Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

EMT_Asap_Standard_JacobsenStoltzeNorskov_1996_AlAgAuCuNiPdPt__MO_115316750986_001

Interatomic potential for Aluminum (Al), Copper (Cu), Gold (Au), Nickel (Ni), Palladium (Pd), Platinum (Pt), Silver (Ag).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
EMT potential for Al, Ni, Cu, Pd, Ag, Pt and Au developed by Jacobsen, Stoltze, and Norskov (1996) v001
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
Effective Medium Theory (EMT) model based on the EMT implementation in ASAP (https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/asap).

Effective Medium Theory is a many-body potential of the same class as Embedded Atom Method, Finnis-Sinclair etc. The main term in the energy per atom is the local density of atoms.

The functional form implemented here is that of Ref. 1. The principles behind EMT are described in Refs. 2 and 3 (with 2 being the more detailed and 3 being the most pedagogical). Be aware that the functional form and even some of the principles have changed since refs 2 and 3. EMT can be considered the last step of a series of approximations starting with Density Functional Theory; see Ref 4.

This model implements the "official" parametrization as published in Ref. 1.

Note on the cutoff: EMT uses a global cutoff, and this cutoff depends on the largest atom in the simulation. In OpenKIM the model does not reliably have access to all the species in a parallel simulation, so the cutoff is always set to the cutoff associated with the largest supported atom (in this case Silver).

For single-element simulations, please use the single-element parametrizations, as they use a cutoff more appropriate for the element in question (and are marginally faster).

These files are based on Asap version 3.11.5.


REFERENCES:

[1] Jacobsen, K. W., Stoltze, P., & Nørskov, J.: "A semi-empirical effective medium theory for metals and alloys". Surf. Sci. 366, 394–402 (1996).

[2] Jacobsen, K. W., Nørskov, J., & Puska, M.: "Interatomic interactions in the effective-medium theory". Phys. Rev. B 35, 7423–7442 (1987).

[3] Jacobsen, K. W.: "Bonding in Metallic Systems: An Effective-Medium Approach". Comments Cond. Mat. Phys. 14, 129-161 (1988).

[4] Chetty, N., Stokbro, K., Jacobsen, K. W., & Nørskov, J.: "Ab initio potential for solids". Phys. Rev. B 46, 3798–3809 (1992).


HISTORY:
* This model was previously available as MO_118428466217_002. After the change to KIM API v2 the cutoff is handled in a marginally different way, and a new KIM model ID was assigned.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Ag, Al, Au, Cu, Ni, Pd, Pt
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin https://gitlab.com/asap/asap
Contributor Jakob Schiøtz
Maintainer Jakob Schiøtz
Developer Jens K. Nørskov
Karsten W. Jacobsen
P. Stoltze
Published on KIM 2019
How to Cite

This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5].

[1] Jacobsen KW, Stoltze P, Nørskov JK. A semi-empirical effective medium theory for metals and alloys. Surface Science. 1996;366(2):394–402. doi:10.1016/0039-6028(96)00816-3 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Nørskov JK, Jacobsen KW, Stoltze P. EMT potential for Al, Ni, Cu, Pd, Ag, Pt and Au developed by Jacobsen, Stoltze, and Norskov (1996) v001. OpenKIM; 2019. doi:10.25950/485ab326

[3] Jacobsen KW, Stoltze P, Nørskov JK. Effective Medium Theory (EMT) potential driver v004. OpenKIM; 2019. doi:10.25950/7e5b8be7

[4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Citations

This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on.

The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel.

The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied.

The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP).

Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis.

OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm.

This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information.

Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the  .
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_115316750986_001
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
EMT_Asap_Standard_JacobsenStoltzeNorskov_1996_AlAgAuCuNiPdPt__MO_115316750986_001
DOI 10.25950/485ab326
https://doi.org/10.25950/485ab326
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/485ab326
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver EMT_Asap__MD_128315414717_004
DriverEMT_Asap__MD_128315414717_004
KIM API Version2.0.2
Potential Type eam
Previous Version EMT_Asap_Standard_JacobsenStoltzeNorskov_1996_AlAgAuCuNiPdPt__MO_115316750986_000

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
B vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Au
Species: Ni
Species: Cu
Species: Pt
Species: Pd
Species: Ag
Species: Al


