Jump to: Tests | Visualizers | Files | Wiki

Sim_LAMMPS_ReaxFF_ChenowethVanDuinGoddard_2008_CHO__SM_584143153761_001

Interatomic potential for Carbon (C), Hydrogen (H), Oxygen (O).
Use this Potential

Title
A single sentence description.
LAMMPS ReaxFF potential for hydrocarbon oxidation (C-H-O) developed by Chenoweth, van Duin, and Goddard (2008) v001
Citations

This panel presents information regarding the papers that have cited the interatomic potential (IP) whose page you are on.

The OpenKIM machine learning based Deep Citation framework is used to determine whether the citing article actually used the IP in computations (denoted by "USED") or only provides it as a background citation (denoted by "NOT USED"). For more details on Deep Citation and how to work with this panel, click the documentation link at the top of the panel.

The word cloud to the right is generated from the abstracts of IP principle source(s) (given below in "How to Cite") and the citing articles that were determined to have used the IP in order to provide users with a quick sense of the types of physical phenomena to which this IP is applied.

The bar chart shows the number of articles that cited the IP per year. Each bar is divided into green (articles that USED the IP) and blue (articles that did NOT USE the IP).

Users are encouraged to correct Deep Citation errors in determination by clicking the speech icon next to a citing article and providing updated information. This will be integrated into the next Deep Citation learning cycle, which occurs on a regular basis.

OpenKIM acknowledges the support of the Allen Institute for AI through the Semantic Scholar project for providing citation information and full text of articles when available, which are used to train the Deep Citation ML algorithm.

This panel provides information on past usage of this interatomic potential (IP) powered by the OpenKIM Deep Citation framework. The word cloud indicates typical applications of the potential. The bar chart shows citations per year of this IP (bars are divided into articles that used the IP (green) and those that did not (blue)). The complete list of articles that cited this IP is provided below along with the Deep Citation determination on usage. See the Deep Citation documentation for more information.

Help us to determine which of the papers that cite this potential actually used it to perform calculations. If you know, click the  .
Description LAMMPS ReaxFF potential for hydrocarbon oxidation (C-H-O) ('pair_style reax/c' with potential file ffield.reax.cho). To obtain the H/C/O compound data required to extend the hydrocarbon-training set, DFT calculations were performed on the dissociation energies for various bonds containing carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen. The ground state structure was obtained through full geometry optimization. Dissociation curves were calculated by constraining only the bond length of interest and re-optimization of the remaining internal coordinates. Optimization was also performed for the various angles and torsions associated with C/H/O interactions.
Species
The supported atomic species.
C, H, O
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Content Origin LAMMPS package 29-Feb-2019
Contributor Ellad B. Tadmor
Maintainer Ellad B. Tadmor
Developer Kimberly Chenoweth
Adri C. T. van Duin
William A. Goddard
Published on KIM 2020
How to Cite

This Simulator Model originally published in [1] is archived in OpenKIM [2-4].

[1] Chenoweth K, Duin ACT van, Goddard WA. ReaxFF Reactive Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Hydrocarbon Oxidation. Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2008;112(5):1040–53. doi:10.1021/jp709896w — (Primary Source) A primary source is a reference directly related to the item documenting its development, as opposed to other sources that are provided as background information.

[2] Chenoweth K, Duin ACT van, Goddard WA. LAMMPS ReaxFF potential for hydrocarbon oxidation (C-H-O) developed by Chenoweth, van Duin, and Goddard (2008) v001. OpenKIM; 2020. doi:10.25950/3e955762

[3] Tadmor EB, Elliott RS, Sethna JP, Miller RE, Becker CA. The potential of atomistic simulations and the Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models. JOM. 2011;63(7):17. doi:10.1007/s11837-011-0102-6

[4] Elliott RS, Tadmor EB. Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models (KIM) Application Programming Interface (API). OpenKIM; 2011. doi:10.25950/ff8f563a

Click here to download the above citation in BibTeX format.
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
SM_584143153761_001
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
Sim_LAMMPS_ReaxFF_ChenowethVanDuinGoddard_2008_CHO__SM_584143153761_001
DOI 10.25950/3e955762
https://doi.org/10.25950/3e955762
https://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.25950/3e955762
KIM Item TypeSimulator Model
KIM API Version2.1
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn.
LAMMPS
Potential Type reax
Simulator Potential reax/c
Run Compatibility portable-models
Previous Version Sim_LAMMPS_ReaxFF_ChenowethVanDuinGoddard_2008_CHO__SM_584143153761_000

(Click here to learn more about Verification Checks)

