Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_ZhangTrinkle_2016_TiO__SM_513612626462_000

Interatomic potential for Oxygen (O), Titanium (Ti).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
LAMMPS MEAM potential for the Ti-O system developed by Zhang and Trinkle (2016) v000
Citations

This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on.

The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel.

The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied.

The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP).

Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis.

OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm.

This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information.

Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the  .
Description Ti-O cubic spline potential where O is in the dilute limit.

Modeling oxygen interstitials in titanium requires a new empirical potential. We optimize potential parameters using a fitting database of first-principle oxygen interstitial energies and forces. A new database optimization algorithm based on Bayesian sampling is applied to obtain an optimal potential for a specific testing set of density functional data. A parallel genetic algorithm minimizes the sum of logistic function evaluations of the testing set predictions. We test the transferability of the potential model against oxygen interstitials in HCP titanium, transition barriers between oxygen interstitial sites, and oxygen in the titanium prismatic stacking fault. The potential predicts that the interaction between oxygen and a screw dislocation core is weak and short-ranged.

Notes: This file was sent to the NIST IPRP by Prof. Dallas Trinkle (Univ. of Illinois) on 9 Aug. 2016 and posted with his permission. This version corrects an issue by removing an extra comment line that was not compatible with the LAMMPS MEAM/spline code (distributed with LAMMPS package). The reference information was also updated at the same time. Prof. Trinkle said that this potential is specifically intended for dilute oxygen in titanium as there's no oxygen-oxygen interaction. "
Species
The supported atomic species.
O, Ti
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin NIST IPRP (https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/Ti.html#Ti-O)
Content Other Locations Also provided with the LAMMPS release of 22-Sept-2017
Contributor Ronald E. Miller
Maintainer Ronald E. Miller
Developer Dallas R. Trinkle
Pinchao Zhang
Published on KIM 2019
How to Cite

This Simulator Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-4].

[1] Zhang P, Trinkle DR. A modified embedded atom method potential for interstitial oxygen in titanium. Computational Materials Science [Internet]. 2016Nov;124:204–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.07.039 doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.07.039 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Trinkle DR, Zhang P. LAMMPS MEAM potential for the Ti-O system developed by Zhang and Trinkle (2016) v000. OpenKIM; 2019. doi:10.25950/a3d72fec

[3] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[4] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
SM_513612626462_000
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_ZhangTrinkle_2016_TiO__SM_513612626462_000
DOI 10.25950/a3d72fec
https://doi.org/10.25950/a3d72fec
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/a3d72fec
KIM Item TypeSimulator Model
KIM API Version2.1
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn.
LAMMPS
Potential Type meam
Simulator Potential meam/spline
Run Compatibility portable-models

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
A vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
P vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
P vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ti
Species: O


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Ti


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: O


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: O
Species: Ti


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: O
Species: Ti


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: O


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: O

Species: Ti





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v002

Creators: Daniel S. Karls
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c6746c52

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Titanium view 516
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Titanium view 484


Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc O v003 view 1823
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Ti v003 view 1951
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond O v003 view 1919
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc O v003 view 1919
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Ti v003 view 1855
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc O v003 view 1951


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v004

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/75393d88

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for sc Ti at zero temperature view 1870


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc O at zero temperature v006 view 2751
Elastic constants for bcc Ti at zero temperature v006 view 2207
Elastic constants for diamond O at zero temperature v001 view 35732
Elastic constants for fcc O at zero temperature v006 view 4542
Elastic constants for fcc Ti at zero temperature v006 view 2943
Elastic constants for sc O at zero temperature v006 view 2975


Elastic constants for hexagonal crystals at zero temperature v003

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2e4b93d9

Computes the elastic constants for hcp crystals by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for hcp O at zero temperature view 2031


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v000

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/53ef2ea4

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v000 view 107954
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v000 view 86946
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v000 view 65154
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP3_191_ad v000 view 77817


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v001

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/e8a7ed84

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A11B6_mC68_12_11i_6i v001 view 23403662
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cF12_225_c_a v001 view 140026
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_hP9_152_c_a v001 view 70029
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_hP9_189_fg_ad v001 view 81872
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_mC24_12_4i_2i v001 view 194271
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_mP12_11_4e_2e v001 view 1013507
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_mP12_14_2e_e v001 view 101670
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_oP12_60_d_c v001 view 88124
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_oP12_62_2c_c v001 view 147487
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_oP24_61_2c_c v001 view 234876
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_tI12_141_e_a v001 view 84300
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_tP6_136_f_a v001 view 82749
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_hR10_167_e_c v001 view 488840
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_oP20_62_3c_2c v001 view 194505
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A5B3_mC32_12_5i_3i v001 view 1295058
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A5B3_oC32_63_c2f_cf v001 view 417207
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A5B4_tI18_87_ah_h v001 view 71486
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A7B4_aP22_2_7i_4i v001 view 33487389
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_f v001 view 55436
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR2_166_c v001 view 80246
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_hP16_163_ac_i v001 view 2258530
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_hP24_149_acgi_3l v001 view 4651564
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3_hP8_193_b_g v001 view 1022294
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB6_hP14_163_c_i v001 view 1721395
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB6_hP7_162_a_k v001 view 910538
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_225_a_b v001 view 112860


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2f2c4ad3

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A11B6_aP34_2_11i_6i v002 view 586903
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A17B9_aP52_2_17i_ac8i v002 view 602805


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v005

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/f3eec5a9

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Ti view 1193
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Ti view 935


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc O v007 view 5406
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Ti v007 view 5918
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond O v007 view 8573
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc O v007 view 8029
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Ti v007 view 6462
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc O v007 view 6878


Equilibrium lattice constants for hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure v004

Creators: Junhao Li
Contributor: jl2922
Publication Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/25bcc28b

Calculates lattice constant of hexagonal bulk structures at zero temperature and pressure by using simplex minimization to minimize the potential energy.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium lattice constants for hcp O view 12156


Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for sc O view 37499117


CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_001
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cP12_205_c_a v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_oC24_35_abdf_de v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_tI24_141_h_c v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A7B4_aP110_2_35i_20i v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A9B5_aP28_1_18a_10a v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype A9B5_aP28_2_9i_ab4i v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF4_225_a v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Ti in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP3_191_ad v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_mC16_12_2ij v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_mC4_12_i v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC12_63_cg v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oP24_61_3c v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_hP3_164_a_d v001 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OTi in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_mC20_12_a2i_d2i v001 other view

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002

LatticeConstantCubicEnergy__TD_475411767977_007

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005

VacancyFormationEnergyRelaxationVolume__TD_647413317626_000
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for hcp Ti mismatch view

VacancyFormationEnergyRelaxationVolume__TD_647413317626_001
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for sc O other view

VacancyFormationMigration__TD_554849987965_000

No Driver
Verification Check Error Categories Link to Error page
PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004 other view
UnitConversion__VC_128739598203_000 mismatch view



Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content