Title
A single sentence description.
|
LAMMPS ADP potential for the U-Mo system developed by Starikov et al. (2017) v000 |
---|---|
Description | Developed for simulation of the structure and thermodynamic properties of cubic and tetragonal phases of U-Mo alloy |
Species
The supported atomic species.
| Mo, U |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Content Origin | NIST IPRP (https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/U.html#U-Mo) |
Contributor |
Ronald E. Miller |
Maintainer |
Ronald E. Miller |
Developer |
Vasiliy I. Tseplyaev Lada N Kolotova Alexey Yu Kuksin Daria Smirnova Sergey Starikov |
Published on KIM | 2019 |
How to Cite |
This Simulator Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-4]. [1] Starikov SV, Kolotova LN, Kuksin AY, Smirnova DE, Tseplyaev VI. Atomistic simulation of cubic and tetragonal phases of U-Mo alloy: Structure and thermodynamic properties. Journal of Nuclear Materials [Internet]. 2018Feb;499:451–63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.11.047 doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.11.047 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information. [2] Tseplyaev VI, Kolotova LN, Kuksin AY, Smirnova D, Starikov S. LAMMPS ADP potential for the U-Mo system developed by Starikov et al. (2017) v000. OpenKIM; 2019. doi:10.25950/466f25ce [3] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [4] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Citations
This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on. The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel. The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied. The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP). Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis. OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm. |
This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information. ![]() 42 Citations (32 used)
Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the .
USED (high confidence) L. Kolotova and I. Gordeev, “Structure and Phase Transition Features of Monoclinic and Tetragonal Phases in U–Mo Alloys,” Crystals. 2020. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: Using molecular dynamics simulations, we studied the structu… read more USED (high confidence) L. Kolotova, S. Starikov, and V. Ozrin, “Atomistic Simulation of the Fission-Fragment-Induced Formation of Defects in a Uranium–Molybdenum Alloy,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics. 2019. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) P. Jiang et al., “Development of U-Zr-Xe ternary interatomic potentials appropriate for simulation of defect and Xe behaviors in U-Zr system,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) H. Chen, D. Yuan, H. Geng, W. Hu, and B. Huang, “Development of a machine-learning interatomic potential for uranium under the moment tensor potential framework,” Computational Materials Science. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) S. Starikov, A. Abbass, R. Drautz, and M. Mrovec, “Disordering complexion transition of grain boundaries in bcc metals: Insights from atomistic simulations,” Acta Materialia. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) S. Starikov, V. Jamebozorgi, D. Smirnova, R. Drautz, and M. Mrovec, “Atomistic simulations of pipe diffusion in bcc transition metals,” Acta Materialia. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) B. Beeler and Y. Zhang, “The reconciliation and validation of a combined interatomic potential for the description of Xe in γU-Mo,” Frontiers in Nuclear Engineering. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: A U-Mo alloy has been selected as the fuel design for the co… read more USED (low confidence) X. Ou et al., “Mechanical Properties and Deformation Mechanisms of Nanocrystalline U-10Mo Alloys by Molecular Dynamics Simulation,” Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: U-Mo alloys were considered to be the most promising candida… read more USED (low confidence) P. Söderlind, A. Landa, E. Moore, A. Perron, J. Roehling, and J. McKeown, “High-Temperature Thermodynamics of Uranium from Ab Initio Modeling,” Applied Sciences. 2023. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: We present high-temperature thermodynamic properties for ura… read more USED (low confidence) F. Lemma et al., “Microstructural and phase changes in alpha uranium investigated via in-situ studies and molecular dynamics.,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) S. Zhu et al., “Density functional theory study of adsorption of H2O on γ-U(110) surface,” Indian Journal of Physics. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) S. Starikov and D. Smirnova, “Details of structure transformations in pure uranium and U-Mo alloys: insights from classical atomistic simulation,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 1 USED (low confidence) H. Macdonald et al., “The Thermo-Elastic Properties and Damping of U-6wt%Nb,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2023. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) S. Bhoir, S. Pathak, S. Jayabun, and A. Sengupta, “Development of ICP‐OES Based Analytical Method with Prior Preferential Removal of Emission Rich Matrix by Elevated Temperature Ionic Liquid Based Extractive Mass Transfer for Determination of Metallic Constituents in U‐Mo Alloy: The Next Generation Nuclear Fuel,” ChemistrySelect. 2022. link Times cited: 0 USED (low confidence) B. Beeler, Y. Zhang, A. J. Hasan, G. Park, S. Hu, and Z. Mei, “Analyzing the effect of pressure on the properties of point defects in γU–Mo through atomistic simulations,” MRS Advances. 2022. link Times cited: 1 Abstract: Uranium–molybdenum (U–Mo) alloys in monolithic fuel foil are… read more USED (low confidence) A. Ullah, M. Usman, A. Shah, A. H. Shar, and M. Maqbool, “Ion Beam Effect on the Structural and Optical Properties of AlN:Er,” Journal of Composites Science. 2022. