Title
A single sentence description.
|
EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for the Al-Cu system developed by Liu et al. (1999) v000 |
---|---|
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
EAM potential for the Al-Cu system developed by Liu et al. (1999). The potential was used to study electromigration in Al-Cu interconnects. |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| Al, Cu |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | NIST IPRP (https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/Al.html#Al-Cu) |
Content Other Locations | http://enpub.fulton.asu.edu/cms/potentials/main/main.htm |
Contributor |
Ellad B. Tadmor |
Maintainer |
Ellad B. Tadmor |
Developer |
Chunli Liu Leonard Borucki XY Liu |
Published on KIM | 2018 |
How to Cite |
This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5]. [1] Liu X-Y, Liu C-L, Borucki LJ. A new investigation of copper’s role in enhancing Al–Cu interconnect electromigration resistance from an atomistic view. Acta Materialia. 1999;47(11):3227–31. doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00186-X — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Liu C, Borucki L, Liu XY. EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for the Al-Cu system developed by Liu et al. (1999) v000. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/2dd77629 [3] Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS, Plimpton SJ. EAM Model Driver for tabulated potentials with cubic Hermite spline interpolation as used in LAMMPS v005. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/68defa36 [4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 44 Citations (24 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (definite) “Local decomposition induced by dislocation motions inside tetragonal Al2Cu compound: slip system-dependent dynamics,” Scientific Reports. 2013. link Times cited: 0 USED (high confidence) D. Andre et al., “Dislocation-mediated plasticity in the Al2Cu θ-phase.” 2021. link Times cited: 7 USED (high confidence) H. Lin, T. Li, and H. Li, “Molecular dynamics study on the heterogeneous nucleation of liquid Al-Cu alloys on different kinds of copper substrates.,” Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP. 2018. link Times cited: 5 Abstract: Al-Cu alloys are widely used in aeronautics and aerospace en… read more USED (high confidence) Q. Wei, X.-Y. Liu, and A. Misra, “Observation of continuous and reversible bcc–fcc phase transformation in Ag/V multilayers,” Applied Physics Letters. 2011. link Times cited: 19 Abstract: A continuous and reversible bcc–fcc phase transformation via… read more USED (high confidence) G. Campbell, J. Plitzko, W. King, S. Foiles, C. Kisielowski, and G. Duscher, “Copper Segregation to the Σ5 (310)/[001] Symmetric Tilt Grain Boundary in Aluminum,” Interface Science. 2004. link Times cited: 18 USED (high confidence) H. Yoshida, T. Yamamoto, Y. Ikuhara, and T. Sakuma, “A change in the chemical bonding strength and high-temperature creep resistance in Al2O3 with lanthanoid oxide doping,” Philosophical Magazine A. 2002. link Times cited: 14 Abstract: High-temperature creep resistance in polycrystalline Al2O3 i… read more USED (high confidence) P. Wang et al., “Atomistic simulation for deforming complex alloys with application toward TWIP steel and associated physical insights,” Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2017. link Times cited: 42 USED (low confidence) X. Zhang, L. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhang, and X. Huang, “Effect of solute atoms segregation on Al grain boundary energy and mechanical properties by first-principles study,” Mechanics of Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) R. Thiruchelvam, J. E. Suryana, and R. Nambatyathu, “Method to Reduce Micromasking defects caused by Cu precipitation using Ar/N2 plasma : YE: Yield Enhancement/Learning,” 2023 34th Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC). 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: This paper discusses ways to reduce micro masking due to Cop… read more USED (low confidence) V. Krasnikov, A. Mayer, P. Bezborodova, and M. Gazizov, “Effect of Copper Segregation at Low-Angle Grain Boundaries on the Mechanisms of Plastic Relaxation in Nanocrystalline Aluminum: An Atomistic Study,” Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: The paper studies the mechanisms of plastic relaxation and m… read more USED (low confidence) B. Li, Z. Zhang, X. Zhou, M.-men Liu, and Y. Jie, “Mechanical behavior and microstructure evolution of Al/AlCu alloy interface,” Journal of Materials Science. 2023. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) B. Waters, D. S. Karls, I. Nikiforov, R. Elliott, E. Tadmor, and B. Runnels, “Automated determination of grain boundary energy and potential-dependence using the OpenKIM framework,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) L. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhang, X. Zhang, and X. Huang, “Computational simulation of grain boundary segregation of solute atoms in nanocrystalline metals,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2022. link Times cited: 4 USED (low confidence) Y. Kashyrina, A. S. Muratov, V. Kazimirov, and O. S. Roik, “X-ray diffraction study and molecular dynamic simulation of liquid Al-Cu alloys: a new data and interatomic potentials comparison,” Journal of Molecular Modeling. 2022. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) L.