Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

EAM_Dynamo_BonnyGrigorevTerentyev_2014EAM2_WHHe__MO_626183701337_000

Interatomic potential for Helium (He), Hydrogen (H), Tungsten (W).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
 EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for the W-H-He system developed by Bonny et al. (2014); Potential EAM2 v000
Citations

This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on.

The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel.

The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied.

The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP).

Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis.

OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm.

This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information.

Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the  .
Description
A short description of the Model describing its key features including for example: type of model (pair potential, 3-body potential, EAM, etc.), modeled species (Ac, Ag, ..., Zr), intended purpose, origin, and so on.
EAM potential for the W-H-He system developed by Bonny, Grigorev, and Terentyev (2014); Potential EAM2. In this work we developed an embedded atom method potential for large scale atomistic simulations in the ternary tungsten–hydrogen–helium (W–H–He) system, focusing on applications in the fusion research domain. Following available ab initio data, the potential reproduces key interactions between H, He and point defects in W and utilizes the most recent potential for matrix W. The potential is applied to assess the thermal stability of various H–He complexes of sizes too large for ab initio techniques. The results show that the dissociation of H–He clusters stabilized by vacancies will occur primarily by emission of hydrogen atoms and then by break-up of V–He complexes, indicating that H–He interaction does influence the release of hydrogen.
Species
The supported atomic species.
H, He, W
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin NIST IPRP (https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/W.html#W-H-He)
Contributor Ellad B. Tadmor
Maintainer Ellad B. Tadmor
Developer Giovanni Bonny
Petr Grigorev
D. Terentyev
Published on KIM 2018
How to Cite

This Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-5].

[1] Bonny G, Grigorev P, Terentyev D. On the binding of nanometric hydrogen–helium clusters in tungsten. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2014;26(48):485001. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/26/48/485001 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Bonny G, Grigorev P, Terentyev D. EAM potential (LAMMPS cubic hermite tabulation) for the W-H-He system developed by Bonny et al. (2014); Potential EAM2 v000. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/e2ede53d

[3] Foiles SM, Baskes MI, Daw MS, Plimpton SJ. EAM Model Driver for tabulated potentials with cubic Hermite spline interpolation as used in LAMMPS v005. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/68defa36

[4] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[5] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
MO_626183701337_000
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
EAM_Dynamo_BonnyGrigorevTerentyev_2014EAM2_WHHe__MO_626183701337_000
DOI 10.25950/e2ede53d
https://doi.org/10.25950/e2ede53d
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/e2ede53d
KIM Item Type
Specifies whether this is a Portable Model (software implementation of an interatomic model); Portable Model with parameter file (parameter file to be read in by a Model Driver); Model Driver (software implementation of an interatomic model that reads in parameters).
Portable Model using Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005
DriverEAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005
KIM API Version2.0
Potential Type eam

Verification Check Dashboard

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
 Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
 Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
 Results Files
A vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
 Results Files
F vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
 Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
 Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
 Results Files
P vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
 Results Files
P vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
 Results Files
P vc-unit-conversion mandatory
The model is able to correctly convert its energy and/or forces to different unit sets; see full description.
 Results Files

Visualizers (in-page)


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: W


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: He
Species: W


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: He
Species: W


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: H
Species: He
Species: W


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: He
Species: W


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: W


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: H

Species: He

Species: W



Tests


CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_002
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v002

Creators: Daniel S. Karls
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c6746c52

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Helium view 3555
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Helium view 3739

CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc W v004 view 9111
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond He v004 view 9120
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond W v004 view 10896
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc He v004 view 10749
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc W v004 view 9031
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc W v004 view 9111

DislocationCoreEnergyCubic__TD_452950666597_002
Dislocation core energy for cubic crystals at a set of dislocation core cutoff radii v002

Creators:
Contributor: qyc081025
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/ebecf626

