Title
A single sentence description.
|
LAMMPS MEAM potential for Fe developed by Asadi et al. (2015) v001 |
---|---|
Description |
In this paper, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations based on the modified-embedded atom method (MEAM) and a phase-field crystal (PFC) model are utilized to quantitatively investigate the solid-liquid properties of Fe. A set of second nearest-neighbor MEAM parameters for high-temperature applications are developed for Fe, and the solid-liquid coexisting approach is utilized in MD simulations to accurately calculate the melting point, expansion in melting, latent heat, and solid-liquid interface free energy, and surface anisotropy. The required input properties to determine the PFC model parameters, such as liquid structure factor and fluctuations of atoms in the solid, are also calculated from MD simulations. The PFC parameters are calculated utilizing an iterative procedure from the inputs of MD simulations. The solid-liquid interface free energy and surface anisotropy are calculated using the PFC simulations. Very good agreement is observed between the results of our calculations from MEAM-MD and PFC simulations and the available modeling and experimental results in the literature. As an application of the developed model, the grain boundary free energy of Fe is calculated using the PFC model and the results are compared against experiments. HISTORY: Changes in version 001: * Change ibar parameter in library file to be integer rather than float to avoid LAMMPS type check error |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| Fe |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | NIST IPRP (https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/Fe.html) |
Contributor |
Daniel S. Karls |
Maintainer |
Daniel S. Karls |
Developer |
Ebrahim Asadi Mohsen Asle Zaeem Sasan Nouranian Michael I. Baskes |
Published on KIM | 2021 |
How to Cite |
This Simulator Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-4]. [1] Asadi E, Asle Zaeem M, Nouranian S, Baskes MI. Quantitative modeling of the equilibration of two-phase solid-liquid Fe by atomistic simulations on diffusive time scales. Phys Rev B. 2015;91:024105. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.024105 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Asadi E, Zaeem MA, Nouranian S, Baskes MI. LAMMPS MEAM potential for Fe developed by Asadi et al. (2015) v001. OpenKIM; 2021. doi:10.25950/fa2eccc9 [3] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [4] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 59 Citations (42 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (high confidence) B. Waters, D. S. Karls, I. Nikiforov, R. Elliott, E. Tadmor, and B. Runnels, “Automated determination of grain boundary energy and potential-dependence using the OpenKIM framework,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 5 USED (high confidence) Y. Shiihara et al., “Artificial Neural Network Molecular Mechanics of Iron Grain Boundaries,” EngRN: Metals & Alloys (Topic). 2021. link Times cited: 9 Abstract: This study reports grain boundary (GB) energy calculations f… read more USED (high confidence) M. Fellinger, A. M. Tan, L. Hector, and D. Trinkle, “Geometries of edge and mixed dislocations in bcc Fe from first-principles calculations,” Physical Review Materials. 2018. link Times cited: 21 Abstract: We use DFT to compute core structures of $a_0[100](010)$ edg… read more USED (high confidence) E. Asadi and M. A. Zaeem, “The anisotropy of hexagonal close-packed and liquid interface free energy using molecular dynamics simulations based on modified embedded-atom method,” Acta Materialia. 2016. link Times cited: 37 USED (high confidence) S. Kavousi, “Combined Molecular Dynamics and Phase Field Simulation of Crystal Melt Interfacial Properties and Microstructure Evolution during Rapid Solidification of TI-NI Alloys.” 2019. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) O. Klimanova, T. Miryashkin, and A. Shapeev, “Accurate melting point prediction through autonomous physics-informed learning,” Physical Review B. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: We present an algorithm for computing melting points by auto… read more USED (low confidence) S. Kavousi, V. Ankudinov, P. Galenko, and M. A. Zaeem, “Atomistic-informed kinetic phase-field modeling of non-equilibrium crystal growth during rapid solidification,” Acta Materialia. 2023. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) C. Zhang, Q. Liao, X. Zhang, F. Ma, M. Wu, and Q. Xu, “Characterization of porosity in lack of fusion pores in selective laser melting using the wavefunction,” Materials Research Express. 2022. