Title
A single sentence description.
|
A hybrid neural network potential for multilayer graphene systems developed by Wen and Tadmor (2019) v001 |
---|---|
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
A hybrid neural network (NN) and Lennard-Jones (LJ) model driver for multilayer graphene systems. The NN term models short-range intralayer and orbital overlap interactions and the theoretically-motivated LJ term models long-range dispersion. The potential is trained against a large dataset of monolayer graphene, bilayer graphene, and graphite configurations obtained from ab initio total-energy calculations based on density functional theory (DFT). The potential provides accurate energy and forces for both intralayer and interlayer interactions, correctly reproducing DFT results for structural, energetic, and elastic properties such as the equilibrium layer spacing, interlayer binding energy, elastic moduli, and phonon dispersions to which it was not fit. |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| C |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
This model is designed for multilayer graphene systems and graphite. It is not appropriate for bulk carbon structures. |
Contributor |
Mingjian Wen |
Maintainer |
Mingjian Wen |
Developer |
Mingjian Wen Ellad B. Tadmor |
Published on KIM | 2019 |
How to Cite |
This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5]. [1] Wen M, Tadmor EB. Hybrid neural network potential for multilayer graphene. Physical Review B. 2019;100(19):195419. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.195419 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Wen M, Tadmor EB. A hybrid neural network potential for multilayer graphene systems developed by Wen and Tadmor (2019) v001. OpenKIM; 2019. doi:10.25950/a74cc44e [3] Wen M, Tadmor EB. A hybrid neural network model driver for multilayer two-dimensional materials developed by Wen and Tadmor (2019) v001. OpenKIM; 2019. doi:10.25950/9fa4935a [4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 37 Citations (4 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (high confidence) J. G. Mchugh, P. Mouratidis, and K. Jolley, “Ripplocations in layered materials: Sublinear scaling and basal climb,” arXiv: Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 9 Abstract: The ripplocation is a crystallographic defect which is uniqu… read more USED (low confidence) H. Tran and H. Chew, “Surface morphology and carbon structure effects on sputtering: Bridging scales between molecular dynamics simulations and experiments,” Carbon. 2023. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) H. Zhai and J. Yeo, “Multiscale mechanics of thermal gradient coupled graphene fracture: A molecular dynamics study,” International Journal of Applied Mechanics. 2022. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: The thermo-mechanical coupling mechanism of graphene fractur… read more USED (low confidence) P. Ying, H. Dong, T. Liang, Z. Fan, Z. Zhong, and J. Zhang, “Atomistic insights into the mechanical anisotropy and fragility of monolayer fullerene networks using quantum mechanical calculations and machine-learning molecular dynamics simulations,” Extreme Mechanics Letters. 2022. link Times cited: 15 NOT USED (low confidence) C. Hong et al., “Applications and training sets of machine learning potentials,” Science and Technology of Advanced Materials: Methods. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: ABSTRACT Recently, machine learning potentials (MLPs) have b… read more NOT USED (low confidence) P. Ying and Z. Fan, “Combining the D3 dispersion correction with the neuroevolution machine-learned potential,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: Machine-learned potentials (MLPs) have become a popular appr… read more NOT USED (low confidence) J. A. Vita et al., “ColabFit exchange: Open-access datasets for data-driven interatomic potentials.,” The Journal of chemical physics. 2023. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: Data-driven interatomic potentials (IPs) trained on large co… read more NOT USED (low confidence) M. C. Venetos, M. Wen, and K. Persson, “Machine Learning Full NMR Chemical Shift Tensors of Silicon Oxides with Equivariant Graph Neural Networks,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry. a. 2023. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) chemical shift tensor i… read more NOT USED (low confidence) L. O. AGBOLADE et al., “Recent advances in density functional theory approach for optoelectronics properties of graphene,” Heliyon. 