link Times cited: 89 USED (high confidence) J. Puibasset, “Adsorption-Induced Deformation of a Nanoporous Material: Influence of the Fluid-Adsorbent Interaction and Surface Freezing on the Pore-Load Modulus Measurement,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2017. link Times cited: 5 Abstract: Liquid adsorption in nanoporous materials induces their defo… read more USED (high confidence) M. Damadam, S. Shao, I. Salehinia, G. Ayoub, and H. Zbib, “Molecular dynamics simulations of mechanical behavior in nanoscale ceramic–metallic multilayer composites,” Materials Research Letters. 2017. link Times cited: 17 Abstract: ABSTRACT The mechanical behavior of nanoscale ceramic–metall… read more USED (low confidence) M. Billah, M. S. Rabbi, K. A. Rahman, and P. Acar, “Temperature and strain rate dependent tensile properties of Titanium carbide/nitride MXenes,” Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) D. Yu and E. Pahl, “Melting of atomic materials under high pressures using computer simulations,” Advances in Physics: X. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: ABSTRACT Enormous progress has been made in high-pressure re… read more USED (low confidence) J. Zhou et al., “Molecular dynamics simulation of the tensile response and deformation mechanism of diamond/TiC combinations,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) V. Kushch, “A Study of Thermodynamic and Elastic Properties of Nanosized Diamond Single Crystals by the Classical Molecular Dynamics Method,” Journal of Superhard Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) Y. Yang, M. Liu, S. Zhou, W. Ren, Q. Zhou, and S. Lan, “Breaking through the strength-ductility trade-off in graphene reinforced Ti6Al4V composites,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2021. link Times cited: 22 USED (low confidence) C.-he Jiang, K. Li, J. Zhang, M. Sun, and Z. Bi, “Structural characteristics of liquid iron with various carbon contents based on atomic simulation,” Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2021. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) S. Roy, A. Dutta, and N. Chakraborti, “A novel method of determining interatomic potential for Al and Al-Li alloys and studying strength of Al-Al3Li interphase using evolutionary algorithms,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 13 USED (low confidence) A. Agrawal and R. Mirzaeifar, “Copper-graphene composites; developing the MEAM potential and investigating their mechanical properties,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 9 USED (low confidence) A. O. Tipeev, E. D. Zanotto, and J. Rino, “Crystal Nucleation Kinetics in Supercooled Germanium: MD Simulations Versus Experimental Data.,” The journal of physical chemistry. B. 2020. link Times cited: 16 Abstract: The validity of the Classical Nucleation Theory (CNT), the m… read more USED (low confidence) W. Xu and W. K. Kim, “Role of boundary conditions and thermostats in the uniaxial tensile loading of silicon nanowires,” Computational Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) I. Aslam et al., “Thermodynamic and kinetic behavior of low-alloy steels: An atomic level study using an Fe-Mn-Si-C modified embedded atom method (MEAM) potential,” Materialia. 2019. link Times cited: 12 USED (low confidence) K. Li et al., “Atomic-Scale Understanding about Coke Carbon Structural Evolution by Experimental Characterization and ReaxFF Molecular Dynamics,” Energy & Fuels. 2019. link Times cited: 11 Abstract: Atomic-scale structural transformation of coke carbon in the… read more USED (low confidence) W. Xu and W. K. Kim, “Molecular dynamics simulation of the uniaxial tensile test of silicon nanowires using the MEAM potential,” Mechanics of Materials. 2019. link Times cited: 24 USED (low confidence) T. Sun et al., “Molecular dynamics research on geometric effect of nanostructured diamond-like carbon substrates on potassium stearate adsorption,” Applied Surface Science. 2019. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) M. Elkhateeb and Y. Shin, “Molecular dynamics-based cohesive zone representation of Ti6Al4V/TiC composite interface,” Materials & Design. 2018. link Times cited: 43 USED (low confidence) S. Guo et al., “Influence of surface morphology on adsorption of potassium stearate molecules on diamond-like carbon substrate: A molecular dynamics study,” Applied Surface Science. 2018. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) A. Al-Motasem, J. Bergström, A. Gåård, P. Krakhmalev, and L. J. Holleboom, “Tool microstructure impact on the wear behavior of ferrite iron during nanoscratching: An atomic level simulation,” Wear. 2017. link Times cited: 14 USED (low confidence) C. Tomas, I. Suarez-Martinez, and N. Marks, “Graphitization of amorphous carbons: A comparative study of interatomic potentials,” Carbon. 