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: Selective laser melting (SLM) is used extensively in the man… read more USED (low confidence) Y. Lei et al., “An Embedded-Atom Method Potential for studying the properties of Fe-Pb solid-liquid interface,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) L. Zhang, G. Csányi, E. Giessen, and F. Maresca, “Atomistic fracture in bcc iron revealed by active learning of Gaussian approximation potential,” npj Computational Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) G. Azizi, S. Kavousi, and M. A. Zaeem, “Interactive Effects of Interfacial Energy Anisotropy and Solute Transport on Solidification Patterns of Al-Cu Alloys,” Acta Materialia. 2022. link Times cited: 16 USED (low confidence) S. A. Etesami, M. Laradji, and E. Asadi, “The influence of Pb content on the interfacial free energy of solid Sn in eutectic Pb–Sn liquid mixtures using molecular dynamics simulations,” Molecular Simulation. 2022. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: ABSTRACT The solid–liquid interfacial free energy (γ) for bi… read more USED (low confidence) A. Mahata, T. Mukhopadhyay, and M. A. Zaeem, “Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for Al-Cu, Al-Fe and Al-Ni binary alloys: From room temperature to melting point,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 27 USED (low confidence) S. Kavousi, A. Gates, L. Jin, and M. A. Zaeem, “A Temperature-Dependent Atomistic-Informed Phase-Field Model to Study Dendritic Growth,” Journal of Crystal Growth. 2021. link Times cited: 6 USED (low confidence) L. Gui et al., “Effects of Carbon Segregation and Interface Roughness on the Mobility of Solid-liquid Interface in Fe-C Alloy: A Molecular Dynamics Study,” Materialia. 2021. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) M. Khalid, J. Friis, P. H. Ninive, K. Marthinsen, I. G. Ringdalen, and A. Strandlie, “Modified embedded atom method potential for Fe-Al intermetallics mechanical strength: A comparative analysis of atomistic simulations,” Physica B-condensed Matter. 2021. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) Z. Chen, Y. Hu, X. He, T. Xiao, L. Hao, and Y. Ruan, “Phase-field crystal method for multiscale microstructures with cubic term,” Materials Today Communications. 2021. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) Z. Wu, R. Wang, L. Zhu, S. Pattamatta, and D. Srolov, “Revealing and Controlling the Core of Screw Dislocations in BCC Metals.” 2021. link Times cited: 0 Abstract:
Body-centred-cubic (BCC) transition metals (TMs) tend to b… read more USED (low confidence) R. Namakian, B. R. Novak, X. Zhang, W. Meng, and D. Moldovan, “A combined molecular dynamics/Monte Carlo simulation of Cu thin film growth on TiN substrates: Illustration of growth mechanisms and comparison with experiments,” Applied Surface Science. 2021. link Times cited: 6 USED (low confidence) S. Starikov et al., “Angular-dependent interatomic potential for large-scale atomistic simulation of iron: Development and comprehensive comparison with existing interatomic models,” Physical Review Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 16 Abstract: The development of classical interatomic potential for iron … read more USED (low confidence) S. Kavousi, B. R. Novak, D. Moldovan, and M. A. Zaeem, “Quantitative prediction of rapid solidification by integrated atomistic and phase-field modeling,” Acta Materialia. 2021. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) P. Nieves, J. Tranchida, S. Arapan, and D. Legut, “Spin-lattice model for cubic crystals,” Physical Review B. 2020. link Times cited: 11 Abstract: We present a methodology based on the N\'{e}el model to… read more USED (low confidence) S. A. Etesami, M. Laradji, and E. Asadi, “Reliability of molecular dynamics interatomic potentials for modeling of titanium in additive manufacturing processes,” Computational Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) M. Xing, A. Pathak, S. Sanyal, Q. Peng, X. Liu, and X. Wen, “Temperature-dependent surface free energy and the Wulff shape of iron and iron carbide nanoparticles: A molecular dynamics study,” Applied Surface Science. 2020. link Times cited: 13 USED (low confidence) I. Aslam et al., “Thermodynamic and kinetic behavior of low-alloy steels: An atomic level study using an Fe-Mn-Si-C modified embedded atom method (MEAM) potential,” Materialia. 2019. link Times cited: 12 USED (low confidence) A. Mahata and M. A. Zaeem, “Effects of solidification defects on nanoscale mechanical properties of rapid directionally solidified Al-Cu Alloy: A large scale molecular dynamics study,” Journal of Crystal Growth. 2019. link Times cited: 21 USED (low confidence) N. T. Brown, E. Martínez, and J. Qu, “Solid-liquid metal interface definition studies using capillary fluctuation method,” Computational Materials Science. 2019. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) K. Li et al., “Determination of the accuracy and reliability of molecular dynamics simulations in estimating the melting point of iron: Roles of interaction potentials and initial system configurations,” Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2019. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) L. Gr’an’asy et al., “Phase-field modeling of crystal nucleation in undercooled liquids – A review,” Progress in Materials Science. 