2023. link Times cited: 1 NOT USED (low confidence) D. M. Anstine and O. Isayev, “Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials and Long-Range Physics,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry. a. 2023. link Times cited: 12 Abstract: Advances in machine learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs), … read more NOT USED (low confidence) M. Wen, E. Spotte-Smith, S. M. Blau, M. J. McDermott, A. Krishnapriyan, and K. Persson, “Chemical reaction networks and opportunities for machine learning,” Nature Computational Science. 2023. link Times cited: 11 NOT USED (low confidence) A. M. Barboza, L. C. R. Aliaga, D. Faria, and I. Bastos, “Bilayer Graphene Kirigami,” SSRN Electronic Journal. 2022. link Times cited: 1 NOT USED (low confidence) Y. Kurniawan et al., “Bayesian, frequentist, and information geometric approaches to parametric uncertainty quantification of classical empirical interatomic potentials.,” The Journal of chemical physics. 2021. link Times cited: 6 Abstract: In this paper, we consider the problem of quantifying parame… read more NOT USED (low confidence) T. Leadbetter, A. Seiphoori, C. Reina, and P. Purohit, “Emergence of viscosity and dissipation via stochastic bonds,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2021. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (low confidence) A. Thompson et al., “LAMMPS - A flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales,” Computer Physics Communications. 2021. link Times cited: 2377 NOT USED (low confidence) Y. Zeng, Y.-X. Feng, L.-M. Tang, and K. Chen, “Effect of out-of-plane strain on the phonon structures and anharmonicity of twisted multilayer graphene,” Applied Physics Letters. 2021. link Times cited: 34 Abstract: Twisted bilayer and multilayer two-dimensional materials lin… read more NOT USED (low confidence) D. Hedman, T. Rothe, G. Johansson, F. Sandin, J. Larsson, and Y. Miyamoto, “Impact of training and validation data on the performance of neural network potentials: A case study on carbon using the CA-9 dataset.” 2021. link Times cited: 3 NOT USED (low confidence) S. Watanabe et al., “High-dimensional neural network atomic potentials for examining energy materials: some recent simulations,” Journal of Physics: Energy. 2020. link Times cited: 16 Abstract: Owing to their simultaneous accuracy and computational effic… read more NOT USED (low confidence) M. Babar, H. L. Parks, G. Houchins, and V. Viswanathan, “An accurate machine learning calculator for the lithium-graphite system,” Journal of Physics: Energy. 2020. link Times cited: 10 Abstract: Machine-learning potentials are accelerating the development… read more NOT USED (low confidence) Y. Shaidu, E. Kucukbenli, R. Lot, F. Pellegrini, E. Kaxiras, and S. de Gironcoli, “A systematic approach to generating accurate neural network potentials: the case of carbon,” npj Computational Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 18 NOT USED (low confidence) X. Liu, Q. Wang, and J. Zhang, “Machine Learning Interatomic Force Fields for Carbon Allotropic Materials.” 2021. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) A. Singh and Y. Li, “Reliable machine learning potentials based on artificial neural network for graphene,” ArXiv. 2023. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) M. Qamar, M. Mrovec, Y. Lysogorskiy, A. Bochkarev, and R. Drautz, “Atomic Cluster Expansion for Quantum-Accurate Large-Scale Simulations of Carbon.,” Journal of chemical theory and computation. 2022. link Times cited: 17 Abstract: We present an atomic cluster expansion (ACE) for carbon that… read more NOT USED (high confidence) H. Dong, C. Cao, P. Ying, Z. Fan, P. Qian, and Y. Su, “Anisotropic and high thermal conductivity in monolayer quasi-hexagonal fullerene: A comparative study against bulk phase fullerene,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2022. link Times cited: 14 NOT USED (high confidence) J. G. Mchugh, P. Mouratidis, A. Impellizzeri, K. Jolley, D. Erbahar, and C. Ewels, “Prismatic Edge Dislocations in Graphite,” MatSciRN EM Feeds. 2021. link Times cited: 9 Abstract: Dislocations are a central concept in materials science, whi… read more NOT USED (high confidence) M. Wen, Y. Afshar, R. Elliott, and E. Tadmor, “KLIFF: A framework to develop physics-based and machine learning interatomic potentials,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 2021. link Times cited: 12 NOT USED (high confidence) Z. Fan et al., “Neuroevolution machine learning potentials: Combining high accuracy and low cost in atomistic simulations and application to heat transport,” Physical Review B. 2021. link Times cited: 42 Abstract: We develop a neuroevolution-potential (NEP) framework for ge… read more NOT USED (high confidence) I. Demiroglu, Y. Karaaslan, T. Kocabaş, M. Keçeli, Á. Vázquez-Mayagoitia, and C. Sevik, “Computation of the Thermal Expansion Coefficient of Graphene with Gaussian Approximation Potentials,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2021. link Times cited: 5 NOT USED (high confidence) C.