2016. link Times cited: 160 USED (low confidence) A. Al-Motasem, A. Al-Motasem, J. Bergström, A. Gåård, P. Krakhmalev, and L. J. Holleboom, “Adhesion between ferrite iron–iron/cementite countersurfaces: A molecular dynamics study,” Tribology International. 2016. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) J. Godet, C. Furgeaud, L. Pizzagalli, and M. Demkowicz, “Uniform tensile elongation in Au–Si core–shell nanowires,” Extreme Mechanics Letters. 2016. link Times cited: 10 USED (low confidence) T. A. Timmerscheidt, J. Appen, and R. Dronskowski, “A molecular-dynamics study on carbon diffusion in face-centered cubic iron,” Computational Materials Science. 2014. link Times cited: 14 USED (low confidence) K. Kang, T. Eun, M.-C. Jun, and B.-J. Lee, “Governing factors for the formation of 4H or 6H-SiC polytype during SiC crystal growth: An atomistic computational approach,” Journal of Crystal Growth. 2014. link Times cited: 30 USED (low confidence) Y. Liu, G. F. Zhou, L. He, and H. Ye, “Studying the rotation induced super-lattices on graphite using a type-criterion potential based molecular dynamics method,” Computational Materials Science. 2014. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) M. Joe, M. Moon, and K.-R. Lee, “Atomistic simulations of diamond-like carbon growth,” Thin Solid Films. 2012. link Times cited: 12 USED (low confidence) C. D. Cruz, P. Chantrenne, and X. Kleber, “Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Kapitza Conductance Prediction of Si/Au Systems Using the New Full 2NN MEAM Si/Au Cross-Potential,” Journal of Heat Transfer-transactions of The Asme. 2012. link Times cited: 10 Abstract: Superlattices made by superposing dielectric and metal nanol… read more USED (low confidence) A. Smolyanitsky, J. Killgore, and V. Tewary, “Effect of elastic deformation on frictional properties of few-layer graphene,” Physical Review B. 2012. link Times cited: 110 Abstract: We describe the results of Brownian dynamics (BD) simulation… read more USED (low confidence) A. Smolyanitsky and V. Tewary, “Atomistic simulation of a graphene-nanoribbon–metal interconnect,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2011. link Times cited: 15 Abstract: We report a molecular statics simulation of the physical pro… read more USED (low confidence) Y.-M. Kim, N. Kim, and B.-J. Lee, “Atomistic Modeling of pure Mg and Mg―Al systems,” Calphad-computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry. 2009. link Times cited: 119 USED (low confidence) R. Narulkar, S. Bukkapatnam, L. Raff, and R. Komanduri, “Graphitization as a precursor to wear of diamond in machining pure iron: A molecular dynamics investigation,” Computational Materials Science. 2009. link Times cited: 98 USED (low confidence) X. Zhang, Z.-wei Sun, and G. Wu, “Molecular dynamics simulation on the out-of plane thermal conductivity of monocrystal germanium thin-film,” 2009 4th IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems. 2009. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: We establish a heat conduction model to investigate the ther… read more USED (low confidence) H.-K. Kim, W. Jung, and B.-J. Lee, “Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for the Fe–Ti–C and Fe–Ti–N ternary systems,” Acta Materialia. 2008. link Times cited: 121 USED (low confidence) T. Sinno, “Atomistic Calculation of Defect Thermodynamics in Crystalline Silicon.” 2015. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) T. Nakajima and K. Shintani, “Atomistic study of the mechanical stability of multi-layered graphene nanobridges,” MRS Proceedings. 2011. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) E. Hristova, R. Janisch, R. Drautz, and A. Hartmaier, “Solubility of carbon in α-iron under volumetric strain and close to the Σ5(3 1 0)[0 0 1] grain boundary: Comparison of DFT and empirical potential methods,” Computational Materials Science. 2011. link Times cited: 46 USED (low confidence) Y.-M. Kim, Y.-H. Shin, and B.-J. Lee, “Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for pure Mn and the Fe–Mn system,” Acta Materialia. 2009. link Times cited: 64 NOT USED (low confidence) S. Du, H. Guo, H. Yang, J. Zhang, Z. Xie, and N. Wu, “Interface regulation of diamond-doped GaInSn composites,” Diamond and Related Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (low confidence) M. Ma’zdziarz, “Transferability of interatomic potentials for germanene (2D germanium),” Journal of Applied Physics. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: The capacities of various interatomic potentials available f… read more NOT USED (low confidence) B. Lv, C. Chen, F. Zhang, G. Poletaev, and R. Rakitin, “Potentials for Describing Interatomic Interactions in γFe-Mn-C-N System,” Metals. 