Jump to: Models | Files | Wiki

CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_fcc_Pt__TE_164136256057_003

Title
A single sentence description.
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc Pt v003
Description This Test computes an energy vs. lattice constant curve for fcc Pt. The curve is computed for lattice constants ranging from 0.8*a_0 to 1.5*a_0, where a_0 represents the equilibrium lattice constant. The value for a_0 is obtained by querying the KIM database for the results of LatticeConstantCubicEnergy_fcc_Pt when paired against the Model being used.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Pt
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Contributor Daniel S. Karls
Maintainer Daniel S. Karls
Published on KIM 2019
How to Cite Click here to download this citation in BibTeX format.
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
TE_164136256057_003
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_fcc_Pt__TE_164136256057_003
Citable Link https://openkim.org/cite/TE_164136256057_003
KIM Item TypeTest
DriverCohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003
Properties
Properties as defined in kimspec.edn. These properties are inhereted from the Test Driver.
KIM API Version2.0
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn. This Simulator Name is inhereted from the Test Driver.
LAMMPS
Programming Language(s)
The programming languages used in the code and the percentage of the code written in each one.
100.00% Python
Previous Version CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_fcc_Pt__TE_164136256057_002


EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
EAM_Dynamo_AdamsFoilesWolfer_1989Universal6_Pt__MO_388062184209_000 view 2271
EAM_Dynamo_FoilesBaskesDaw_1986Universal3_Pt__MO_757342646688_000 view 2271
EAM_Dynamo_OBrienBarrPrice_2018_PtAu__MO_946831081299_000 view 2783
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouWadleyJohnson_2001_Pt__MO_102190350384_005 view 2495
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouWadleyJohnson_2001NISTretabulation_Pt__MO_601539325066_000 view 2527
EAM_QuinticClampedSpline__MD_532469991695_003
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
EAM_QuinticClampedSpline_Kim_2021_PtAu__MO_463728687265_000 view 4644
EMT_Asap__MD_128315414717_004
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
EMT_Asap_Standard_JacobsenStoltzeNorskov_1996_AlAgAuCuNiPdPt__MO_115316750986_001 view 1919
EMT_Asap_Standard_JacobsenStoltzeNorskov_1996_Pt__MO_637493005914_001 view 2207
LJ__MD_414112407348_003
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
LJ_ElliottAkerson_2015_Universal__MO_959249795837_003 view 2527
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
MEAM_LAMMPS_JeongLee_2020_PtC__MO_716623333967_001 view 3740
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimLee_2006_PtFe__MO_343168101490_001 view 5242
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimSeolJi_2017_PtAl__MO_793141037706_001 view 4665
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimSeolJi_2017_PtCo__MO_545073984441_001 view 4913
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimSeolJi_2017_PtCu__MO_070797404269_001 view 3053
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimSeolJi_2017_PtMo__MO_831380044253_001 view 7082
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimSeolJi_2017_PtNi__MO_020840179467_001 view 5540
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimSeolJi_2017_PtTi__MO_280985530673_001 view 2984
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimSeolJi_2017_PtV__MO_912978207512_001 view 5341
MEAM_LAMMPS_LeeShimBaskes_2003_Pt__MO_534993486058_000 view 3839
Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Tersoff_LAMMPS_AlbeNordlundAverback_2002_PtC__MO_500121566391_004 view 2199


  • No Errors associated with this Test




This Test requires a Test Driver. Archives for the Test Driver CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003 appear below.


CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003.zip Zip Windows archive
Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content