This Test Driver computes the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. First, it generates several periodic atomistic supercells containing a dislocation dipole. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. The supercell is increased in size until the disolcation core energy converges. Finally, after checking the independence of the results from the simulation cell geometry, the dislocation core energies are determined for each dislocation core radius.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Dislocation core energy for bcc W computed at zero temperature for a set of dislocation core cutoff radii with burgers vector [0.5, 0.5, 0.5] along line direction [1, 1, 0] v000 view 6563857
Dislocation core energy for bcc W computed at zero temperature for a set of dislocation core cutoff radii with burgers vector [0.5, 0.5, 0.5] along line direction [1, 1, 1] v000 view 6114791
Dislocation core energy for bcc W computed at zero temperature for a set of dislocation core cutoff radii with burgers vector [0.5, 0.5, 0.5] along line direction [1, 1, 2] v000 view 4366358
Dislocation core energy for bcc W computed at zero temperature for a set of dislocation core cutoff radii with burgers vector [0.5, 0.5, 0.5] along line direction [1, 1, 3] v000 view 26410618
Dislocation core energy for bcc W computed at zero temperature for a set of dislocation core cutoff radii with burgers vector [0.5, 0.5, 0.5] along line direction [1, 1, 4] v000 view 12531453
Dislocation core energy for bcc W computed at zero temperature for a set of dislocation core cutoff radii with burgers vector [0.5, 0.5, 0.5] along line direction [1, 1, 5] v000 view 44035985
Dislocation core energy for bcc W computed at zero temperature for a set of dislocation core cutoff radii with burgers vector [0.5, 0.5, 0.5] along line direction [1, 1, 6] v000 view 44686204
Dislocation core energy for bcc W computed at zero temperature for a set of dislocation core cutoff radii with burgers vector [0.5, 0.5, 0.5] along line direction [1, 1, 7] v000 view 191050130
Dislocation core energy for bcc W computed at zero temperature for a set of dislocation core cutoff radii with burgers vector [0.5, 0.5, 0.5] along line direction [2, 2, 3] v000 view 21039152
Dislocation core energy for bcc W computed at zero temperature for a set of dislocation core cutoff radii with burgers vector [0.5, 0.5, 0.5] along line direction [2, 2, 5] v000 view 90664897
Dislocation core energy for bcc W computed at zero temperature for a set of dislocation core cutoff radii with burgers vector [0.5, 0.5, 0.5] along line direction [2, 2, -1] v000 view 125391138
Dislocation core energy for bcc W computed at zero temperature for a set of dislocation core cutoff radii with burgers vector [0.5, 0.5, 0.5] along line direction [2, 2, -3] v000 view 258960919

ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_004
Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v004

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/75393d88

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc H at zero temperature view 2382
Elastic constants for bcc He at zero temperature view 2786
Elastic constants for fcc H at zero temperature view 3225
Elastic constants for sc H at zero temperature view 3152
Elastic constants for sc He at zero temperature view 3409

ElasticConstantsCubic__TD_011862047401_006
Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc W at zero temperature v006 view 6174
Elastic constants for diamond He at zero temperature v001 view 4926
Elastic constants for diamond W at zero temperature v001 view 7389
Elastic constants for fcc He at zero temperature v006 view 4351
Elastic constants for fcc W at zero temperature v006 view 2175
Elastic constants for sc W at zero temperature v006 view 1855

ElasticConstantsHexagonal__TD_612503193866_003
Elastic constants for hexagonal crystals at zero temperature v003

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2e4b93d9

Computes the elastic constants for hcp crystals by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for hcp H at zero temperature view 3335

ElasticConstantsHexagonal__TD_612503193866_004
Elastic constants for hexagonal crystals at zero temperature v004

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/d794c746

Computes the elastic constants for hcp crystals by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for hcp He at zero temperature v004 view 2388
Elastic constants for hcp W at zero temperature v004 view 2579

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_001
Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v001

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/e8a7ed84

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HW in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B_mP8_11_3e_e v001 view 101586
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HW in AFLOW crystal prototype A5B_oP12_51_eij_f v001 view 67804
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HW in AFLOW crystal prototype A6B_mC28_12_6i_i v001 view 313108
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for He in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 view 89743
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for W in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 view 71338
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for H in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v001 view 74946
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for He in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v001 view 71338
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for W in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v001 view 77743
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for W in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP8_223_ac v001 view 79805
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for He in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP1_191_a v001 view 73032
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for H in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v001 view 244715
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for He in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v001 view 74136
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for H in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_f v001 view 114480
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for H in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP1_123_a v001 view 59265
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HW in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_hP4_194_a_c v001 view 71338