2022. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: Potentials for describing interatomic interactions in a γFe-… read more NOT USED (low confidence) F. Iesari, H. Setoyama, and T. Okajima, “Extracting Local Symmetry of Mono-Atomic Systems from Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Using Deep Neural Networks,” Symmetry. 2021. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: In recent years, neural networks have become a new method fo… read more NOT USED (low confidence) V. Talanin and I. E. Talanin, “Complexation in germanium in accordance with Vlasov’s model for solids,” Journal of Crystal Growth. 2020. link Times cited: 1 NOT USED (low confidence) G.-U. Jeong and B.-J. Lee, “Interatomic potentials for Pt-C and Pd-C systems and a study of structure-adsorption relationship in large Pt/graphene system,” Computational Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 4 NOT USED (low confidence) K. Hyodo, S. Munetoh, and T. Tsuchiyama, “Empirical interatomic potential for Fe-C system using original Finnis-Sinclair potential function,” Computational Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 3 NOT USED (low confidence) J. A. Desai, A. S. Bandyopadhyay, M. Min, G. Sáenz, and A. Kaul, “A photo-capacitive sensor operational from 6 K to 350 K with a solution printable, thermally-robust hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) dielectric and conductive graphene electrodes,” Applied Materials Today. 2020. link Times cited: 16 NOT USED (low confidence) X.-song Huang, X. Dong, L. Liu, and P. Li, “An improved modified embedded-atom method potential to fit the properties of silicon at high temperature,” Computational Materials Science. 2018. link Times cited: 5 NOT USED (low confidence) B. Liu, H. Zhang, J. Tao, Z. R. Liu, X. Chen, and Y. Zhang, “Development of a second-nearest-neighbor modified embedded atom method potential for silicon–phosphorus binary system,” Computational Materials Science. 2016. link Times cited: 8 NOT USED (low confidence) S. Groh, “Mechanical, thermal, and physical properties of Mg-Ca compounds in the framework of the modified embedded-atom method.,” Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 2015. link Times cited: 16 NOT USED (low confidence) B.-J. Lee, W. Ko, H.-K. Kim, and E.-H. Kim, “The modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials and recent progress in atomistic simulations,” Calphad-computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Thermochemistry. 2010. link Times cited: 137 NOT USED (low confidence) G. Grochola, S. Russo, and I. Snook, “A modified embedded atom method interatomic potential for alloy SiGe,” Chemical Physics Letters. 2010. link Times cited: 5 NOT USED (low confidence) S.-G. Kim et al., “Semi-Empirical Potential Methods for Atomistic Simulations of Metals and Their Construction Procedures,” Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology-transactions of The Asme. 2009. link Times cited: 20 Abstract: General theory of semi-empirical potential methods including… read more NOT USED (low confidence) M. Zhao, M. Iron, P. Staszewski, N. E. Schultz, R. Valero, and D. Truhlar, “Valence-Bond Order (VBO): A New Approach to Modeling Reactive Potential Energy Surfaces for Complex Systems, Materials, and Nanoparticles.,” Journal of chemical theory and computation. 2009. link Times cited: 12 Abstract: The extension of molecular mechanics to reactive systems, me… read more NOT USED (low confidence) B.-J. Lee, T.-H. Lee, and S.-J. Kim, “A modified embedded-atom method interatomic potential for the Fe–N system: A comparative study with the Fe–C system,” Acta Materialia. 2006. link Times cited: 72 NOT USED (low confidence) Y.-M. Kim, B.-J. Lee, and M. Baskes, “Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for Ti and Zr,” Physical Review B. 2006. link Times cited: 193 Abstract: Semiempirical interatomic potentials for hcp elements, Ti an… read more NOT USED (high confidence) M. Zacate, “Modified embedded-atom method potential for cadmium,” Hyperfine Interactions. 2019. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) L. N. Abdulkadir, K. Abou-El-Hossein, A. I. Jumare, M. Liman, T. A. Olaniyan, and P. B. Odedeyi, “Review of molecular dynamics/experimental study of diamond-silicon behavior in nanoscale machining,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2018. link Times cited: 38 NOT USED (high confidence) L. N. Abdulkadir, K. Abou-El-Hossein, A. I. Jumare, M. Liman, T. A. Olaniyan, and P. B. Odedeyi, “Review of molecular dynamics/experimental study of diamond-silicon behavior in nanoscale machining,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2018. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) J. P. Mendez, M. Ponga, and M. Ortiz, “Diffusive molecular dynamics simulations of lithiation of silicon nanopillars,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2018. link Times cited: 21 NOT USED (high confidence) L. Hale, Z. Trautt, and C. Becker, “Evaluating variability with atomistic simulations: the effect of potential and calculation methodology on the modeling of lattice and elastic constants,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2018. link Times cited: 40 Abstract: Atomistic simulations using classical interatomic potentials… read more NOT USED (high confidence) T. Prasanthi, C. Sudha, and S. Saroja, “Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Diffusion of Fe in HCP Ti Lattice,” Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals. 2018. link Times cited: 2 NOT USED (high confidence) S. Liu et al., “Refinement effect of TiC on ferrite by molecular statics/dynamics simulations and first-principles calculations,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2018. link Times cited: 3 NOT USED (high confidence) F. Montero-Chacón et al., “Multiscale thermo-mechanical analysis of multi-layered coatings in solar thermal applications,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design. 2017. link Times cited: 16 NOT USED (high confidence) M. Zacate, “Indium-defect interactions in FCC and BCC metals studied using the modified embedded atom method,” Hyperfine Interactions. 2016. link Times cited: 1 NOT USED (high confidence) T. Fang, W.-J. Chang, Y.-L. Feng, and C. Weng, “Tensile fracture of graphene nanoribbons encapsulated in single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Acta Mechanica. 2016. link Times cited: 4 NOT USED (high confidence) S. Banerjee, I. Dutta, and B. Majumdar, “A molecular dynamics evaluation of the effect of dopant addition on grain boundary diffusion in tin: Implication for whisker growth,” Materials Science and Engineering A-structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing. 2016. link Times cited: 11 NOT USED (high confidence) Y.-K. Kim, W. Jung, and B.-J. Lee, “Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for the Ni–Co binary and the Ni–Al–Co ternary systems,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2015. link Times cited: 32 Abstract: Interatomic potentials for the Ni–Co binary and Ni–Al–Co ter… read more NOT USED (high confidence) R. Guo and B. Huang, “Approaching the alloy limit of thermal conductivity in single-crystalline Si-based thermoelectric nanocomposites: A molecular dynamics investigation,” Scientific Reports. 2015. link Times cited: 18 NOT USED (high confidence) J. Chun and B. Lee, “Atomistic calculations of mechanical properties of Ni-Ti-C metallic glass systems,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2013. link Times cited: 3 NOT USED (high confidence) T. Ito, T. Arima, M. Himi, and H. Yugo, “Atomistic simulations on the interfacial interaction of metallic fuel and structural materials in SFRs - molecular dynamics model for Pu-Fe system,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 2013. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: Interaction between metallic fuel and steel structures is on… read more NOT USED (high confidence) J. Chun and B. Lee, “Atomistic calculations of mechanical properties of Ni-Ti-C metallic glass systems,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2013. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) L. Pizzagalli et al., “A new parametrization of the Stillinger–Weber potential for an improved description of defects and plasticity of silicon,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2013. link Times cited: 66 Abstract: A new parametrization of the widely used Stillinger–Weber po… read more NOT USED (high confidence) W. Ko, N. Kim, and B.-J. Lee, “Atomistic modeling of an impurity element and a metal–impurity system: pure P and Fe–P system,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2012. link Times cited: 23 Abstract: An interatomic potential for pure phosphorus, an element tha… read more NOT USED (high confidence) B. Jelinek et al., “Modified embedded atom method potential for Al, Si, Mg, Cu, and Fe alloys,” Physical Review B. 2011. link Times cited: 218 Abstract: A set of modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) potentials for… read more NOT USED (high confidence) H.-K. Kim, W. Jung, and B.-J. Lee, “Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for the Nb-C, Nb-N, Fe-Nb-C, and Fe-Nb-N systems,” Journal of Materials Research. 2010. link Times cited: 21 Abstract: Modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) interatomic potentials … read more NOT USED (high confidence) E. Lee and B.