-F. Zhu, J. Janssen, S. Ishibashi, F. Körmann, B. Grabowski, and J. Neugebauer, “A fully automated approach to calculate the melting temperature of elemental crystals,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 17 USED (low confidence) J. Wang, S. Shin, A. Y. Nobakht, and A. Shyam, “Structural deformation and transformation of θ′-Al2Cu precipitate in Al matrix via interfacial diffusion,” Computational Materials Science. 2019. link Times cited: 11 USED (low confidence) H. N. Pishkenari, F. S. Yousefi, and A. Taghibakhshi, “Determination of surface properties and elastic constants of FCC metals: a comparison among different EAM potentials in thin film and bulk scale,” Materials Research Express. 2018. link Times cited: 22 Abstract: Three independent elastic constants C11, C12, and C44 were c… read more USED (low confidence) J. Dziedzic, S. Winczewski, and J. Rybicki, “Structure and properties of liquid Al–Cu alloys: empirical potentials compared,” Computational Materials Science. 2016. link Times cited: 17 USED (low confidence) L. Deng, H. Deng, J.-feng Tang, X. Zhang, S. Xiao, and W. Hu, “Monte Carlo simulations of strain-driven elemental depletion or enrichment in Cu95Al5 and Cu90Al10 alloys,” Computational Materials Science. 2015. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) F. Hung, J. Liao, T. Lui, and L.-H. Chen, “Electrical current induced mechanism in microstructure and nano-indention of Al-Zn-Mg-Cu (AZMC) Al alloy thin film,” Current Applied Physics. 2011. link Times cited: 8 USED (low confidence) E. Jannot, V. Mohles, G. Gottstein, and B. Thijsse, “Atomistic Simulation of Pipe Diffusion in AlCu Alloys,” Defect and Diffusion Forum. 2006. link Times cited: 11 Abstract: Activation energies for solute diffusion along dislocations … read more USED (low confidence) P. Choi, T. Al-Kassab, and R. Kirchheim, “Investigation of sputter-deposited Al-2at.%Cu layers by means of the tomographic atom probe (TAP),” Scripta Materialia. 2005. link Times cited: 7 USED (low confidence) C. Witt, C. Volkert, and E. Arzt, “Electromigration-induced Cu motion and precipitation in bamboo Al–Cu interconnects,” Acta Materialia. 2003. link Times cited: 38 USED (low confidence) T. Cale, T. Merchant, L. Borucki, and A. Labun, “Topography simulation for the virtual wafer fab,” Thin Solid Films. 2000. link Times cited: 46 NOT USED (low confidence) R. Thiruchelvam, S. H. Siraji, and L. Koon, “Elimination of Cu Precipitation in Al-Cu films due to the Effect of Thermal Cycles,” 2023 34th Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC). 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: This paper explains how copper precipitation can be eliminat… read more NOT USED (low confidence) X. Wang, G.-ping Cheng, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, W. Liao, and T. A. Venkatesh, “On the Evolution of Nano-Structures at the Al–Cu Interface and the Influence of Annealing Temperature on the Interfacial Strength,” Nanomaterials. 2022. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are invoked to simulate … read more NOT USED (low confidence) S. Ma, Z. Dong, N. Zong, T. Jing, and H. Dong, “Solute-adsorption enhanced heterogeneous nucleation: the effect of Cu adsorption on α-Al nucleation at the sapphire substrate.,” Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP. 2021. link Times cited: 7 Abstract: Interfacial adsorption of solute atoms is a promising means … read more NOT USED (low confidence) L. Borucki, “Taking on the Multiscale Challenge.” 2004. link Times cited: 0 NOT USED (high confidence) H. Jo et al., “Direct strain correlations at the single-atom level in three-dimensional core-shell interface structures,” Nature Communications. 2022. link Times cited: 8 NOT USED (high confidence) Z. Wang et al., “Symmetry-adapted graph neural networks for constructing molecular dynamics force fields,” Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy. 2021. link Times cited: 9 NOT USED (high confidence) W. Jiang, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Accurate Deep Potential model for the Al–Cu–Mg alloy in the full concentration space*,” arXiv: Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 24 Abstract: Combining first-principles accuracy and empirical-potential … read more NOT USED (high confidence) S. Mojumder, M. S. H. Thakur, M. Islam, M. Mahboob, and M. Motalab, “Numerical investigation of mechanical properties of aluminum-copper alloys at nanoscale,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2020. link Times cited: 5 NOT USED (high confidence) P. Parajuli et al., “Misorientation dependence grain boundary complexions in <111> symmetric tilt Al grain boundaries,” Acta Materialia. 2019. link Times cited: 10 NOT USED (high confidence) Y.-C. Liu and S. Lin, “A Critical Review on the Electromigration Effect, the Electroplastic Effect, and Perspectives on the Effects of Electric Current Upon Alloy Phase Stability,” JOM. 2019. link Times cited: 9 NOT USED (high confidence) P. Parajuli, R. Mendoza-Cruz, A. Hurtado-Macías, U. Santiago, and M. Yacamán, “A Direct Observation of Ordered Structures Induced by Cu Segregation at Grain Boundaries of Al 7075 Alloys,” physica status solidi (a). 2018. link Times cited: 7 Abstract: The experimental investigation of the atomic‐scale structure… read more NOT USED (high confidence) L. Hale, “Comparing Modeling Predictions of Aluminum Edge Dislocations: Semidiscrete Variational Peierls–Nabarro Versus Atomistics,” JOM. 2018. link Times cited: 7 NOT USED (high confidence) D. Zhao, O. Løvvik, K. Marthinsen, and Y. Li, “Segregation of Mg, Cu and their effects on the strength of Al Σ5 (210)[001] symmetrical tilt grain boundary,” Acta Materialia. 