Title
A single sentence description.
|
MEAM potential for Ti/TiN and Cu/TiN interfaces developed by Miraz et al. (2020) v002 |
---|---|
Citations
This panel presents the list of papers that cite the interatomic potential whose page you are on (by its primary sources given below in "How to Cite"). Articles marked by the green star have been determined to have used the potential in computations (as opposed to only citing it as background information) by a machine learning (ML) algorithm developed by the KIM Team that analyzes the full text of the papers. Articles that do not use it are marked with a null symbol, and in cases where no information is available a question mark is shown. The full text of the articles used to train the ML algorithm is provided by the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project. The word cloud to the right is built from the abstracts of the primary sources and using papers to give a sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this interatomic potential is applied. IMPORTANT NOTE: Usage can only be determined for articles for which Semantic Scholar can provide OpenKIM with the full text. Where this is not the case, we ask the community for help in determining usage. If you know whether an article did or did not use a potential, let us know by clicking the cloud icon by the article and completing a one question form. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework (click the question mark on the left for more details). The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this potential. The list below indicates usage of the potential by citing articles. ![]()
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
|
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
A modified embedded atom method interatomic potential was developed to study semi-coherent metal/ceramic interfaces involving Cu, Ti, and N. A genetic algorithm was used to fit the model parameters to the physical properties of the materials. To accurately describe interfacial interactions and shear, two-dimensional generalized stacking fault energy profiles for relevant slip systems were selected as one of the major parameterization targets for the models. The models were applied to study semi-coherent Ti(0001)/TiN(111) and Cu(111)/TiN(111) systems. Ti/TiN was stable with misfits accommodated away from the interface. Cu/TiN, in contrast, was more stable with misfits at the interface. A spiral pattern in the misfit dislocation networks was observed away from the Cu/TiN interface, similar to the metal/metal (111) semi-coherent interfaces. The theoretical shear strength calculated for Ti/TiN when the misfits were several layers away from the interface and for Cu/TiN with the misfit at the chemical interface, had a reasonable agreement with the experiment. |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| Cu, N, Ti |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | NIST IPRP (https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/system/Cu-N-Ti#CuNTi) |
Contributor |
Yaser Afshar |
Maintainer |
Yaser Afshar |
Developer |
Abu Shama Mohammad Miraz Nisha Dhariwal Wenjin Meng Bala R. Ramachandran Collin D. Wick |
Published on KIM | 2023 |
How to Cite |
This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5]. [1] Miraz ASM, Dhariwal N, Meng WJ, Ramachandran BR, Wick CD. Development and application of interatomic potentials to study the stability and shear strength of Ti/TiN and Cu/TiN interfaces. Materials & Design. 2020;196:109123. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109123 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Miraz ASM, Dhariwal N, Meng W, Ramachandran BR, Wick CD. MEAM potential for Ti/TiN and Cu/TiN interfaces developed by Miraz et al. (2020) v002. OpenKIM; 2023. doi:10.25950/469db493 [3] Afshar Y, Hütter S, Rudd RE, Stukowski A, Tipton WW, Trinkle DR, et al. The modified embedded atom method (MEAM) potential v002. OpenKIM; 2023. doi:10.25950/ee5eba52 [4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_122936827583_002 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| MEAM_LAMMPS_MirazDhariwalMeng_2020_CuNTi__MO_122936827583_002 |
DOI |
10.25950/469db493 https://doi.org/10.25950/469db493 https://search.datacite.org/works/10.25950/469db493 |
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 |
Driver | MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 |
KIM API Version | 2.2 |
Potential Type | meam |
Previous Version | MEAM_LAMMPS_MirazDhariwalMeng_2020_CuNTi__MO_122936827583_001 |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
B | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v004 | view | 13159 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ti v004 | view | 8723 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cu v004 | view | 9966 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ti v004 | view | 8683 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cu v004 | view | 12840 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ti v004 | view | 10675 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cu v004 | view | 10454 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ti v004 | view | 10675 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 47927 | |
Elastic constants for bcc Ti at zero temperature v006 | view | 39461 | |
Elastic constants for diamond Cu at zero temperature v001 | view | 81488 | |
Elastic constants for diamond Ti at zero temperature v001 | view | 47117 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 53559 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Ti at zero temperature v006 | view | 25546 | |
Elastic constants for sc Cu at zero temperature v006 | view | 56364 | |
Elastic constants for sc Ti at zero temperature v006 | view | 34528 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v000 | view | 80384 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v000 | view | 72825 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v000 | view | 65445 | |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP3_191_ad v000 | view | 60681 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 | view | 38638917 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cu v007 | view | 18847 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ti v007 | view | 19902 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu v007 | view | 20982 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ti v007 | view | 24589 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cu v007 | view | 20956 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ti v007 | view | 19289 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cu v007 | view | 19822 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ti v007 | view | 23117 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu v005 | view | 257502 | |
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp N v005 | view | 282629 | |
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ti v005 | view | 238137 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Cu at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 | view | 143218103 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu v002 | view | 81399463 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 | view | 157614 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Cu | view | 755788 | |
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for hcp Ti | view | 551344 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Cu | view | 2206186 | |
Vacancy formation and migration energy for hcp Ti | view | 4209105 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp Cu at zero temperature v004 | other | view |
Elastic constants for hcp N at zero temperature v004 | other | view |
Elastic constants for hcp Ti at zero temperature v004 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cF96_227_e_cf v000 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for N in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oP2_51_e v001 | other | view |
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_tP4_123_a_ce v001 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc N v007 | other | view |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond N v007 | other | view |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc N v007 | other | view |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc N v007 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 | other | view |
MEAM_LAMMPS_MirazDhariwalMeng_2020_CuNTi__MO_122936827583_002.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
MEAM_LAMMPS_MirazDhariwalMeng_2020_CuNTi__MO_122936827583_002.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002 appear below.
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_002.zip | Zip | Windows archive |