Jump to: Models | Files | Wiki

CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_diamond_Fe__TE_747158614799_001

Title
A single sentence description.
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Iron
Description This Test computes an energy vs. lattice constant curve for diamond Iron. The
curve is computed for lattice constants ranging from 0.8*a_0 to 1.5*a_0,
where a_0 represents the equilibrium lattice constant. The value for a_0 is obtained by querying
the KIM database for the results of LatticeConstantCubicEnergy_diamond_Fe when paired
against the Model being used.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Fe
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Contributor Daniel S. Karls
Maintainer Daniel S. Karls
Published on KIM 2014
How to Cite Click here to download this citation in BibTeX format.
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
TE_747158614799_001
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_diamond_Fe__TE_747158614799_001
Citable Link https://openkim.org/cite/TE_747158614799_001
KIM Item TypeTest
DriverCohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_001
Properties
Properties as defined in kimspec.edn. These properties are inhereted from the Test Driver.
KIM API Version1.9.0
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn. This Simulator Name is inhereted from the Test Driver.
LAMMPS
Programming Language(s)
The programming languages used in the code and the percentage of the code written in each one.
100.00% Python
Previous Version CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_diamond_Fe__TE_747158614799_000


EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_004
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
EAM_Dynamo_Ackland_Bacon_Fe__MO_142799717516_004 view 1938
EAM_Dynamo_Ackland_Mendelev_FeP__MO_884343146310_004 view 3445
EAM_Dynamo_Bonny_Pasianot_FeCuNi__MO_469343973171_004 view 3302
EAM_Dynamo_Bonny_Pasianot_FeNi__MO_267721408934_004 view 2799
EAM_Dynamo_Hepburn_Ackland_FeC__MO_143977152728_004 view 11843
EAM_Dynamo_Mendelev_Han_Fe_2__MO_769582363439_004 view 2656
EAM_Dynamo_Mendelev_Han_Fe_5__MO_942420706858_004 view 3230
EAM_Dynamo_Mendelev_Han_VFe__MO_249706810527_004 view 4055
EAM_Dynamo_Mendelev_Srolovitz_AlFe__MO_577453891941_004 view 4307
EAM_Dynamo_Zhou_Johnson_Fe__MO_650279905230_004 view 2117
LennardJones612__MD_414112407348_002
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
LennardJones612_UniversalShifted__MO_959249795837_002 view 1113
Pair_Morse_Shifted__MD_552566534109_001
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Pair_Morse_Shifted_GirifalcoWeizer_HighCutoff_Fe__MO_147603128437_001 view 4255
Pair_Morse_Shifted_GirifalcoWeizer_LowCutoff_Fe__MO_331285495617_001 view 4460
Pair_Morse_Shifted_GirifalcoWeizer_MedCutoff_Fe__MO_984358344196_001 view 4187
Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_002
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Tersoff_LAMMPS_Mueller_Erhart_Albe_Fe__MO_137964310702_001 view 1866
model_driver_PF_cubic_splines__MD_620624592962_001
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
model_Fe_PF_DudarevDerlet__MO_135034229282_001 view 4153
model_Fe_PF_mendelev__MO_856295952425_001 view 25554
model_driver_PF_quintic_splines__MD_543355979582_001
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
model_Fe_PF_chiesa_quinticsplines__MO_140444321607_001 view 3915
No Driver
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Pair_Johnson_Fe__MO_857282754307_002 view 2719


  • No Errors associated with this Test




This Test requires a Test Driver. Archives for the Test Driver CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_001 appear below.


CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_001.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_001.zip Zip Windows archive
Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content