Title
A single sentence description.
|
LAMMPS MEAM potential for U developed by Fernández and Pascuet (2014) v000 |
---|---|
Description | A new interatomic potential in the framework of the modified embedded atom method (MEAM) to model U metal is presented. The potential acceptably reproduces the lattice parameters and cohesive energy of the orthorhombic αU. The relative stability of the experimentally observed phase at low temperatures with respect to several other structures (bct, bcc, simple cubic, tetragonal β Np, fcc and hcp) is also taken into account. Intrinsic point defect properties compare reasonably well with data from the literature. To determine the quality of the interaction, the potential is used to study a number of properties for the pure metal at finite temperatures and the results are compared with the available data. The obtained allotropic αU ↔ γU transformation and melting temperatures are in good agreement with experimental values. Based on the simulations, a new αU ↔ γU transformation mechanism is proposed. |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| U |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | NIST IPRP (https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/U.html) |
Contributor |
Daniel S. Karls |
Maintainer |
Daniel S. Karls |
Developer |
Maria I. Pascuet Julián R. Fernández |
Published on KIM | 2019 |
How to Cite |
This Simulator Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-4]. [1] Fernández JR, Pascuet MI. On the accurate description of uranium metallic phases: a MEAM interatomic potential approach. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering [Internet]. 2014Jun;22(5):055019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088%2F0965-0393%2F22%2F5%2F055019 doi:10.1088/0965-0393/22/5/055019 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Pascuet MI, Fernández JR. LAMMPS MEAM potential for U developed by Fernández and Pascuet (2014) v000. OpenKIM; 2019. doi:10.25950/b45ccb53 [3] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [4] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 29 Citations (18 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (high confidence) L. Kolotova and I. Gordeev, “Structure and Phase Transition Features of Monoclinic and Tetragonal Phases in U–Mo Alloys,” Crystals. 2020. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: Using molecular dynamics simulations, we studied the structu… read more USED (low confidence) P. Jiang et al., “Development of U-Zr-Xe ternary interatomic potentials appropriate for simulation of defect and Xe behaviors in U-Zr system,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) Y. Wang, B. Beeler, and A. Jokisaari, “An atomistic study of fundamental bulk and defect properties in α-uranium,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) S. Starikov and D. Smirnova, “Details of structure transformations in pure uranium and U-Mo alloys: insights from classical atomistic simulation,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) J. French and X. Bai, “Molecular Dynamics Studies of Grain Boundary Mobility and Anisotropy in BCC γ-Uranium,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) W. Ouyang, W. Lai, J. Li, J.-bo Liu, and B.-xin Liu, “Atomic Simulations of U-Mo under Irradiation: A New Angular Dependent Potential,” Metals. 2021. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: Uranium-Molybdenum alloy has been a promising option in the … read more USED (low confidence) A. Antropov, V. Ozrin, G. S. Smirnov, V. Stegailov, and V. I. Tarasov, “Bubbles in γ-uranium: atomistic simulation of surface self-diffusion,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: Mechanistic models of nuclear fuels require development of m… read more USED (low confidence) B. Beeler, Y. Zhang, M. Okuniewski, and C. Deo, “Calculation of the displacement energy of α and γ uranium,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2018. link Times cited: 18 USED (low confidence) S. Phillpot et al., “Charge Optimized Many Body (COMB) potentials for simulation of nuclear fuel and clad,” Computational Materials Science. 2018. link Times cited: 19 USED (low confidence) S. Starikov, L. Kolotova, A. Kuksin, D. Smirnova, and V. Tseplyaev, “Atomistic simulation of cubic and tetragonal phases of U-Mo alloy: Structure and thermodynamic properties,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2018. link Times cited: 46 USED (low confidence) K. Migdal, P. Pokatashkin, and A. Yanilkin, “Thermodynamic properties and phase transitions of γ and liquid uranium: QMD and classical MD modeling.” 2017. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: The application of molecular dynamics allows us to take into… read more USED (low confidence) K. Fidanyan and V. Stegailov, “Vibrational properties of bcc U and Mo at different temperatures,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2016. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: An accurate description of the vibrational density of states… read more USED (low confidence) A. Kuksin, S. Starikov, D. Smirnova, and V. Tseplyaev, “The diffusion of point defects in uranium mononitride: Combination of DFT and atomistic simulation with novel potential,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2016. link Times cited: 24 USED (low confidence) M. I. Pascuet and J. R. Fernández, “Atomic interaction of the MEAM type for the study of intermetallics in the Al–U alloy,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2015. link Times cited: 37 USED (low confidence) A. P. Moore, B. Beeler, C. Deo, M. Baskes, and M. Okuniewski, “Atomistic modeling of high temperature uranium–zirconium alloy structure and thermodynamics,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2015. link Times cited: 41 USED (low confidence) D. Smirnova, A. Kuksin, and S. Starikov, “Investigation of point defects diffusion in bcc uranium and U–Mo alloys,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2015. link Times cited: 47 USED (low confidence) Y. Li, “A universal COMB potential for the whole composition range of the uranium oxygen system,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2019. link Times cited: 6 USED (low confidence) A. Antropov, K. Fidanyan, and V. Stegailov, “Phonon density of states for solid uranium: Accuracy of the embedded atom model classical interatomic potential,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018. link Times cited: 8 Abstract: An accurate computation of the vibrational properties of a c… read more NOT USED (low confidence) H. Chen, D. Yuan, H. Geng, W. Hu, and B. Huang, “Development of a machine-learning interatomic potential for uranium under the moment tensor potential framework,” Computational Materials Science. 