Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

MEAM_LAMMPS_MirazDhariwalMeng_2020_CuNTi__MO_122936827583_001

Interatomic potential for Copper (Cu), Nitrogen (N), Titanium (Ti).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
MEAM potential for Ti/TiN and Cu/TiN interfaces developed by Miraz et al. (2020) v001
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
A modified embedded atom method interatomic potential was developed to study semi-coherent metal/ceramic interfaces involving Cu, Ti, and N. A genetic algorithm was used to fit the model parameters to the physical properties of the materials. To accurately describe interfacial interactions and shear, two-dimensional generalized stacking fault energy profiles for relevant slip systems were selected as one of the major parameterization targets for the models. The models were applied to study semi-coherent Ti(0001)/TiN(111) and Cu(111)/TiN(111) systems. Ti/TiN was stable with misfits accommodated away from the interface. Cu/TiN, in contrast, was more stable with misfits at the interface. A spiral pattern in the misfit dislocation networks was observed away from the Cu/TiN interface, similar to the metal/metal (111) semi-coherent interfaces. The theoretical shear strength calculated for Ti/TiN when the misfits were several layers away from the interface and for Cu/TiN with the misfit at the chemical interface, had a reasonable agreement with the experiment.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Cu, N, Ti
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin NIST IPRP (https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/system/Cu-N-Ti#CuNTi)
Contributor Yaser Afshar
Maintainer Yaser Afshar
Developer Abu Shama Mohammad Miraz
Nisha Dhariwal
Wenjin Meng
Bala R. Ramachandran
Collin D. Wick
Published on KIM 2021
How to Cite Click here to download this citation in BibTeX format.
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_122936827583_001
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
MEAM_LAMMPS_MirazDhariwalMeng_2020_CuNTi__MO_122936827583_001
DOI 10.25950/bc3a2244
https://doi.org/10.25950/bc3a2244
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/bc3a2244
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001
DriverMEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001
KIM API Version2.2
Potential Type meam
Previous Version MEAM_LAMMPS_MirazDhariwalMeng_2020_CuNTi__MO_122936827583_000

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
A vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ti
Species: Cu


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu
Species: Ti


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ti
Species: Cu


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu
Species: Ti


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ti
Species: Cu


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu
Species: Ti


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Cu

Species: N

Species: Ti





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v004 view 8345
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ti v004 view 11836
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cu v004 view 11480
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ti v004 view 8335
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cu v004 view 8205
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ti v004 view 8394
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cu v004 view 8295
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ti v004 view 10528


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Cu at zero temperature v006 view 52943
Elastic constants for bcc Ti at zero temperature v006 view 42798
Elastic constants for diamond Cu at zero temperature v001 view 110182
Elastic constants for fcc Cu at zero temperature v006 view 54872
Elastic constants for fcc Ti at zero temperature v006 view 34682
Elastic constants for sc Cu at zero temperature v006 view 54146
Elastic constants for sc Ti at zero temperature v006 view 32325


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v000

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/53ef2ea4

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_tI10_139_ae_e v000 view 89743
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuN in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v000 view 95633
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuN in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_b v000 view 79584
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_oP8_59_ae_b v000 view 92259
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuN in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_tP32_123_ilmnr_abcdef v000 view 237500
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuN in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_tP8_123_egh_ab v000 view 58160
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A4B3_tI14_139_2e_ae v000 view 111316
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A4B_oP20_62_4c_c v000 view 120001
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v000 view 79068
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v000 view 72001
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for N in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI20_217_ce v000 view 203782
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v000 view 59927
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v000 view 68936
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for N in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI8_199_a v000 view 103216
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for N in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP8_198_2a v000 view 112867
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for N in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP8_205_c v000 view 107191
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for N in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v000 view 441208
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP3_191_ad v000 view 68982
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for N in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_f v000 view 60879
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for N in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR16_167_cf v000 view 2725873
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for N in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP4_136_f v000 view 49105
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for NTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_tI12_141_a_e v000 view 96924
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_tI6_139_a_e v000 view 61031
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuN in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_oP32_61_c_3c v000 view 2208171
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuN in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_tI16_140_a_ch v000 view 140542
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuN in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_tI32_88_c_df v000 view 1526920
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuN in AFLOW crystal prototype AB6_oP28_62_c_6c v000 view 1249675
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuN in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_216_a_c v000 view 153566
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for NTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_225_a_b v000 view 93363
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v000 view 88877
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for NTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v000 view 82015
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_tP4_123_g_g v000 view 51608
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_tP4_129_c_c v000 view 48295


Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v003

Creators:
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2c59c9d6

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 58390166
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 216149273
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 119584230
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 431740287


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cu v007 view 25571
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ti v007 view 27103
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu v007 view 26795
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ti v007 view 26824
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cu v007 view 26824
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ti v007 view 25979
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cu v007 view 26785
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ti v007 view 26625


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu v005 view 574501
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ti v005 view 550432


ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Elastic constants for diamond Ti at zero temperature v001 other view

ElasticConstantsHexagonal__TD_612503193866_004

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_000

GrainBoundaryCubicCrystalSymmetricTiltRelaxedEnergyVsAngle__TD_410381120771_002

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_007

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp N v005 other view

LinearThermalExpansionCoeffCubic__TD_522633393614_001

PhononDispersionCurve__TD_530195868545_004
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004 other view

StackingFaultFccCrystal__TD_228501831190_002
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu v002 other view

SurfaceEnergyCubicCrystalBrokenBondFit__TD_955413365818_004
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 other view

No Driver
Verification Check Error Categories Link to Error page
DimerContinuityC1__VC_303890932454_004 other view
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 other view




This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001 appear below.


MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001.zip Zip Windows archive
Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content