EAM_Dynamo_Onat_Durukanoglu_CuNi__MO_592013496703_004
There is a newer version of this item. See EAM_Dynamo_OnatDurukanoglu_2014_CuNi__MO_592013496703_005
| Title
A single sentence description.
|
An optimized EAM potential for Cu-Ni alloys |
|---|---|
| Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
An optimized EAM potential for Cu-Ni alloys. The potential is determined by fitting to experimental and first-principles data for Cu, Ni and Cu-Ni binary compounds, such as lattice constants, cohesive energies, bulk modulus, elastic constants, diatomic bond lengths and bond energies. The generated potentials were tested by computing a variety of properties of pure elements and the alloy of Cu, Ni: the melting points, alloy mixing enthalpy, lattice specific heat, equilibrium lattice structures, vacancy formation and interstitial formation energies, and various diffusion barriers on the (100) and (111) surfaces of Cu and Ni. The details of the fitting procedure and the predictions of the potential are published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/26/3/035404. Using the developed potential, the vibrational thermodynamic functions of Cu-Ni alloys are also investigated and the results are published at http://epjb.epj.org/articles/epjb/abs/2014/11/b140315/b140315.html. This model uses parameter file 'CuNi_v2.eam.alloy', which is a newer version of the parameter file 'CuNi.eam.alloy' distributed with the LAMMPS simulation package. |
| Species
The supported atomic species.
| Cu, Ni |
| Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
This potential is tabulated using more spline points to provide smoother cutoff and better accuracy for simulations. |
| Contributor |
Berk Onat |
| Maintainer |
Berk Onat |
| Published on KIM | 2018 |
| How to Cite | Click here to download this citation in BibTeX format. |
| Funding | Not available |
| Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_592013496703_004 |
| Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| EAM_Dynamo_Onat_Durukanoglu_CuNi__MO_592013496703_004 |
| Citable Link | https://openkim.org/cite/MO_592013496703_004 |
| KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_004 |
| Driver | EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_004 |
| KIM API Version | 1.6 |
| Previous Version | EAM_Dynamo_Onat_Durukanoglu_CuNi__MO_592013496703_003 |
(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)
| Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| F | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
BCC Lattice Constant
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)Cohesive Energy Graph
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)Diamond Lattice Constant
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)Dislocation Core Energies
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)FCC Elastic Constants
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)FCC Lattice Constant
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)FCC Stacking Fault Energies
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)FCC Surface Energies
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)SC Lattice Constant
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table
Species: CuSpecies: Ni
Disclaimer From Model Developer
This potential is tabulated using more spline points to provide smoother cutoff and better accuracy for simulations.
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattice
Creators: Daniel Karls
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/
This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic
lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings
range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and
a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice
constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0
(a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and
samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Creators: Daniel Karls
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/
This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic
lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings
range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and
a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice
constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0
(a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and
samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Copper | view | 3876 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Nickel | view | 3768 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Copper | view | 3625 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Nickel | view | 4163 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Copper | view | 3445 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Nickel | view | 3589 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Copper | view | 3732 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Nickel | view | 3804 |
Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature
Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/
Measures the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. Error estimate is reported due to the numerical differentiation.
This version fixes the number of repeats in the species key.
Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/
Measures the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. Error estimate is reported due to the numerical differentiation.
This version fixes the number of repeats in the species key.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elastic constants for bcc Cu at zero temperature | view | 1759 | |
| Elastic constants for bcc Ni at zero temperature | view | 1364 | |
| Elastic constants for fcc Cu at zero temperature | view | 1723 | |
| Elastic constants for fcc Ni at zero temperature | view | 1651 | |
| Elastic constants for sc Cu at zero temperature | view | 1902 | |
| Elastic constants for sc Ni at zero temperature | view | 1436 |
Elastic constants for hexagonal crystals at zero temperature
Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/
Measures the hexagonal elastic constants for hcp structure by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. Error estimate is reported due to the numerical differentiation.
This version fixes the number of repeats in the species key and the coordinate of the 2nd atom in the normed basis.
Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/
Measures the hexagonal elastic constants for hcp structure by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. Error estimate is reported due to the numerical differentiation.
