Title
A single sentence description.
|
EAM potential for magnetic bcc metals with cubic spline interpolation v002 |
---|---|
Description | EAM magnetic potential formalism for bcc metals, with cubic splines for pairwise repulsive part and embedded atom pair density. Generalized to be used with two different functional forms for embedding function. For studying atomic defects at moderate temperatures. Also includes option to read in short range Biersack-Ziegler Coloumb potential and associated interpolating function to link to outer EAM part - useful for cascade simulations. |
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
|
None |
Contributor |
Mark R. Gilbert |
Maintainer |
Mark R. Gilbert |
Implementer | Mark R. Gilbert |
Developer |
Peter Derlet Sergei Dudarev Mikhail I. Mendelev Seungwu Han David J. Srolovitz Graeme J. Ackland Deyan Sun Mark Asta |
Published on KIM | 2018 |
How to Cite |
This Model Driver originally published in [1-3] is archived in OpenKIM [4-6]. [1] Dudarev SL, Derlet PM. A ’magnetic’ interatomic potential for molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2005;17(44):7097–118. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/17/44/003 [2] Dudarev SL, Derlet PM. Erratum: A ’magnetic’ interatomic potential for molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2007;19(23):239001. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/19/23/239001 [3] Mendelev MI, Han S, Srolovitz DJ, Ackland GJ, Sun DY, Asta M. Development of new interatomic potentials appropriate for crystalline and liquid iron. Philosophical Magazine. 2003;83(35):3977–94. doi:10.1080/14786430310001613264 [4] Gilbert MR, Derlet P, Dudarev S, Mendelev MI, Han S, Srolovitz DJ, et al. EAM potential for magnetic bcc metals with cubic spline interpolation v002. OpenKIM; 2018. doi:10.25950/9776664f [5] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6 [6] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format. |
Funding | Not available |
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
| MD_620624592962_002 |
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
| EAM_MagneticCubic__MD_620624592962_002 |
DOI |
10.25950/9776664f https://doi.org/10.25950/9776664f https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/9776664f |
KIM Item Type | Model Driver |
KIM API Version | 2.0 |
Programming Language(s)
The programming languages used in the code and the percentage of the code written in each one.
| 100.00% Fortran |
Previous Version | EAM_MagneticCubic__MD_620624592962_001 |
EAM_MagneticCubic__MD_620624592962_002.txz | Tar+XZ | Linux and OS X archive |
EAM_MagneticCubic__MD_620624592962_002.zip | Zip | Windows archive |
In an attempt to explore the ability of classical mechanics to replicate quantum-mechanical calculations, R. Biswas and D. R. Hamann developed a three body cluster potential for Si in 1987. In their article “New classical models for silicon structural energies” (Physical Review B, 36(12): 6434, 1987), Biswas and Hamann discuss two different potentials, referred to as ‘old’ and ‘new’ potentials in their original article. To address the shortcomings of their ‘old’ potential, namely its inability to capture properties of tetrahedral structure of Si, they introduce their ‘new’ potential, which is attractive for molecular-dynamics simulations given its short range. However, as a trade-off, the ‘new’ potential is not as efficient as the ‘old’ model in describing high-pressure transitions and bulk metallic Si structures. The authors discuss how their ‘new’ potential is able to model the formation energies of interstitials and vacancies, and can also give reasonable account of thermal properties and melting of Si. Our model driver implements this ‘new’ potential of Biswas and Hamann.
The functional form of the two-body potential is
\[\phi^{\rm BH}_2(r_{ij}) = (A_1 \exp[-\lambda_1 r_{ij}^2] + A_2 \exp[-\lambda_2 r_{ij}^2]) f_{\rm 2c}^{\rm BH}(r_{ij})\] \[f_{\rm 2c}^{\rm BH} = \{1+\exp[(r-r_c)/\mu]\}^{-1}\]The functional form of the three body potential is
\[\phi^{\rm BH}_3(r_{ij},r_{ik},\theta_{jik}) = [B_1 \exp[-\alpha_1 r_{ij}^2] \exp[-\alpha_1 r_{ik}^2] (\cos\theta_{jik}+\tfrac{1}{3})^2 + B_2 \exp[-\alpha_2 r_{ij}^2] \exp[-\alpha_2 r_{ik}^2] (\cos\theta_{jik}+\tfrac{1}{3})^3] f_{\rm 2c}^{\rm BH}(r_{ij}) f_{\rm 2c}^{\rm BH}(r_{ik})\]