LAMMPS MEAM potential for Cu developed by Wagner (2007) v000

Gregory J. Wagner

doi:10.25950/b76885aa

Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_Wagner_2007_Cu__SM_521856783904_000

Interatomic potential for Copper (Cu).
Use this Potential

Title A single sentence description.	LAMMPS MEAM potential for Cu developed by Wagner (2007) v000
Description	Unpublished MEAM potential for Cu contributed to LAMMPS by Greg Wagner (Sandia) 2007-06-11.
Species The supported atomic species.	Cu
Disclaimer A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.	None
Content Origin	LAMMPS package 22-Sep-2017

Contributor	Daniel S. Karls
Maintainer	Daniel S. Karls
Developer	Gregory J. Wagner
Published on KIM	2019
How to Cite	This Simulator Model is archived in OpenKIM [1-3]. [1] Wagner GJ. LAMMPS MEAM potential for Cu developed by Wagner (2007) v000. OpenKIM; 2019. doi:10.25950/b76885aa [2] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [3] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Funding	Not available

Short KIM ID The unique KIM identifier code.	SM_521856783904_000
Extended KIM ID The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.	Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_Wagner_2007_Cu__SM_521856783904_000
DOI	10.25950/b76885aa https://doi.org/10.25950/b76885aa https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/b76885aa
KIM Item Type	Simulator Model
KIM API Version	2.1
Simulator Name The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn.	LAMMPS
Potential Type	meam
Simulator Potential	meam/c
Run Compatibility	portable-models

Verification Check Dashboard

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade	Name	Category	Brief Description	Full Results	Aux File(s)
P All elements claimed by model are supported in at least one of the tested configurations.	vc-species-supported-as-stated	mandatory	The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.	Results	Files
P Periodic boundary conditions were correctly supported for all configurations that the model was able to compute.	vc-periodicity-support	mandatory	Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.	Results	Files
P Model energy has permutation symmetry for all configurations the model was able to compute.	vc-permutation-symmetry	mandatory	Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.	Results	Files
A The letter grade A was assigned because the normalized error in the computation was 1.05718e-09 compared with a machine precision of 2.22045e-16. The letter grade was based on 'score=log10(error/eps)', with ranges A=[0, 7.5], B=(7.5, 10.0], C=(10.0, 12.5], D=(12.5, 15.0), F>15.0. 'A' is the best grade, and 'F' indicates failure.	vc-forces-numerical-derivative	consistency	Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.	Results	Files
F The model is C^0 continuous. This means that the model has continuous energy, but a discontinuous first derivative.	vc-dimer-continuity-c1	informational	The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.	Results	Files
P Model energy and forces are invariant with respect to rigid-body motion (translation and rotation) for all configurations the model was able to compute.	vc-objectivity	informational	Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.	Results	Files
P Model energy has inversion symmetry for all configurations the model was able to compute.	vc-inversion-symmetry	informational	Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.	Results	Files
N/A Unable to perform verification check due to an error.	vc-memory-leak	informational	The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.	Results	Files
N/A Thread safety can only be checked for KIM Models.	vc-thread-safe	mandatory	The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.	Results	Files

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu

Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu

Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu

Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu

FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu

FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu

Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Cu

Tests

CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003

Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v004	view	2061
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cu v004	view	2209
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cu v004	view	2061
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cu v004	view	1841

ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006

Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Cu at zero temperature v006	view	2751
Elastic constants for diamond Cu at zero temperature v001	view	6846
Elastic constants for fcc Cu at zero temperature v006	view	6206
Elastic constants for sc Cu at zero temperature v006	view	2975

ElasticConstantsHexagonal__TD_612503193866_004

Elastic constants for hexagonal crystals at zero temperature v004

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/d794c746

Computes the elastic constants for hcp crystals by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for hcp Cu at zero temperature v004		view	2133

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_001

Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v001

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/e8a7ed84

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001		view	89891
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v001		view	86799

GrainBoundaryCubicCrystalSymmetricTiltRelaxedEnergyVsAngle__TD_410381120771_002

Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v002

Creators: Brandon Runnels
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/4723cee7

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v000	view	2375441
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v000	view	7811572
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v000	view	3389154
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v000	view	14530948

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_007

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.

Test	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cu v007	view	4382
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu v007	view	9245
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cu v007	view	9469
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cu v007	view	6270

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005

Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu v005		view	38649

LinearThermalExpansionCoeffCubic__TD_522633393614_001

Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v001

Creators: Mingjian Wen
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fc69d82d

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Cu at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001		view	20223798

PhononDispersionCurve__TD_530195868545_004

Phonon dispersion relations for an fcc lattice v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64f4999b

Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004		view	60203

StackingFaultFccCrystal__TD_228501831190_002

Stacking and twinning fault energies of an fcc lattice at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: SubrahmanyamPattamatta
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/b4cfaf9a

Intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies, unstable stacking fault energy, unstable twinning energy, stacking fault energy as a function of fractional displacement, and gamma surface for a monoatomic FCC lattice at zero temperature and pressure.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu v002		view	18371667

SurfaceEnergyCubicCrystalBrokenBondFit__TD_955413365818_004

High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004		view	270563

VacancyFormationEnergyRelaxationVolume__TD_647413317626_001

Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fca89cea

Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Cu		view	3736608

VacancyFormationMigration__TD_554849987965_001

Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.

Test	Test Results	Link to Test Results page	Benchmark time Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run. Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Cu		view	7634519

Errors

CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003

Test	Error Categories	Link to Error page
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v004	other	view
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cu v004	other	view
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cu v004	other	view
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cu v004	other	view

PhononDispersionCurve__TD_530195868545_003

Test	Error Categories	Link to Error page
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu	other	view

StackingFaultFccCrystal__TD_228501831190_001

Test	Error Categories	Link to Error page
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu	other	view

No Driver

Verification Check	Error Categories	Link to Error page
PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004	other	view

Files

CMakeLists.txt
Cu.meam
LICENSE
kimprovenance.edn
kimspec.edn
library.meam
smspec.edn

Download

Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_Wagner_2007_Cu__SM_521856783904_000.txz	Tar+XZ	Linux and OS X archive
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_Wagner_2007_Cu__SM_521856783904_000.zip	Zip	Windows archive

Wiki

Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_Wagner_2007_Cu__SM_521856783904_000

Verification Check Dashboard

Visualizers (in-page)

BCC Lattice Constant

Cohesive Energy Graph

Diamond Lattice Constant

Dislocation Core Energies

FCC Elastic Constants

FCC Lattice Constant

FCC Stacking Fault Energies

FCC Surface Energies

SC Lattice Constant

Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Tests

Errors

Files

Download

Wiki