Grade Name Category Brief Description Full Results Aux File(s)
P vc-species-supported-as-stated mandatory
The model supports all species it claims to support; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-periodicity-support mandatory
Periodic boundary conditions are handled correctly; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-permutation-symmetry mandatory
Total energy and forces are unchanged when swapping atoms of the same species; see full description.
Results Files
D vc-forces-numerical-derivative consistency
Forces computed by the model agree with numerical derivatives of the energy; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-dimer-continuity-c1 informational
The energy versus separation relation of a pair of atoms is C1 continuous (i.e. the function and its first derivative are continuous); see full description.
Results Files
F vc-objectivity informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces transform correctly under rigid-body translation and rotation; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-inversion-symmetry informational
Total energy is unchanged and forces change sign when inverting a configuration through the origin; see full description.
Results Files
F vc-memory-leak informational
The model code does not have memory leaks (i.e. it releases all allocated memory at the end); see full description.
Results Files
N/A vc-thread-safe mandatory
The model returns the same energy and forces when computed in serial and when using parallel threads for a set of configurations. Note that this is not a guarantee of thread safety; see full description.
Results Files


BCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: H
Species: O
Species: C


Cohesive Energy Graph

This graph shows the cohesive energy versus volume-per-atom for the current mode for four mono-atomic cubic phases (body-centered cubic (bcc), face-centered cubic (fcc), simple cubic (sc), and diamond). The curve with the lowest minimum is the ground state of the crystal if stable. (The crystal structure is enforced in these calculations, so the phase may not be stable.) Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: C
Species: O


Diamond Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered diamond lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: C
Species: H
Species: O


Dislocation Core Energies

This graph shows the dislocation core energy of a cubic crystal at zero temperature and pressure for a specific set of dislocation core cutoff radii. After obtaining the total energy of the system from conjugate gradient minimizations, non-singular, isotropic and anisotropic elasticity are applied to obtain the dislocation core energy for each of these supercells with different dipole distances. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Elastic Constants

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) elastic constants predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: H
Species: C
Species: O


FCC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in red) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: O
Species: C
Species: H


FCC Stacking Fault Energies

This bar chart plot shows the intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies as well as the unstable stacking and unstable twinning energies for face-centered cubic (fcc) predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

FCC Surface Energies

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic face-centered cubic (fcc) relaxed surface energies predicted by the current model (shown in blue) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

(No matching species)

SC Lattice Constant

This bar chart plot shows the mono-atomic simple cubic (sc) lattice constant predicted by the current model (shown in the unique color) compared with the predictions for all other models in the OpenKIM Repository that support the species. The vertical bars show the average and standard deviation (one sigma) bounds for all model predictions. Graphs are generated for each species supported by the model.

Species: C
Species: H
Species: O


Cubic Crystal Basic Properties Table

Species: C

Species: H

Species: O





Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for monoatomic cubic lattices v003

Creators:
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/64cb38c5

This Test Driver uses LAMMPS to compute the cohesive energy of a given monoatomic cubic lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, or diamond) at a variety of lattice spacings. The lattice spacings range from a_min (=a_min_frac*a_0) to a_max (=a_max_frac*a_0) where a_0, a_min_frac, and a_max_frac are read from stdin (a_0 is typically approximately equal to the equilibrium lattice constant). The precise scaling and number of lattice spacings sampled between a_min and a_0 (a_0 and a_max) is specified by two additional parameters passed from stdin: N_lower and samplespacing_lower (N_upper and samplespacing_upper). Please see README.txt for further details.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc C v003 view 16847
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc O v003 view 2206
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond C v003 view 20459
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for diamond O v004 view 43878
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc C v004 view 34324
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc O v004 view 59412
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc C v004 view 6405
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for sc O v004 view 4724


Elastic constants for cubic crystals at zero temperature and pressure v006

Creators: Junhao Li and Ellad Tadmor
Contributor: tadmor
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/5853fb8f

Computes the cubic elastic constants for some common crystal types (fcc, bcc, sc, diamond) by calculating the hessian of the energy density with respect to strain. An estimate of the error associated with the numerical differentiation performed is reported.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Elastic constants for bcc C at zero temperature v006 view 56262
Elastic constants for bcc H at zero temperature v006 view 9686
Elastic constants for bcc O at zero temperature v006 view 23464
Elastic constants for diamond C at zero temperature v001 view 2799286
Elastic constants for diamond H at zero temperature v001 view 54376
Elastic constants for diamond O at zero temperature v001 view 989283
Elastic constants for fcc C at zero temperature v006 view 62432
Elastic constants for fcc H at zero temperature v006 view 71254
Elastic constants for fcc O at zero temperature v006 view 69848
Elastic constants for sc C at zero temperature v006 view 13202
Elastic constants for sc H at zero temperature v006 view 8791
Elastic constants for sc O at zero temperature v006 view 21450