This version fixes the number of repeats in the species key and the coordinate of the 2nd atom in the normed basis.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elastic constants for hcp Cu at zero temperature | view | 1759 | |
| Elastic constants for hcp Ni at zero temperature | view | 1866 |
Equilibrium lattice constants for bulk cubic structures
Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/
Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/
Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cu | view | 574 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ni | view | 754 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu | view | 754 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ni | view | 718 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cu | view | 610 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ni | view | 754 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cu | view | 718 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ni | view | 646 |
Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures
Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/
Calculates lattice constant by minimizing energy function.
This version fixes the output format problems in species and stress, and adds support for PURE and OPBC neighbor lists. The cell used for calculation is switched from a hexagonal one to an orthorhombic one to comply with the requirement of OPBC.
Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/
Calculates lattice constant by minimizing energy function.
This version fixes the output format problems in species and stress, and adds support for PURE and OPBC neighbor lists. The cell used for calculation is switched from a hexagonal one to an orthorhombic one to comply with the requirement of OPBC.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu | view | 6173 | |
| Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ni | view | 7142 |
Cohesive energy versus shear parameter relation for a cubic crystal
Creators: Jiadi Fan
Contributor: Jiadi
Publication Year: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/
This test driver is used to test lattice invariance shear in a cubic crystal based on cb-kim code. Initial guess of lattice parameter, shear direction vector, shear plane normal vector, relaxation optional key need to be set as input. The output will be first PK stress, stiffness matrix, cohesive energy, and displacement of shuffle (if relaxation optional key is true)
Creators: Jiadi Fan
Contributor: Jiadi
Publication Year: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/
This test driver is used to test lattice invariance shear in a cubic crystal based on cb-kim code. Initial guess of lattice parameter, shear direction vector, shear plane normal vector, relaxation optional key need to be set as input. The output will be first PK stress, stiffness matrix, cohesive energy, and displacement of shuffle (if relaxation optional key is true)
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohesive energy versus <-1 1 0>{1 1 1} shear parameter relation for bcc Cu | view | 2620 | |
| Cohesive energy versus <-1 1 0>{1 1 1} shear parameter relation for fcc Cu | view | 2620 |
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of a cubic crystal structure at a given temperature and pressure v000
Creators: Mingjian Wen
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/
This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
Creators: Mingjian Wen
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/
This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Cu at room temperature under zero pressure | view | 7966927 | |
| Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Ni at room temperature under zero pressure | view | 7044436 |
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices
Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/
Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.
Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/
Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu | view | 98192 | |
| Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Ni | view | 97116 |
Stacking and twinning fault energies for FCC crystals
Creators: Subrahmanyam Pattamatta
Contributor: SubrahmanyamPattamatta
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/
Intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies, unstable stacking fault energy, unstable twinning energy, stacking fault energy as a function of fractional displacement, and gamma surface for a monoatomic FCC lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Creators: Subrahmanyam Pattamatta
Contributor: SubrahmanyamPattamatta
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/
Intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies, unstable stacking fault energy, unstable twinning energy, stacking fault energy as a function of fractional displacement, and gamma surface for a monoatomic FCC lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu | view | 9156863 | |
| Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Ni | view | 8625132 |
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in cubic crystal lattices
Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/
Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:
E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c
E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.
In Python, these two fits take the form:
def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):
import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]
def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):
import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]
Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/
Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:
E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c
E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.
In Python, these two fits take the form:
def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):
import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]
def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):
import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu | view | 51537 | |
| Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Ni | view | 58284 |
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals
Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/
Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/
Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Cu | view | 337500 | |
| Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Ni | view | 363735 |
Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals
Creators:
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/
Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Creators:
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/
Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Cu | view | 250146 | |
| Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Ni | view | 169899 |
ElasticConstantsFirstStrainGradient__TD_361847723785_000
| Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| Classical and first strain gradient elastic constants for fcc copper | other | view |
| EAM_Dynamo_Onat_Durukanoglu_CuNi__MO_592013496703_004.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
| EAM_Dynamo_Onat_Durukanoglu_CuNi__MO_592013496703_004.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_004 appear below.
| EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_004.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
| EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_004.zip | Zip | Windows archive |