MEAM_LAMMPS_SunRamachandranWick_2018_TiAl__MO_022920256108_001
| Title
A single sentence description.
|
MEAM potential for TiAl alloys developed by Sun et al. (2018) v001 |
|---|---|
| Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
|
Interatomic potentials for pure Ti and Al and binary TiAl were developed utilizing the second nearest neighbor modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) formalism. The potentials were parameterized to reproduce multiple properties spanning bulk solids, solid surfaces, solid/liquid phase changes, and liquid interfacial properties. This parametrization was carried out using a newly developed optimization procedure that combined a fitness function's simple minimization with a genetic algorithm to efficiently span the parameter space. The resulting MEAM potentials gave good agreement with experimental and DFT solid and liquid properties and reproduced the melting points for Ti, Al, and TiAl. However, the surface tensions from the model consistently underestimated experimental values. Liquid TiAl's surface was found to be mostly covered with Al atoms, showing that Al has a significant propensity for the liquid/air interface. |
| Species
The supported atomic species.
| Al, Ti |
| Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
| Content Origin | Files are provided by Collin D. Wick (Louisiana Tech University) on Feb 4, 2021, and posted with his permission. |
| Contributor |
Yaser Afshar |
| Maintainer |
Yaser Afshar |
| Developer |
Shoutian Sun Bala R. Ramachandran Collin D. Wick |
| Published on KIM | 2021 |
| How to Cite | Click here to download this citation in BibTeX format. |
| Funding | Not available |
| Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MO_022920256108_001 |
| Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| MEAM_LAMMPS_SunRamachandranWick_2018_TiAl__MO_022920256108_001 |
| DOI |
10.25950/b3c76733 https://doi.org/10.25950/b3c76733 https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/b3c76733 |
| KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
| Portable Model using Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001 |
| Driver | MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001 |
| KIM API Version | 2.2 |
| Potential Type | meam |
| Previous Version | MEAM_LAMMPS_SunRamachandranWick_2018_TiAl__MO_022920256108_000 |
| Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| B | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| N/A | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
| P | vc-unit-conversion | mandatory | The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description. |
Results | Files |
BCC Lattice Constant
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Cohesive Energy Graph
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Diamond Lattice Constant
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Dislocation Core Energies
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)FCC Elastic Constants
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
FCC Lattice Constant
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
FCC Stacking Fault Energies
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
FCC Surface Energies
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)SC Lattice Constant
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table
Species: AlSpecies: Ti
Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5
This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Al v004 | view | 5948 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ti v004 | view | 5997 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Al v004 | view | 6007 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ti v004 | view | 5948 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Al v004 | view | 5918 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ti v004 | view | 5968 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Al v004 | view | 16251 | |
| Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ti v004 | view | 7436 |
Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f
Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elastic constants for bcc Al at zero temperature v006 | view | 23860 | |
| Elastic constants for bcc Ti at zero temperature v006 | view | 37536 | |
| Elastic constants for diamond Al at zero temperature v001 | view | 59487 | |
| Elastic constants for diamond Ti at zero temperature v001 | view | 103498 | |
| Elastic constants for fcc Al at zero temperature v006 | view | 24974 | |
| Elastic constants for fcc Ti at zero temperature v006 | view | 44976 | |
| Elastic constants for sc Al at zero temperature v006 | view | 45065 | |
| Elastic constants for sc Ti at zero temperature v006 | view | 25352 |
Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/53ef2ea4
Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Creators:
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2c59c9d6
Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v003 | view | 7442274 | |
| Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 | view | 26545973 | |
| Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 | view | 17289959 | |
| Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 | view | 85637004 |
Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf
Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Al v007 | view | 13397 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ti v007 | view | 14054 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Al v007 | view | 15168 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ti v007 | view | 14292 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Al v007 | view | 14660 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ti v007 | view | 14193 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Al v007 | view | 13616 | |
| Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ti v007 | view | 14054 |
Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32
Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Al v005 | view | 294640 | |
| Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ti v005 | view | 256836 |
Creators: Mingjian Wen
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fc69d82d
This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Al at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 | view | 37375686 |
Creators:
Contributor: SubrahmanyamPattamatta
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/b4cfaf9a
Intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies, unstable stacking fault energy, unstable twinning energy, stacking fault energy as a function of fractional displacement, and gamma surface for a monoatomic FCC lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
| Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Al v002 | view | 14068448 |
| Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| Elastic constants for hcp Al at zero temperature v004 | other | view |
| Elastic constants for hcp Ti at zero temperature v004 | other | view |
PhononDispersionCurve__TD_530195868545_004
| Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Al v004 | other | view |
SurfaceEnergyCubicCrystalBrokenBondFit__TD_955413365818_004
| Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Al v004 | other | view |
No Driver
| Verification Check | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
|---|---|---|
| MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 | other | view |
| PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004 | other | view |
| MEAM_LAMMPS_SunRamachandranWick_2018_TiAl__MO_022920256108_001.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
| MEAM_LAMMPS_SunRamachandranWick_2018_TiAl__MO_022920256108_001.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001 appear below.
| MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
| MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001.zip | Zip | Windows archive |