-gen Qian, B. Mclean, D. Hedman, and F. Ding, “A comprehensive assessment of empirical potentials for carbon materials,” APL Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 22 Abstract: Carbon materials and their unique properties have been exten… read more NOT USED (high confidence) N. B. Kovachki et al., “Multiscale modeling of materials: Computing, data science, uncertainty and goal-oriented optimization,” Mechanics of Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 24 NOT USED (high confidence) B. Liu et al., “A learning-based multiscale method and its application to inelastic impact problems,” Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2021. link Times cited: 41 NOT USED (high confidence) P. Yoo, M. Sakano, S. Desai, M. M. Islam, P. Liao, and A. Strachan, “Neural network reactive force field for C, H, N, and O systems,” npj Computational Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 30 NOT USED (high confidence) M. Hu and Z. Yang, “Perspective on multi-scale simulation of thermal transport in solids and interfaces.,” Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP. 2020. link Times cited: 5 Abstract: Phonon-mediated thermal transport is inherently multi-scale.… read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. Wille, H. Jiang, O. Bünermann, A. Wodtke, J. Behler, and A. Kandratsenka, “An experimentally validated neural-network potential energy surface for H-atom on free-standing graphene in full dimensionality.,” Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP. 2020. link Times cited: 8 Abstract: We present a first principles-quality potential energy surfa… read more NOT USED (high confidence) M. Wen and E. Tadmor, “Uncertainty quantification in molecular simulations with dropout neural network potentials,” npj Computational Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 46 NOT USED (high confidence) S. Desai, S. Reeve, and J. Belak, “Implementing a neural network interatomic model with performance portability for emerging exascale architectures,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 2020. link Times cited: 9 NOT USED (high confidence) B. Mortazavi et al., “Exploring phononic properties of two-dimensional materials using machine learning interatomic potentials,” arXiv: Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 111 |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_421038499185_001 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| hNN_WenTadmor_2019Grx_C__MO_421038499185_001 |
DOI |
10.25950/a74cc44e https://doi.org/10.25950/a74cc44e https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/a74cc44e |
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver hNN__MD_435082866799_001 |
Driver | hNN__MD_435082866799_001 |
KIM API Version | 2.0 |
Potential Type | hnn |
Previous Version | hNN_WenTadmor_2019Grx_C__MO_421038499185_000 |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
A | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This model is designed for multilayer graphene systems and graphite. It is not appropriate for bulk carbon structures.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc C v004 | view | 7658 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond C v004 | view | 18111 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc C v004 | view | 12515 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc C v004 | view | 4785 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc C at zero temperature v006 | view | 17902 | |
Elastic constants for diamond C at zero temperature v001 | view | 141363 | |
Elastic constants for fcc C at zero temperature v006 | view | 16614 | |
Elastic constants for sc C at zero temperature v006 | view | 8072 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp C at zero temperature v004 | view | 23744 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy and equilibrium lattice constant of graphene v002 | view | 597 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc C v007 | view | 4774 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond C v007 | view | 11181 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc C v007 | view | 5057 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc C v007 | view | 3046 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp C v005 | view | 408951 |
Verification Check | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
ThreadSafety__VC_881176209980_002 | other | view |
hNN_WenTadmor_2019Grx_C__MO_421038499185_001.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
hNN_WenTadmor_2019Grx_C__MO_421038499185_001.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver hNN__MD_435082866799_001 appear below.
hNN__MD_435082866799_001.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
hNN__MD_435082866799_001.zip | Zip | Windows archive |