Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

MEAM_LAMMPS_KimJungLee_2015_NiAlCo__MO_876687166519_002

Interatomic potential for Aluminum (Al), Cobalt (Co), Nickel (Ni).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
MEAM Potential for the Ni-Al-Co system developed by Kim, Jung, and Lee, (2015) v002
Citations

This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on.

The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel.

The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied.

The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP).

Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis.

OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm.

This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information.

Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the  .
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
Interatomic potentials for the Ni–Co binary and Ni–Al–Co ternary systems have been developed on the basis of the second nearest-neighbor modified embedded-atom method (2NN MEAM) formalism. The potentials describe structural, thermodynamic, deformation and defect properties of solid solution phases or compound phases in reasonable agreements with experiments or first-principles calculations. In the original paper (Kim et al Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 23(5), 2015), the results demonstrate the transferability of the potentials and their applicability to large-scale atomistic simulations to investigate the effect of an alloying element, cobalt, on various microstructural factors related to mechanical properties of Ni-based superalloys on an atomic scale.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Al, Co, Ni
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin http://cmse.postech.ac.kr/home_2nnmeam
Contributor Hyeon-Seok Do
Maintainer Hyeon-Seok Do
Developer Young-Kwang Kim
Woo-Sang Jung
Byeong-Joo Lee
Published on KIM 2023
How to Cite

This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5].

[1] Kim Y-K, Jung W-S, Lee B-J. Modified embedded-atom method interatomic potentials for the Ni–Co binary and the Ni–Al–Co ternary systems. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2015;23(5):055004. doi:10.1088/0965-0393/23/5/055004 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Kim Y-K, Jung W-S, Lee B-J. MEAM Potential for the Ni-Al-Co system developed by Kim, Jung, and Lee, (2015) v002. OpenKIM; 2023. doi:10.25950/bf52f2c4

[3] Afshar Y, Hütter S, Rudd RE, Stukowski A, Tipton WW, Trinkle DR, et al. The modified embedded atom method (MEAM) potential v002. OpenKIM; 2023. doi:10.25950/ee5eba52

[4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_876687166519_002
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimJungLee_2015_NiAlCo__MO_876687166519_002
DOI 10.25950/bf52f2c4
https://doi.org/10.25950/bf52f2c4
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/bf52f2c4
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002
DriverMEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002
KIM API Version2.2
Potential Type meam
Previous Version MEAM_LAMMPS_KimJungLee_2015_NiAlCo__MO_876687166519_001

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
B vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Al

Species: Co

Species: Ni





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Al v004 view 14724
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Co v004 view 14503
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ni v004 view 15019
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Al v004 view 11905
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Co v004 view 15166
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ni v004 view 12850
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Al v004 view 16918
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Co v004 view 12403
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ni v004 view 15019
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Al v004 view 12621
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Co v004 view 13258
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ni v004 view 13397


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Al at zero temperature v006 view 32334
Elastic constants for bcc Co at zero temperature v006 view 46602
Elastic constants for bcc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 46307
Elastic constants for diamond Al at zero temperature v001 view 82087
Elastic constants for diamond Co at zero temperature v001 view 61556
Elastic constants for diamond Ni at zero temperature v001 view 86504
Elastic constants for fcc Al at zero temperature v006 view 70013
Elastic constants for fcc Co at zero temperature v006 view 55731
Elastic constants for fcc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 43215
Elastic constants for sc Al at zero temperature v006 view 44982
Elastic constants for sc Co at zero temperature v006 view 31429
Elastic constants for sc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 31897


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v001

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/e8a7ed84

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype A13B4_oP102_31_17a11b_8a2b v001 view 826243
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_hP5_164_ad_d v001 view 81351
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B5_oC16_65_ah_bej v001 view 92023
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v001 view 86725
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_oP16_62_cd_c v001 view 81136
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A4B3_cI112_230_af_g v001 view 1645345
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype A5B2_hP28_194_ahk_ch v001 view 86725
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype A9B2_mP22_14_a4e_e v001 view 70823
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 view 79216
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 view 84443
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 view 60148
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v001 view 49945
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v001 view 63534
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v001 view 64712
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v001 view 75903
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Co in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP28_136_f2ij v001 view 120664
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cF16_225_a_bc v001 view 121768
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v001 view 85547
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v001 view 55657
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_hP8_194_c_h v001 view 86799
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCo in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v001 view 104247
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v001 view 82455
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CoNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v001 view 77670


Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v003

Creators:
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2c59c9d6

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v003 view 21732279
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 32366880
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 view 67568579
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 view 34001764
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 57435226


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Al v007 view 33276
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Co v007 view 35191
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ni v007 view 34334
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Al v007 view 32762
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Co v007 view 35298
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ni v007 view 35925
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Al v007 view 32046
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Co v007 view 43733
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ni v007 view 34234
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Al v007 view 33190
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Co v007 view 33718
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ni v007 view 32982


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Al v005 view 328337
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Co v005 view 350437
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ni v005 view 389968


Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v001

Creators: Mingjian Wen
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fc69d82d

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Ni at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 view 196248400


Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v002

Creators:
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/9d9822ec

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Al at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 5326296


Phonon dispersion relations for an fcc lattice v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64f4999b

Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Ni v004 view 86279


Stacking and twinning fault energies of an fcc lattice at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: SubrahmanyamPattamatta
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/b4cfaf9a

Intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies, unstable stacking fault energy, unstable twinning energy, stacking fault energy as a function of fractional displacement, and gamma surface for a monoatomic FCC lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Al v002 view 37280592
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Ni v002 view 47049135


High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):


import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Al v004 view 113713
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Ni v004 view 137235


Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fca89cea

Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Al view 506362
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Ni view 747690
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for hcp Co view 728401


Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Al view 2325303
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Ni view 1321341
Vacancy formation and migration energy for hcp Co view 5143055


ElasticConstantsHexagonal__TD_612503193866_004

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_000

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_001

GrainBoundaryCubicCrystalSymmetricTiltRelaxedEnergyVsAngle__TD_410381120771_003

PhononDispersionCurve__TD_530195868545_004

SurfaceEnergyCubicCrystalBrokenBondFit__TD_955413365818_004

No Driver
Verification Check Error Categories Link to Error page
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 other view




This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 appear below.


MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002.zip Zip Windows archive
Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content