Title
A single sentence description.
|
LAMMPS Tersoff-ZBL potential for Fe developed by J. Byggmästar and Granberg (2020) v000 |
---|---|
Description |
This potential was developed mainly for defect clusters and radiation damage. See also the published paper and its supplementary pdf (open access) for benchmark results. Paper abstract: Density functional theory predicts clusters in the form of the C15 Laves phase to be the most stable cluster of self-interstitials in iron at small sizes. The C15 clusters can form as a result of irradiation, but their prevalence and survival in harsh irradiation conditions have not been thoroughly studied. Using a new bond-order potential optimised for molecular dynamics simulations of radiation damage, we explore the dynamical stability of the C15 clusters in iron under irradiation conditions. We find that small C15 clusters make up 5–20% of the interstitial clusters formed directly in cascades. In continuous irradiation, C15 clusters are frequently formed, after which they remain highly stable and grow by absorbing nearby single interstitial atoms. Growth of C15 clusters ultimately leads to collapse into dislocation loops, most frequently into 1/2 <111> loops and only rarely collapsing into <100> loops at low temperatures. The population, size, and collapse of C15 clusters during continuous irradiation correlates well with their formation energies relative to dislocation loops calculated at zero Kelvin. |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| Fe |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151893 |
Content Other Locations |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151893 https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/entry/2020--Byggmastar-J-Granberg-F--Fe/2020--Byggmastar-J--Fe--LAMMPS--ipr1.html |
Contributor |
Jesper Byggmästar |
Maintainer |
Jesper Byggmästar |
Developer |
Jesper Byggmästar Fredric Gustaf Granberg |
Published on KIM | 2020 |
How to Cite |
This Simulator Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-4]. [1] Byggmästar J, Granberg F. Dynamical Stability of Radiation-Induced C15 Clusters in Iron. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2020Jan;528:151893. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151893 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Byggmästar J, Granberg FG. LAMMPS Tersoff-ZBL potential for Fe developed by J. Byggmästar and Granberg (2020) v000. OpenKIM; 2020. doi:10.25950/436c99e7 [3] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [4] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 24 Citations (18 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (high confidence) L. Stefanescu, M. Boleininger, and P. Ma, “Athermal swelling and creep of heavily irradiated iron under uniaxial stress,” Physical Review Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: The athermal irradiation-induced swelling and creep in iron … read more USED (high confidence) K. Talaat, B. Cowen, and O. Anderoglu, “Method of information entropy for convergence assessment of molecular dynamics simulations,” Journal of Applied Physics. 2020. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: The lack of a reliable method to evaluate the convergence of… read more USED (low confidence) A. Yanilkin, “Simplified atomistic based kinetic model for swelling prediction,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) S. S. M. N. Souq, F. A. Ghasemi, and M. M. S. Fakhrabadi, “Performance of different traditional and machine learning-based atomistic potential functions in the simulation of mechanical behavior of Fe nanowires,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) L. Zhang, G. Csányi, E. Giessen, and F. Maresca, “Atomistic fracture in bcc iron revealed by active learning of Gaussian approximation potential,” npj Computational Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) J. Gao, E. Gaganidze, and J. Aktaa, “Relative population of 1/2<111> and <100> interstitial loops in alpha-Fe under irradiation: Effects of C15 cluster stability and loop one-dimensional movement,” Acta Materialia. 2022. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) M. Roldán, F. Sánchez, P. Fernández, C. Ortiz, A. Gómez-Herrero, and D. J. Rey, “Dislocation Loop Generation Differences between Thin Films and Bulk in EFDA Pure Iron under Self-Ion Irradiation at 20 MeV,” Metals. 2021. link Times cited: 3 Abstract: In the present investigation, high-energy self-ion irradiati… read more USED (low confidence) H. Ji et al., “Comparison of interatomic potentials on crack propagation properties in bcc iron,” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 2021. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) Z. Wu, R. Wang, L. Zhu, S. Pattamatta, and D. Srolov, “Revealing and Controlling the Core of Screw Dislocations in BCC Metals.” 2021. link Times cited: 0 Abstract:
Body-centred-cubic (BCC) transition metals (TMs) tend to b… read more USED (low confidence) L. Liu et al., “Formation mechanism of
〈111〉
