Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

Tersoff_LAMMPS_AlbeNordlundNord_2002_GaAs__MO_799020228312_004

Interatomic potential for Arsenic (As), Gallium (Ga).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
Tersoff-style three-body potential for GaAs developed by Albe et al. (2002) v004
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
Tersoff-style three-body potential for GaAs by Albe, Nordlund, Nord, and Kuronen. Does not include the modified repulsive potential for high-energy collison from the appendix.
Species
The supported atomic species.
As, Ga
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Contributor Tobias Brink
Maintainer Tobias Brink
Implementer Tobias Brink
Developer Karsten Albe
Kai Nordlund
J. Nord
Antti A. Kuronen
Published on KIM 2021
How to Cite

This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5].

[1] Albe K, Nordlund K, Nord J, Kuronen A. Modeling of compound semiconductors: Analytical bond-order potential for Ga, As, and GaAs. Physical Review B. 2002Jul;66(3):035205. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.66.035205 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Brink T, Albe K, Nordlund K, Nord J, Kuronen AA. Tersoff-style three-body potential for GaAs developed by Albe et al. (2002) v004. OpenKIM; 2021. doi:10.25950/f77a27e8

[3] Brink T, Thompson AP, Farrell DE, Wen M, Tersoff J, Nord J, et al. Model driver for Tersoff-style potentials ported from LAMMPS v005. OpenKIM; 2021. doi:10.25950/9a7dc96c

[4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Citations

This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on.

The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel.

The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied.

The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP).

Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis.

OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm.

This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information.

Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the  .
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_799020228312_004
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
Tersoff_LAMMPS_AlbeNordlundNord_2002_GaAs__MO_799020228312_004
DOI 10.25950/f77a27e8
https://doi.org/10.25950/f77a27e8
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/f77a27e8
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005
DriverTersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005
KIM API Version2.2
Potential Type tersoff
Previous Version Tersoff_LAMMPS_AlbeNordlundNord_2002_GaAs__MO_799020228312_003

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
A vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ga
Species: As


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ga
Species: As


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ga
Species: As


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ga
Species: As


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: As
Species: Ga


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ga
Species: As


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: As

Species: Ga





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc As v004 view 2684
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ga v004 view 2407
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond As v004 view 2626
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ga v004 view 2904
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc As v004 view 2724
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ga v004 view 2429
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc As v004 view 2356
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ga v004 view 2356


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc As at zero temperature v006 view 12542
Elastic constants for bcc Ga at zero temperature v006 view 9707
Elastic constants for diamond Ga at zero temperature v001 view 16884
Elastic constants for fcc As at zero temperature v006 view 11438
Elastic constants for fcc Ga at zero temperature v006 view 21463
Elastic constants for sc As at zero temperature v006 view 5404
Elastic constants for sc Ga at zero temperature v006 view 10951


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2f2c4ad3

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ga in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI12_220_a v002 view 95332
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for As in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP1_221_a v002 view 49276
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ga in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR22_166_ae3h v002 view 116416
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for As in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR2_166_c v002 view 45935
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ga in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC40_63_2cf3g v002 view 393133
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ga in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC4_63_c v002 view 69645
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ga in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC8_63_g v002 view 51768
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for As in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC8_64_f v002 view 65375
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ga in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC8_64_f v002 view 49884
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ga in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tI2_139_a v002 view 47271
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for As in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tI4_139_e v002 view 71044
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AsGa in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_216_a_c v002 view 76315
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AsGa in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP16_205_c_c v002 view 117498
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AsGa in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_hP4_186_b_b v002 view 77302


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc As v007 view 3280
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ga v007 view 8733
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond As v007 view 3690
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ga v007 view 3764
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc As v007 view 8872
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ga v007 view 7201
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc As v007 view 6107
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ga v007 view 6883


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp As v005 view 33657
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ga v005 view 32427





This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005 appear below.


Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005.zip Zip Windows archive
Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content