Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

Sim_LAMMPS_ReaxFF_RaymandVanDuinBaudin_2008_ZnOH__SM_449472104549_001

Interatomic potential for Hydrogen (H), Oxygen (O), Zinc (Zn).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
ReaxFF potential for Zn-O-H systems developed by Raymand et al. (2008) v001
Description LAMMPS ReaxFF potential for Zn-O-H systems ('pair_style reax/c' with potential file ffield.reax.ZnOH2 and additional control and charge equilibration information). Based on QM calculations for Zn(s), ZnO(s), and Zn hydroxide clusters [Zn(OH)2 and O(ZnOH)2], ReaxFF parameters were generated for Zn-O and Zn-Zn bond energies and for Zn-O-Zn, O-Zn-O, O-Zn-Zn and Zn-O-H valence angle energies. QM calculations were performed for the four crystal polymorphs of the wurtzite, zincblende, rocksalt and caesium chloride structures (the structures are also referred to as h-ZnS, c-ZnS, NaCl and CsCl, respectively).
Species
The supported atomic species.
H, O, Zn
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin LAMMPS package 29-Feb-2019
Contributor Ellad B. Tadmor
Maintainer Ellad B. Tadmor
Developer David Raymand
Micael Baudin
Adri C. T. van Duin
Kersti Hermansson
Published on KIM 2020
How to Cite

This Simulator Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-4].

[1] Raymand D, Duin ACT van, Baudin M, Hermansson K. A reactive force field (ReaxFF) for zinc oxide. Surface Science. 2008;602(5):1020–31. doi:10.1016/j.susc.2007.12.023 — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Raymand D, Baudin M, Duin ACT van, Hermansson K. ReaxFF potential for Zn-O-H systems developed by Raymand et al. (2008) v001. OpenKIM; 2020. doi:10.25950/6f36a392

[3] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[4] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Citations

This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on.

The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel.

The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied.

The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP).

Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis.

OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm.

This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information.

Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the  .
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
SM_449472104549_001
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
Sim_LAMMPS_ReaxFF_RaymandVanDuinBaudin_2008_ZnOH__SM_449472104549_001
DOI 10.25950/6f36a392
https://doi.org/10.25950/6f36a392
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/6f36a392
KIM Item TypeSimulator Model
KIM API Version2.1
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn.
LAMMPS
Potential Type reax
Simulator Potential reax/c
Run Compatibility portable-models
Previous Version Sim_LAMMPS_ReaxFF_RaymandVanDuinBaudin_2008_ZnOH__SM_449472104549_000

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
D vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
F vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: O
Species: H
Species: Zn


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: O
Species: Zn


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: Zn
Species: O
Species: H


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: O
Species: H
Species: Zn


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: H
Species: Zn
Species: O


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: O
Species: H
Species: Zn


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: H

Species: O

Species: Zn





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc O v003 view 1694
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Zn v003 view 5083
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond O v004 view 41301
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond Zn v004 view 10233
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc O v004 view 51608
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Zn v004 view 28712
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc O v004 view 3976
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc Zn v004 view 11746


Elastic constants for arbitrary crystals at zero temperature and pressure v000

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/888f9943

Computes the elastic constants for an arbitrary crystal. A robust computational protocol is used, attempting multiple methods and step sizes to achieve an acceptably low error in numerical differentiation and deviation from material symmetry. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation as part of the Crystal Genome testing framework. In addition, the distance from the obtained elasticity tensor to the nearest isotropic tensor is computed.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for OZn in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cP12_205_c_a at zero temperature and pressure v000 view 246952640


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc H at zero temperature v006 view 16175
Elastic constants for bcc O at zero temperature v006 view 5179
Elastic constants for bcc Zn at zero temperature v006 view 15312
Elastic constants for diamond H at zero temperature v001 view 420846
Elastic constants for diamond O at zero temperature v001 view 559710
Elastic constants for diamond Zn at zero temperature v001 view 24742
Elastic constants for fcc H at zero temperature v006 view 73972
Elastic constants for fcc O at zero temperature v006 view 62208
Elastic constants for fcc Zn at zero temperature v006 view 30592
Elastic constants for sc H at zero temperature v006 view 17070
Elastic constants for sc O at zero temperature v006 view 4220
Elastic constants for sc Zn at zero temperature v006 view 14353


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2f2c4ad3

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HOZn in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B2C_oP20_19_2a_2a_a v001 view 143781
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OZn in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_cP12_205_c_a v002 view 110872
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_hP36_185_2cd_2c v002 view 298016
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_mP36_4_12a_6a v002 view 1597859
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_oI48_72_cdefg_k v002 view 2162160
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_oP36_19_6a_3a v002 view 375983
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_tP36_92_3b_ab v002 view 279684
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for Zn in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 view 52800
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_f v002 view 61915
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR2_166_c v002 view 84884
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC12_63_cg v002 view 62157
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oP24_61_3c v002 view 319051
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OZn in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_216_a_c v002 view 84942
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OZn in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cF8_225_a_b v002 view 83927
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OZn in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP2_221_a_b v002 view 63616
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OZn in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_hP4_186_b_b v002 view 84811
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for OZn in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_hP4_194_c_a v002 view 85621
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_tP16_92_b_b v002 view 225177


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc H v007 view 8024
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc O v007 view 3996
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc Zn v007 view 7193
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond H v007 view 25030
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond O v007 view 27524
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond Zn v007 view 36858
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc H v007 view 26437
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc O v007 view 24551
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc Zn v007 view 14257
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc H v007 view 6617
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc O v007 view 3452
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc Zn v007 view 5850


Vacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals v001

Creators:
Contributor: efuem
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/c27ba3cd

Computes the monovacancy formation and migration energies for cubic and hcp monoatomic crystals.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Vacancy formation and migration energy for sc O view 8927737


CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_000

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_aP36_1_24a_12a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_mP12_4_4a_2a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for H in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI2_229_a v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for H in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for H in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_f v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_mC16_12_2ij v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_mC4_12_i v002 other view
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for H in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tP1_123_a v002 other view

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005

VacancyFormationEnergyRelaxationVolume__TD_647413317626_001
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for sc O other view

No Driver
Verification Check Error Categories Link to Error page
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 other view
PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004 other view



Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content