interstitial dislocation loops from irradiation-induced C15 clusters in tungsten,” Physical Review Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) L. Malerba et al., “Physical mechanisms and parameters for models of microstructure evolution under irradiation in Fe alloys – Part I: Pure Fe,” Nuclear Materials and Energy. 2021. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) J. Gao, E. Gaganidze, B. Kaiser, and J. Aktaa, “Evolution mechanisms of irradiation-induced helium bubbles, C15 clusters and dislocation loops in ferrite/martensite steels: A cluster dynamics modeling study,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 6 USED (low confidence) R. Collette and J. King, “Molecular dynamics simulations of radiation cascade evolution near cellular dislocation structures in additively manufactured stainless steels,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) K. Lai, K. Li, H. Wen, Q. Guo, B. Wang, and Y. Zheng, “Synergistic effects of applied strain and cascade overlap on irradiation damage in BCC iron,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 9 USED (low confidence) A. Dubinko, N. Castin, D. Terentyev, G. Bonny, and M. Konstantinović, “Effect of Si–Ni–P on the emergence of dislocations loops in Fe–9Cr matrix under neutron irradiation: TEM study and OKMC modelling,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 10 USED (low confidence) R. Alexander et al., “Interatomic potentials for irradiation-induced defects in iron,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 13 USED (low confidence) S. Y. Korostelev, E. E. Slyadnikov, and I. Turchanovsky, “The resistance of amorphous metals to thermal effects. Molecular dynamics modeling,” PHYSICAL MESOMECHANICS OF CONDENSED MATTER: Physical Principles of Multiscale Structure Formation and the Mechanisms of Nonlinear Behavior: MESO2022. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) J. Crocombette and F. Willaime, “Ab Initio Electronic Structure Calculations for Nuclear Materials,” Comprehensive Nuclear Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 11 NOT USED (low confidence) I. Toda-Caraballo, J. Wróbel, and D. Nguyen-Manh, “Generalized universal equation of states for magnetic materials: A novel formulation for an interatomic potential in Fe,” Physical Review Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (low confidence) Y. Wang et al., “Machine-learning interatomic potential for radiation damage effects in bcc-iron,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 7 NOT USED (high confidence) A. Goryaeva et al., “Compact A15 Frank-Kasper nano-phases at the origin of dislocation loops in face-centred cubic metals,” Nature Communications. 2023. link Times cited: 2 NOT USED (high confidence) A. Esfandiarpour, J. Byggmästar, J. Balbuena, M. Caturla, K. Nordlund, and F. Granberg, “Effect of cascade overlap and C15 clusters on the damage evolution in Fe: An OKMC study,” Materialia. 2022. link Times cited: 2 |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| SM_958863895234_000 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| Sim_LAMMPS_TersoffZBL_ByggmastarGranberg_2020_Fe__SM_958863895234_000 |
DOI |
10.25950/436c99e7 https://doi.org/10.25950/436c99e7 https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/436c99e7 |
KIM Item Type | Simulator Model |
KIM API Version | 2.1 |
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn.
| LAMMPS |
Potential Type | tersoff |
Simulator Potential | tersoff/zbl |
Run Compatibility | portable-models |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
N/A | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
N/A | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Fe v004 | view | 1701 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Fe v004 | view | 2162 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Fe v004 | view | 2497 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Fe v004 | view | 1789 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 | view | 127511 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 | view | 73841 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 | view | 42897 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v002 | view | 59545 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of bcc Fe at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 | view | 2734078 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for bcc Fe | view | 4486065 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Vacancy formation and migration energy for bcc Fe | view | 9988829 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Fe in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP1_123_a v002 | other | view |
Verification Check | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 | other | view |
PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004 | other | view |
Sim_LAMMPS_TersoffZBL_ByggmastarGranberg_2020_Fe__SM_958863895234_000.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
Sim_LAMMPS_TersoffZBL_ByggmastarGranberg_2020_Fe__SM_958863895234_000.zip | Zip | Windows archive |