Jump to: Models | Files | Wiki

CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_bcc_Cu__TE_864632638496_002

Title
A single sentence description.
Cohesive energy versus lattice constant curve for bcc Copper
Description This Test computes an energy vs. lattice constant curve for bcc Copper. The curve is computed for lattice constants ranging from 0.8*a_0 to 1.5*a_0, where a_0 represents the equilibrium lattice constant. The value for a_0 is obtained by querying the KIM database for the results of LatticeConstantCubicEnergy_bcc_Cu when paired against the Model being used.
Species
The supported atomic species.
Cu
Disclaimer
A statement of applicability provided by the contributor, informing users of the intended use of this KIM Item.
None
Contributor Daniel S. Karls
Maintainer Daniel S. Karls
Published on KIM 2018
How to Cite Click here to download this citation in BibTeX format.
Funding Not available
Short KIM ID
The unique KIM identifier code.
TE_864632638496_002
Extended KIM ID
The long form of the KIM ID including a human readable prefix (100 characters max), two underscores, and the Short KIM ID. Extended KIM IDs can only contain alpha-numeric characters (letters and digits) and underscores and must begin with a letter.
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_bcc_Cu__TE_864632638496_002
Citable Link https://openkim.org/cite/TE_864632638496_002
KIM Item TypeTest
DriverCohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_002
Properties
Properties as defined in kimspec.edn. These properties are inhereted from the Test Driver.
KIM API Version2.0
Simulator Name
The name of the simulator as defined in kimspec.edn. This Simulator Name is inhereted from the Test Driver.
LAMMPS
Programming Language(s)
The programming languages used in the code and the percentage of the code written in each one.
100.00% Python
Previous Version CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant_bcc_Cu__TE_864632638496_001


EAM_Dynamo__MD_120291908751_005
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
EAM_Dynamo_AcklandTichyVitek_1987_Cu__MO_179025990738_005 view 3176
EAM_Dynamo_AcklandTichyVitek_1987v2_Cu__MO_762798677854_000 view 3176
EAM_Dynamo_AcklandVitek_1990_Cu__MO_642748370624_000 view 3112
EAM_Dynamo_AdamsFoiles_1989Universal6_Cu__MO_145873824897_000 view 1797
EAM_Dynamo_BonnyPasianotCastin_2009_FeCuNi__MO_469343973171_005 view 3561
EAM_Dynamo_BorovikovMendelevKing_2016_CuZr__MO_097471813275_000 view 4588
EAM_Dynamo_CaiYe_1996_AlCu__MO_942551040047_005 view 1444
EAM_Dynamo_Foiles_1985_Cu__MO_831121933939_000 view 1059
EAM_Dynamo_FoilesBaskesDaw_1986Universal3_Cu__MO_666348409573_004 view 1348
EAM_Dynamo_HoytGarvinWebb_2003_PbCu__MO_119135752160_005 view 1251
EAM_Dynamo_LiuLiuBorucki_1999_AlCu__MO_020851069572_000 view 1155
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevKing_2008_Cu__MO_748636486270_005 view 2150
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevKramerBecker_2008_Cu__MO_945691923444_005 view 2021
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevKramerOtt_2009_CuZr__MO_600021860456_005 view 3305
EAM_Dynamo_MendelevSordeletKramer_2007_CuZr__MO_120596890176_005 view 3273
EAM_Dynamo_MishinMehlPapaconstantopoulos_2001_Cu__MO_346334655118_005 view 1957
EAM_Dynamo_OnatDurukanoglu_2014_CuNi__MO_592013496703_005 view 2727
EAM_Dynamo_WilliamsMishinHamilton_2006_CuAg__MO_128703483589_005 view 3369
EAM_Dynamo_WuTrinkle_2009_CuAg__MO_270337113239_005 view 1701
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouJohnsonWadley_2004_Cu__MO_127245782811_005 view 1508
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouJohnsonWadley_2004NISTretabulation_CuAgAu__MO_318213562153_000 view 1829
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouWadleyJohnson_2001_Cu__MO_380822813353_000 view 2406
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouWadleyJohnson_2001_CuTa__MO_547744193826_000 view 1540
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouWadleyJohnson_2001NISTretabulation_Cu__MO_759493141826_000 view 1315
EAM_Dynamo_ZhouWadleyJohnson_2001NISTretabulation_CuTa__MO_950828638160_000 view 1668
EMT_Asap__MD_128315414717_004
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
EMT_Asap_MetalGlass_BaileySchiotzJacobsen_2004_CuMg__MO_228059236215_001 view 1123
EMT_Asap_MetalGlass_PaduraruKenoufiBailey_2007_CuZr__MO_987541074959_001 view 1315
EMT_Asap_Standard_JacobsenStoltzeNorskov_1996_AlAgAuCuNiPdPt__MO_115316750986_001 view 1412
EMT_Asap_Standard_JacobsenStoltzeNorskov_1996_Cu__MO_396616545191_001 view 1187
LJ__MD_414112407348_003
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
LJ_ElliottAkerson_2015_Universal__MO_959249795837_003 view 802
Morse_Shifted__MD_552566534109_003
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
Morse_Shifted_GirifalcoWeizer_1959HighCutoff_Cu__MO_151002396060_003 view 1636
Morse_Shifted_GirifalcoWeizer_1959LowCutoff_Cu__MO_673777079812_003 view 2053
Morse_Shifted_GirifalcoWeizer_1959MedCutoff_Cu__MO_173787283511_003 view 1348
No Driver
Model Test Results Link to Test Results page Benchmark time
Usertime multiplied by the Whetstone Benchmark. This number can be used (approximately) to compare the performance of different models independently of the architecture on which the test was run.

Measured in Millions of Whetstone Instructions (MWI)
EAM_NN_Johnson_1988_Cu__MO_887933271505_002 view 1027
Sim_LAMMPS_ADP_ApostolMishin_2011_AlCu__SM_667696763561_000 view 5166
Sim_LAMMPS_ADP_PunDarlingKecskes_2015_CuTa__SM_399364650444_000 view 4652
Sim_LAMMPS_BOP_ZhouWardFoster_2015_CCu__SM_784926969362_000 view 3176
Sim_LAMMPS_BOP_ZhouWardFoster_2015_CuH__SM_404135993060_000 view 3465
Sim_LAMMPS_BOP_ZhouWardFoster_2016_AlCu__SM_566399258279_000 view 3722
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_AsadiZaeemNouranian_2015_Cu__SM_239791545509_000 view 4684
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_EtesamiAsadi_2018_Cu__SM_316120381362_000 view 5069
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_JelinekGrohHorstemeyer_2012_AlSiMgCuFe__SM_656517352485_000 view 9786
Sim_LAMMPS_MEAM_Wagner_2007_Cu__SM_521856783904_000 view 4139





This Test requires a Test Driver. Archives for the Test Driver CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_002 appear below.


CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_002.txz Tar+XZ Linux and OS X archive
CohesiveEnergyVsLatticeConstant__TD_554653289799_002.zip Zip Windows archive
Wiki is ready to accept new content.

Login to edit Wiki content