2018. link Times cited: 86 NOT USED (high confidence) K. Choudhary et al., “Charge optimized many-body potential for aluminum,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2014. link Times cited: 19 Abstract: An interatomic potential for Al is developed within the thir… read more NOT USED (high confidence) B. Jelinek et al., “Modified embedded atom method potential for Al, Si, Mg, Cu, and Fe alloys,” Physical Review B. 2011. link Times cited: 218 Abstract: A set of modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) potentials for… read more NOT USED (high confidence) C. Yu, X. Jijin, Y. Yang, and H. Lu, “First principles calculation of the effects of solute atom on electromigration resistance of Al interconnects,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2009. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: Electromigration (EM) resistance of Al could be improved thr… read more NOT USED (high confidence) F. Sen and M. Aydinol, “Atomistic simulation of self-diffusion in Al and Al alloys under electromigration conditions,” Journal of Applied Physics. 2008. link Times cited: 9 Abstract: The effect of alloying elements on the self-diffusion behavi… read more NOT USED (high confidence) C.-ming Chen and S.-wen Chen, “Electromigration effect upon the Zn/Ni and Bi/Ni interfacial reactions,” Journal of Electronic Materials. 2000. link Times cited: 45 |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_020851069572_000 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| EAM_Dynamo_LiuLiuBorucki_1999_AlCu__MO_020851069572_000 |
DOI |
10.25950/2dd77629 https://doi.org/10.25950/2dd77629 https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/2dd77629 |
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 |
Driver | EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 |
KIM API Version | 2.0 |
Potential Type | eam |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
B | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Al v004 | view | 2974 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v004 | view | 3243 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Al v004 | view | 3004 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cu v004 | view | 2596 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Al v004 | view | 4361 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cu v004 | view | 4510 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Al v004 | view | 2705 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cu v004 | view | 3392 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc Al at zero temperature v006 | view | 1408 | |
Elastic constants for bcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 1855 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Al at zero temperature v006 | view | 3903 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 1919 | |
Elastic constants for sc Al at zero temperature v006 | view | 1983 | |
Elastic constants for sc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 1919 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp Al at zero temperature v004 | view | 1305 | |
Elastic constants for hcp Cu at zero temperature v004 | view | 1846 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 | view | 58749 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v001 | view | 54258 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Al v007 | view | 1791 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cu v007 | view | 1823 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Al v007 | view | 2079 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu v007 | view | 2655 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Al v007 | view | 3839 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cu v007 | view | 3327 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Al v007 | view | 1759 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cu v007 | view | 2271 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Al v005 | view | 15440 | |
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu v005 | view | 23750 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Cu at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 | view | 4360133 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Al at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 | view | 725015 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Al v004 | view | 49679 | |
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004 | view | 50223 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Al v002 | view | 5147382 | |
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu v002 | view | 5777981 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Al v004 | view | 22168 | |
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 | view | 27159 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Al | view | 321648 | |
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Cu | view | 352348 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Al | view | 976429 | |
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Cu | view | 2101571 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Elastic constants for diamond Al at zero temperature v001 | other | view |
Elastic constants for diamond Cu at zero temperature v001 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Al | other | view |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu | other | view |
Verification Check | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
DimerContinuityC1__VC_303890932454_005 | other | view |
EAM_Dynamo_LiuLiuBorucki_1999_AlCu__MO_020851069572_000.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
EAM_Dynamo_LiuLiuBorucki_1999_AlCu__MO_020851069572_000.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 appear below.
EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.zip | Zip | Windows archive |