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu
Species: Pd
Species: Pt
Species: Ni
Species: Au
Species: Al
Species: Ag


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Cu
Species: Ag
Species: Ni
Species: Pt
Species: Au
Species: Pd
Species: Al


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ni
Species: Cu
Species: Ag
Species: Au
Species: Pd
Species: Pt
Species: Al


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ag
Species: Au
Species: Al
Species: Pt
Species: Pd
Species: Cu
Species: Ni


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Au
Species: Cu
Species: Pt
Species: Al
Species: Pd
Species: Ni
Species: Ag


FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Pt
Species: Au
Species: Cu
Species: Pd
Species: Ni
Species: Ag
Species: Al


SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Pt
Species: Ni
Species: Cu
Species: Ag
Species: Pd
Species: Au
Species: Al


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: Ag

Species: Al

Species: Au

Species: Cu

Species: Ni

Species: Pd

Species: Pt





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ag v004 view 2228
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Al v004 view 2208
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Au v004 view 2278
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Cu v004 view 2367
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ni v004 view 2218
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Pd v004 view 2357
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Pt v004 view 2298
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ag v004 view 2238
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Al v004 view 2307
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Au v004 view 2477
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Cu v004 view 4324
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Ni v004 view 2188
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Pd v004 view 2278
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Pt v004 view 2656
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ag v004 view 2356
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Al v004 view 3280
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Au v004 view 2357
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Cu v004 view 2228
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ni v004 view 3317
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Pd v004 view 2356
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Pt v004 view 2556
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ag v004 view 2209
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Al v004 view 2198
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Au v004 view 2387
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Cu v004 view 2666
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Ni v004 view 2188
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Pd v004 view 2429
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Pt v004 view 2209


Elastic constants for arbitrary crystals at zero temperature and pressure v000

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/888f9943

Computes the elastic constants for an arbitrary crystal. A robust computational protocol is used, attempting multiple methods and step sizes to achieve an acceptably low error in numerical differentiation and deviation from material symmetry. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation as part of the Crystal Genome testing framework. In addition, the distance from the obtained elasticity tensor to the nearest isotropic tensor is computed.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for AlPd in AFLOW crystal prototype A21B8_tI116_88_a5f_2f at zero temperature and pressure v000 view 347243
Elastic constants for AlPt in AFLOW crystal prototype A21B8_tI116_88_a5f_2f at zero temperature and pressure v000 view 2926019
Elastic constants for AlAu in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF12_225_c_a at zero temperature and pressure v000 view 71927
Elastic constants for AlPd in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF12_225_c_a at zero temperature and pressure v000 view 74796
Elastic constants for AlPt in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF12_225_c_a at zero temperature and pressure v000 view 56081
Elastic constants for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_hP5_164_ad_d at zero temperature and pressure v000 view 152247


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc Ag at zero temperature v006 view 1887
Elastic constants for bcc Al at zero temperature v006 view 2079
Elastic constants for bcc Au at zero temperature v006 view 1695
Elastic constants for bcc Cu at zero temperature v006 view 1503
Elastic constants for bcc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 2335
Elastic constants for bcc Pd at zero temperature v006 view 6206
Elastic constants for bcc Pt at zero temperature v006 view 1695
Elastic constants for diamond Ag at zero temperature v001 view 3647
Elastic constants for diamond Au at zero temperature v001 view 3167
Elastic constants for diamond Pd at zero temperature v001 view 4958
Elastic constants for diamond Pt at zero temperature v001 view 14267
Elastic constants for fcc Ag at zero temperature v006 view 3999
Elastic constants for fcc Al at zero temperature v006 view 6398
Elastic constants for fcc Au at zero temperature v006 view 1599
Elastic constants for fcc Cu at zero temperature v006 view 6046
Elastic constants for fcc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 6526
Elastic constants for fcc Pd at zero temperature v006 view 4223
Elastic constants for fcc Pt at zero temperature v006 view 1695
Elastic constants for sc Ag at zero temperature v006 view 1503
Elastic constants for sc Al at zero temperature v006 view 6270
Elastic constants for sc Au at zero temperature v006 view 6302
Elastic constants for sc Cu at zero temperature v006 view 1695
Elastic constants for sc Ni at zero temperature v006 view 2047
Elastic constants for sc Pd at zero temperature v006 view 1695
Elastic constants for sc Pt at zero temperature v006 view 1855