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002
Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2f2c4ad3

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HW in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_oP12_62_2c_c v002 view 69792

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_005
Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/f3eec5a9

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc H view 1393
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc He view 1539
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond H view 1613
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc H view 1429
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc H view 1283
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc He view 1503

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_007
Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc W v007 view 2175
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond He v007 view 4031
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond W v007 view 3519
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc He v007 view 4127
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc W v007 view 2975
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc W v007 view 2207

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_004
Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v004

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/25bcc28b

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp H view 11216

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005
Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c339ca32

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp He v005 view 36357
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp W v005 view 22699

LinearThermalExpansionCoeffCubic__TD_522633393614_002
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of cubic crystal structures v002

Creators:
Contributor: mjwen
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/9d9822ec

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the linear thermal expansion coefficient at a finite temperature under a given pressure for a cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) of a single given species.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of bcc W at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 view 530583

SurfaceEnergyCubicCrystalBrokenBondFit__TD_955413365818_004
High-symmetry surface energies in cubic lattices and broken bond model v004

Creators: Matt Bierbaum
Contributor: mattbierbaum
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/6c43a4e6

Calculates the surface energy of several high symmetry surfaces and produces a broken-bond model fit. In latex form, the fit equations are given by:

E_{FCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (2 ( |x+ 2y + z| + |x+2y-z| + |x-2y + z| + |x-2y-z| + |2x+y+z| + |2x+y-z| +|2x-y+z| +|2x-y-z| +|x+y+2z| +|x+y-2z| +|x-y+2z| +|x-y-2z| ) + c

E_{BCC} (\vec{n}) = p_1 (6 \left( | x+y+z| + |x+y-z| + |-x+y-z| + |x-y+z| \right)) + p_2 (8 \left( |x| + |y| + |z|\right)) + p_3 (4 \left( |x+y| + |x-y| + |x+z| + |x-z| + |z+y| +|z-y|\right)) +c.

In Python, these two fits take the following form:

def BrokenBondFCC(params, index):

import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*(abs(x+2*y+z) + abs(x+2*y-z) +abs(x-2*y+z) +abs(x-2*y-z) + abs(2*x+y+z) +abs(2*x+y-z) +abs(2*x-y+z) +abs(2*x-y-z) + abs(x+y+2*z) +abs(x+y-2*z) +abs(x-y+2*z) +abs(x-y-2*z))+params[3]

def BrokenBondBCC(params, x, y, z):


import numpy
x, y, z = index
x = x / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
y = y / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)
z = z / numpy.sqrt(x**2.+y**2.+z**2.)

return params[0]*6*(abs(x+y+z) + abs(x-y-z) + abs(x-y+z) + abs(x+y-z)) + params[1]*8*(abs(x) + abs(y) + abs(z)) + params[2]*4* (abs(x+y) + abs(x-y) + abs(x+z) + abs(x-z) + abs(z+y) + abs(z-y)) + params[3]
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in bcc W v004 view 15643

VacancyFormationEnergyRelaxationVolume__TD_647413317626_001
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/fca89cea

Computes the monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for bcc W view 230359
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for hcp He view 605676

VacancyFormationMigration__TD_554849987965_001
Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for bcc W view 3206246
Vacancy formation and migration energy for hcp He view 25576572


Errors

DislocationCoreEnergyCubic__TD_452950666597_002

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_001

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_007

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp H v005 other view

No Driver
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
other view
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 other view


Files

CMakeLists.txt
LICENSE
kimprovenance.edn
kimspec.edn
potential-WHHe-EAM2.eam.alloy

Download

EAM_Dynamo_BonnyGrigorevTerentyev_2014EAM2_WHHe__MO_626183701337_000.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
EAM_Dynamo_BonnyGrigorevTerentyev_2014EAM2_WHHe__MO_626183701337_000.zip Zip Windows archive

Download Dependency

This Model requires a Model Driver. Archives for the Model Driver EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005 appear below.


EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005.zip Zip Windows archive

Wiki

Wiki is ready to accept new content.
Login to edit Wiki content