Jump to: Models | Files | Wiki

CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_fcc_C__TE_004682584752_003

Title
A single sentence description.
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for fcc C v003
Description This Test computes an energy vs. lattice constant curve for fcc C. The curve is computed for lattice constants ranging from 0.8*a_0 to 1.5*a_0, where a_0 represents the equilibrium lattice constant. The value for a_0 is obtained by querying the KIM database for the results of LatticeConstantCubicEnergy_fcc_C when paired against the Model being used.
Species
The supported atomic species.
C
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Contributor Daniel S. Karls
Maintainer Daniel S. Karls
Published on KIM 2019
How to Cite Click here to download this citation in BibTeX format.
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
TE_004682584752_003
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_fcc_C__TE_004682584752_003
Citable Link https://openkim.org/cite/TE_004682584752_003
KIM Item TypeTest
DriverCohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003
Properties
Properties as defined in kimspec.edn. These properties are inhereted from the Test Driver.
KIM API Version2.0
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn. This Simulator Name is inhereted from the Test Driver.
LAMMPS
Programming Language(s)
The programming languages used in the code and the percentage of the code written in each one.
100.00% Python
Previous Version CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_fcc_C__TE_004682584752_002


EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
EAM_Dynamo_HepburnAckland_2008_FeC__MO_143977152728_005 view 9533
EDIP_LAMMPS__MD_783584031339_000
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
EDIP_LAMMPS_JiangMorganSzlufarska_2012_SiC__MO_667792548433_000 view 3280
EDIP_LAMMPS_LucasBertolusPizzagalli_2009_SiC__MO_634310164305_000 view 2496
EDIP_LAMMPS_Marks_2000_C__MO_374144505645_000 view 4696
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_000
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
MEAM_LAMMPS_AslamBaskesDickel_2019_FeMnSiC__MO_427873955970_000 view 12446
MEAM_LAMMPS_LiyanageKimHouze_2014_FeC__MO_075279800195_000 view 4391
MEAM_LAMMPS__MD_249792265679_001
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
MEAM_LAMMPS_AgrawalMirzaeifar_2021_CuC__MO_028979335952_001 view 3939
MEAM_LAMMPS_JeongLee_2020_PdC__MO_068985622065_001 view 3302
MEAM_LAMMPS_JeongLee_2020_PtC__MO_716623333967_001 view 3441
MEAM_LAMMPS_KangEunJun_2014_SiC__MO_477506997611_001 view 4100
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimJungLee_2009_FeTiC__MO_110119204723_001 view 9180
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimJungLee_2010_FeNbC__MO_072689718616_001 view 14024
MEAM_LAMMPS_KimLee_2008_TiC__MO_134206624109_001 view 3720
MEAM_LAMMPS_Lee_2006_FeC__MO_856956178669_001 view 7111
MEAM_LAMMPS_LeeLee_2005_C__MO_996970420049_000 view 2845
MEAM_LAMMPS_NouranianTschoppGwaltney_2014_CH__MO_354152387712_001 view 2437
MEAM_LAMMPS_Wagner_2007_SiC__MO_430846853065_001 view 2833
Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_004
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Tersoff_LAMMPS_Tersoff_1989_SiC__MO_171585019474_003 view 1453
Tersoff_LAMMPS__MD_077075034781_005
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Tersoff_LAMMPS_AlbeNordlundAverback_2002_PtC__MO_500121566391_004 view 2228
Tersoff_LAMMPS_ErhartAlbe_2005_SiC__MO_903987585848_005 view 2087
Tersoff_LAMMPS_KinaciHaskinsSevik_2012_BNC__MO_105008013807_000 view 3094
Tersoff_LAMMPS_PlummerRathodSrivastava_2021_TiAlC__MO_992900971352_000 view 3019
Tersoff_LAMMPS_PlummerTucker_2019_TiAlC__MO_736419017411_000 view 2367
Tersoff_LAMMPS_PlummerTucker_2019_TiSiC__MO_751442731010_000 view 2268
Tersoff_LAMMPS_Tersoff_1988_C__MO_579868029681_004 view 2013
Tersoff_LAMMPS_Tersoff_1990_SiC__MO_444207127575_000 view 2188
Tersoff_LAMMPS_Tersoff_1994_SiC__MO_794973922560_000 view 2385
hNN__MD_435082866799_001
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
hNN_WenTadmor_2019Grx_C__MO_421038499185_001 view 3392
No Driver
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Sim_LAMMPS_LCBOP_LosFasolino_2003_C__SM_469631949122_000 view 2879
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_KimJungLee_2009_FeTiC__SM_531038274471_000 view 4031
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_LiyanageSeongGonHouze_2014_FeC__SM_652425777808_000 view 2719
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_Wagner_2007_SiC__SM_264944083668_000 view 2367
Sim_LAMMPS_ReaxFF_ChenowethVanDuinGoddard_2008_CHO__SM_584143153761_001 view 19276
Sim_LAMMPS_ReaxFF_ChenowethVanDuinPersson_2008_CHOV__SM_429148913211_001 view 18189
Sim_LAMMPS_ReaxFF_StrachanVanDuinChakraborty_2003_CHNO__SM_107643900657_001 view 12755
Tersoff_LAMMPS_ErhartAlbe_2005SiII_SiC__MO_408791041969_004 view 2274





This Test requires a Test Driver. Archives for the Test Driver CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003 appear below.


CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_003.zip Zip Windows archive
Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content