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v001

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/e8a7ed84

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF16_227_c v001 view 241991
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF240_202_h2i v001 view 8542187
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cF8_227_a v001 view 137449
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI16_206_c v001 view 100786
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI16_229_f v001 view 104173
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cI8_214_a v001 view 85621
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP1_221_a v001 view 96958
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_cP20_221_gj v001 view 120001
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP12_194_bc2f v001 view 241696
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP12_194_e2f v001 view 236248
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP16_194_e3f v001 view 189352
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_191_c v001 view 85473
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for H in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP2_194_c v001 view 125891
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_bc v001 view 89449
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_f v001 view 63166
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for H in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_f v001 view 131633
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP4_194_f v001 view 57424
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hP8_194_ef v001 view 104173
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR10_166_5c v001 view 236395
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR14_166_7c v001 view 415440
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR2_166_c v001 view 75682
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR2_166_c v001 view 78774
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR4_166_2c v001 view 238162
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_hR60_166_2h4i v001 view 6489721
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_mC16_12_4i v001 view 150480
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC12_63_cg v001 view 85842
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC16_65_mn v001 view 439514
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC16_65_pq v001 view 253843
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oC8_65_gh v001 view 90627
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oI120_71_lmn6o v001 view 66822678
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oP16_62_4c v001 view 162480
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for O in AFLOW crystal prototype A_oP24_61_3c v001 view 341673
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for C in AFLOW crystal prototype A_tI8_139_h v001 view 83633
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_cP12_205_a_c v001 view 95928
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_hR24_167_be_cf v001 view 254138
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_oC12_64_a_f v001 view 113007
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_oP12_60_c_d v001 view 114627
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_oP24_19_2a_4a v001 view 26713567
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_tI12_122_a_d v001 view 9536800
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2_tP6_136_a_f v001 view 84737
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CHO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2C2_oP20_33_a_2a_2a v000 view 190972
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CHO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2C_hR24_161_b_2b_b v000 view 875789
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CHO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB2C_oP80_60_c2d_5d_c2d v000 view 1292629
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CHO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB3C3_mP28_14_e_3e_3e v000 view 44929781
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CH in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cI16_199_a_a v001 view 129793
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_cP8_198_a_a v001 view 78700
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_hR16_161_ab_ab v001 view 965606
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype AB_tP16_92_b_b v001 view 690708


Equilibrium structure and energy for a crystal structure at zero temperature and pressure v002

Creators:
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2f2c4ad3

Computes the equilibrium crystal structure and energy for an arbitrary crystal at zero temperature and applied stress by performing symmetry-constrained relaxation. The crystal structure is specified using the AFLOW prototype designation. Multiple sets of free parameters corresponding to the crystal prototype may be specified as initial guesses for structure optimization. No guarantee is made regarding the stability of computed equilibria, nor that any are the ground state.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CH in AFLOW crystal prototype A19B34_mP106_4_19a_34a v002 view 14817116
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_hP36_185_2cd_2c v002 view 136102
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_mP12_4_4a_2a v002 view 341820
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_mP36_4_12a_6a v002 view 9834310
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_oI48_72_cdefg_k v002 view 8308019
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_oP36_19_6a_3a v002 view 598911
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for HO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2B_tP36_92_3b_ab v002 view 602510
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CHO in AFLOW crystal prototype A2BC2_mP20_11_4e_2e_4e v001 view 237025
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CO in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2_oP40_62_a3cd_2cd v002 view 188417
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CHO in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B2C4_tP36_76_3a_2a_4a v001 view 18172852
Equilibrium crystal structure and energy for CHO in AFLOW crystal prototype A3B8C2_mP52_14_3e_8e_2e v001 view 549210


Cohesive energy and equilibrium lattice constant of hexagonal 2D crystalline layers v002

Creators: Ilia Nikiforov
Contributor: ilia
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/dd36239b

Given atomic species and structure type (graphene-like, 2H, or 1T) of a 2D hexagonal monolayer crystal, as well as an initial guess at the lattice spacing, this Test Driver calculates the equilibrium lattice spacing and cohesive energy using Polak-Ribiere conjugate gradient minimization in LAMMPS
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Cohesive energy and equilibrium lattice constant of graphene v002 view 352


Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure v007

Creators: Daniel S. Karls and Junhao Li
Contributor: karls
Publication Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25950/2765e3bf

Equilibrium lattice constant and cohesive energy of a cubic lattice at zero temperature and pressure.
Test Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc C v007 view 19532
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc H v007 view 5882
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for bcc O v007 view 4635
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond C v007 view 41589
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond H v007 view 25861
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for diamond O v007 view 29538
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc C v007 view 24519
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc H v007 view 28195
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for fcc O v007 view 25446
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc C v007 view 4028
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc H v007 view 4188
Equilibrium zero-temperature lattice constant for sc O v007 view 3452


CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_000

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_001

EquilibriumCrystalStructure__TD_457028483760_002

LatticeConstantHexagonalEnergy__TD_942334626465_005

LinearThermalExpansionCoeffCubic__TD_522633393614_001

VacancyFormationEnergyRelaxationVolume__TD_647413317626_001
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Monovacancy formation energy and relaxation volume for sc O other view

VacancyFormationMigration__TD_554849987965_001
Test Error Categories Link to Error page
Vacancy formation and migration energy for sc O other view

No Driver
Verification Check Error Categories Link to Error page
MemoryLeak__VC_561022993723_004 other view
PeriodicitySupport__VC_895061507745_004 other view



Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content