2023. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (low confidence) J. Chen, W. Ouyang, W. Lai, J. Li, and Z. Zhang, “A new type angular-dependent interatomic potential and its application to model displacement cascades in uranium,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 2019. link Times cited: 5 NOT USED (low confidence) B. Beeler, M. Baskes, D. Andersson, M. Cooper, and Y. Zhang, “A modified Embedded-Atom Method interatomic potential for uranium-silicide,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2017. link Times cited: 26 NOT USED (high confidence) H. Wang, X. Pan, Y.-feng Wang, X.-R. Chen, Y.-X. Wang, and H. Geng, “Lattice dynamics and elastic properties of α-U at high-temperature and high-pressure by machine learning potential simulations,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 6 NOT USED (high confidence) B. G. del Rio, L. González, and D. González, “First principles study of liquid uranium at temperatures up to 2050 K,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2020. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: Uranium compounds are used as fissile materials in nuclear r… read more NOT USED (high confidence) A. A. Saltos, N. Peters, and K. Hammond, “Thermal neutron scattering cross sections of 238U and 235U in the γ phase,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2018. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: The development of metallic, low-enrichment uranium fuels re… read more NOT USED (high confidence) K. E. Garrett et al., “Carbon diffusion in molten uranium: an ab initio molecular dynamics study,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2018. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: In this work we used ab initio molecular dynamics within the… read more NOT USED (high confidence) K. Migdal, P. Pokatashkin, and A. Yanilkin, “Investigation of melting at the uranium γ phase by quantum and classical molecular dynamics methods,” High Temperature. 2017. link Times cited: 3 NOT USED (high confidence) Y. Li, A. Chernatynskiy, J. Kennedy, S. Sinnott, and S. Phillpot, “Lattice expansion by intrinsic defects in uranium by molecular dynamics simulation,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2016. link Times cited: 13 NOT USED (high confidence) L. Kolotova and S. Starikov, “Anisotropy of the U–Mo alloy: Molecular-dynamics study,” The Physics of Metals and Metallography. 2016. link Times cited: 1 |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| SM_176800861722_000 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_FernandezPascuet_2014_U__SM_176800861722_000 |
DOI |
10.25950/b45ccb53 https://doi.org/10.25950/b45ccb53 https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/b45ccb53 |
KIM Item Type | Simulator Model |
KIM API Version | 2.1 |
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn.
| LAMMPS |
Potential Type | meam |
Simulator Potential | meam/c |
Run Compatibility | portable-models |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
A | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
N/A | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc U v003 | view | 2559 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond U v004 | view | 3018 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc U v004 | view | 2775 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc U v004 | view | 3093 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for U in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC4_63_c at zero temperature and pressure v000 | view | 282703 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc U at zero temperature v006 | view | 2271 | |
Elastic constants for diamond U at zero temperature v001 | view | 13595 | |
Elastic constants for fcc U at zero temperature v006 | view | 2879 | |
Elastic constants for sc U at zero temperature v006 | view | 2143 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp U at zero temperature | view | 5262 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for U in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 | view | 59849 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for U in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 | view | 50735 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for U in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC4_63_c v002 | view | 92688 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc U v007 | view | 7357 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond U v007 | view | 10332 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc U v007 | view | 7325 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc U v007 | view | 7006 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp U | view | 9914 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc U v004 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for U in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC4_63_c v000 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp U v005 | other | view |
Verification Check | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 | other | view |
PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004 | other | view |
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_FernandezPascuet_2014_U__SM_176800861722_000.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_FernandezPascuet_2014_U__SM_176800861722_000.zip | Zip | Windows archive |