-J. Lee, “Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potential for the Fe–Al system,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2010. link Times cited: 100 Abstract: An interatomic potential for the Fe–Al binary system has bee… read more NOT USED (high confidence) Y. Mishin, M. Asta, and J. Li, “Atomistic modeling of interfaces and their impact on microstructure and properties,” Acta Materialia. 2010. link Times cited: 418 NOT USED (high confidence) T. Nakajima and K. Shintani, “Molecular dynamics study of energetics of graphene flakes,” Journal of Applied Physics. 2009. link Times cited: 18 Abstract: Molecular dynamics simulations for graphene flakes of variou… read more NOT USED (high confidence) B.-J. Lee, “A Semi-Empirical Atomistic Approach in Materials Research,” Journal of Phase Equilibria and Diffusion. 2009. link Times cited: 3 NOT USED (high confidence) E. C. Do, Y.-H. Shin, and B.-J. Lee, “Atomistic modeling of III–V nitrides: modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for GaN, InN and Ga1−xInxN,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2009. link Times cited: 26 Abstract: Modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) interatomic potentials … read more NOT USED (high confidence) G. Elsharkawy and F. Shehadeh, “MODELING CRYSTALLINE STRUCTURE FOR METALS USING A THREE DIMENSIONAL SIMULATION CODE: PART I.” 2008. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: The field of crystalline structure research is considered as… read more NOT USED (high confidence) A. P. Moore, C. Deo, M. Baskes, M. Okuniewski, and D. McDowell, “Understanding the uncertainty of interatomic potentials’ parameters and formalism,” Computational Materials Science. 2017. link Times cited: 17 NOT USED (high confidence) Z. Cui, F. Gao, Z. Cui, and J. Qu, “Developing a second nearest-neighbor modified embedded atom method interatomic potential for lithium,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2011. link Times cited: 66 Abstract: This paper reports the development of a second nearest-neigh… read more |
Funding |
Award Number: M1-0213-04-0002 Funder: Ministry of Science and Technology of Korea |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_996970420049_001 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| MEAM_LAMMPS_LeeLee_2005_C__MO_996970420049_001 |
DOI |
10.25950/dc72e397 https://doi.org/10.25950/dc72e397 https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/dc72e397 |
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 |
Driver | MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 |
KIM API Version | 2.2 |
Potential Type | meam |
Previous Version | MEAM_LAMMPS_LeeLee_2005_C__MO_996970420049_000 |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
A | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc C v004 | view | 3607 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond C v004 | view | 3902 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc C v004 | view | 3819 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc C v004 | view | 3819 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc C at zero temperature v006 | view | 27262 | |
Elastic constants for diamond C at zero temperature v001 | view | 29321 | |
Elastic constants for fcc C at zero temperature v006 | view | 13367 | |
Elastic constants for sc C at zero temperature v006 | view | 32688 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy and equilibrium lattice constant of graphene v002 | view | 736 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc C v007 | view | 21865 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond C v007 | view | 10503 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc C v007 | view | 16123 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc C v007 | view | 11558 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp C v005 | view | 32761 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of diamond C at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 | view | 3023447 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp C at zero temperature v004 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP16_194_e3f v000 | other | view |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_191_c v000 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_mC16_12_4i v002 | other | view |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oP16_62_4c v002 | other | view |
MEAM_LAMMPS_LeeLee_2005_C__MO_996970420049_001.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
MEAM_LAMMPS_LeeLee_2005_C__MO_996970420049_001.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 appear below.
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002.zip | Zip | Windows archive |