Elastic constants for hexagonal crystals at zero temperature v003

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2e4b93d9

Computes the elastic constants for hcp crystals by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for hcp Ag at zero temperature view 2451
Elastic constants for hcp Al at zero temperature view 1806
Elastic constants for hcp Au at zero temperature view 2515
Elastic constants for hcp Cu at zero temperature view 1193
Elastic constants for hcp Ni at zero temperature view 1870
Elastic constants for hcp Pd at zero temperature view 1580
Elastic constants for hcp Pt at zero temperature view 1548


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v001

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/e8a7ed84

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AuCu in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v001 view 64197
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ag in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 view 83559
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Au in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 view 82897
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 view 73694
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Cu in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v001 view 72001
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ag in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v001 view 76197
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ag in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_ac v001 view 68982
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AuCu in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v001 view 80688
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AuCu in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_oI40_74_5e_5e v001 view 183830
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AuCu in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_tP2_123_a_d v001 view 73621


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2f2c4ad3

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPd in AFLOW crystal prototype A21B8_tI116_88_a5f_2f v002 view 2305794
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPt in AFLOW crystal prototype A21B8_tI116_88_a5f_2f v002 view 365046
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlAu in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF12_225_c_a v002 view 82087
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPd in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF12_225_c_a v002 view 104983
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPt in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF12_225_c_a v002 view 83059
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCu in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_tI12_140_h_a v002 view 47454
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCu in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_tP3_123_e_a v002 view 49178
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPt in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_hP10_164_abcd_2d v002 view 81719
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCu in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_hP5_164_ad_d v002 view 89596
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_hP5_164_ad_d v002 view 50309
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPd in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_hP5_164_ad_d v002 view 58602
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPt in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_hP5_164_ad_d v002 view 48183
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B5_oC16_65_ah_bej v002 view 83338
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPd in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B5_oP16_55_ah_cgh v002 view 89596
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPt in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B5_oP16_55_ah_cgh v002 view 101228
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlAu in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B8_hR44_167_bce_2c2f v002 view 596915
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AgPt in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 view 100124
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AuPd in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 view 78623
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuPd in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 view 65499
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuPt in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 view 61914
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for NiPt in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_cP4_221_c_a v002 view 59180
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuPd in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_tP28_123_aeg2h3i_c2gh v002 view 94381
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype A4B3_cI112_230_af_g v002 view 2771885
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCu in AFLOW crystal prototype A4B9_cP52_215_ei_3efgi v002 view 290433
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuPd in AFLOW crystal prototype A4B_tP20_84_afjk_j v002 view 62036
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 view 60456
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 view 93645
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Pd in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 view 55838
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Pt in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v002 view 55717
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Al in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 view 73277
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 view 56264
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ni in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 view 83118
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPd in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_oP12_62_c_2c v002 view 69056
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPt in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_oP12_62_c_2c v002 view 69866
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPt in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_oP24_51_afj_cf2ij v002 view 86644
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlAu in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_oP30_58_a2g_5g v002 view 102745
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlAu in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_tI6_139_a_e v002 view 76124
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCu in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cF16_225_a_bc v002 view 78137
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cF16_225_a_bc v002 view 137229
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AgPt in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v002 view 91216
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCu in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v002 view 52132
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v002 view 91142
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPt in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v002 view 88713
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AuPd in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_cP4_221_a_c v002 view 89670
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCu in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_oP12_47_al_ejoz v002 view 173155
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlAu in AFLOW crystal prototype AB4_cP20_198_a_ab v002 view 64527
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPd in AFLOW crystal prototype AB5_oP24_62_c_5c v002 view 101081
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuPt in AFLOW crystal prototype AB7_cF32_225_a_bd v002 view 229734
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlAu in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 view 97694
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlNi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 view 63373
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPd in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 view 62461
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPt in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 view 96737
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuPd in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 view 97694
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPd in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP8_198_a_a v002 view 97155
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPt in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP8_198_a_a v002 view 96548
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlPd in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_hR26_148_a2f_b2f v002 view 165389
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CuPt in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_hR2_166_a_b v002 view 80983
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCu in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_mC20_12_a2i_c2i v002 view 140689
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlAu in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_mP8_11_2e_2e v002 view 105351
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for AlCuPt in AFLOW crystal prototype ABC2_tP4_123_a_c_e v001 view 48851


Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v002

Creators: Brandon Runnels
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/4723cee7

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v000 view 62047185


Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a symmetric tilt grain boundary within a cubic crystal v003

Creators:
Contributor: brunnels
Publication Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2c59c9d6

Computes grain boundary energy for a range of tilt angles given a crystal structure, tilt axis, and material.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ag v000 view 10581033
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v003 view 10578129
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Au v000 view 10096463
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 19604737
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 19381030
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pd v000 view 12661474
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pt v000 view 12097762
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ag v000 view 36508185
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 view 25299222
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Au v000 view 34022831
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 59342056
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 74057116
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pd v000 view 42873708
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pt v000 view 40843844
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ag v000 view 21259686
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 view 13774176
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Au v000 view 18855830
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 21415896
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ni v001 view 43952111
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pd v000 view 23896036
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pt v000 view 21602095
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Ag v000 view 74880147
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Al v001 view 76828475
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Au v000 view 68887438
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Cu v001 view 118067297
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pd v000 view 89350992
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in fcc Pt v000 view 80517931


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ag v007 view 1599
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Al v007 view 1471
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Au v007 view 2015
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Cu v007 view 1631
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ni v007 view 1919
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Pd v007 view 1695
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Pt v007 view 2143
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ag v007 view 2015
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Al v007 view 1983
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Au v007 view 2271
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Cu v007 view 3135
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ni v007 view 3327
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Pd v007 view 2975
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Pt v007 view 2879
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ag v007 view 3711
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Al v007 view 3775
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Au v007 view 3103
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Cu v007 view 3679
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ni v007 view 2495
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Pd v007 view 2015
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Pt v007 view 1887
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ag v007 view 1791
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Al v007 view 1887
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Au v007 view 2239
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Cu v007 view 1791
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ni v007 view 1919
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Pd v007 view 1983
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Pt v007 view 2175


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v004

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/25bcc28b

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ag view 5353
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Al view 7835
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Au view 6417
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Cu view 7642
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Ni view 7384
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Pd view 6675
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Pt view 6965


Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v001

Creators: Mingjian Wen
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fc69d82d

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Ag at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 view 9020546
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Au at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 view 15024721
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Cu at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v001 view 46260476


Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v002

Creators:
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/9d9822ec

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Al at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 1175499
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Ni at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 1894550
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Pd at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 866681
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of fcc Pt at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 1306617


Phonon dispersion relations for an fcc lattice v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64f4999b

Calculates the phonon dispersion relations for fcc lattices and records the results as curves.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Ag v004 view 50351
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Al v004 view 49391
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Au v004 view 53070
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Cu v004 view 49231
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Ni v004 view 45232
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Pd v004 view 51086
Phonon dispersion relations for fcc Pt v004 view 51182


Stacking and twinning fault energies of an fcc lattice at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: SubrahmanyamPattamatta
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/b4cfaf9a

Intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies, unstable stacking fault energy, unstable twinning energy, stacking fault energy as a function of fractional displacement, and gamma surface for a monoatomic FCC lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Ag v002 view 9508026
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Al v002 view 7865263
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Au v002 view 9157779
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Cu v002 view 9721777
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Ni v002 view 12801198
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Pd v002 view 11152677
Stacking and twinning fault energies for fcc Pt v002 view 7766129


High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):


import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Ag v004 view 30166
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Al v004 view 29590
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Au v004 view 33109
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Cu v004 view 39506
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Ni v004 view 48271
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Pd v004 view 38035
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in fcc Pt v004 view 40818


Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fca89cea

Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Ag view 365305
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Al view 325476
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Au view 420447
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Cu view 398213
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Ni view 339391
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Pd view 390925
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for fcc Pt view 414852


Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Ag view 1467257
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Al view 2421305
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Au view 1795383
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Cu view 1986060
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Ni view 2695394
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Pd view 1843973
Vacancy formation and migration energy for fcc Pt view 1558546


ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_000

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_006
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Al other view

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005

StackingFaultFccCrystal__TD_228501831190_001

No Driver
Verification Check Error Categories Link to Error page
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 other view




This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver EMT_Asap__MD_128315414717_004 appear below.


EMT_Asap__MD_128315414717_004.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
EMT_Asap__MD_128315414717_004.zip Zip Windows archive
Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content