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: Erbium (Er)-doped Aluminum Nitride (AlN) thin films were dep… read more USED (low confidence) J. French and X. Bai, “Molecular Dynamics Studies of Grain Boundary Mobility and Anisotropy in BCC γ-Uranium,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) G. Hu et al., “Molecular Dynamic Calculation of Solidification Kinetic Coefficient of Metallic γ metallic uranium,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 2 USED (low confidence) S. Starikov and D. Smirnova, “Optimized interatomic potential for atomistic simulation of Zr-Nb alloy,” Computational Materials Science. 2021. link Times cited: 15 USED (low confidence) S. Starikov et al., “Angular-dependent interatomic potential for large-scale atomistic simulation of iron: Development and comprehensive comparison with existing interatomic models,” Physical Review Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 16 Abstract: The development of classical interatomic potential for iron … read more USED (low confidence) K. Mahbuba, B. Beeler, and A. Jokisaari, “Evaluation of the anisotropic grain boundaries and surfaces of α-U via molecular dynamics,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 7 USED (low confidence) G. Park, B. Beeler, and M. Okuniewski, “An atomistic study of defect energetics and diffusion with respect to composition and temperature in γU and γU-Mo alloys,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 10 USED (low confidence) M. Jin, Y. Gao, C. Jiang, and J. Gan, “Defect dynamics in γ-U, Mo, and their alloys,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 3 USED (low confidence) D. Chaney et al., “Tuneable correlated disorder in alloys,” arXiv: Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 14 Abstract: Understanding the role of disorder and the correlations that… read more USED (low confidence) G. Hu, C. Luo, L. Wu, Q. Tang, Z. Ren, and B. Xu, “Molecular dynamics simulation of solid/liquid interfacial energy of uranium,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 7 USED (low confidence) S. Starikov and V. Tseplyaev, “Two-scale simulation of plasticity in molybdenum: Combination of atomistic simulation and dislocation dynamics with non-linear mobility function,” Computational Materials Science. 2020. link Times cited: 9 USED (low confidence) D. Smirnova et al., “Atomistic description of self-diffusion in molybdenum: A comparative theoretical study of non-Arrhenius behavior,” Physical Review Materials. 2020. link Times cited: 16 Abstract: According to experimental observations, the temperature depe… read more USED (low confidence) J. Chen, W. Ouyang, W. Lai, J. Li, and Z. Zhang, “A new type angular-dependent interatomic potential and its application to model displacement cascades in uranium,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 2019. link Times cited: 5 USED (low confidence) D. Smirnova, S. Starikov, and A. Vlasova, “New interatomic potential for simulation of pure magnesium and magnesium hydrides,” Computational Materials Science. 2018. link Times cited: 17 USED (low confidence) D. Smirnova, S. Starikov, and I. Gordeev, “Evaluation of the structure and properties for the high-temperature phase of zirconium from the atomistic simulations,” Computational Materials Science. 2018. link Times cited: 13 USED (low confidence) B. Beeler, M. Cooper, Z. Mei, D. Schwen, and Y. Zhang, “Radiation driven diffusion in γU-Mo,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2021. link Times cited: 12 USED (low confidence) Y. Li, “A universal COMB potential for the whole composition range of the uranium oxygen system,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2019. link Times cited: 6 NOT USED (high confidence) B. Waters, D. S. Karls, I. Nikiforov, R. Elliott, E. Tadmor, and B. Runnels, “Automated determination of grain boundary energy and potential-dependence using the OpenKIM framework,” Computational Materials Science. 2022. link Times cited: 5 NOT USED (high confidence) H. Wang, X. Pan, Y.-feng Wang, X.-R. Chen, Y.-X. Wang, and H. Geng, “Lattice dynamics and elastic properties of α-U at high-temperature and high-pressure by machine learning potential simulations,” Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2022. link Times cited: 6 NOT USED (high confidence) W. Ouyang, W. Lai, J. Li, J.-bo Liu, and B.-xin Liu, “Atomic Simulations of U-Mo under Irradiation: A New Angular Dependent Potential,” Metals. 2021. link Times cited: 4 Abstract: Uranium-Molybdenum alloy has been a promising option in the … read more NOT USED (high confidence) A. Landa, P. Söderlind, and A. Wu, “Phase Stability in U-6Nb Alloy Doped with Ti from the First Principles Theory,” Applied Sciences. 2020. link Times cited: 8 Abstract: First-principles calculations within the density-functional-… read more NOT USED (high confidence) B. G. del Rio, L. González, and D. González, “First principles study of liquid uranium at temperatures up to 2050 K,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2020. link Times cited: 2 Abstract: Uranium compounds are used as fissile materials in nuclear r… read more NOT USED (high confidence) B. Borts, I. Laptev, A. Parkhomenko, A. F. Vanzha, I. Vorobjev, and Y. Marchenko, “ANALYSES OF STRUCTURE PHASE STABILITY OF U-Mo TARGET OF THE NEUTRON SOURCE,” Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. 2020. link Times cited: 0 Abstract: The paper presents analyses of structure phase stability of … read more NOT USED (high confidence) G. Smirnov, G. Smirnov, V. Stegailov, and V. Stegailov, “Formation free energies of point defects and thermal expansion of bcc U and Mo,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2019. link Times cited: 9 Abstract: -U is a high temperature body-centred cubic (bcc) phase of u… read more NOT USED (high confidence) Y. Lysogorskiy, T. Hammerschmidt, J. Janssen, J. Neugebauer, and R. Drautz, “Transferability of interatomic potentials for molybdenum and silicon,” Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. link Times cited: 14 Abstract: Interatomic potentials are widely used in computational mate… read more NOT USED (high confidence) I. Novoselov et al., “Moment tensor potentials as a promising tool to study diffusion processes,” Computational Materials Science. 2018. link Times cited: 64 |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| SM_682749584055_000 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| Sim_LAMMPS_ADP_StarikovKolotovaKuksin_2017_UMo__SM_682749584055_000 |