2019. link Times cited: 67 USED (low confidence) S. Kavousi, B. R. Novak, M. A. Zaeem, and D. Moldovan, “Combined molecular dynamics and phase field simulation investigations of crystal-melt interfacial properties and dendritic solidification of highly undercooled titanium,” Computational Materials Science. 2019. link Times cited: 28 USED (low confidence) A. Mahata and M. A. Zaeem, “Evolution of solidification defects in deformation of nano-polycrystalline aluminum,” Computational Materials Science. 2019. link Times cited: 25 USED (low confidence) S. A. Etesami, M. Baskes, M. Laradji, and E. Asadi, “Thermodynamics of solid Sn and Pb Sn liquid mixtures using molecular dynamics simulations,” Acta Materialia. 2018. link Times cited: 21 USED (low confidence) A. Nourian-Avval and E. Asadi, “Thermodynamics of FCC metals at melting point in one-mode phase-field crystals model,” Computational Materials Science. 2018. link Times cited: 7 USED (low confidence) M. A. Zaeem and E. Asadi, “Phase‐Field Crystal Modeling: Integrating Density Functional Theory, Molecular Dynamics, and Phase‐Field Modeling.” 2018. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) A. Yamanaka, K. McReynolds, and P. Voorhees, “Phase field crystal simulation of grain boundary motion, grain rotation and dislocation reactions in a BCC bicrystal,” Acta Materialia. 2017. link Times cited: 51 USED (low confidence) A. Nourian-Avval and E. Asadi, “On the quantification of phase-field crystals model for computational simulations of solidification in metals,” Computational Materials Science. 2017. link Times cited: 11 USED (low confidence) C. Qi, J. Li, B. Xu, L. Kong, and S. Zhao, “Atomistic characterization of solid-liquid interfaces in the Cu-Ni binary alloy system,” Computational Materials Science. 2016. link Times cited: 15 USED (low confidence) E. Asadi and M. A. Zaeem, “Predicting Solidification Properties of Magnesium by Molecular Dynamics Simulations.” 2016. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) Y. Shibuta, K. Oguchi, T. Takaki, and M. Ohno, “Homogeneous nucleation and microstructure evolution in million-atom molecular dynamics simulation,” Scientific Reports. 2015. link Times cited: 85 USED (low confidence) E. Asadi and M. A. Zaeem, “A Modified Two-Mode Phase-Field Crystal Model Applied to Face-Centered Cubic and Body-Centered Cubic Orderings,” Computational Materials Science. 2015. link Times cited: 26 USED (low confidence) A. Mahata, T. Mukhopadhyay, and M. A. Zaeem, “Liquid ordering induced heterogeneities in homogeneous nucleation during solidification of pure metals,” Journal of Materials Science & Technology. 2022. link Times cited: 11 USED (low confidence) S. A. Etesami and E. Asadi, “Molecular dynamics for near melting temperatures simulations of metals using modified embedded-atom method,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. 2018. link Times cited: 71 NOT USED (low confidence) J. Harrison, J. Schall, S. Maskey, P. Mikulski, M. T. Knippenberg, and B. Morrow, “Review of force fields and intermolecular potentials used in atomistic computational materials research,” Applied Physics Reviews. 2018. link Times cited: 99 Abstract: Molecular simulation is a powerful computational tool for a … read more NOT USED (low confidence) S. Ghosh, “A novel technique to obtain analytical direct correlation functions for use in classical density functional theory,” Computational Materials Science. 2017. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) D. Tourret, H. Liu, and J. Llorca, “Phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution: Recent applications, perspectives and challenges,” Progress in Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 61 NOT USED (high confidence) S. Kazanç and C. Canbay, “Fe elementindeki αγδ Katı-Katı Faz Geçişlerinin Moleküler Dinamik Benzetimi ile İncelenmesi,” Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2021. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: When the phase diagram of the element Fe is examined, it is … read more NOT USED (high confidence) T. D. Cuong and A. D. Phan, “Efficient analytical approach for high-pressure melting properties of iron.” 2020. link Times cited: 8 NOT USED (high confidence) S. Kavousi, B. R. Novak, M. Baskes, M. A. Zaeem, and D. Moldovan, “Modified embedded-atom method potential for high-temperature crystal-melt properties of Ti–Ni alloys and its application to phase field simulation of solidification,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. link Times cited: 21 Abstract: We developed new interatomic potentials, based on the second… read more NOT USED (high confidence) A. Mahata and M. A. Zaeem, “Size effect in molecular dynamics simulation of nucleation process during solidification of pure metals: investigating modified embedded atom method interatomic potentials,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. link Times cited: 8 Abstract: Due to the significant increase in computing power in recent… read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. M. Handrigan, L. Morrissey, and S. Nakhla, “Investigating various many-body force fields for their ability to predict reduction in elastic modulus due to vacancies using molecular dynamics simulations,” Molecular Simulation. 