Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

Sim_LAMMPS_SMTBQ_SallesPolitanoAmzallag_2016_AlO__SM_853967355976_000

Interatomic potential for Aluminum (Al), Oxygen (O).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
LAMMPS SMTBQ potential for the Al-O system developed by Salles et al. (2016) v000
Description A tight-binding variable-charge model aimed at performing large-scale realistic simulations of bulk, surfaces and interfaces of aluminum oxides have been developed. This model is based on the charge equilibration (QEq) method and explicitly takes into account the mixed iono–covalent character of the metal–oxygen bond by means of a tight-binding analytical approach in the second-moment approximation of the electronic structure. The parameters of the model were optimized to reproduce structural and energetic properties of the a-Al2O3 corundum structure at room temperature and pressure. The model exhibits a good transferability between five alumina polymorphs: corundum, Rh2O3 (II)-type, perovskite (Pbnm), CaIrO3-type and U2S3-type structures. The limit length is rc2sm=dc2**2.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Al, O
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin LAMMPS package 22-Sep-2017
Contributor Ronald E. Miller
Maintainer Ronald E. Miller
Developer Nicolas Salles
Olivier Politano
Emilie Amzallag
Robert Tétot
Published on KIM 2019
How to Cite

This Simulator Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-4].

[1] Salles N, Politano O, Amzallag E, Tétot R. Molecular dynamics study of high-pressure alumina polymorphs with a tight-binding variable-charge model. Computational Materials Science [Internet]. 2016Jan;111:181–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.017 doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.017 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Salles N, Politano O, Amzallag E, Tétot R. LAMMPS SMTBQ potential for the Al-O system developed by Salles et al. (2016) v000. OpenKIM; 2019. doi:10.25950/4b35d834

[3] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[4] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Citations

This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on.

The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel.

The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied.

The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP).

Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis.

OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm.

This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information.

Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the  .
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
SM_853967355976_000
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
Sim_LAMMPS_SMTBQ_SallesPolitanoAmzallag_2016_AlO__SM_853967355976_000
DOI 10.25950/4b35d834
https://doi.org/10.25950/4b35d834
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/4b35d834
KIM Item TypeSimulator Model
KIM API Version2.1
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn.
LAMMPS
Potential Type smtbq
Simulator Potential smtbq
Run Compatibility portable-models

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: O
Species: Al


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Al

Species: O





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v002

Creators: Daniel S. Karls
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c6746c52

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Aluminum view 119998
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Oxygen view 118458
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Aluminum view 118939
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Oxygen view 124329


Elastic constants for arbitrary crystals at zero temperature and pressure v000

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/888f9943

Computes the elastic constants for an arbitrary crystal. A robust computational protocol is used, attempting multiple methods and step sizes to achieve an acceptably low error in numerical differentiation and deviation from material symmetry. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation as part of the Crystal Genome testing framework. In addition, the distance from the obtained elasticity tensor to the nearest isotropic tensor is computed.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for AlO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF12_225_c_a at zero temperature and pressure v000 view 31377131


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v004

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/75393d88

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Al at zero temperature view 11133
Elastic constants for bcc O at zero temperature view 10460
Elastic constants for sc Al at zero temperature view 10556
Elastic constants for sc O at zero temperature view 11101


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2f2c4ad3

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B3_hR10_167_c_e v002 view 822690
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B3_oC20_63_ac_cf v002 view 1209246
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B3_oP20_60_d_cd v002 view 1207155
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF12_225_c_a v002 view 516338
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 view 2326261
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 view 1180652
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_f v002 view 74431
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR2_166_c v002 view 280052
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_mC16_12_2ij v002 view 185196
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_mC4_12_i v002 view 170736
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC12_63_cg v002 view 202898
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oP24_61_3c v002 view 350360
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_225_a_b v002 view 344509


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/f3eec5a9

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Al view 9240
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc O view 10363
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Al view 10556
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Al view 9850
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc O view 9626
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Al view 10524
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc O view 10396


EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_000

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_007

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005

No Driver
Verification Check Error Categories Link to Error page
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 other view
PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004 other view



Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content