DOI |
10.25950/466f25ce https://doi.org/10.25950/466f25ce https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/466f25ce |
KIM Item Type | Simulator Model |
KIM API Version | 2.1 |
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn.
| LAMMPS |
Potential Type | adp |
Simulator Potential | adp |
Run Compatibility | portable-models |
Grade | Name | Category | Brief Description | Full Results | Aux File(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | vc-species-supported-as-stated | mandatory | The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-periodicity-support | mandatory | Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-permutation-symmetry | mandatory | Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description. |
Results | Files |
B | vc-forces-numerical-derivative | consistency | Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description. |
Results | Files |
F | vc-dimer-continuity-c1 | informational | The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-objectivity | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description. |
Results | Files |
P | vc-inversion-symmetry | informational | Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description. |
Results | Files |
N/A | vc-memory-leak | informational | The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description. |
Results | Files |
N/A | vc-thread-safe | mandatory | The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description. |
Results | Files |
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
(No matching species)This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Mo v004 | view | 3551 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc U v004 | view | 3650 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Mo v004 | view | 4249 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond U v004 | view | 3998 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Mo v004 | view | 4734 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc U v004 | view | 3591 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Mo v004 | view | 6001 | |
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc U v004 | view | 3630 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for U in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC4_63_c at zero temperature and pressure v000 | view | 202635 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for bcc Mo at zero temperature v006 | view | 9245 | |
Elastic constants for bcc U at zero temperature v006 | view | 2367 | |
Elastic constants for diamond Mo at zero temperature v001 | view | 23864 | |
Elastic constants for diamond U at zero temperature v001 | view | 29878 | |
Elastic constants for fcc Mo at zero temperature v006 | view | 2815 | |
Elastic constants for fcc U at zero temperature v006 | view | 3039 | |
Elastic constants for sc Mo at zero temperature v006 | view | 9885 | |
Elastic constants for sc U at zero temperature v006 | view | 2623 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Elastic constants for hcp Mo at zero temperature v004 | view | 1751 | |
Elastic constants for hcp U at zero temperature v004 | view | 2197 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 100 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Mo v001 | view | 3459624 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 110 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Mo v001 | view | 10247116 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 111 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Mo v001 | view | 5022737 | |
Relaxed energy as a function of tilt angle for a 112 symmetric tilt grain boundary in bcc Mo v001 | view | 12570451 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Mo v007 | view | 5630 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc U v007 | view | 6078 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Mo v007 | view | 8477 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond U v007 | view | 9053 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Mo v007 | view | 9917 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc U v007 | view | 6974 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Mo v007 | view | 5982 | |
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc U v007 | view | 6014 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp Mo v005 | view | 51861 | |
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp U v005 | view | 40909 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Linear thermal expansion coefficient of bcc Mo at 293.15 K under a pressure of 0 MPa v002 | view | 591762 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for bcc Mo | view | 2987667 |
Test | Test Results | Link to Test Results page | Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.
Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI) |
---|---|---|---|
Vacancy formation and migration energy for bcc Mo | view | 12142892 |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for U in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC4_63_c v000 | other | view |
Test | Error Categories | Link to Error page |
---|---|---|
Broken-bond fit of high-symmetry surface energies in bcc Mo v004 | other | view |
Sim_LAMMPS_ADP_StarikovKolotovaKuksin_2017_UMo__SM_682749584055_000.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
Sim_LAMMPS_ADP_StarikovKolotovaKuksin_2017_UMo__SM_682749584055_000.zip | Zip | Windows archive |