2019. link Times cited: 6 Abstract: ABSTRACT Molecular dynamics simulations are more frequently … read more NOT USED (high confidence) L. Morrissey, S. M. Handrigan, S. Subedi, and S. Nakhla, “Atomistic uniaxial tension tests: investigating various many-body potentials for their ability to produce accurate stress strain curves using molecular dynamics simulations,” Molecular Simulation. 2019. link Times cited: 13 Abstract: ABSTRACT Molecular dynamics simulations, which take place on… read more NOT USED (high confidence) K. A. Moats, E. Asadi, and M. Laradji, “Phase field crystal simulations of the kinetics of Ostwald ripening in two dimensions.,” Physical review. E. 2019. link Times cited: 8 Abstract: The kinetics of Ostwald ripening of solid domains in the liq… read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. A. Etesami, M. Laradji, and E. Asadi, “Transferability of interatomic potentials in predicting the temperature dependency of elastic constants for titanium, zirconium and magnesium,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: We present our investigation of the current state of the art… read more NOT USED (high confidence) C. Angelie and J. Soudan, “Nanothermodynamics of iron clusters: Small clusters, icosahedral and fcc-cuboctahedral structures.,” The Journal of chemical physics. 2017. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: The study of the thermodynamics and structures of iron clust… read more NOT USED (high confidence) E. Asadi and M. A. Zaeem, “Quantitative Phase-Field Crystal Modeling of Solid-Liquid Interfaces for FCC Metals,” Computational Materials Science. 2017. link Times cited: 8 NOT USED (high confidence) C. Guo, J. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Li, Y. Guo, and Y. Huang, “Interfacial free energy adjustable phase field crystal model for homogeneous nucleation.,” Soft matter. 2016. link Times cited: 13 Abstract: To describe the homogeneous nucleation process, an interfaci… read more NOT USED (high confidence) A. Emdadi, M. A. Zaeem, and E. Asadi, “Revisiting Phase Diagrams of Two-Mode Phase-Field Crystal Models,” Computational Materials Science. 2016. link Times cited: 18 NOT USED (high confidence) Y. Shibuta, M. Ohno, and T. Takaki, “Solidification in a Supercomputer: From Crystal Nuclei to Dendrite Assemblages,” JOM. 2015. link Times cited: 83 |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| SM_042630680993_001 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_AsadiZaeemNouranian_2015_Fe__SM_042630680993_001 |
DOI |
10.25950/fa2eccc9 https://doi.org/10.25950/fa2eccc9 https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/fa2eccc9 |
KIM Item Type | Simulator Model |
KIM API Version | 2.2 |
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn.
| LAMMPS |
Potential Type | meam |
Simulator Potential | meam |
Run Compatibility | portable-models |
Previous Version | Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_AsadiZaeemNouranian_2015_Fe__SM_042630680993_000 |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
N/A | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
A | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
N/A | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v003 | view | 373735 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v003 | view | 190567 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v003 | view | 191288 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v003 | view | 599085 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Fe v007 | view | 9276 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Fe v007 | view | 18184 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Fe v007 | view | 15313 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Fe v007 | view | 25178 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP1_123_a v003 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Fe v007 | other | view |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Fe v007 | other | view |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Fe v007 | other | view |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Fe v007 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Fe v005 | other | view |
Verification Check | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
InversionSymmetry__VC_021653764022_002 | other | view |
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 | other | view |
Objectivity__VC_813478999433_002 | other | view |
PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004 | other | view |
PermutationSymmetry__VC_903502816694_002 | other | view |
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_AsadiZaeemNouranian_2015_Fe__SM_042630680993_001.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_AsadiZaeemNouranian_2015_Fe__SM_042630680993_001.zip | Zip | Windows archive |